scholarly journals Comparison of MB/BacT and BACTEC 460 TB Systems for Recovery of Mycobacteria in a Routine Diagnostic Laboratory

1999 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 3711-3712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Roggenkamp ◽  
Mathias W. Hornef ◽  
Adelheid Masch ◽  
Bettina Aigner ◽  
Ingo B. Autenrieth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Routine Laboratory ◽  
Diagnostic Laboratory ◽  
Recovery Rates ◽  
Clinical Specimens ◽  
Smear Negative

MB/BacT, BACTEC 460 TB, and Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium were evaluated in parallel for recovery of mycobacteria from 3,700 continuous clinical specimens in a routine laboratory. Mycobacteria were identified from 123 (3.3%) specimens. The recovery rates for all mycobacteria by the different systems were 91.0, 73.0, and 53.6% for BACTEC 460 TB, MB/BacT, and LJ medium, respectively. The recovery rates for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex were 97.1, 80.2, and 67.6%, respectively. The lack of sensitivity of the MB/BacT system was more pronounced with smear-negative specimens and resulted in a failure to detect three patients with infectious tuberculosis.

scholarly journals Comparison of recoveries of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using the automated BACTEC MGIT 960 System and Lowenstein – Jensen medium

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Mo. A.AL-Mazini, T. Bukeet, and A. Abdul Kareem
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Recovery Rates ◽  
Clinical Specimens ◽  
Indicator Tube ◽  
Lowenstein Jensen ◽  
Bactec System ◽  
Smear Negative ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Growth Indicator

We examined whether the BACTEC/ Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) System alone could supplant the use of a supplemental Lowenstein–Jensen (LJ) slant for routine recovery of M. tuberculosis from clinical specimens. A total of 392 specimens of sputum were included in the study, collected from 196 patients. Specimens were processed with standard N-acetyl- L- Cysteine (NALC-NaOH) method, then inoculated onto BACTEC MGIT 960 and onto LJ media. The recovery rates of M.tuberculosis were 100 % (256/256) with BACTEC MGIT 960 and 72.6%(186/256) with LJ. The rates of contamination for each of the system were 4.8%with BACTEC MGIT 960 and 5.3%with LJ. The TTD for M. tuberculosis was 11.3 days with BACTEC System and 30.8 days with LJ. The difference in TTD between smear positive and smear negative specimens for M.tuberculosis with BACTEC MGIT 960 was not statistically significant. This study shows that the BACTEC System demonstrates better sensitivity for the recovery of M. tuberculosis from clinical specimens.

scholarly journals Comparison of the MB/BacT and BACTEC 460 TB Systems for Recovery of Mycobacteria from Various Clinical Specimens

1999 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 1206-1209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Brunello ◽  
Flavio Favari ◽  
Roberta Fontana
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Nontuberculous Mycobacteria ◽  
Common Species ◽  
Individual Species ◽  
Mycobacterium Chelonae ◽  
Recovery Rates ◽  
Clinical Specimens ◽  
Lowenstein Jensen ◽  
Smear Negative ◽  
The Difference

A total of 1,830 specimens (75.7% respiratory and 24.3% nonrespiratory) were cultured in parallel with the MB/BacT and BACTEC 460 TB systems and on Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium. Mycobacteria were identified from 173 (6.5%) specimens. The most common species recovered were Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (65.9%),Mycobacterium avium complex (22.5%), andMycobacterium chelonae (9.2%). The recovery rates by individual systems were 96.5, 99.4, and 95.9% for MB/BacT, BACTEC 460 TB, and LJ medium, respectively, for all mycobacteria; the recovery rates were 99.1, 100, and 98.2%, respectively, for M. tuberculosis complex alone. The difference among the recovery rates for all mycobacteria and those for individual species was not significant. The BACTEC 460 TB system detected M. tuberculosis isolates more rapidly than the MB/BacT system (8 versus 11.8 days for smear-positive specimens [P < 0.01] and 18 versus 21 days for smear-negative specimens [P < 0.05]), whereas the MB/BacT system more rapidly detected the nontuberculous mycobacteria (17.1 versus 12.7 days [P < 0.01]). These results indicate that the nonradiometric MB/BacT system is a rapid, sensitive, and efficient method for the recovery ofM. tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria from both pulmonary and extrapulmonary clinical specimens.

scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation of COBAS TaqMan PCR for the Detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosisandM. aviumComplex

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Ikegame ◽  
Yoritake Sakoda ◽  
Nao Fujino ◽  
Kazuhito Taguchi ◽  
Masayuki Kawasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Pcr Analysis ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Clinical Specimens ◽  
Cobas Taqman ◽  
Taqman Pcr ◽  
Smear Negative ◽  
Pcr Test

A retrospective observational study was performed to determine the sensitivity and limitation of PCR test for the detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosisandM. aviumcomplex. We obtained clinical specimens collected from the respiratory tract, culturedM. tuberculosisorM. aviumcomplex, and performed PCR analysis. A total of 299 samples (M. tuberculosis, 177;M. avium, 35;M. intracellulare, 87) were analyzed by COBAS TaqMan PCR from April 2007 to March 2011. The PCR positivity rates were 50–55%, 70–100%, 88–98%, and 100% in smear-negative, smear 1+, 2+, and 3+ groups, respectively. The PCR positivity of tuberculosis in smear 1+ was 80.6%, which was statistically significantly (P<0.001) lower than that of smear 2+ (97.3%). From January 2005 to March 2007, we collected an additional 138 samples (M. tuberculosis, 74;M. avium, 21; M. intracellulare, 43), which were analyzed by COBAS Amplicor PCR. The PCR positivity rates obtained using COBAS TaqMan PCR and COBAS Amplicor PCR were not significantly different. The sensitivity of PCR test for mycobacteria is not sufficient in case of smear 1+. Careful consideration must be given to the interpretation of negative PCR test results in smear 1+, because smear-positive tuberculosis is the criterion for isolation.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Abbott RealTi m e MTB and RealTi m e MTB INH/RIF Assays for Direct Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex and Resistance Markers in Respiratory and Extrapulmonary Specimens

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 3022-3027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Hofmann-Thiel ◽  
Nikolay Molodtsov ◽  
Uladzimir Antonenka ◽  
Harald Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Drug Susceptibility ◽  
Drug Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Clinical Specimens ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Resistance Markers ◽  
Smear Negative

The Abbott RealTi m e MTB (RT MTB) assay is a new automated nucleic acid amplification test for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) in clinical specimens. In combination with the RealTi m e MTB INH/RIF (RT MTB INH/RIF) resistance assay, which can be applied to RT MTB-positive specimens as an add-on assay, the tests also indicate the genetic markers of resistance to isoniazid (INH) and rifampin (RIF). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of RT MTB using different types of respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens and to compare performance characteristics directly with those of the FluoroType MTB assay. The resistance results obtained by RT MTB INH/RIF were compared to those from the GenoType MTBDR plus and from phenotypic drug susceptibility testing. A total of 715 clinical specimens were analyzed. Compared to culture, the overall sensitivity of RT MTB was 92.1%; the sensitivity rates for smear-positive and smear-negative samples were 100% and 76.2%, respectively. The sensitivities of smear-negative specimens were almost identical for respiratory (76.3%) and extrapulmonary (76%) specimens. Specificity rates were 100% and 95.8% for culture-negative specimens and those that grew nontuberculous mycobacteria, respectively. RT MTB INH/RIF was applied to 233 RT MTB-positive samples and identified resistance markers in 7.7% of samples. Agreement with phenotypic and genotypic drug susceptibility testing was 99.5%. In conclusion, RT MTB and RT MTB INH/RIF allow for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in different types of specimens and reliably indicate resistance markers. The strengths of this system are the comparably high sensitivity with paucibacillary specimens, its ability to detect INH and RIF resistance, and its high-throughput capacities.

scholarly journals Improving the Sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay on Sputum Pellets by Decreasing the Amount of Added Sample Reagent: a Laboratory and Clinical Evaluation

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 1258-1263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nila J. Dharan ◽  
Danielle Amisano ◽  
Gerald Mboowa ◽  
Willy Ssengooba ◽  
Robert Blakemore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Smear Microscopy ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Clinical Specimens ◽  
Test Sensitivity ◽  
Smear Negative ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Culture Positive ◽  
Xpert Assay

The Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay permits rapid near-patient detection ofMycobacterium tuberculosisin sputum; however, the test sensitivity remains suboptimal in paucibacillary specimens that are negative for acid-fast bacilli using smear microscopy. Xpert testing includes dilution with sample reagent, and when processed sputum pellets are tested, the recommended sample reagent/pellet ratio is 3:1. We evaluated whether a decreased sample reagent/pellet ratio of 2:1 increased Xpert sensitivity compared to the recommended 3:1. The limit of detection was determined by inoculating serial dilutions ofM. tuberculosisinto sputum samples, preparing sputum pellets, and testing each pellet by Xpert at both sample reagent ratios. Processed sputum pellets obtained fromM. tuberculosisculture-positive clinical specimens were also tested by Xpert at both ratios. Among spiked sputum pellets, the limit of detection was 1,478 CFU/ml (95% confidence interval [CI], 1,211 to 1,943) at a 3:1 ratio and decreased to 832 CFU/ml (95% CI, 671 to 1,134) at 2:1. The proportion of specimens in whichM. tuberculosiswas detected was greater at 2:1 than at 3:1 for almost all numbers of CFU/ml; this difference was most prominent at lower numbers of CFU/ml. Among 134 concentrated sputum pellets from the clinical study, the sensitivity of Xpert at 2:1 was greater than at 3:1 overall (80% versus 72%;P= 0.03) and for smear-negative specimens (67% versus 58%;P= 0.12). For Xpert testing of sputum pellets, using a lower sample reagent/pellet ratio increasedM. tuberculosisdetection, especially for paucibacillary specimens. Our study supports use of a 2:1 sample reagent/pellet dilution for Xpert testing of sputum pellets.

scholarly journals Comparison of the MB/BacT System with a Revised Antibiotic Supplement Kit to the BACTEC 460 System for Detection of Mycobacteria in Clinical Specimens

1998 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 3234-3238 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Benjamin ◽  
K. B. Waites ◽  
A. Beverly ◽  
L. Gibbs ◽  
M. Waller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Data Management ◽  
Bacterial Overgrowth ◽  
Data Management System ◽  
Single Specimen ◽  
Diagnostic Laboratory ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Clinical Specimens ◽  
Acceptable Alternative ◽  
Mean Time

The MB/BacT system (MB/BacT) with a revised antibiotic supplement kit was compared with the BACTEC 460 system (BACTEC 460) in a test of 488 specimens submitted for mycobacterial culture from 302 patients. Twenty-four Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were detected by the BACTEC 460 versus 23 isolates by the MB/BacT. Mean time until detection of M. tuberculosis isolates identified by both systems was 11.9 days for the BACTEC 460 versus 13.7 days for the MB/BacT (P = 0.046). M. aviumcomplex was detected in 12 specimens by the MB/BacT versus 10 specimens by the BACTEC 460. Only 8 of 14 (57%) M. avium isolates were detected by both systems, with a mean time until detection of 10.1 days for the BACTEC 460 and 14.2 days for the MB/BacT (P = 0.009). The BACTEC 460 and the MB/BacT detected M. gordonae in four specimens, but only a single specimen was positive by both systems. OneM. fortuitum isolate and one of five M. kansasii isolates were recovered only by the BACTEC 460. The bacterial overgrowth rate was 7.0% for the MB/BacT versus 4.1% for the BACTEC 460. We found the MB/BacT to be comparable to the BACTEC 460 for mycobacterial detection. Even though time until detection with the MB/BacT was slightly longer (1.8 days longer forM. tuberculosis and 4.1 days for M. avium [mean values]) and the bacterial overgrowth rate was somewhat higher, the decreased labor, the availability of a computerized data management system, and the noninvasive, nonradiometric aspects of the MB/BacT offset these relative disadvantages and make it an acceptable alternative for use in the diagnostic laboratory.

Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in smear negative sputum by PCR

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 2-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Jobayer ◽  
SM Shamsuzzaman ◽  
Kazi Zulfiquer Mamun
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Pulmonary Tuberculosis ◽  
Accurate Method ◽  
Major Health Problem ◽  
Major Health ◽  
Tuberculosis Patients ◽  
Diagnostic Potential ◽  
Total Death ◽  
Smear Negative ◽  
Negative Sputum

Pulmonary tuberculosis is a major health problem in Bangladesh that is responsible for about 7% of total death in a year. This study was conducted to isolate and identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis from sputum and to evaluate the efficacy of PCR as a modern diagnostic tool, for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in the smear negative cases. One hundred and fifty suspected pulmonary TB patients (male/ female: 97/53) were included in this study. Single morning sputum was collected from each patient and diagnostic potential of PCR was compared with staining and culture. Twenty five (16.7%) sputum were positive by ZN stained smear. Among 125 smear negative samples, 13 (10.4%) yielded growth in culture in LJ media and 21 (16.8%) samples were positive by PCR. The sensitivity and specificity of PCR in smear negative cases was 100% and 92.9% respectively. Mean detection time in PCR was 24 hours. PCR detected M. tuberculosis in 21 smear negative and 9 culture negative samples. For diagnosis of tuberculosis in smear negative cases, PCR directly from sputum was a very sensitive and accurate method. In conclusion, PCR may be done, especially in clinically suspected pulmonary tuberculosis patients who remain negative by conventional methods.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjmm.v6i2.19368 Bangladesh J Med Microbiol 2012; 06(02): 2-6

scholarly journals Comparison of Proportion and Resistance Ratio Methods for Drug Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolated from Patients Attending National Tuberculosis Centre, Nepal

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
S Acharya ◽  
P Ghimire ◽  
DK Khadka ◽  
S Nepali
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Fluorescence Microscopy ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Drug Susceptibility ◽  
Drug Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Resistance Ratio ◽  
National Tuberculosis ◽  
Smear Negative ◽  
Culture Positive ◽  
Good Agreement

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is among the most serious infectious cause of global morbidity and mortality. Emergence of Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is posing an increased threat to TB control programs. Drug susceptibility testing (DST) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) isolates is important for tackling such problems. Setting: National Tuberculosis Centre (NTC), Thimi, Bhaktapur, Nepal. Objectives: Comparative evaluation of two in vitro DST methods in determining susceptibility of M. tuberculosis isolates from patients attending NTC, to front-line anti-TB drugs: (Isoniazid-INH, Rifampicin-RFP, Streptomycin-SM, and Ethambutol-EMB). Methodology: This study was conducted from Sep 2006-Jun 2007. A total of 862 sputum samples (diagnosis or follow up cases) collected from patients (type of patients or their categories was not differentiated in this study) attending NTC bacteriology lab for sputum direct smear microscopy were analyzed using fluorescence microscopy. All smear positive samples, smear negative samples requested for culture were cultured. All culture positive samples confirmed as M. tuberculosis by biochemical tests were processed for DST by both proportion (PR) and resistance ratio (RR) methods. Results: Out of 862 sputum samples analyzed, 226 (26.2%) samples were positive for Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) by fluorescence microscopy. Among 323 samples 226 smear positive samples and 97 smear negative samples requested for culture), 221 (68.4%) were culture positive, 92 (28.5%) were culture negative and 10 (3.1%) were contaminated. Out of 221 isolates of M. tuberculosis, 57.5% were resistant to one or more drugs by the PR method and 56.6% by the RR method. Similarly, MDR isolates were 29.9% and 29% by PR and RR methods respectively. On correlation analysis using Mc Nemar Chi-square test, no significant difference between the two tests were observed (p>0.05). The results showed high agreement between both methods and agreement rates to INH, RFP, SM and EMB were 93.2%, 93.7%, 93.2% and 94.1% respectively. Similarly, the agreement rates between both methods using kappa analysis showed kappa (k) value of 0.86, 0.85, 0.86 and 0.84 for INH, RFP, SM and EMB respectively, which is believed to be good agreement between both methods (k=0.80 to 1.00: Very good agreement). Conclusion: In conclusion, this study showed that both the Proportion and Resistance ratio methods are equally good for determining drug susceptibility of M. tuberculosis. Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Drug Susceptibility Testing; Proportion Method; Resistance Ratio Method. DOI: 10.3126/saarctb.v5i1.3078 SAARC J. Tuber. Lung Dis. HIV/AIDS 2008 Vol.5(1) 13-20

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document