scholarly journals Who Gets What, According to Whom? An Analysis of Fairness Perceptions in Service Allocation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Hannan ◽  
Huei-Yen Winnie Chen ◽  
Kenneth Joseph
Keyword(s):  
Fairness Perceptions ◽  
Service Allocation

When Apologies for Injustice Matter

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
David De Cremer ◽  
Barbara C. Schouten
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Study ◽  
Interaction Effect ◽  
Interactive Effect ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Fairness Perceptions ◽  
Organizational Survey ◽  
Experimental Laboratory

The present research examined the idea that the effectiveness of apologies on promoting fairness perceptions depends on how meaningful and sincere the apology is experienced. More precisely, it was predicted that apologies are more effective when they are communicated by an authority being respectful to others. A study using a cross-sectional organizational survey showed that an apology (relative to giving no apology) revealed higher fairness perceptions, but only so when the authority was respectful rather than disrespectful. In a subsequent experimental laboratory study the same interaction effect (as in Study 1) on fairness perceptions was found. In addition, a similar interaction effect also emerged on participants’ self-evaluations in terms of relational appreciation (i.e., feeling valued and likeable). Finally, these self-evaluations accounted (at least partly) for the interactive effect on fairness perceptions.

Organizational change: Effects of fairness perceptions on cynicism.

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Thompson ◽  
Lawrence L. Bailey ◽  
Kurt M. Joseph ◽  
Jody A. Worley ◽  
Clara A. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Change ◽  
Fairness Perceptions

Fairness Perceptions of Video Resumes Among Culturally Diverse Applicants

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemarie Hiemstra ◽  
Eva Derous ◽  
Alec W. Serlie ◽  
Marise Ph. Born
Keyword(s):  
Culturally Diverse ◽  
Fairness Perceptions

Efficient Multi-Service Allocation for Digital Terrestrial Broadcasting Systems

2014 ◽  
Vol E97.B (9) ◽  
pp. 1977-1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo HAO ◽  
Jun WANG ◽  
Zhaocheng WANG
Keyword(s):  
Service Allocation

The Roles of Organizational Politics and Fairness in the Relationship between Performance Management Systems and Trust

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong M. Lau ◽  
Glennda Scully
Keyword(s):  
Performance Management ◽  
Performance Measures ◽  
Organizational Politics ◽  
Measurement Systems ◽  
Fairness Perceptions ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Perceptions Of Fairness ◽  
Performance Measurement Systems ◽  
Financial Performance Measures ◽  
The Relationship

ABSTRACT Organizational politics is ubiquitous in organizations. Yet to date, no prior research has investigated, in a systematic empirical manner, the mediating role of organizational politics in performance measurement systems. The primary purpose of this research is to investigate if perceptions of organizational politics mediate the relationships between performance measures and employees' trust in their superiors. As organizational politics may also affect employees' perceptions of fairness, a model is used to investigate (1) if performance measures affect organizational politics; (2) if organizational politics, in turn, affects procedural and interpersonal fairness; and (3) if fairness perceptions subsequently affect trust in superiors. Based on a sample of 104 responses, the partial least squares results indicate that organizational politics and fairness perceptions significantly mediate the nonfinancial performance measures and trust relationship. In contrast, the results indicate that the mediating effects of organizational politics and fairness on the relationship between financial performance measures and trust are generally insignificant.

scholarly journals Aircraft Noise Distribution as a Fairness Dilemma—A Review of Aircraft Noise through the Lens of Social Justice Research

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (14) ◽  
pp. 7399
Author(s):  
Dominik Hauptvogel ◽  
Susanne Bartels ◽  
Dirk Schreckenberg ◽  
Tobias Rothmund
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Noise Exposure ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Aircraft Noise ◽  
Noise Distribution ◽  
Justice Research ◽  
Fairness Perceptions ◽  
Noise Annoyance ◽  
Social Justice Research ◽  
The Relationship

Aircraft noise exposure is a health risk and there is evidence that noise annoyance partly mediates the association between noise exposure and stress-related health risks. Thus, approaches to reduce annoyance may be beneficial for health. Annoyance is influenced by manifold non-acoustic factors and perceiving a fair and trustful relationship between the airport and its residents may be one of them. The distribution of aircraft noise exposure can be regarded as a fairness dilemma: while residents living near an airport may seem to have some advantages, the majority of residents living under certain flight routes or in their immediate proximity suffer from the disadvantages of the airport, especially the noise. Moreover, a dilemma exists between the airport’s beneficial economic impact for a region and the physical and psychological integrity of residents. Aircraft noise exposure through the lens of social justice research can help to improve our understanding of noise annoyance. Research indicates that the fairness perceptions of the parties involved can be enhanced by (a) improving individual cost–benefit ratios, (b) providing a fair procedure for deciding upon the noise distribution, and (c) implementing fair social interaction with residents. Based on the review of evidence from social justice research, we derive recommendations on how fairness aspects can be integrated into aircraft noise management with the purpose of improving the relationship between the airport and its residents, to reduce annoyance, and to enhance the acceptance of local aviation and the airport as a neighbor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document