Assessment of the incorporation of CNV surveillance into gene panel next-generation sequencing testing for inherited retinal diseases

BackgroundDiagnostic use of gene panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques is commonplace for individuals with inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs), a highly genetically heterogeneous group of disorders. However, these techniques have often failed to capture the complete spectrum of genomic variation causing IRD, including CNVs. This study assessed the applicability of introducing CNV surveillance into first-tier diagnostic gene panel NGS services for IRD.MethodsThree read-depth algorithms were applied to gene panel NGS data sets for 550 referred individuals, and informatics strategies used for quality assurance and CNV filtering. CNV events were confirmed and reported to referring clinicians through an accredited diagnostic laboratory.ResultsWe confirmed the presence of 33 deletions and 11 duplications, determining these findings to contribute to the confirmed or provisional molecular diagnosis of IRD for 25 individuals. We show that at least 7% of individuals referred for diagnostic testing for IRD have a CNV within genes relevant to their clinical diagnosis, and determined a positive predictive value of 79% for the employed CNV filtering techniques.ConclusionIncorporation of CNV analysis increases diagnostic yield of gene panel NGS diagnostic tests for IRD, increases clarity in diagnostic reporting and expands the spectrum of known disease-causing mutations.

Download Full-text

Designing Myeloid Gene Panels

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine ◽

10.5858/arpa.2021-0124-oa ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Fang Zhao ◽

David S. Bosler ◽

James R. Cook

Keyword(s):

Next Generation Sequencing ◽

Molecular Pathology ◽

Diagnostic Yield ◽

Gene Panel ◽

Next Generation ◽

Gene Set ◽

Variants Of Unknown Significance ◽

The Core ◽

Unknown Significance ◽

Generation Sequencing

Context.— Next-generation sequencing studies are increasingly used in the evaluation of suspected chronic myeloid neoplasms (CMNs), but there is wide variability among laboratories in the genes analyzed for this purpose. Recently, the Association for Molecular Pathology CMN working group recommended a core 34-gene set as a minimum target list for evaluation of CMNs. This list was recommended based on literature review, and its diagnostic yield in clinical practice is unknown. Objective.— To determine the diagnostic yield of the core 34 genes and assess the potential impact of including selected additional genes. Design.— We retrospectively reviewed 185 patients with known or suspected CMNs tested using a 62-gene next-generation sequencing panel that included all 34 core genes. Results.— The Association for Molecular Pathology's core 34 genes had a diagnostic yield of 158 of 185 (85.4%) to detect at least 1 variant with strong/potential clinical significance and 107 of 185 (57.8%) to detect at least 2 such variants. The 62-gene panel had a diagnostic yield of 160 of 185 (86.5%) and 112 of 185 (60.5%), respectively. Variants of unknown significance were identified in 49 of 185 (26.5%) using the core 34 genes versus 76 of 185 (41.1%) using the 62-gene panel. Conclusions.— This study demonstrates that the Association for Molecular Pathology–recommended core 34-gene set has a high diagnostic yield in CMNs. Inclusion of selected additional genes slightly increases the rate of abnormal results, while also increasing the detection of variants of unknown significance. We recommend inclusion of CUX1, DDX41, ETNK1, RIT1, and SUZ12 in addition to the Association for Molecular Pathology's 34-gene core set for routine evaluation of CMNs.

Download Full-text

Solving the molecular diagnostic testing conundrum for Mendelian disorders in the era of next-generation sequencing: single-gene, gene panel, or exome/genome sequencing

Genetics in Medicine ◽

10.1038/gim.2014.122 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 17 (6) ◽

pp. 444-451 ◽

Cited By ~ 175

Author(s):

Yuan Xue ◽

Arunkanth Ankala ◽

William R. Wilcox ◽

Madhuri R. Hegde

Keyword(s):

Next Generation Sequencing ◽

Genome Sequencing ◽

Single Gene ◽

Diagnostic Testing ◽

Gene Panel ◽

Molecular Diagnostic ◽

Next Generation ◽

Mendelian Disorders ◽

Molecular Diagnostic Testing ◽

Generation Sequencing

Download Full-text

Genetic Analysis Using a Next Generation Sequencing-Based Gene Panel in Patients With Skeletal Dysplasia: A Single-Center Experience

Frontiers in Genetics ◽

10.3389/fgene.2021.670608 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

Author(s):

Su Jin Kim ◽

Sae-Mi Lee ◽

Jong-Moon Choi ◽

Ja-Hyun Jang ◽

Hyun Gi Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Next Generation Sequencing ◽

Skeletal Dysplasia ◽

Diagnostic Yield ◽

Genetic Diagnosis ◽

Clinical Manifestations ◽

Gene Panel ◽

Next Generation ◽

Skeletal Involvement ◽

Diagnosis Rate ◽

Generation Sequencing

Skeletal dysplasia (SD), a heterogeneous disease group with rare incidence and various clinical manifestations, is associated with multiple causative genes. For clinicians, accurate diagnosis of SD is clinically and genetically difficult. The development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has substantially aided in the genetic diagnosis of SD. In this study, we conducted a targeted NGS of 437 genes – included in the nosology of SD published in 2019 – in 31 patients with a suspected SD. The clinical and genetic diagnoses were confirmed in 16 out of the 31 patients, and the diagnostic yield was 51.9%. In these patients, 18 pathogenic variants were found in 13 genes (COL2A1, MYH3, COMP, MATN3, CTSK, EBP, CLCN7, COL1A2, EXT1, TGFBR1, SMAD3, FIG4, and ARID1B), of which, four were novel variants. The diagnosis rate was very high in patients with a suspected familial SD and with radiological evidence indicating clinical SD (11 out of 15, 73.3%). In patients with skeletal involvement and other clinical manifestations including dysmorphism or multiple congenital anomalies, and various degrees of developmental delay/intellectual disability, the diagnosis rate was low (5 out of 16, 31.2%) but rare syndromic SD could be diagnosed. In conclusion, NGS-based gene panel sequencing can be helpful in diagnosing SD which has clinical and genetic heterogeneity. To increase the diagnostic yield of suspected SD patients, it is important to categorize patients based on the clinical features, family history, and radiographic evidence.

Download Full-text

Diagnostic Yield of a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Gene Panel for Pediatric-Onset Movement Disorders: A 3-Year Cohort Study

Frontiers in Genetics ◽

10.3389/fgene.2019.01026 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 10 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Federica Graziola ◽

Giacomo Garone ◽

Fabrizia Stregapede ◽

Luca Bosco ◽

Federico Vigevano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Next Generation Sequencing ◽

Movement Disorders ◽

Diagnostic Yield ◽

Gene Panel ◽

Next Generation ◽

Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽

Generation Sequencing ◽

Pediatric Onset

Download Full-text

Diagnostic yield of targeted next generation sequencing in 2002 Dutch cardiomyopathy patients

International Journal of Cardiology ◽

10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.02.069 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Mohamed Z. Alimohamed ◽

LennartF. Johansson ◽

Anna Posafalvi ◽

Ludolf G. Boven ◽

Krista K. van Dijk ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Next Generation Sequencing ◽

Diagnostic Yield ◽

Next Generation ◽

Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽

Generation Sequencing

Download Full-text

SAT0531 NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING AND AUTOINFLAMMATORY SYNDROMES: CLINICAL AND GENETICAL CORRELATION ON AN ADULT POPULATION FROM A REFERRAL THIRD-CARE CENTRE

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.5067 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1223-1223

Author(s):

J. R. Marques Soares ◽

M. Antolin Mate ◽

E. Garcia Arumi ◽

E. Tizzano Ferrari ◽

S. Bujan Rivas

Keyword(s):

Next Generation Sequencing ◽

Genetic Data ◽

Clinical Suspicion ◽

Gene Panel ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Next Generation ◽

Related Gene ◽

Unknown Significance ◽

Level Hospital ◽

Generation Sequencing

Background:Systemic autoinflammatory diseases (sAID) are a group of conditions with recurrent episodes of inflammation in absence of infection or autoimmune response. Its physiopathology mainly lies on mono/poligenic mutations involving genes related to the innate immune system response. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) platformss have been a big step forward on sAID diagnosis, although a clinical and genetic correlation is still needed.Objectives:To review the sAID related gene panel variants identified using NGS sAID gene panel on a cohort of adult patients screened for sAID from a referral third-level hospital.To correlate genetic and clinical findings for sAID related variants identified in order to the clinical suspicion diagnosis of sAID.Methods:A retrospective review of a cohort of adult (≥ 16 yo) patients with available NGS sAID related gene panel (MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform including intron and exon variants from up to 17 sAID genes, with coverage depth > x100) among 2014 and 2019 was performed.Demographic, clinical and genetic data were collected in a database.Genetic variants were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics/Association for Molecular Pathology classification as benign/likely benign/variable of unknown significance (VUS)/likely pathogenic/pathogenic. In case of polymorphisms or lack of genetic data, the variants were named as unclassified.A description of the cohort and an analysis of the correlation assessment between clinical data and genetic findings were performed.Results:246 out of 299 (82%) patients with NGS sAID gene panel had clinical data available. 170/246 (69%) were adult patients. The medium age was 48 yo, and the M/F ratio was 2.46. 87/170 (51%) adult patients presented 122 variants involving sAID genes (60/87 patients with a single variant). All the variants out of 7 seven were heterozygous variants.Variants were classified according to ACMG/AMP as follow: pathogenic/probably pathogenic: 22/122 (18%), unknown significance: 74/122 (60.6%), benign/probably benign: 6/122 (4.91%). 20/122 (16.4%) were unclassified variants or polymorphisms.The most frequent variants identified involved MEFV (54/122), NOD2/CARD15 (18/122) and TNFRSF1A (17/122 including 12 p.Arg121Gln variants) genes.37/122 (30%) variants correlated with the clinical picture in 33 patients, allowing to confirm the suspected diagnosis. Among the 122 variants, 7 not previously communicated variants were identified.No somatic variants were found.Conclusion:NGS sAID related gene panel is a useful tool for sAID diagnosis. In this cohort of 170 adult patients from a referral third-level hospital, genetic tests identified sAID related variants in almost half of them.20% of patients who underwent genetic NGS sAID related gene panel studies were finally diagnosed with sAID.The identification of a genetic variant (even pathogenic / likely pathogenic variant) is not diagnostic for sAID if there is not a suggestive clinical picture.Despite genetic findings, a careful evaluation of clinical – genetic correlation is needed to confirm the suspicion diagnosis, especially for low penetrance variants like TNFRSF1A p. Arg121Gln.References:Diagnostic utility of a targeted next-generation sequencing gene panel in the clinical suspicion of systemic autoinflammatory diseases: a multi-center study. Karacan I, Balamir A, Uğurlu S, et al. . Rheumatol Int. 2019 May;39(5):911-919. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04252-5. Epub 2019 Feb 19.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

Next generation sequencing-based gene panel tests for the management of solid tumors

Cancer Science ◽

10.1111/cas.13837 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 110 (1) ◽

pp. 6-15 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

Masayuki Nagahashi ◽

Yoshifumi Shimada ◽

Hiroshi Ichikawa ◽

Hitoshi Kameyama ◽

Kazuaki Takabe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Next Generation Sequencing ◽

Solid Tumors ◽

Gene Panel ◽

Next Generation ◽

Generation Sequencing

Download Full-text

Next-Generation Sequencing Approach to Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Yields More Actionable Alterations

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine ◽

10.5858/arpa.2017-0046-oa ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 142 (3) ◽

pp. 353-357 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Mitra Mehrad ◽

Somak Roy ◽

Humberto Trejo Bittar ◽

Sanja Dacic

Keyword(s):

Next Generation Sequencing ◽

Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽

Small Cell ◽

Gene Panel ◽

Next Generation ◽

Small Cell Lung ◽

Genomic Alterations ◽

Generation Sequencing ◽

Gene Alterations ◽

Cancer Panel

Context.— Different testing algorithms and platforms for EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements in advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma exist. The multistep approach with single-gene assays has been challenged by more efficient next-generation sequencing (NGS) of a large number of gene alterations. The main criticism of the NGS approach is the detection of genomic alterations of uncertain significance. Objective.— To determine the best testing algorithm for patients with lung cancer in our clinical practice. Design.— Two testing approaches for metastatic lung adenocarcinoma were offered between 2012–2015. One approach was reflex testing for an 8-gene panel composed of DNA Sanger sequencing for EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF and fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK, ROS1, MET, and RET. At the oncologist's request, a subset of tumors tested by the 8-gene panel was subjected to a 50-gene Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Panel. Results.— Of 1200 non–small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), 57 including 46 adenocarcinomas and NSCLCs, not otherwise specified; 7 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs); and 4 large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) were subjected to Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Panel. Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Panel detected 9 potentially actionable variants in 29 adenocarcinomas that were wild type by the 8-gene panel testing (9 of 29, 31.0%) in the following genes: ERBB2 (3 of 29, 10.3%), STK11 (2 of 29, 6.8%), PTEN (2 of 29, 6.8%), FBXW7 (1 of 29, 3.4%), and BRAF G469A (1 of 29, 3.4%). Four SCCs and 2 LCNECs showed investigational genomic alterations. Conclusions.— The NGS approach would result in the identification of a significant number of actionable gene alterations, increasing the therapeutic options for patients with advanced NSCLCs.

Download Full-text