scholarly journals cis-Dominant mutations which dramatically enhance DUR1,2 gene expression without affecting its normal regulation.

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 947-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Chisholm ◽  
T Cooper

We have isolated three cis-dominant mutations which dramatically enhance DUR1 ,2 gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The mutant phenotype, which is expressed both in haploid and MATa/MAT alpha diploid strains, does not appear to be an alteration of the normal control system for this gene because its expression remained fully inducible and sensitive to nitrogen catabolite repression. Instead, we found much higher levels of DUR1 ,2-specific RNA under both uninduced and induced conditions, i.e., the overproduction trait was superimposed on normal regulation of the gene. The mutations seemed to affect gene expression in a unidirectional manner or to be specific for DUR1 ,2 gene expression, because other genes in proximity to the mutations were not affected. We feel that these mutations may alter the chromatin structure in the vicinity of the DUR1 ,2 upstream control sequences or, alternatively, may be Ty insertions which no longer possess the ROAM characteristics reported by others and ourselves.

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 947-955
Author(s):  
G Chisholm ◽  
T Cooper

We have isolated three cis-dominant mutations which dramatically enhance DUR1 ,2 gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The mutant phenotype, which is expressed both in haploid and MATa/MAT alpha diploid strains, does not appear to be an alteration of the normal control system for this gene because its expression remained fully inducible and sensitive to nitrogen catabolite repression. Instead, we found much higher levels of DUR1 ,2-specific RNA under both uninduced and induced conditions, i.e., the overproduction trait was superimposed on normal regulation of the gene. The mutations seemed to affect gene expression in a unidirectional manner or to be specific for DUR1 ,2 gene expression, because other genes in proximity to the mutations were not affected. We feel that these mutations may alter the chromatin structure in the vicinity of the DUR1 ,2 upstream control sequences or, alternatively, may be Ty insertions which no longer possess the ROAM characteristics reported by others and ourselves.


1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 3954-3964 ◽  
Author(s):  
F S Genbauffe ◽  
T G Cooper

The DUR1,2 gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been isolated on recombinant plasmids along with all DNA between the DUR1,2 and MET8 loci. DUR1,2 was found to encode a 5.7-kilobase transcript, which is consistent with our earlier suggestion that the DUR1 and DUR2 loci are two domains of a single multifunctional gene. Steady-state levels of the DUR1,2 transcript responded to induction and nitrogen catabolite repression in the same way as urea amidolyase activity. dal81 mutants (grown with inducer) contained barely detectable amounts of DUR1,2 RNA, whereas dal80 mutants (grown without inducer) contained the same amount as a wild-type induced culture. These observations support our earlier hypothesis that DUR1,2 is transcriptionally regulated, with control being mediated by the DAL80 and DAL81 gene products. We cloned the DUR1,2-Oh mutation and found it to be a Ty insertion near sequences required for complementation of dur1,2 mutations. The ROAM phenotype of the DUR1,2-Oh mutation is sharply different from that of cis-dominant, DUR80 mutations, which enhance DUR1,2 expression but do not affect the normal control pattern of the gene. There is evidence that DUR80 mutations may also be Ty insertions, which generate phenotypes that are different from those in DUR1,2-Oh mutations.


1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 3954-3964
Author(s):  
F S Genbauffe ◽  
T G Cooper

The DUR1,2 gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been isolated on recombinant plasmids along with all DNA between the DUR1,2 and MET8 loci. DUR1,2 was found to encode a 5.7-kilobase transcript, which is consistent with our earlier suggestion that the DUR1 and DUR2 loci are two domains of a single multifunctional gene. Steady-state levels of the DUR1,2 transcript responded to induction and nitrogen catabolite repression in the same way as urea amidolyase activity. dal81 mutants (grown with inducer) contained barely detectable amounts of DUR1,2 RNA, whereas dal80 mutants (grown without inducer) contained the same amount as a wild-type induced culture. These observations support our earlier hypothesis that DUR1,2 is transcriptionally regulated, with control being mediated by the DAL80 and DAL81 gene products. We cloned the DUR1,2-Oh mutation and found it to be a Ty insertion near sequences required for complementation of dur1,2 mutations. The ROAM phenotype of the DUR1,2-Oh mutation is sharply different from that of cis-dominant, DUR80 mutations, which enhance DUR1,2 expression but do not affect the normal control pattern of the gene. There is evidence that DUR80 mutations may also be Ty insertions, which generate phenotypes that are different from those in DUR1,2-Oh mutations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document