scholarly journals 297 A prospective study to identify rates of SARS-CoV-2 virus in the peritoneum and lower genital tract of patients having surgery

Author(s):  
D Jones ◽  
D Faluyi ◽  
M Roberts ◽  
C Greaves ◽  
S Hamilton ◽  
...  
1995 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 205-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Turrentine ◽  
Lisa Troyer ◽  
Bernard Gonik

Objective:The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and side effects of erythromycin, amoxicillin, and clindamycin in eradicatingChlamydia trachomatisfrom the lower genital tract of pregnant women.Methods:A total of 174 women at <36 weeks gestation with positive cervical cultures forC. trachomatiswere enrolled. Patients were assigned in a randomized prospective fashion to either erythromycin (500 mg q.i.d, for 7 days), amoxicillin (500 mg t.i.d, for 7 days), or clindamycin (600 mg t.i.d, for 10 days). Six women elected not to participate and 8 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 53 patients in the erythromycin group, 55 patients in the amoxicillin group, and 52 patients in the clindamycin group. All sexual partners of the enrolled women were offered doxycycline (100 mg b.i.d. for 7 days) and patients were instructed to use barrier contraception until treatment was complete.Results:All 3 medications were effective agents for the treatment of antenatalC. trachomatisinfection with treatment efficacies of 96%, 94%, and 98% for the erythromycin, amoxicillin, and clindamycin groups, respectively. When the antibiotic groups were compared, no statistically significant differences were noted in intolerance. However, the differences in the incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms between erythromycin and amoxicillin and/or clindamycin were significant (P < 0.05).Conclusions:These findings suggest that 1) all 3 antibiotic regimens are efficacious, 2) erythromycin has a higher incidence of side effects, and 3) amoxicillin or clindamycin are reasonable alternatives for the treatment ofC. trachomatisin pregnant patients unable to tolerate erythromycin.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Jones ◽  
David Faluyi ◽  
Sarah Hamilton ◽  
Nicholas Stylianides ◽  
Kenneth Ma ◽  
...  

Introduction The risks to surgeons of carrying out aerosol generating procedures during the COVID pandemic are unknown. To start to define these risks, in a systematic manner, we investigated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 virus in the abdominal fluid and lower genital tract of patients undergoing surgery. Methods We carried out a prospective cross sectional observational study of 113 patients undergoing abdominal surgery or instrumentation of the lower genital tract. We took COVID swabs from the peritoneal cavity and from the vagina from all eligible patients. Results were stratified by pre operative COVID status. Results In patients who were presumed COVID negative at the time of surgery SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA was detected in 0/102 peritoneal samples and 0/98 vaginal samples. Peritoneal and vaginal swabs were also negative in one patient who had a positive nasopharyngeal swab immediately prior to surgery. Conclusions The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the abdominal fluid or lower genital tract of presumed negative patients is nil or extremely low. These data will inform surgeons of the risks of restarting laparoscopic surgery at a time when COVID19 is endemic in the population.


2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Aktekin ◽  
Taha Karaman ◽  
Yesim Yigiter Senol ◽  
Sukru Erdem ◽  
Hakan Erengin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document