Exploring territory quality in the North American red squirrel through removal experiments

If territory quality affects the fitness of its holder, then relatively unsuccessful individuals should relocate if given the opportunity to appropriate a higher quality territory. Relocation by these animals, however, may be prevented by habitat saturation, poor competitive ability, or the costs of relocating. We conducted two removal studies that created numerous territory vacancies in a population of the North American red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus), thus providing favourable conditions for relocation. In both experiments, we tested whether nonbreeding females were more likely to relocate than breeding females, presumably because they (the nonbreeders) occupied relatively poor-quality territories. In our first experiment we permanently removed most of the squirrels from a study site and monitored the relative proportions of the remaining nonbreeding and breeding females that relocated. In our second experiment we monitored the response of squirrels to vacant territories that had been previously held by nonbreeding and breeding females, as well as by males. We also monitored the behaviour of squirrels that did not hold territories (dispersing offspring), as these individuals would not experience the same costs of relocation as adults. Our experiments showed that neither category of female was likely to relocate, regardless of the type of territory available. Both residents and dispersing offspring displayed no biases towards vacant territories that previously belonged to nonbreeding or breeding females or to males. Relocation does not appear to be a strategy for a female in this system to increase her reproductive opportunities. This suggests that either territory quality is inconsequential or the costs of relocation are prohibitive. Dispersing offspring also may be unable to select certain territories because of the premium placed on acquiring a territory, regardless of its quality.