Towards Understanding Perceptual Differences between Genuine and Face-Swapped Videos

Author(s):  
Leslie Wöhler ◽  
Martin Zembaty ◽  
Susana Castillo ◽  
Marcus Magnor
2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 457
Author(s):  
Fuxing WANG ◽  
Xiujuan HOU ◽  
Zhaohui DUAN ◽  
Huashan LIU ◽  
Hui LI

1989 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 1726-1740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Kewley‐Port ◽  
Bishnu S. Atal

Author(s):  
Eric A. Whitaker ◽  
John M. Fulwider

This chapter examines whether there are perceptual differences in how partisan identifiers think about the in-group and out-group, and whether these judgments relate reliably to other attitudes and political behaviors. It first selectively reviews the psychological literature on social identity theory and group-based perceptual differences, focusing primarily on the out-group homogeneity effect. The subsequent analyses then consider and examine: how perceptions of in-group and out-group similarity and agreement vary among Democrats and Republicans, whether these judgments are systematically related to affective judgments about political groups and political figures, and whether these judgments relate to conventional political behaviors, such as voter turnout and vote choice. Finally, the chapter concludes with a set of recommendations for future research.


Author(s):  
Greg Snyder ◽  
Ashlee Manahan ◽  
Peyton McKnight ◽  
Myriam Kornisch

Purpose This study measured between-groups differences in perceived speech skills and personality characteristics of a 12-year-old male child who stutters (CWS) as a function of a written factual stuttering disclosure statement, delivered by the CWS, his “mother,” or his “teacher.” Method Four hundred twenty-four college-age adults were assigned to one of four groups, including three experimental groups (i.e., written self-disclosure, mother-written disclosure, and teacher-written disclosure) and a control group (no written disclosure). Participants in the control conditions viewed a brief video of the CWS. In the experimental conditions, participants read a brief written disclosure statement for 30 s, followed by the same video used in the control condition. After viewing the video, all participants completed surveys relative to their perceptions of the CWS speech skills and personality characteristics. Results Results reveal that a written stuttering disclosure statement provided by the mother correlated with select significant desirable perceptual differences of the CWS, while a written disclosure statement provided by the CWS yielded insignificant or even undesirable perceptual differences of the CWS. Written stuttering disclosures provided by a “teacher” did not yield any significant between-groups differences in the perception of a CWS. Gender affiliation was found to be a source of covariance in a number of perceived speech skills and personality characteristics. Conclusions Written stuttering disclosure statements provided by the “mother” correlated with select favorable perceptual differences of speech skills and personal characteristics of a CWS. Clinically, the application of novel methods (written and oral disclosure statements) and sources (i.e., CWS advocates such as “mother” and “teacher”) of stuttering disclosure statement can be integrated into a systematic therapeutic program, creating an innovative approach of scaffolding self-advocacy via stuttering disclosure in CWS. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.15505857


Author(s):  
Jonathan Barnes ◽  
Alejna Brugos ◽  
Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel ◽  
Nanette Veilleux

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document