Feeding of Tench Tinca tinca (Cyprinidae) in a Small Eutrophic Water Body

2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-551
Author(s):  
V. V. Bezmaternykh ◽  
G. Kh. Shcherbina
1992 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Roncero ◽  
E. Durán ◽  
F. Soler ◽  
J. Masot ◽  
L. Gómez

2008 ◽  
Vol 131 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 393-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Aranaz ◽  
A. Gibello ◽  
J. Álvarez ◽  
A.I. Mata ◽  
A. Rodríguez ◽  
...  

Aquaculture ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 432 ◽  
pp. 46-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soňa Tolarová ◽  
Martina Dávidová ◽  
Andrea Šimková ◽  
Martin Flajšhans ◽  
Pavel Hyršl

2021 ◽  
Vol 267 ◽  
pp. 01035
Author(s):  
Ziqi Zhang ◽  
Lei Yang ◽  
Dongxu Han ◽  
Hongyan Shen

An investigation of phytoplankton community and water quality for M River was conducted in December 2019.The results showed that 38 species of phytoplankton belonging to 6 phyla and 26 genera were collected. Among them, Bacillariophyta is the richest species, which accounted for 34.21%, followed by Cyanophyta with 26.32% and Chlorophyta with 28.95%. The density of phytoplankton was 63.0*106 inds/L which indicated as eutrophic water body. The highest density was Bacillariophyta, accounting for 51.03%. The Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H’) varied from 1.34 to 2.24, the Margalef Species diversity index (d) varied from 2.71 to 3.85, and the Pielou evenness index (J) varied from 0.38 to 0.67. According to the integrative analysis results of H’, d and J, M River water quality belongs to oligo-polluted, but individual sites belong to meso-polluted.


2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Hulak ◽  
Vojtech Kaspar ◽  
Martin Psenicka ◽  
David Gela ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document