scholarly journals High-intensity interval exercise attenuates but does not eliminate endothelial dysfunction after a fast food meal

2018 ◽  
Vol 314 (2) ◽  
pp. H188-H194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley J. Tucker ◽  
Brandon J. Sawyer ◽  
Catherine L. Jarrett ◽  
Dharini M. Bhammar ◽  
Justin R. Ryder ◽  
...  

We investigated whether two different bouts of high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) could attenuate postprandial endothelial dysfunction. Thirteen young (27 ± 1 yr), nonexercise-trained men underwent three randomized conditions: 1) four 4-min intervals at 85–95% of maximum heart rate separated by 3 min of active recovery (HIIE 4 × 4), 2) 16 1-min intervals at 85–95% of maximum heart rate separated by 1 min of active recovery (HIIE 16 × 1), and 3) sedentary control. HIIE was performed in the afternoon, ~18 h before the morning fast food meal (1,250 kcal, 63g of fat). Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was performed before HIIE ( baseline 1), during fasting before meal ingestion ( baseline 2), and 30 min, 2 h, and 4 h postprandial. Capillary glucose and triglycerides were assessed at fasting, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 4 h (triglycerides only). Both HIIE protocols increased fasting FMD compared with control (HIIE 4 × 4: 6.1 ± 0.4%, HIIE 16 × 1: 6.3 ± 0.5%, and control: 5.1 ± 0.4%, P < 0.001). For both HIIE protocols, FMD was reduced only at 30 min postprandial but never fell below baseline 1 or FMD during control at any time point. In contrast, control FMD decreased at 2 h (3.8 ± 0.4%, P < 0.001) and remained significantly lower than HIIE 4 × 4 and 16 × 1 at 2 and 4 h. Postprandial glucose and triglycerides were unaffected by HIIE. In conclusion, HIIE performed ~18 h before a high-energy fast food meal can attenuate but not entirely eliminate postprandial decreases in FMD. This effect is not dependent on reductions in postprandial lipemia or glycemia.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Two similar high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) protocols performed ∼18 h before ingestion of a high-energy fast food meal attenuated but did not entirely eliminate postprandial endothelial dysfunction in young men largely by improving fasting endothelial function. Both HIIE protocols produced essentially identical results, suggesting high reproducibility of HIIE effects.

Author(s):  
Laura Järvinen ◽  
Sofi Lundin Petersdotter ◽  
Thomas Chaillou

Abstract Purpose Traditional high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) highly stimulates the cardiorespiratory system and increases energy expenditure (EE) during exercise. High-intensity resistance exercise (HIRE) has become more popular in recreationally active subjects. The physiological responses to HIRE performed with light or moderate load is currently largely unknown. Here, we examined the effect of the type of interval exercise [HIRE at 40% (HIRE40) and 60% (HIRE60) 1-RM vs. traditional HIIE] on the cardiorespiratory response and EE during and after exercise. Methods Fifteen recreationally active adults randomly completed traditional HIIE on an ergocyle, HIRE40 and HIRE60. The sessions consisted of two sets of ten 30-s intervals (power at 100% VO2max during HIIE; maximal number of repetitions for 10 different free-weight exercises during HIRE40 and HIRE60) separated by 30-s active recovery periods. Gas exchange, heart rate (HR) and EE were assessed during and after exercise. Results VO2mean, VO2peak, HRmean, the time spent above 90% VO2max and HRmax, and aerobic EE were lower in both HIRE sessions compared with HIIE (P < 0.05). Anaerobic glycolytic contribution to total exercise EE was higher in HIRE40 and HIRE60 compared with HIIE (P < 0.001). EE from excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) was similar after the three sessions. Overall, similar cardiorespiratory responses and EE were found in HIRE40 and HIRE60. Conclusions HIRE is not as effective as HIIE for increasing the cardiorespiratory response and EE during exercise, while EPOC remains similar in HIRE and HIIE. These parameters are not substantially different between HIRE40 and HIRE60.


2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Arroyo-Morales ◽  
Lourdes Díaz Rodríguez ◽  
Belen Rubio-Ruiz ◽  
Nicolas Olea

Interval exercise has been used as an alternative modality to continuous exercise in patients with various conditions. Although interval exercise can improve health status, it may also exert deleterious effects. Few data are available on differences in psychoneuroimmunological response to high-intensity interval exercise, and it is not known whether males and females differ in their responses to a similar physical stress task. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences between the psychoneuroimmunological responses of healthy active males and females to a high-intensity interval exercise protocol. Fifty healthy active subjects (25 females) underwent 2 exercise protocol sessions at least 2 weeks apart and at the same time of the day. The first session familiarized participants with the protocol. In the second, after a baseline measurement, subjects performed an exercise protocol with a standardized warm-up followed by three 30-s Wingate tests and an active recovery period. Baseline and postintervention data were gathered on the following: Holter electrocardiogram recordings (standard deviation of normal-to-normal interval [SDNN], square root of mean squared differences of successive NN intervals [RMSSD]); heart rate variability (HRV) index; salivary total protein and immunoglobulin A levels; pressure pain thresholds in masseter and upper trapezius muscles; and profile of mood states. After the exercise protocol, mood disturbance was significantly greater in the males than in the females, while the salivary immunoglobulin A level relative to total proteins was significantly lower in the males. These results suggest that high-intensity interval exercise induces a worse psychoneuroimmunological state in males than in females.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jeanette M. Ricci ◽  
Todd A. Astorino ◽  
Katharine D. Currie ◽  
Karin A. Pfeiffer

The majority of studies examining children’s responses to high-intensity interval exercise primarily utilized running; however, this modality does not require/include other important aspects of physical activity including muscular fitness. Purpose: To compare acute responses between a body weight resistance exercise circuit (CIRC) and treadmill-based (TM) high-intensity interval exercise. Method: A total of 17 boys (age = 9.7 [1.3] y) completed a graded exercise test to determine peak heart rate, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), and maximal aerobic speed. Sessions were randomized and counterbalanced. CIRC required 2 sets of 30-second maximal repetitions of 4 exercises. TM included eight 30-second bouts of running at 100% maximal aerobic speed. Both included 30-second active recovery between bouts. Blood lactate concentration was measured preexercise and postexercise. Rating of perceived exertion, affective valence, and enjoyment were recorded preexercise, after intervals 3 and 6, and postexercise. Results: Participants attained 88% (5%) peak heart rate and 74% (9%) VO2peak for CIRC and 89% (4%) peak heart rate and 81% (6%) VO2peak for TM, with a significant difference in percentage of VO2peak (P = .003) between protocols. Postexercise blood lactate concentration was higher following CIRC (5.0 [0.7] mM) versus TM (2.0 [0.3] mM) (P < .001). Rating of perceived exertion, affective valence, and enjoyment responses did not differ between protocols (P > .05). Conclusion: HR responses were near maximal during CIRC, supporting that this body-weight circuit is representative of high-intensity interval exercise.


2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 908-909
Author(s):  
Luis Andrés Téllez-T ◽  
Diana Camelo-Prieto ◽  
Alejandra Tordecilla-Sanders ◽  
Jorge E. Correa-Bautista ◽  
Robinson Ramírez-Vélez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document