Fast Synaptic Connections From CBIs to Pattern-Generating Neurons in Aplysia: Initiation and Modification of Motor Programs

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 2120-2136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itay Hurwitz ◽  
Irving Kupfermann ◽  
Klaudiusz R. Weiss

Consummatory feeding movements in Aplysia californica are organized by a central pattern generator (CPG) in the buccal ganglia. Buccal motor programs similar to those organized by the CPG are also initiated and controlled by the cerebro-buccal interneurons (CBIs), interneurons projecting from the cerebral to the buccal ganglia. To examine the mechanisms by which CBIs affect buccal motor programs, we have explored systematically the synaptic connections from three of the CBIs (CBI-1, CBI-2, CBI-3) to key buccal ganglia CPG neurons (B31/B32, B34, and B63). The CBIs were found to produce monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) with both fast and slow components. In this report, we have characterized only the fast component. CBI-2 monosynaptically excites neurons B31/B32, B34, and B63, all of which can initiate motor programs when they are sufficiently stimulated. However, the ability of CBI-2 to initiate a program stems primarily from the excitation of B63. In B31/B32, the size of the EPSPs was relatively small and the threshold for excitation was very high. In addition, preventing firing in either B34 or B63 showed that only a block in B63 firing prevented CBI-2 from initiating programs in response to a brief stimulus. The connections from CBI-2 to the buccal ganglia neurons showed a prominent facilitation. The facilitation contributed to the ability of CBI-2 to initiate a BMP and also led to a change in the form of the BMP. The cholinergic blocker hexamethonium blocked the fast EPSPs induced by CBI-2 in buccal ganglia neurons and also blocked the EPSPs between a number of key CPG neurons within the buccal ganglia. CBI-2 and B63 were able to initiate motor patterns in hexamethonium, although the form of a motor pattern was changed, indicating that non-hexamethonium-sensitive receptors contribute to the ability of these cells to initiate bursts. By contrast to CBI-2, CBI-1 excited B63 but inhibited B34. CBI-3 excited B34 and not B63. The data indicate that CBI-1, -2, and -3 are components of a system that initiates and selects between buccal motor programs. Their behavioral function is likely to depend on which combination of CBIs and CPG elements are activated.

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 374-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evgeni A. Kabotyanski ◽  
Douglas A. Baxter ◽  
Susan J. Cushman ◽  
John H. Byrne

The buccal ganglia of Aplysia contain a central pattern generator (CPG) that mediates rhythmic movements of the buccal apparatus during feeding. Activity in this CPG is believed to be regulated, in part, by extrinsic serotonergic inputs and by an intrinsic and extrinsic system of putative dopaminergic cells. The present study investigated the roles of dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) in regulating feeding movements of the buccal apparatus and properties of the underlying neural circuitry. Perfusing a semi-intact head preparation with DA (50 μM) or the metabolic precursor of catecholamines (l-3–4-dihydroxyphenylalanine, DOPA, 250 μM) induced feeding-like movements of the jaws and radula/odontophore. These DA-induced movements were similar to bites in intact animals. Perfusing with 5-HT (5 μM) also induced feeding-like movements, but the 5-HT-induced movements were similar to swallows. In preparations of isolated buccal ganglia, buccal motor programs (BMPs) that represented at least two different aspects of fictive feeding (i.e., ingestion and rejection) could be recorded. Bath application of DA (50 μM) increased the frequency of BMPs, in part, by increasing the number of ingestion-like BMPs. Bath application of 5-HT (5 μM) did not significantly increase the frequency of BMPs nor did it significantly increase the proportion of ingestion-like BMPs being expressed. Many of the cells and synaptic connections within the CPG appeared to be modulated by DA or 5-HT. For example, bath application of DA decreased the excitability of cells B4/5 and B34, which in turn may have contributed to the DA-induced increase in ingestion-like BMPs. In summary, bite-like movements were induced by DA in the semi-intact preparation, and neural correlates of these DA-induced effects were manifest as an increase in ingestion-like BMPs in the isolated ganglia. Swallow-like movements were induced by 5-HT in the semi-intact preparation. Neural correlates of these 5-HT-induced effects were not evident in isolated buccal ganglia, however.


2000 ◽  
Vol 203 (22) ◽  
pp. 3505-3512 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Wilson ◽  
M.B. Harris ◽  
J.E. Remmers ◽  
S.F. Perry

While little is known of the origin of air-breathing in vertebrates, primitive air breathers can be found among extant lobe-finned (Sarcopterygii) and ray-finned (Actinopterygii) fish. The descendents of Sarcopterygii, the tetrapods, generate lung ventilation using a central pattern generator, the activity of which is modulated by central and peripheral CO(2)/H(+) chemoreception. Air-breathing in Actinopterygii, in contrast, has been considered a ‘reflexive’ behaviour with little evidence for central CO(2)/H(+) respiratory chemoreceptors. Here, we describe experiments using an in vitro brainstem preparation of a primitive air-breathing actinopterygian, the longnose gar Lepisosteus osseus. Our data suggest (i) that gill and air-breathing motor patterns can be produced autonomously by the isolated brainstem, and (ii) that the frequency of the air-breathing motor pattern is increased by hypercarbia. These results are the first evidence consistent with the presence of an air-breathing central pattern generator with central CO(2)/H(+) respiratory chemosensitivity in any primitive actinopterygian fish. We speculate that the origin of the central neuronal controller for air-breathing preceded the divergence of the sarcopterygian and actinopterygian lineages and dates back to a common air-breathing ancestor.


2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 1728-1742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Sakurai ◽  
Paul S. Katz

The nudibranch mollusc, Dendronotus iris, swims by rhythmically flexing its body from left to right. We identified a bilaterally represented interneuron, Si3, that provides strong excitatory drive to the previously identified Si2, forming a half-center oscillator, which functions as the central pattern generator (CPG) underlying swimming. As with Si2, Si3 inhibited its contralateral counterpart and exhibited rhythmic bursts in left-right alternation during the swim motor pattern. Si3 burst almost synchronously with the contralateral Si2 and was coactive with the efferent impulse activity in the contralateral body wall nerve. Perturbation of bursting in either Si3 or Si2 by current injection halted or phase-shifted the swim motor pattern, suggesting that they are both critical CPG members. Neither Si2 nor Si3 exhibited endogenous bursting properties when activated alone; activation of all four neurons was necessary to initiate and maintain the swim motor pattern. Si3 made a strong excitatory synapse onto the contralateral Si2 to which it is also electrically coupled. When Si3 was firing tonically but not exhibiting bursting, artificial enhancement of the Si3-to-Si2 synapse using dynamic clamp caused all four neurons to burst. In contrast, negation of the Si3-to-Si2 synapse by dynamic clamp blocked ongoing swim motor patterns. Together, these results suggest that the Dendronotus swim CPG is organized as a “twisted” half-center oscillator in which each “half” is composed of two excitatory-coupled neurons from both sides of the brain, each of which inhibits its contralateral counterpart. Consisting of only four neurons, this is perhaps the simplest known network oscillator for locomotion.


2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 2996-3005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksey Y. Malyshev ◽  
Tigran P. Norekian

Coordination between different motor centers is essential for the orderly production of all complex behaviors, in both vertebrates and invertebrates. The current study revealed that rhythmic activities of two feeding structures of the pteropod mollusk Clione limacina, radula and hooks, which are used to extract the prey from its shell, are highly coordinated in a phase-dependent manner. Hook protraction always coincided with radula retraction, while hook retraction coincided with radula protraction. Thus hooks and radula were always moving in the opposite phases, taking turns grabbing and pulling the prey tissue out of the shell. Identified buccal ganglia motor neurons controlling radula and hooks protraction and retraction were rhythmically active in the same phase-dependent manner. Hook protractor motor neurons were active in the same phase with radula retractor motor neurons, while hook retractor motor neurons burst in phase with radula protractor motor neurons. One of the main mechanisms underlying the phase-locked coordination was electrical coupling between hook protractor and radula retractor motor neurons. In addition, reciprocal inhibitory synaptic connections were found between hook protractor and radula protractor motor neurons. These electrical and inhibitory synaptic connections ensure that rhythmically active hooks and radula controlling motor neurons are coordinated in the specific phase-dependent manner described above. The possible existence of a single multifunctional central pattern generator for both radula and hook motor centers is discussed.


1989 ◽  
Vol 147 (1) ◽  
pp. 361-374
Author(s):  
CATHERINE R. McCROHAN ◽  
MICHAEL A. KYRIAKIDES

1. The cerebral ventral 1 (CV1) interneurones of Lymnaea occurred as a population of at least three in each ganglion, all with similar morphologies. Steady depolarization of a CV1 cell led to initiation and maintenance of rhythmic feeding motor output from the buccal ganglia. 2. CV1 interneurones produced facilitating excitatory postsynaptic potentials in Nl interneurones of the buccal central pattern generator for feeding. Connections with N2 interneurones were not found. 3. The CV1 population could be separated into two subgroups. CVla received strong synaptic feedback in phase with the buccal rhythm, leading to strong bursting during generation of feeding motor output. CVlb received only weak feedback, and often fired continuously when depolarized. 4. Unitary inhibitory postsynaptic potentials were characteristic of all CV1 neurones, but were only visible in CVlb when it was depolarized. These inputs are thought to arise indirectly from the buccal central pattern generator. 5. The CV1 population is probably homologous with similar neurones in other gastropod species.


2019 ◽  
Vol 205 (6) ◽  
pp. 881-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Schöneich ◽  
Berthold Hedwig

Abstract We investigated the central nervous coordination between singing motor activity and abdominal ventilatory pumping in crickets. Fictive singing, with sensory feedback removed, was elicited by eserine-microinjection into the brain, and the motor activity underlying singing and abdominal ventilation was recorded with extracellular electrodes. During singing, expiratory abdominal muscle activity is tightly phase coupled to the chirping pattern. Occasional temporary desynchronization of the two motor patterns indicate discrete central pattern generator (CPG) networks that can operate independently. Intracellular recordings revealed a sub-threshold depolarization in phase with the ventilatory cycle in a singing-CPG interneuron, and in a ventilation-CPG interneuron an excitatory input in phase with each syllable of the chirps. Inhibitory synaptic inputs coupled to the syllables of the singing motor pattern were present in another ventilatory interneuron, which is not part of the ventilation-CPG. Our recordings suggest that the two centrally generated motor patterns are coordinated by reciprocal feedforward discharges from the singing-CPG to the ventilation-CPG and vice versa. Consequently, expiratory contraction of the abdomen usually occurs in phase with the chirps and ventilation accelerates during singing due to entrainment by the faster chirp cycle.


1991 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 1264-1271 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Quinlan ◽  
A. D. Murphy

1. The effects of L-glutamate superfusion over identified neurons within the buccal ganglia of Helisoma trivolvis were examined. Glutamate mirrored the effect of activity of subunit 2 (S2) of the tripartite feeding central pattern generator (CPG) on S2 postsynaptic neurons. Neurons that are excited by S2 are depolarized by glutamate, whereas neurons that are inhibited by S2 are hyperpolarized by glutamate. Glutamate also stimulated rhythmic S2 activity. 2. Different glutamate agonists could mimic specific components of the effects of glutamate on buccal neurons. Kainate produced depolarizations in neurons that receive S2 excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and activated rhythmic S2 activity. Quisqualate produced hyperpolarizations in neurons that receive S2 inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs). 3. The non-N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor antagonist cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) blocked the effects of S2 EPSPs and depolarizations produced by application of glutamate and kainate, but was ineffective in blocking S2 IPSPs or hyperpolarizations produced by application of glutamate and quisqualate. 4. These data support the hypothesis that glutamate is the transmitter of S2 of the feeding CPG in Helisoma, acting at CNQX-sensitive kainate-like receptors at excitatory synapses and CNQX-insensitive quisqualate-like receptors at inhibitory synapses.


1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 294-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Ziv ◽  
D. A. Baxter ◽  
J. H. Byrne

1. We describe a simulator for neural networks and action potentials (SNNAP) that can simulate up to 30 neurons, each with up to 30 voltage-dependent conductances, 30 electrical synapses, and 30 multicomponent chemical synapses. Voltage-dependent conductances are described by Hodgkin-Huxley type equations, and the contributions of time-dependent synaptic conductances are described by second-order differential equations. The program also incorporates equations for simulating different types of neural modulation and synaptic plasticity. 2. Parameters, initial conditions, and output options for SNNAP are passed to the program through a number of modular ASCII files. These modules can be modified by commonly available text editors that use a conventional (i.e., character based) interface or by an editor incorporated into SNNAP that uses a graphical interface. The modular design facilitates the incorporation of existing modules into new simulations. Thus libraries can be developed of files describing distinctive cell types and files describing distinctive neural networks. 3. Several different types of neurons with distinct biophysical properties and firing properties were simulated by incorporating different combinations of voltage-dependent Na+, Ca2+, and K+ channels as well as Ca(2+)-activated and Ca(2+)-inactivated channels. Simulated cells included those that respond to depolarization with tonic firing, adaptive firing, or plateau potentials as well as endogenous pacemaker and bursting cells. 4. Several types of simple neural networks were simulated that included feed-forward excitatory and inhibitory chemical synaptic connections, a network of electrically coupled cells, and a network with feedback chemical synaptic connections that simulated rhythmic neural activity. In addition, with the use of the equations describing electrical coupling, current flow in a branched neuron with 18 compartments was simulated. 5. Enhancement of excitability and enhancement of transmitter release, produced by modulatory transmitters, were simulated by second-messenger-induced modulation of K+ currents. A depletion model for synaptic depression was also simulated. 6. We also attempted to simulate the features of a more complicated central pattern generator, inspired by the properties of neurons in the buccal ganglia of Aplysia. Dynamic changes in the activity of this central pattern generator were produced by a second-messenger-induced modulation of a slow inward current in one of the neurons.


1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 950-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph A. DiCaprio

Gating of afferent input by a central pattern generator. Intracellular recordings from the sole proprioceptor (the oval organ) in the crab ventilatory system show that the nonspiking afferent fibers from this organ receive a cyclic hyperpolarizing inhibition in phase with the ventilatory motor pattern. Although depolarizing and hyperpolarizing current pulses injected into a single afferent will reset the ventilatory motor pattern, the inhibitory input is of sufficient magnitude to block afferent input to the ventilatory central pattern generator (CPG) for ∼50% of the cycle period. It is proposed that this inhibitory input serves to gate sensory input to the ventilatory CPG to provide an unambiguous input to the ventilatory CPG.


1985 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. Paul ◽  
B. Mulloney

We describe a type of nonspiking premotor local interneuron (interneuron IA) in the abdominal nervous system of Pacifasticus leniusculus. All of its branches are restricted to one side of the midline. These interneurons are identifiable and occur as bilateral pairs, one neuron on each side of abdominal ganglia 3, 4, and 5. The membrane potential of interneuron IA oscillated in phase with the swimmeret rhythm, a motor pattern generated in each of these ganglia, because the neuron received postsynaptic potentials in phase with the rhythm. Sustained hyperpolarization of an individual interneuron IA initiated generation of the swimmeret rhythm in all the ganglia of a quiescent nervous system. Sustained depolarization stopped the swimmeret rhythm in all the active ganglia of a nervous system that was generating the rhythm. Currents injected into one interneuron reset the rhythm. Comparisons of the shapes of the IA interneurons in different ganglia showed that they are similar to each other and distinct from other local interneurons in these ganglia. Interneuron IA has a large integrative segment and relatively few branches that are largely restricted to the lateral neuropil, to which all other kinds of swimmeret neurons also project. We conclude that this interneuron occurs only once in each hemiganglion in abdominal segments 3, 4, and 5, and that it is identifiable. Furthermore, this interneuron is an essential component of the circuit in each hemiganglion that generates the swimmeret rhythm. The interneuron was dye coupled to a particular identifiable motor neuron and not to any other neurons. The motor neuron was not dye-coupled to any other local interneurons. The ability of this motor neuron to reset the rhythm is attributed to its being electrically coupled to interneuron IA in its ganglion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document