scholarly journals Werner Syndrome Protein (WRN) Regulates Cell Proliferation and the Human Papillomavirus 16 Life Cycle during Epithelial Differentiation

mSphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire D. James ◽  
Dipon Das ◽  
Ethan L. Morgan ◽  
Raymonde Otoa ◽  
Andrew Macdonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Viral Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Basal Cell ◽  
Viral Life Cycle ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Damage Response

ABSTRACT Human papillomaviruses recruit a host of DNA damage response factors to their viral genome to facilitate homologous recombination replication in association with the viral replication factors E1 and E2. We previously demonstrated that SIRT1 deacetylation of WRN promotes recruitment of WRN to E1-E2 replicating DNA and that WRN regulates both the levels and fidelity of E1-E2 replication. The deacetylation of WRN by SIRT1 results in an active protein able to complex with replicating DNA, but a protein that is less stable. Here, we demonstrate an inverse correlation between SIRT1 and WRN in CIN cervical lesions compared to normal control tissue, supporting our model of SIRT1 deacetylation destabilizing WRN protein. We CRISPR/Cas9 edited N/Tert-1 and N/Tert-1+HPV16 cells to knock out WRN protein expression and subjected the cells to organotypic raft cultures. In N/Tert-1 cells without WRN expression, there was enhanced basal cell proliferation, DNA damage, and thickening of the differentiated epithelium. In N/Tert-1+HPV16 cells, there was enhanced basal cell proliferation, increased DNA damage throughout the epithelium, and increased viral DNA replication. Overall, the results demonstrate that the expression of WRN is required to control the proliferation of N/Tert-1 cells and controls the HPV16 life cycle in these cells. This complements our previous data demonstrating that WRN controls the levels and fidelity of HPV16 E1-E2 DNA replication. The results describe a new role for WRN, a tumor suppressor, in controlling keratinocyte differentiation and the HPV16 life cycle. IMPORTANCE HPV16 is the major human viral carcinogen, responsible for around 3 to 4% of all cancers worldwide. Our understanding of how the viral replication machinery interacts with host factors to control/activate the DNA damage response to promote the viral life cycle remains incomplete. Recently, we demonstrated a SIRT1-WRN axis that controls HPV16 replication, and here we demonstrate that this axis persists in clinical cervical lesions induced by HPV16. Here, we describe the effects of WRN depletion on cellular differentiation with or without HPV16; WRN depletion results in enhanced proliferation and DNA damage irrespective of HPV16 status. Also, WRN is a restriction factor for the viral life cycle since replication is disrupted in the absence of WRN. Future studies will focus on enhancing our understanding of how WRN regulates viral replication. Our goal is to ultimately identify cellular factors essential for HPV16 replication that can be targeted for therapeutic gain.

scholarly journals Werner syndrome protein (WRN) regulates cell proliferation and the human papillomavirus 16 life cycle during epithelial differentiation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire D. James ◽  
Dipon Das ◽  
Ethan L. Morgan ◽  
Raymonde Otoa ◽  
Andrew Macdonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Viral Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Basal Cell ◽  
Viral Life Cycle ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Damage Response

AbstractHuman papillomaviruses recruit a host of DNA damage response factors to their viral genome to facilitate homologous recombination replication in association with the viral replication factors E1 and E2. We previously demonstrated that SIRT1 deacetylation of WRN promotes recruitment of WRN to E1-E2 replicating DNA, and that WRN regulates both the levels and fidelity of E1-E2 replication. The deacetylation of WRN by SIRT1 results in an active protein able to complex with replicating DNA, but a protein that is less stable. Here we demonstrate an inverse correlation between SIRT1 and WRN in CIN cervical lesions when compared with normal control tissue, supporting our model of SIRT1 deacetylation destabilizing WRN protein. We CRISPR/Cas9 edited N/Tert-1 and N/Tert-1+HPV16 cells to knock out WRN protein expression and subjected the cells to organotypic raft cultures. In N/Tert-1 cells without WRN expression there was enhanced basal cell proliferation, DNA damage and thickening of the differentiated epithelium. In N/Tert-1+HPV16 cells, there was enhanced basal cell proliferation, increased DNA damage throughout the epithelium and increased viral DNA replication. Overall, the results demonstrate that the expression of WRN is required to control the proliferation of N/Tert-1 cells and controls the HPV16 life cycle in these cells. This complements our previous data demonstrating that WRN controls the levels and fidelity of HPV16 E1-E2 DNA replication. The results describe a new role for WRN, a tumor suppressor, in controlling keratinocyte differentiation and the HPV16 life cycle.ImportanceHPV16 is the major human viral carcinogen, responsible for around 3-4% of all cancers worldwide. Our understanding of how the viral replication machinery interacts with host factors to control/activate the DNA damage response to promote the viral life cycle remains incomplete. Recently, we demonstrated a SIRT1-WRN axis that controls HPV16 replication and here we demonstrate that this axis persists in clinical cervical lesions induced by HPV16. Here we describe the effects of WRN depletion on cellular differentiation with and without HPV16; WRN depletion results in enhanced proliferation and DNA damage irrespective of HPV16 status. Also, WRN is a restriction factor for the viral life cycle as replication is disrupted in the absence of WRN. Future studies will focus on enhancing our understanding of how WRN regulates viral replication. Our goal is to ultimately identify cellular factors essential for HPV16 replication that can be targeted for therapeutic gain.

scholarly journals Werner Helicase Control of Human Papillomavirus 16 E1-E2 DNA Replication Is Regulated by SIRT1 Deacetylation

mBio ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipon Das ◽  
Molly L. Bristol ◽  
Nathan W. Smith ◽  
Claire D. James ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Human Papillomaviruses ◽  
Repair Protein ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Dna Repair Protein

ABSTRACTHuman papillomaviruses (HPV) are double-stranded DNA viruses causative in a host of human diseases, including several cancers. Following infection, two viral proteins, E1 and E2, activate viral replication in association with cellular factors and stimulate the DNA damage response (DDR) during the replication process. E1-E2 uses homologous recombination (HR) to facilitate DNA replication, but an understanding of host factors involved in this process remains incomplete. Previously, we demonstrated that the class III deacetylase SIRT1, which can regulate HR, is recruited to E1-E2-replicating DNA and regulates the level of replication. Here, we demonstrate that SIRT1 promotes the fidelity of E1-E2 replication and that the absence of SIRT1 results in reduced recruitment of the DNA repair protein Werner helicase (WRN) to E1-E2-replicating DNA. CRISPR/Cas9 editing demonstrates that WRN, like SIRT1, regulates the quantity and fidelity of E1-E2 replication. This is the first report of WRN regulation of E1-E2 DNA replication, or a role for WRN in the HPV life cycle. In the absence of SIRT1 there is an increased acetylation and stability of WRN, but a reduced ability to interact with E1-E2-replicating DNA. We present a model in which E1-E2 replication turns on the DDR, stimulating SIRT1 deacetylation of WRN. This deacetylation promotes WRN interaction with E1-E2-replicating DNA to control the quantity and fidelity of replication. As well as offering a crucial insight into HPV replication control, this system offers a unique model for investigating the link between SIRT1 and WRN in controlling replication in mammalian cells.IMPORTANCEHPV16 is the major viral human carcinogen responsible for between 3 and 4% of all cancers worldwide. Following infection, this virus activates the DNA damage response (DDR) to promote its life cycle and recruits DDR proteins to its replicating DNA in order to facilitate homologous recombination during replication. This promotes the production of viable viral progeny. Our understanding of how HPV16 replication interacts with the DDR remains incomplete. Here, we demonstrate that the cellular deacetylase SIRT1, which is a part of the E1-E2 replication complex, regulates recruitment of the DNA repair protein WRN to the replicating DNA. We demonstrate that WRN regulates the level and fidelity of E1-E2 replication. Overall, the results suggest a mechanism by which SIRT1 deacetylation of WRN promotes its interaction with E1-E2-replicating DNA to control the levels and fidelity of that replication.

scholarly journals Differential Requirements of the C Terminus of Nbs1 in Suppressing Adenovirus DNA Replication and Promoting Concatemer Formation

2008 ◽  
Vol 82 (17) ◽  
pp. 8362-8372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seema S. Lakdawala ◽  
Rachel A. Schwartz ◽  
Kevin Ferenchak ◽  
Christian T. Carson ◽  
Brian P. McSharry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Viral Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Viral Genomes ◽  
Mrn Complex ◽  
E4 Region ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Cellular Dna

ABSTRACT Adenoviruses (Ad) with the early region E4 deleted (E4-deleted virus) are defective for DNA replication and late protein synthesis. Infection with E4-deleted viruses results in activation of a DNA damage response, accumulation of cellular repair factors in foci at viral replication centers, and joining together of viral genomes into concatemers. The cellular DNA repair complex composed of Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1 (MRN) is required for concatemer formation and full activation of damage signaling through the protein kinases Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ATM-Rad3-related (ATR). The E4orf3 and E4orf6 proteins expressed from the E4 region of Ad type 5 (Ad5) inactivate the MRN complex by degradation and mislocalization, and prevent the DNA damage response. Here we investigated individual contributions of the MRN complex, concatemer formation, and damage signaling to viral DNA replication during infection with E4-deleted virus. Using virus mutants, short hairpin RNA knockdown and hypomorphic cell lines, we show that inactivation of MRN results in increased viral replication. We demonstrate that defective replication in the absence of E4 is not due to concatemer formation or DNA damage signaling. The C terminus of Nbs1 is required for the inhibition of Ad DNA replication and recruitment of MRN to viral replication centers. We identified regions of Nbs1 that are differentially required for concatemer formation and inhibition of Ad DNA replication. These results demonstrate that targeting of the MRN complex explains the redundant functions of E4orf3 and E4orf6 in promoting Ad DNA replication. Understanding how MRN impacts the adenoviral life cycle will provide insights into the functions of this DNA damage sensor.

scholarly journals Werner helicase control of human papillomavirus 16 E1-E2 DNA replication is regulated by SIRT1 deacetylation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipon Das ◽  
Molly L Bristol ◽  
Nathan W Smith ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Pietro Pichierri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Human Papillomaviruses ◽  
Repair Protein ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Dna Repair Protein

AbstractHuman papillomaviruses (HPV) are double stranded DNA viruses causative in a host of human diseases including several cancers. Following infection two viral proteins, E1 and E2, activate viral replication in association with cellular factors, and stimulate the DNA damage response (DDR) during the replication process. E1-E2 uses homologous replication (HR) to facilitate DNA replication, but an understanding of host factors involved in this process remains incomplete. Previously we demonstrated that the class III deacetylase SIRT1, which can regulate HR, is recruited to E1-E2 replicating DNA and regulates the level of replication. Here we demonstrate that SIRT1 promotes the fidelity of E1-E2 replication and that the absence of SIRT1 results in reduced recruitment of the DNA repair protein Werner helicase (WRN) to E1-E2 replicating DNA. CRISPR/Cas9 editing demonstrates that WRN, like SIRT1, regulates the quantity and fidelity of E1-E2 replication. This is the first report of WRN regulation of E1-E2 DNA replication, or a role for WRN in the HPV life cycle. In the absence of SIRT1 there is an increased acetylation and stability of WRN, but a reduced ability to interact with E1-E2 replicating DNA. We present a model in which E1-E2 replication turns on the DDR stimulating SIRT1 deacetylation of WRN. This deacetylation promotes WRN interaction with E1-E2 replicating DNA to control the quantity and fidelity of replication. As well as offering a crucial insight into HPV replication control, this system offers a unique model for investigating the link between SIRT1 and WRN in controlling replication in mammalian cells.ImportanceHPV16 is the major viral human carcinogen, responsible for between 3 and 4% of all cancers worldwide. Following infection this virus activates the DNA damage response (DDR) to promote its life cycle, and recruits DDR proteins to its replicating DNA in order to facilitate homologous recombination during replication. This promotes the production of viable viral progeny. Our understanding of how HPV16 replication interacts with the DDR remains incomplete. Here we demonstrate that the cellular deacetylase SIRT1, which is a part of the E1-E2 replication complex, regulates recruitment of the DNA repair protein WRN to the replicating DNA. We demonstrate that WRN regulates the level and fidelity of E1-E2 replication. Overall the results suggest a mechanism where SIRT1 deacetylation of WRN promotes its interaction with E1-E2 replicating DNA to control the levels and fidelity of that replication.

scholarly journals Activation of the DNA Damage Response Is a Conserved Function of HIV-1 and HIV-2 Vpr That Is Independent of SLX4 Recruitment

mBio ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver I. Fregoso ◽  
Michael Emerman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Viral Life Cycle ◽  
Primate Species ◽  
Accessory Gene ◽  
Defense Proteins ◽  
Knock Out ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACTThere has been extraordinary progress in understanding the roles of lentiviral accessory proteins in antagonizing host antiviral defense proteins. However, the precise primary function of the accessory gene Vpr remains elusive. Here we suggest that engagement with the DNA damage response is an important function of primate lentiviral Vpr proteins because of its conserved function among diverse lentiviral lineages. In contrast, we show that, for HIV-1, HIV-2, and related Vpr isolates and orthologs, there is a lack of correlation between DNA damage response activation and interaction with the host SLX4 protein complex of structure specific endonucleases; some Vpr proteins are able to interact with SLX4, but the majority are not. Using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/Cas9 method to knock out SLX4, we formally showed that HIV-1 and HIV-2 Vpr orthologs can still activate the DNA damage response and cell cycle arrest in the absence of SLX4. Together, our data suggest that activation of the DNA damage response, but not SLX4 interaction, is conserved and therefore indicative of an important function of Vpr. Our data also indicate that Vpr activates the DNA damage response through an SLX4-independent mechanism that remains uncharacterized.IMPORTANCEHIV-1 and HIV-2 belong to a family of viruses called lentiviruses that infect at least 40 primate species, including humans. Lentiviruses have been circulating in primates for at least 5 million years. In order to better fight HIV, we must understand the viral and host factors necessary for infection, adaptation, and transmission of these viruses. Using the natural variation of HIV-1, HIV-2, and related lentiviruses, we have investigated the role of the DNA damage response in the viral life cycle. We have found that the ability of lentiviruses to activate the DNA damage response is largely conserved. However, we also found that the SLX4 host factor is not required for this activation, as was previously proposed. This indicates that the DNA damage response is an important player in the viral life cycle, and yet the mechanism(s) by which HIV-1, HIV-2, and other primate lentiviruses engage the DNA damage response is still unknown.

scholarly journals Activating the DNA Damage Response and Suppressing Innate Immunity: Human Papillomaviruses Walk the Line

Pathogens ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire D. James ◽  
Dipon Das ◽  
Molly L. Bristol ◽  
Iain M. Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Innate Immune Response ◽  
Adaptive Immune Response ◽  
Viral Life Cycle ◽  
Human Papillomaviruses ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Damage Response

Activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) by external agents can result in DNA fragments entering the cytoplasm and activating innate immune signaling pathways, including the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway. The consequences of this activation can result in alterations in the cell cycle including the induction of cellular senescence, as well as boost the adaptive immune response following interferon production. Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are the causative agents in a host of human cancers including cervical and oropharyngeal; HPV are responsible for around 5% of all cancers. During infection, HPV replication activates the DDR in order to promote the viral life cycle. A striking feature of HPV-infected cells is their ability to continue to proliferate in the presence of an active DDR. Simultaneously, HPV suppress the innate immune response using a number of different mechanisms. The activation of the DDR and suppression of the innate immune response are essential for the progression of the viral life cycle. Here, we describe the mechanisms HPV use to turn on the DDR, while simultaneously suppressing the innate immune response. Pushing HPV from this fine line and tipping the balance towards activation of the innate immune response would be therapeutically beneficial.

scholarly journals Adenovirus E1B 55-Kilodalton Protein Targets SMARCAL1 for Degradation during Infection and Modulates Cellular DNA Replication

2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reshma Nazeer ◽  
Fadi S. I. Qashqari ◽  
Abeer S. Albalawi ◽  
Ann Liza Piberger ◽  
Maria Teresa Tilotta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Viral Replication ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Adenovirus E1b ◽  
Cellular Dna

ABSTRACT Here, we show that the cellular DNA replication protein and ATR substrate SMARCAL1 is recruited to viral replication centers early during adenovirus infection and is then targeted in an E1B-55K/E4orf6- and cullin RING ligase-dependent manner for proteasomal degradation. In this regard, we have determined that SMARCAL1 is phosphorylated at S123, S129, and S173 early during infection in an ATR- and CDK-dependent manner, and that pharmacological inhibition of ATR and CDK activities attenuates SMARCAL1 degradation. SMARCAL1 recruitment to viral replication centers was shown to be largely dependent upon SMARCAL1 association with the RPA complex, while Ad-induced SMARCAL1 phosphorylation also contributed to SMARCAL1 recruitment to viral replication centers, albeit to a limited extent. SMARCAL1 was found associated with E1B-55K in adenovirus E1-transformed cells. Consistent with its ability to target SMARCAL1, we determined that E1B-55K modulates cellular DNA replication. As such, E1B-55K expression initially enhances cellular DNA replication fork speed but ultimately leads to increased replication fork stalling and the attenuation of cellular DNA replication. Therefore, we propose that adenovirus targets SMARCAL1 for degradation during infection to inhibit cellular DNA replication and promote viral replication. IMPORTANCE Viruses have evolved to inhibit cellular DNA damage response pathways that possess antiviral activities and utilize DNA damage response pathways that possess proviral activities. Adenovirus has evolved, primarily, to inhibit DNA damage response pathways by engaging with the ubiquitin-proteasome system and promoting the degradation of key cellular proteins. Adenovirus differentially regulates ATR DNA damage response signaling pathways during infection. The cellular adenovirus E1B-55K binding protein E1B-AP5 participates in ATR signaling pathways activated during infection, while adenovirus 12 E4orf6 negates Chk1 activation by promoting the proteasome-dependent degradation of the ATR activator TOPBP1. The studies detailed here indicate that adenovirus utilizes ATR kinase and CDKs during infection to promote the degradation of SMARCAL1 to attenuate normal cellular DNA replication. These studies further our understanding of the relationship between adenovirus and DNA damage and cell cycle signaling pathways during infection and establish new roles for E1B-55K in the modulation of cellular DNA replication.

scholarly journals SAMHD1 Regulates Human Papillomavirus 16-Induced Cell Proliferation and Viral Replication during Differentiation of Keratinocytes

mSphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire D. James ◽  
Apurva T. Prabhakar ◽  
Raymonde Otoa ◽  
Michael R. Evans ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Viral Replication ◽  
Cellular Proliferation ◽  
Specific Interaction ◽  
Viral Life Cycle ◽  
Human Papillomaviruses ◽  
Cellular Growth ◽  
Human Papillomavirus 16

ABSTRACT Human papillomaviruses induce a host of anogenital cancers, as well as oropharyngeal cancer (HPV+OPC); human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) is causative in around 90% of HPV+OPC cases. Using telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) immortalized foreskin keratinocytes (N/Tert-1), we have identified significant host gene reprogramming by HPV16 (N/Tert-1+HPV16) and demonstrated that N/Tert-1+HPV16 support late stages of the viral life cycle. Expression of the cellular dNTPase and homologous recombination factor sterile alpha motif and histidine-aspartic domain HD-containing protein 1 (SAMHD1) is transcriptionally regulated by HPV16 in N/Tert-1. CRISPR/Cas9 removal of SAMHD1 from N/Tert-1 and N/Tert-1+HPV16 demonstrates that SAMHD1 controls cell proliferation of N/Tert-1 only in the presence of HPV16; the deletion of SAMHD1 promotes hyperproliferation of N/Tert-1+HPV16 cells in organotypic raft cultures but has no effect on N/Tert-1. Viral replication is also elevated in the absence of SAMHD1. This new system has allowed us to identify a specific interaction between SAMHD1 and HPV16 that regulates host cell proliferation and viral replication; such studies are problematic in nonimmortalized primary keratinocytes due to their limited life span. To confirm the relevance of our results, we repeated the analysis with human tonsil keratinocytes (HTK) immortalized by HPV16 (HTK+HPV16) and observed the same hyperproliferative phenotype following CRISPR/Cas9 editing of SAMHD1. Identical results were obtained with three independent CRISPR/Cas9 guide RNAs. The isogenic pairing of N/Tert-1 with N/Tert-1+HPV16, combined with HTK+HPV16, presents a unique system to identify host genes whose products functionally interact with HPV16 to regulate host cellular growth in keratinocytes. IMPORTANCE HPVs are causative agents in human cancers and are responsible for around of 5% of all cancers. A better understanding of the viral life cycle in keratinocytes will facilitate the development of novel therapeutics to combat HPV-positive cancers. Here, we present a unique keratinocyte model to identify host proteins that specifically interact with HPV16. Using this system, we report that a cellular gene, SAMHD1, is regulated by HPV16 at the RNA and protein levels in keratinocytes. Elimination of SAMHD1 from these cells using CRISPR/Cas9 editing promotes enhanced cellular proliferation by HPV16 in keratinocytes and elevated viral replication but not in keratinocytes that do not have HPV16. Our study demonstrates a specific intricate interplay between HPV16 and SAMHD1 during the viral life cycle and establishes a unique model system to assist exploring host factors critical for HPV pathogenesis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document