Local quantum Fisher information and one-way quantum deficit in spin-1/2 XX Heisenberg chain with three-spin interaction

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (04) ◽  
pp. 2050016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biao-Liang Ye ◽  
Bo Li ◽  
Xiao-Bin Liang ◽  
Shao-Ming Fei

We explore quantum phase transitions in the spin-1/2 [Formula: see text] chain with three-spin interaction in terms of local quantum Fisher information and one-way quantum deficit, together with the demonstration of quantum fluctuations. Analytical results are derived and analyzed in detail.

2016 ◽  
Vol 380 (20) ◽  
pp. 1724-1728 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.B. Coulamy ◽  
J.H. Warnes ◽  
M.S. Sarandy ◽  
A. Saguia

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Long You ◽  
Gaoyong Sun ◽  
Jie Ren ◽  
Wing Chi Yu ◽  
Andrzej M. Oleś

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (03) ◽  
pp. 1850029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biao-Liang Ye ◽  
Bo Li ◽  
Xianqing Li-Jost ◽  
Shao-Ming Fei

We investigate the quantum phase transitions for the [Formula: see text] spin-1/2 chains via the quantum correlations between the nearest and next-to-nearest neighbor spins characterized by negativity, information deficit, trace distance discord and local quantum uncertainty. It is shown that all these correlations exhibit the quantum phase transitions at [Formula: see text]. However, only information deficit and local quantum uncertainty can demonstrate quantum phase transitions at [Formula: see text]. The analytical and numerical behaviors of the quantum correlations for the [Formula: see text] system are presented. We also consider quantum correlations in the Hartree–Fock ground state of the Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick (LMG) model.


2004 ◽  
Vol 174 (8) ◽  
pp. 853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergei M. Stishov

2005 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 241-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Fujisawa ◽  
Budhy Kurniawan ◽  
Toshio Ono ◽  
Hidekazu Tanaka

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-261
Author(s):  
Angel Ricardo Plastino ◽  
Gustavo Luis Ferri ◽  
Angelo Plastino

We employ two different Lipkin-like, exactly solvable models so as to display features of the competition between different fermion–fermion quantum interactions (at finite temperatures). One of our two interactions mimics the pairing interaction responsible for superconductivity. The other interaction is a monopole one that resembles the so-called quadrupole one, much used in nuclear physics as a residual interaction. The pairing versus monopole effects here observed afford for some interesting insights into the intricacies of the quantum many body problem, in particular with regards to so-called quantum phase transitions (strictly, level crossings).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document