scholarly journals AB0312 REAL-LIFE DATA ON THE USE OF BIOLOGICAL DMARDS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN AUSTRIA WITH SPECIAL ATTENTION TO SWITCHING AFTER FIRST BDMARD FAILURE

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1455.1-1455
Author(s):  
V. Nell-Duxneuner ◽  
B. Reichardt ◽  
T. Stamm
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Mode Of Action ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Social Health Insurance ◽  
Tnf Inhibitors ◽  
The Other ◽  
Social Health ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Drug Survival

Background:The introduction of biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) offered new dimensions in controlling disease progress for patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). According to the recommendations by EULAR, treatment should be commenced with a conventional synthetic DMARD as soon as diagnosis is made, followed by a bDMARD after treatment failure. The choice of drug is done in respect to comorbidities, preference of the patient and to costs.Objectives:Drug expenditure data of 2012-2016 were retrieved to evaluate frequency of prescription and drug survival with special focus on switching habits after first bDMARD failure.Methods:Data were extracted from 11 Austrian social health insurance funds covering 86% of the Austrian population. Only patients with first prescriptions of bDMARDs were included. Absolute and relative frequencies of first bDMARD prescriptions, second and third courses of bDMARDs (switches) and probabilities of drug survival of first line bDMARDs were calculated. Baselines were set individually at the beginning of the first bDMARD course. A Sankey diagram was used to illustrate the relationships between first, second and third courses of bDMARDs (Figure). The first left column represents the first bDMARDs, the second and third columns the second and third switched bDMARDs, respectively. The quantity of the bDMARDs is reflected in the width of the lines.Results:7637 RA patients on bDMARD therapy were retrieved in total. With a presumed prevalence of 0.5% (Ref) this would account for 27% of RA patients being treated with a bDMARD. Of these, 3813 were first time prescriptions. The most commonly prescribed drug in bDMARD naïve patients was Etanercept with 26%, followed by Adalimumab with 25%. Third was Tocilizumab followed by Golimumab (16% and 15%), Abatacept with 9% and Certolizumab and Infliximab with both 4%. Tocilizumab showed the longest drug survival with 80% after one and 61% of patients still on the drug after 3 years. Golimumab was clearly favorable among TNF inhibitors with a drug survival of 71% after one and 50% after 3 years compared to Certolizumab showing the lowest with 63% after one year and only 38% after three years. Tocilizumab was the drug most often switched to after first course failure, followed by Adalimumab. The choice of second bDMARD was different: After Adalimumab failure more patients were switched to another mode of action (almost 50%), predominately Tocilizumab. This is also seen after Golimumab failure and is less pronounced in the other TNF inhibitors: they were mostly switched to second TNF inhibitor, mainly Adalimumab. The majority of patients started on Tocilizumab and Abatacept were switched to a TNF inhibitor (74% and 58%, respectively). In third DMARD choice again Tocilizumab is mostly chosen followed by Abatacept, leaving 42% to a TNF inhibitor, mostly Golimumab.Conclusion:Patients were most often started on a TNF inhibitor as first bDMARD, namely Etanercept and Adalimumab. Golimumab was prescribed less often but showed the longest drug survival among TNF inhibitors. Tocilizumab showed the longest drug survival overall and was the bDMARD most often switched to as second bDMARD. When starting with Adalimumab or Golimumab there was a tendency towards change of mode of action, which was not as pronounced for the other three TNF inhibitors. After failing twice Tocilizumab and Abatacept were the most often prescribed drugs.References:[1]Kobelt G, Fasteng F: Access to Innovative Treatments in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Europe. A Report prepared for the EFPIA, 2009Acknowledgments:Austrian Main Social Health Association (Dachverband österreichische Sozialversciherung)Disclosure of Interests:Valerie Nell-Duxneuner Speakers bureau: MSD, Pfizer, Jansen, Abbvie, Lilly, Novartis, Berthold Reichardt: None declared, Tanja Stamm Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Roche, Consultant of: AbbVie, Sanofi Genzyme, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Roche, Sanofi

scholarly journals AB0115 COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND FINDINGS BETWEEN TNF INHIBITORS AND NON-TNF INHIBITORS AT FIRST BIOLOGICS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1086.2-1087
Author(s):  
T. Okano ◽  
T. Koike ◽  
K. Inui ◽  
K. Mamoto ◽  
Y. Yamada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Power Doppler ◽  
Tnf Inhibitors ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Us ◽  
Us Findings ◽  
Improvement Ratio

Background:In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), biologics treatment is one of the effective treatment options. Usually, there is no difference in therapeutic effect regardless of which biologics is used, but the effect for joint synovitis is unknown. Recently, ultrasound (US) has played a role of sensitive imaging modality in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with RA.Objectives:The aim of this study was to compare the improvement of US findings between TNF inhibitors and non-TNF inhibitors at first biologics in patients with RA.Methods:Fifty-four RA patients who started the first biologics from September 2016 to December 2018 were included in this longitudinal study (SPEEDY study, UMIN000028260). All the patients were performed clinical examination, blood test and US examination at baseline, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeks. A US examination was performed at the bilateral first to fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, first interphalangeal (IP) and second to fifth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints, wrist joints (three part of radial, medial and ulnar) and first to fifth metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints, by using HI VISION Ascendus (Hitachi Medical Corporation, Japan) with a multifrequency linear transducer (18-6 MHz). The gray scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) findings were assessed by the semi-quantitative method (0-3). GS score and PD score (both 0-108 points) were defined as the sum of each score. The change of disease activity and US findings were compared between TNF group and non-TNF group.Results:Among 54 cases, 32 patients were used TNF inhibitor and 22 were non-TNF inhibitor. Age and duration of RA were significantly higher in the non-TNF group, and MTX dose was significantly lower in the non-TNF group. The baseline inflammatory markers tended to be higher in the non-TNF group and the disease activity was also higher in the non-TNF group. However, the US findings showed no significant difference in both GS and PD between two groups at baseline. US improvement ratio was no difference between TNF group and non-TNF group at 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeks in both GS and PD score. Regardless of the type of biologics, patients with long-term disease duration tended to have poor improvement in US synovial fingings.Table 1.Baseline patient and disease characteristicsTNF (n=32)non-TNF (n=22)P valueFemale patients, n (%)21 (65.6)16 (72.7)0.767Age (years)63.5±15.471.0±9.00.030Disease duration (years)6.5±8.213.0±11.70.032CRP (mg/dl)1.8±2.53.0±3.20.170DAS28-ESR5.0±1.45.8±1.20.022GS score26.1±18.831.8±21.10.313PD score17.6±11.423.1±14.60.150Figure 1.GS and PD improvement ratio at 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeksConclusion:There was no difference in the US findings improvement between patients with TNF inhibitor and non-TNF inhibitor at first biologics in patients with RA.References:[1]Grassi W, Okano T, Di Geso L, Filippucci E. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: options, uses and optimization. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015;11:1131-46.[2]Nishino A, Kawashiri SY, Koga T, et al. Ultrasonographic Efficacy of Biologic andTargeted Synthetic Disease-ModifyingAntirheumatic Drug Therapy in RheumatoidArthritis From a Multicenter RheumatoidArthritis Ultrasound Prospective Cohort in Japan. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018;70:1719-26.Acknowledgements:We wish to thank Atsuko Kamiyama, Tomoko Nakatsuka for clinical assistant, Setsuko Takeda, Emi Yamashita, Yuko Yoshida, Rika Morinaka, Hatsue Ueda and Tomomi Iwahashi for their special efforts as a sonographer and collecting data.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals AB0302 USE OF TNF-INHIBITORS BEFORE, DURING AND THE FIRST YEAR AFTER PREGNANCY AMONG WOMEN WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1450.2-1450
Author(s):  
H. Bjørngaard ◽  
H. Koksvik ◽  
B. Jakobsen ◽  
M. Wallenius
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Post Partum ◽  
Tnf Inhibitors ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Rheumatic Arthritis ◽  
Quality Register ◽  
In Pregnancy

Background:Treat to target is a goal, also in pregnant women with Rheumatoid arthritis (1). There is increasing evidence on safe use with TNF inhibitors during pregnancy. Adjusted use of TNF inhibitors preconception and throughout pregnancy may stabilize disease activity and prevent flares (2). Low disease activity is also beneficial for the fetus.Objectives:To study the use of TNF-inhibitors among women with Rheumatic arthritis during and after pregnancy.Methods:RevNatus is a Norwegian, nationwide quality register that monitors treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases before, during and after pregnancy. Data from RevNatus in the period October 2017 to October 2019 was used to map the use of all types of TNF inhibitors among 208 women with rheumatoid arthritis, diagnosed by the ACR/EULAR criteria. The use of medication was reported at the time of visit in outpatient clinic. The frequency of use of TNF inhibitors registered at seven timepoints from pre-pregnancy to twelve months after delivery.Results:The use of medication was reported at each visit for all the women with rheumatoid arthritis. Most of the women were not using TNF inhibitors before and beyond conception. Most of the women continuing TNF inhibitors beyond conception used certolizumab or etanercept. Adalimumab and infliximab were used in pregnancy (tabell 1).Tabell 1.certoliz-umabetane-rceptadalim-umabgolim-umabinflixi-mabNo TNF-inhibitorBefore pregnancyn=10521% (22)9% (10)3% (3)1% (1)66% (69)1.trimestern=8119% (15)10% (8)71% (58)2.trimestern=8810% (9)10% (9)80% (70)3.trimestern=9111% (10)5% (5)83% (76)6 weeks post partum n=9622% (21)13% (13)1% (1)1% (1)63% (60)6 months post partum n=8824% (21)18% (16)4% (4)1% (1)53% (46)12 months post partum n=8421% (18)17% (15)7% (6)2% (2)53% (43)Conclusion:Most of the women with rheumatic arthritis were not treated with TNF inhibitors before or in pregnancy. Women with rheumatic arthritis that continuing treatment with TNF inhibitors through pregnancy were using certilozumab and etanercept.References:[1]Gotestam Skorpen C, Hoeltzenbein M, Tincani A, Fischer-Betz R, Elefant E, Chambers C, et al. The EULAR points to consider for use of antirheumatic drugs before pregnancy, and during pregnancy and lactation. 2016;75(5):795-810.[2]van den Brandt S, Zbinden A, Baeten D, Villiger PM, Ostensen M, Forger F. Risk factors for flare and treatment of disease flares during pregnancy in rheumatoid arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):64.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals The Risk of Newly Diagnosed Cancer in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis by TNF Inhibitor Use: A Nationwide Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boyoon Choi ◽  
Hyun Jin Park ◽  
Yun-Kyoung Song ◽  
Yoon-Jeong Oh ◽  
In-Wha Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Tnf Inhibitors ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Korean Patients ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The One ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Abstract Background Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has raised safety concerns about cancer risk, but study results remain controversial. This largest nationwide study to date compared cancer risk in TNF inhibitor users to non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (nbDMARD) users in Korean patients with RA. Methods Data on all the eligible patients diagnosed with RA between 2005 and 2016 were retrieved from the Korean National Health Information Database. The one-to-one matched patients consisted of the matched cohort. The risks for developing all-type and site-specific cancers were estimated using incidence and incidence rate (IR) per 1,000 person-years. Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a Cox regression model. Results Of the 22,851 patients in the before matching cohort, 4,592 patients were included in the matched cohort. Treatment with TNF inhibitors was consistently associated with a lower risk of cancer than in the nbDMARD cohort (IR per 1,000 person-years, 6.5 vs. 15.6; adjusted HR, 0.379; 95% CI, 0.255–0.563). The adjusted HR (95% CI) was significantly lower in the TNF inhibitor cohort than the nbDMARD cohort for gastrointestinal cancer (0.432; 0.235–0.797), breast cancer (0.146; 0.045–0.474), and genitourinary cancer (0.220; 0.059–0.820). Conclusions The use of TNF inhibitors was associated with a lower cancer incidence in Korean patients with RA. A further study linking claims and clinical data is needed to confirm our results.

scholarly journals Changing Patterns of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Use in 9074 Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 907-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUSUF YAZICI ◽  
SVETLANA KRASNOKUTSKY ◽  
JAIME P. BARNES ◽  
PATRICIA L. HINES ◽  
JASON WANG ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Tumor Necrosis Factor ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Tumor Necrosis ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Tnf Inhibitors ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Insurance Claims ◽  
Claims Database ◽  
Necrosis Factor

Objective.Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) commonly switch between tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors after failing to control disease activity. Much of the clinical data that support switching to a second TNF agent when one agent fails to work has come from small, short-term studies. We utilized a US insurance claims database to determine patterns of use such as dose escalation, time to discontinuation, and switching between TNF inhibitors in patients with RA.Methods.A retrospective analysis was performed using an insurance claims database in the US from 2000 to 2005. TNF inhibitor use, time to switch, dose escalation, and continuation times were analyzed in patients with RA.Results.Nine thousand seventy-four patients with RA started TNF inhibitors during the period 2000 to 2005. Etanercept was the most commonly used TNF inhibitor; infliximab had the highest duration of continuation, about 50% at 2 years. In addition, infliximab showed higher rates of dose escalation compared to etanercept and adalimumab. For all TNF inhibitors, time to switching decreased from 2000 to 2005.Conclusion.TNF inhibitor use patterns changed from 2000 to 2005, with more frequent changes among the different TNF inhibitors and a shorter duration of treatment before the change. Only about 50% of TNF inhibitors are still continued at 2 years, reflecting the difference between randomized clinical trials and real-world experience.

scholarly journals P282 Outcome for PsA biologic switchers following primary inefficacy of TNFi therapy in a secondary care cohort: sequential TNFi versus switching mode of action

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meena Naja ◽  
Liliana R Santos ◽  
Muhammad Shipa ◽  
Greenwood Mandy ◽  
Madhura Castelino
Keyword(s):  
Mode Of Action ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
First Line ◽  
Test Analysis ◽  
Drug Survival ◽  
Clinical Biomarkers ◽  
Switching Mode ◽  
Drop Outs

Abstract Background TNFi are the most used first line of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in PsA. In primary loss of response (PLR) to TNFi, there is no current evidence that directs the choice of second line bDMARDs. Our aim in this work was to compare drug survival for those who switched to a second TNFi versus alternative agents in real life. Methods Data was analysed retrospectively from a cohort of 400 PsA patients followed through from 2002-2019. Statistical analysis was carried out with descriptive statistics and t-test analysis using SPSS version 22. Results Out of 400 patients, 220 (55.0%) were started on bDMARD treatment. Of these 220, 212 (96.5%) were started on TNFi as initial therapy. PLR was seen in 42 of these patients (19.8%). The median drug survival of initial TNFi therapy was 7.1 months (interquartile range [IQR] 3.6 - 53.4 months). Of the 42 patients with PLR: 32 (76.2%) were switched to a second TNFi; 6 (14.3%) were switched to ustekinumab and 4 (9.5%) were switched to secukinumab. 21 of the 32 patients switched to a second TNFi were subsequently switched onto a third biologic due to treatment failure (65.6%). The median drug survival of the second TNFi in this group was 7.7 months (IQR 3.0 - 26.3 months). 3 out of the 6 (50%) patients who were switched to ustekinumab were then subsequently switched, this was due to primary inefficacy in 66.7% and adverse events in 33.3%. The median drug survival of ustekinumab in this group was 10.0 months (IQR 0.0 - 16.0 months). All 4 patients switched to secukinumab continue on this treatment with no drop outs, giving a median drug survival 12.3 months (IQR 6.5 - 19.5 months). Conclusion Our data suggests that patients with PLR to TNFi in PsA who switched mode of action to IL-17 inhibitor appeared to have better drug survival than subsequent TNFi or IL-12/23 inhibitors. Exploring the clinical biomarkers for those with successful switch to non-TNFi bDMARD in a larger cohort would help with targeting the most appropriate individuals and early disease control. Disclosures M. Naja None. L. R. Santos None. M. Shipa None. G. Mandy None. M. Castelino None.

scholarly journals O26 Non-serious infections in patients with RA: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Bechman ◽  
Kapil Halai ◽  
Sam Norton ◽  
Andrew P Cope ◽  
Kimme L Hyrich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
British Society ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Drug Survival ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Serious Infections ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Biologics Register

Abstract Background Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at an increased risk of infection. Most attention has been given to serious infections, but these are the tip of the iceberg. Non-serious infections (NSI) are far more frequent, and although not life-threatening, have potential to impact treatment outcomes (drug survival) and quality of life. Our objective was to describe frequency of NSI and compare incidence of NSI by biologic drug within the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-RA). Methods The BSRBR-RA is a prospective observational cohort study. NSI was identified as not requiring hospitalisation, intravenous therapy or leading to disability or death. Infections were captured from clinician questionnaires and patient diaries. Individuals were considered ‘at risk’ from the date of commencing biologic treatment for 3 years. Drug exposure was defined by agent; TNF inhibitor, IL-6 inhibitor, anti-CD20 or csDMARD only. To account for a high frequency of events, a multiple-failure Cox model was used. Multivariable adjustment included age, gender, DAS28-ESR, HAQ-DI, disease duration, smoking, steroid usage, year recruited to BSRBR-RA, line of biologic therapy and cumulative infection number. Results There were 17,304 NSI in 10,099 patients, with an event rate of 27.0 per year (95% CI 26.6 to 27.4). Increasing age, female gender, comorbidity burden, corticosteroid therapy, DAS28 and HAQ-DI were associated with an increased risk of NSI. The rate of NSI was numerically lowest with csDMARDs. Compared to TNFi, IL-6 inhibitor had a higher risk of NSI, whilst the csDMARD cohort had a lower risk. Between the TNFi agents, adalimumab had a higher risk than etanercept (Table 1). Conclusion These results confirm that NSI is a frequent occurrence for patients, which historically has received little attention in research literature. The data suggest biologics increase the risk of NSI, especially IL-6 inhibition. Whilst unmeasured confounding must be considered, the magnitude of effects are large and it seems likely that a causal link between targeted immunosuppression and NSI risk exists. Further research is needed to understand the impact of NSI on clinical outcomes including drug survival and quality of life. Disclosures K. Bechman: None. K. Halai: None. S. Norton: None. A.P. Cope: None. K.L. Hyrich: Honoraria; AbbVie paid to the institution and grant income from Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb for activities outside of this work. J.B. Galloway: Honoraria; for speaking or attending conferences from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Pfizer and Union Chimique Belge.

Effectiveness and Drug Survival of TNF Inhibitors in the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Prospective Cohort Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 2339-2346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arto V. Heinonen ◽  
Kalle J. Aaltonen ◽  
Jaana T. Joensuu ◽  
Jukka P. Lähteenmäki ◽  
Marja I. Pertovaara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Tnf Inhibitors ◽  
Concomitant Treatment ◽  
Tnf Inhibitor ◽  
Biologic Treatment ◽  
Drug Survival ◽  
Concurrent Use

Objective.The aim of this research was to describe the effectiveness and drug survival of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and to analyze the effect of concomitant treatment with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.Methods.Patients with AS identified from the National Register for Biologic Treatment in Finland starting their first TNF inhibitor treatment between July 2004 and December 2011 were included. Treatment response was measured as an improvement of 50% (or 20 mm) after 6 months of treatment onset compared to the baseline Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score. Treatment response and 2-year drug survival were modeled with logistic regression and time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models, respectively.Results.The study comprised 543 patients, of whom 123 also commenced a second TNF inhibitor during the followup. Treatment was discontinued within 24 months by 25% and 28% of the users of the first and the second TNF inhibitors, respectively. BASDAI response at 6 months was achieved by 52% and 25% of the users of the first and the second TNF inhibitors, respectively. Etanercept (ETN; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29–0.62) and adalimumab (ADA; HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.30–0.77) were associated with better drug survival in comparison to infliximab (IFX). Also, concurrent use of sulfasalazine (SSZ; HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49–0.99) decreased the hazard for treatment discontinuation.Conclusion.TNF inhibitors are equipotent in the treatment of AS; however, ETN and ADA were found superior to IFX in drug survival. The use of SSZ improves treatment continuation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document