scholarly journals Durham University students’ experiences of asymptomatic COVID-19 testing: a qualitative study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e055644
Author(s):  
Leah Ffion Jones ◽  
Eleonore Batteux ◽  
Stefanie Bonfield ◽  
Jaskiran Kaur Bhogal ◽  
Jo Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Positive Result ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Daily Activities ◽  
Testing Programme ◽  
Social Events ◽  
Home Testing ◽  
Test Result

ObjectivesTo evaluate the asymptomatic coronavirus testing programme at Durham University by exploring students’ barriers and facilitators to taking part and provide recommendations to improve the programme.DesignQualitative interviews.SettingOnline.Participants30 students enrolled at Durham University were interviewed in March 2021.Main outcome measuresAttitudes towards testing, experiences of testing and barriers and facilitators to engaging in testing at Durham University.ResultsKey motivations for testing included protecting oneself and others and accessing facilities and events. The process of booking, accessing and doing a test was mostly easy and convenient, although some may prefer home testing. There were concerns about the accuracy of tests and the implications of a positive result. Some highlighted they might be less likely to engage in testing if vaccinated. A negative test result provided confidence to engage in their daily activities, while encouraging some to socialise more.ConclusionsThe findings show that the testing programme at Durham University is convenient and well organised, with testing as a potential requirement to access social events, and self-isolation support being key contributor to uptake. These findings provide insights into young adults’ attitudes towards testing and can inform testing programmes in other universities and settings with asymptomatic testing programmes.

scholarly journals Use of symptom checkers for COVID-19-related symptoms among university students: a qualitative study

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjinnov-2020-000498
Author(s):  
Stephanie Aboueid ◽  
Samantha B Meyer ◽  
James R Wallace ◽  
Shreya Mahajan ◽  
Teeyaa Nur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
Positive Experience ◽  
Perceived Credibility ◽  
Inductive Thematic Analysis

ObjectiveSymptom checkers are potentially beneficial tools during pandemics. To increase the use of the platform, perspectives of end users must be gathered. Our objectives were to understand the perspectives and experiences of young adults related to the use of symptom checkers for assessing COVID-19-related symptoms and to identify areas for improvement.MethodsWe conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with 22 young adults (18–34 years of age) at a university in Ontario, Canada. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.ResultsWe identified six main themes related to the decision of using a symptom checker for COVID-19 symptoms: (1) presence of symptoms or a combination of symptoms, (2) knowledge about COVID-19 symptoms, (3) fear of seeking in-person healthcare services, (4) awareness about symptom checkers, (5) paranoia and (6) curiosity. Participants who used symptom checkers shared by governmental entities reported an overall positive experience. Individuals who used non-credible sources reported suboptimal experiences due to lack of perceived credibility. Five main areas for improvement were identified: (1) information about the creators of the platform, (2) explanation of symptoms, (3) personalised experience, (4) language options, and (5) option to get tested.ConclusionsThis study suggests an increased acceptance of symptom checkers due to the perceived risks of infection associated with seeking in-person healthcare services. Symptom checkers have the potential to reduce the burden on healthcare systems and health professionals, especially during pandemics; however, these platforms could be improved to increase use.

scholarly journals Barriers and Facilitators to Seeking Sleep Solutions for Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Qualitative Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sacha Petersen ◽  
Dinah S. Reddihough ◽  
Sally Lima ◽  
Adrienne Harvey ◽  
Fiona Newall
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Sleep Disturbance ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Sleep Problems ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
School Aged Children ◽  
Published Evidence ◽  
Children With Cerebral Palsy

Background: Published evidence to date suggests that sleep problems are common in children with cerebral palsy (CP). This qualitative study is a follow up to a previously published quantitative phase on the experience and impact of sleep problems in this population.Aims: The aim of this study was to explore the experience and impact of sleep disturbance and seeking of sleep solutions for parents of school aged children with CP.Materials and Methods: Semi-structured 19 qualitative interviews were conducted with parents of children with CP aged 6–12 years. Interview data were transcribed verbatim and the thematic analysis techniques by Braun and Clarke was used to identify themes.Results: Thematic analysis identified 7 themes: (1) My Child Doesn't Fit into the Box, (2) A Mother's Ears are Always On, (3) Sleep Disturbance is like Water Torture, (4) Sleep is One of Many Spot Fires, I Put it on the Backburner, (5) Luck, Money or Jumping Up and Down, (6) There is Never One Silver Bullet and (7) Help: The Earlier the Better. The key finding was that parents of children with CP often described their child's needs being distinct from what is provided by systems and services.Conclusion: Parents face significant challenges sourcing effective sleep solutions for their child with CP. Sleep is often not a priority for either the parent or the clinician as other health problems take precedence. Parents reflected that early sleep intervention for their child was or would have been helpful. The barriers and facilitators to sleep care identified in this study should be used to inform clinical change in care for children with CP. Sleep needs to be prioritized in healthcare for children.

Integrating addiction and mental health networks to improve access to treatment for people with alcohol and drug‐related problems: a qualitative study

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francina Fonseca ◽  
Gail Gilchrist ◽  
Marta Torrens
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Drug Related Problems ◽  
Access To Treatment ◽  
Health Networks ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Drug Problems

PurposeImprovement in Access to Treatment for People with Alcohol and Drug Related Problems (IATPAD) was a European study that detected barriers and facilitators to accessing treatment for patients with alcohol and drug‐related problems. This article seeks to compare the findings from a qualitative study with patients and staff in Catalunya (Spain).Design/methodology/approachThe paper describes a multi‐centre, qualitative study. A purposive sample of 47 staff, from a randomly selected sample of the three main entrance points to treatment for patients with alcohol and drug problems in Catalunya, were recruited from: Out‐patient General Psychiatry Centres (CSMA); Out‐patient Addiction Centres (CAS); and Primary Care Centres (CAP). In addition, open‐ended responses were collated from 142 additional staff on barriers and facilitators to accessing treatment for patients with alcohol and drug problems and how these barriers could be improved. A total of 25 patients from two CAS were interviewed in‐depth. The framework approach was used to interpret qualitative interviews.FindingsThe main barriers and facilitators to accessing treatment identified by staff and patients were patients' motivation, centres' opening hours, staff attitudes, the provision of information about services, and the co‐ordination and integration of different services – mainly the mental health and addiction sectors.Originality/valueThis paper describes and compares the main barriers and facilitators to accessing treatment from both staff and patients' point of view. Recommendations are made in order to improve service accessibility for patients with addiction problems and those with a dual diagnosis.

Pathways of Nicotine Product Use: A Qualitative Study of Youth and Young Adults in California

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 722-727
Author(s):  
Tamar M J Antin ◽  
Catherine Hess ◽  
Emily Kaner ◽  
Sharon Lipperman-Kreda ◽  
Rachelle Annechino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Delivery Systems ◽  
Health Consequences ◽  
Product Use ◽  
Relative Risks ◽  
Nicotine Delivery ◽  
Youth And Young Adults

Abstract Introduction Existing research on youth’s adoption of alternative nicotine delivery systems (ANDS) has focused on identifying pathways of nicotine product use, specifically examining whether vaping encourages progression to smoking. Few studies have considered other pathways of initiation. Qualitative studies suggest that meanings of vaping vary significantly, suggestive of the need for a more nuanced understanding of the role of vaping for youth with different pathways into vaping and smoking. Methods We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 49 Californian youth between 15 and 25 years old who reported ever vaping nicotine to gain a deeper understanding of their initiation pathways of vaping and smoking, paying special attention to youth’s experiences and reasons for ANDS initiation and use. Categorizing participants into initiation pathways by self-reported use and age of initiation of ANDS and cigarettes, we then compared the meaning and role of vaping across three distinct pathways of use: (1) smoking to vaping, (2) vaping to smoking, and (3) vaping only. Results The most common pathway reported was smoking to vaping (74%), eight participants began vaping before smoking, and five participants reported only vaping but never smoking. Analysis of participants’ narratives emphasized that youth in our study, regardless of initiation pathway, were generally aware of the health consequences of smoking and negotiated their use of nicotine products considering relative risks. Conclusion Findings from this study suggest that ANDS serve as a transitional tool for youth who are keenly aware of the health consequences of smoking, thus challenging conventional discourses about ANDS as a threat to youth’s health. Implications This qualitative study queries concerns about the potential of alternative nicotine delivery systems (ANDS) to serve as a gateway into cigarette smoking for youth and young adults. Findings suggest that most of the youth participants discussed and considered relative risks in their pathways of initiation, highlighting the need to acknowledge harm reduction in constructing public health messaging and policies for smoking cessation.

A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to enrollment of adolescents and young adults onto cancer clinical trials at NCI community oncology research program (NCORP) sites.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19050-e19050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Siembida ◽  
Holli Ann Loomans-Kropp ◽  
Irene Tami-Maury ◽  
Lillian Sung ◽  
Brad H. Pollock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Adolescents And Young Adults ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Stakeholder Views ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
The Impact

e19050 Background: Cancer clinical trials (CCTs) contribute to improving patient survival and quality of life; however, adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15-39 years old), are underrepresented in CCTs, especially in the community setting. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to AYA CCT enrollment in the NCORP. Methods: We conducted 43 one-on-one semi-structured qualitative interviews with key stakeholders involved in the enrollment of AYAs across a diverse group of NCORP primary (n = 5) and affiliate (n = 10) sites. Interviews were conducted remotely by 3 trained interviewers using the Zoom platform. Stakeholders were recruited from high and low AYA enrolling sites (AYA/total site enrollments > 10% and < 3%, respectively). Stakeholders were overall NCORP Site PIs (n = 5), lead NCORP administrators (n = 4), clinical research associates (n = 11), medical and pediatric oncologists involved in the enrollment of AYAs (n = 7), regulatory research associates (n = 5), nurse navigators (n = 6), and patient advocates (n = 5). Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify themes and relate them back to our primary research questions regarding barriers and facilitators to AYA CCT enrollment. Results: Stakeholder views on enrollment barriers centered on 5 main themes: (1) lack of site-level prioritization or discussion of AYA enrollment; (2) limited number of clinical trials for AYAs available nationally, with few trials opened locally; (3) insufficient resources and research staff; (4) concerns about the cost effectiveness of opening AYA trials due to low numbers of eligible patients; and (5) patient misconceptions about CCTs. Stakeholder views on enrollment facilitators centered on 3 main themes: (1) presence of an AYA program focused on increasing enrollment; (2) having a designated site AYA “champion”; and (3) having site leadership identify AYA enrollment as a priority. Stakeholders agreed that incentivizing AYA enrollments via increased reimbursement and/or study credits could potentially lead to increased enrollment. Conclusions: In addition to identifying multiple shared barriers to AYA CCT enrollment, our study also identified possible interventions for enrollment improvement, including designation of AYA “champions”, increased reimbursement for AYA enrollments, and improving AYA’s understanding of CCTs. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of interventions aimed at increasing AYA enrollment across the NCORP.

805-P: Barriers and Facilitators of Participation in Clinical Trials among Youth and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes and Their Caregivers

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 805-P
Author(s):  
SARAH C. WESTEN ◽  
LINDSAY M. ANDERSON ◽  
SAMANTHA A. BARRY ◽  
SYDNEY LOOK ◽  
STEFANIA PINTO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Youth And Young Adults

Safe Spaces: Gay-Straight Alliances in High School

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina Fetner ◽  
Athena Elafros ◽  
Sandra Bortolin ◽  
Coralee Drechsler
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
High School ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
High Schools ◽  
Social Context ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Safe Space ◽  
Safe Spaces ◽  
Complex Concept ◽  
The People

In activists' circles as in sociology, the concept "safe space" has beenapplied to all sorts of programs, organizations, and practices. However,few studies have specified clearly what safe spaces are and how theysupport the people who occupy them. In this paper, we examine one sociallocation typically understood to be a safe space: gay-straight alliancegroups in high schools. Using qualitative interviews with young adults inthe United States and Canada who have participated in gay-straightalliances, we examine the experiences of safe spaces in these groups. Weunpack this complex concept to consider some of the dimensions along whichsafe spaces might vary. Participants identified several types of safespace, and from their observations we derive three inter-related dimensionsof safe space: social context, membership and activity.

scholarly journals Doing trials within trials: a qualitative study of stakeholder views on barriers and facilitators to the routine adoption of methodology research in clinical trials

Trials ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Rick ◽  
Mike Clarke ◽  
Alan A. Montgomery ◽  
Paul Brocklehurst ◽  
Rachel Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Stakeholder Views
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document