Subcortical contributions to head movements in macaques. I. Contrasting effects of electrical stimulation of a medial pontomedullary region and the superior colliculus

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 2648-2664 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Cowie ◽  
D. L. Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Reticular Nucleus ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gigantocellular Reticular Nucleus ◽  
External Events

1. These studies were initiated to understand the neural sites and mechanisms controlling head movements during gaze shifts. Gaze shifts are made by saccadic eye movements with and without head movements. Sites were stimulated electrically within the brain stem of awake, trained monkeys relatively free to make head movements to study the head-movement components of gaze shifts. 2. Electrical stimulation in and around the gigantocellular reticular nucleus evoked head movements in the ipsilateral direction. Gaze shifts were never evoked from these sites, presumably because the vestibulo-ocular reflex compensated. The rough topography of this region included large head movements laterally, small movements medially, downward movements from dorsal sites, and upward movements more ventrally. 3. The initial position of the head influenced the magnitude of the elicited movement with larger movements produced when the head was directed to the contralateral side. Attentive fixation was associated with larger and faster head movements when compared with those evoked during spontaneous behavior. 4. The superior colliculus makes a significant contribution to gaze shifts and has been shown to contribute to head movements. Because the colliculus is a major source of afferents to the gigantocellular reticular nucleus, comparable stimulation studies of the superior colliculus were conducted. When the colliculus was excited, shifts of gaze in the contralateral direction were predominant. These were most often accomplished by saccadic eye movements, however, we frequently elicited head movements that had an average latency 10 ms longer than those elicited from the reticular head movement region. Sites evoking head movements tended to be deeper and more caudal than loci eliciting eye movements. Neither the onset latencies, amplitudes, nor peak velocities of head movements and eye movements were correlated. Gaze shifts evoked from the caudal colliculus with the head free were larger than those elicited from the same site with the head fixed. 5. These studies demonstrate that both the superior colliculus and gigantocellular reticular nucleus mediate head movements. The colliculus plays a role in orienting to external events, and so collicular head movements predominantly were associated with gaze shifts, with the eye and head movements uncoupled. The medullary reticular system may play a role in the integration of a wider range of movements. Head movements from the medullary reticular sites probably participate in several forms of head movements, such as those that are related to postural reflexes, started volitionally, and/or oriented to external events.

scholarly journals Superior colliculus drives stimulus-evoked directionally biased saccades and attempted head movements in head-fixed mice

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian H Zahler ◽  
David E Taylor ◽  
Joey Y Wong ◽  
Julia M Adams ◽  
Evan H Feinberg
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Tactile Stimuli ◽  
Vestibular Cues ◽  
Saccade Direction ◽  
Head Rotations ◽  
Prevailing View

Animals investigate their environments by directing their gaze towards salient stimuli. In the prevailing view, mouse gaze shifts entail head rotations followed by brainstem-mediated eye movements, including saccades to reset the eyes. These 'recentering' saccades are attributed to head movement-related vestibular cues. However, microstimulating mouse superior colliculus (SC) elicits directed head and eye movements resembling SC-dependent sensory-guided gaze shifts in other species, suggesting that mouse gaze shifts may be more flexible than has been recognized. We investigated this possibility by tracking eye and attempted head movements in a head-fixed preparation that eliminates head movement-related sensory cues. We found tactile stimuli evoke directionally biased saccades coincident with attempted head rotations. Differences in saccade endpoints across stimuli are associated with distinct stimulus-dependent relationships between initial eye position and saccade direction and amplitude. Optogenetic perturbations revealed SC drives these gaze shifts. Thus, head-fixed mice make sensory-guided, SC-dependent gaze shifts involving coincident, directionally biased saccades and attempted head movements. Our findings uncover flexibility in mouse gaze shifts and provide a foundation for studying head-eye coupling.

Contribution of the Frontal Eye Field to Gaze Shifts in the Head-Unrestrained Monkey: Effects of Microstimulation

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 618-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Knight ◽  
Albert F. Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Stimulus Duration ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Threshold Region ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
Orbital Position

The role of the primate frontal eye field (FEF) has been inferred primarily from experiments investigating saccadic eye movements with the head restrained. Three recent reports investigating head-unrestrained gaze shifts disagree on whether head movements are evoked with FEF stimulation and thus whether the FEF participates in gaze movement commands. We therefore examined the eye, head, and overall gaze movement evoked by low-intensity microstimulation of the low-threshold region of the FEF in two head-unrestrained monkeys. Microstimulation applied at 200 or 350 Hz for 200 ms evoked large gaze shifts with substantial head movement components from most sites in the dorsomedial FEF, but evoked small, predominantly eye-only gaze shifts from ventrolateral sites. The size and direction of gaze and eye movements were strongly affected by the eye position before stimulation. Head movements exhibited little position dependency, but at some sites and initial eye positions, head-only movements were evoked. Stimulus-evoked gaze shifts and their eye and head components resembled those elicited naturally by visual targets. With stimulus train durations >200 ms, the evoked gaze shifts were more likely to be accomplished with a substantial head movement, which often continued for the entire stimulus duration. The amplitude, duration and peak velocity of the evoked head movement were more strongly correlated with stimulus duration than were those of the gaze or eye movements. We conclude that the dorsomedial FEF generates a gaze command signal that can produce eye, head, or combined eye–head movement depending on the initial orbital position of the eye.

scholarly journals Normal correspondence of tectal maps for saccadic eye movements in strabismus

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (6) ◽  
pp. 2541-2549 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Economides ◽  
Daniel L. Adams ◽  
Jonathan C. Horton
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Systematic Change ◽  
Free Viewing ◽  
Pattern Deviation ◽  
Ocular Deviation ◽  
The Right ◽  
Stem Structure

The superior colliculus is a major brain stem structure for the production of saccadic eye movements. Electrical stimulation at any given point in the motor map generates saccades of defined amplitude and direction. It is unknown how this saccade map is affected by strabismus. Three macaques were raised with exotropia, an outwards ocular deviation, by detaching the medial rectus tendon in each eye at age 1 mo. The animals were able to make saccades to targets with either eye and appeared to alternate fixation freely. To probe the organization of the superior colliculus, microstimulation was applied at multiple sites, with the animals either free-viewing or fixating a target. On average, microstimulation drove nearly conjugate saccades, similar in both amplitude and direction but separated by the ocular deviation. Two monkeys showed a pattern deviation, characterized by a systematic change in the relative position of the two eyes with certain changes in gaze angle. These animals' saccades were slightly different for the right eye and left eye in their amplitude or direction. The differences were consistent with the animals' underlying pattern deviation, measured during static fixation and smooth pursuit. The tectal map for saccade generation appears to be normal in strabismus, but saccades may be affected by changes in the strabismic deviation that occur with different gaze angles.

scholarly journals Electrical Stimulation of the Frontal Eye Field in a Monkey Produces Combined Eye and Head Movements

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 1103-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyson A. Tu ◽  
E. Gregory Keating
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Eye Movements ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
A Site ◽  
Head Rotations ◽  
Stimulation Of

The frontal eye field (FEF), an area in the primate frontal lobe, has long been considered important for the production of eye movements. Past studies have evoked saccade-like movements from the FEF using electrical stimulation in animals that were not allowed to move their heads. Using electrical stimulation in two monkeys that were free to move their heads, we have found that the FEF produces gaze shifts that are composed of both eye and head movements. Repeated stimulation at a site evoked gaze shifts of roughly constant amplitude. However, that gaze shift could be accomplished with varied amounts of head and eye movements, depending on their (head and eye) respective starting positions. This evidence suggests that the FEF controls visually orienting movements using both eye and head rotations rather than just shifting the eyes as previously thought.

Eye-head coordination in cats

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 1030-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Guitton ◽  
R. M. Douglas ◽  
M. Volle
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Maximum Velocity ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Visual Axis ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Rapid Eye Movements ◽  
Motor Strategy

Gaze is the position of the visual axis in space and is the sum of the eye movement relative to the head plus head movement relative to space. In monkeys, a gaze shift is programmed with a single saccade that will, by itself, take the eye to a target, irrespective of whether the head moves. If the head turns simultaneously, the saccade is correctly reduced in size (to prevent gaze overshoot) by the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR). Cats have an oculomotor range (OMR) of only about +/- 25 degrees, but their field of view extends to about +/- 70 degrees. The use of the monkey's motor strategy to acquire targets lying beyond +/- 25 degrees requires the programming of saccades that cannot be physically made. We have studied, in cats, rapid horizontal gaze shifts to visual targets within and beyond the OMR. Heads were either totally unrestrained or attached to an apparatus that permitted short unexpected perturbations of the head trajectory. Qualitatively, similar rapid gaze shifts of all sizes up to at least 70 degrees could be accomplished with the classic single-eye saccade and a saccade-like head movement. For gaze shifts greater than 30 degrees, this classic pattern frequently was not observed, and gaze shifts were accomplished with a series of rapid eye movements whose time separation decreased, frequently until they blended into each other, as head velocity increased. Between discrete rapid eye movements, gaze continued in constant velocity ramps, controlled by signals added to the VOR-induced compensatory phase that followed a saccade. When the head was braked just prior to its onset in a 10 degrees gaze shift, the eye attained the target. This motor strategy is the same as that reported for monkeys. However, for larger target eccentricities (e.g., 50 degrees), the gaze shift was interrupted by the brake and the average saccade amplitude was 12-15 degrees, well short of the target and the OMR. Gaze shifts were completed by vestibularly driven eye movements when the head was released. Braking the head during either quick phases driven by passive head displacements or visually triggered saccades resulted in an acceleration of the eye, thereby implying interaction between the VOR and these rapid-eye-movement signals. Head movements possessed a characteristic but task-dependent relationship between maximum velocity and amplitude. Head movements terminated with the head on target. The eye saccade usually lagged the head displacement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Activity of Cells in the Deeper Layers of the Superior Colliculus of the Rhesus Monkey: Evidence for a Gaze Displacement Command

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 1669-1690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward G. Freedman ◽  
David L. Sparks
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Rhesus Monkey ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Unit Recording ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Head Displacement ◽  
Separate Channel

Freedman, Edward G. and David L. Sparks. Activity of cells in the deeper layers of the superior colliculus of the rhesus monkey: evidence for a gaze displacement command. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 1669–1690, 1997. When the head is free to move, microstimulation of the primate superior colliculus (SC) evokes coordinated movements of the eyes and head. The similarity between these stimulation-induced movements and visually guided movements indicates that the SC of the primate is involved in redirecting the line of sight (gaze). To determine how movement commands are represented by individual collicular neurons, we recorded the activity of single cells in the deeper layers of the superior colliculus of the rhesus monkey during coordinated eye-head gaze shifts. Two alternative hypotheses were tested. The “separate channel” hypothesis states that two displacement commands are generated by the SC: one signal specifying the amplitude and direction of eye movements and a second signal specifying the amplitude and direction of head movements. Alternatively, a single gaze displacement command could be generated by the SC (“gaze displacement” hypothesis). The activity of collicular neurons was examined during three behavioral dissociations of gaze, eye, and head movement amplitude and direction (metrics). Subsets of trials were selected in which the amplitude and direction of either gaze shifts or eye movements or head movements were relatively constant but the metrics of the other two varied over wide ranges. Under these conditions, the separate channel and gaze displacement hypotheses make differential predictions about the patterns of SC activity. We tested these differential predictions by comparing observed patterns with predicted patterns of neuronal activity. We obtained data consistent with the predictions of the gaze displacement hypothesis. The predictions of the separate channel hypothesis were not confirmed. Thus microstimulation data, single-unit recording data, and behavioral data are all consistent with the gaze displacement hypothesis of collicular function—the hypothesis that a gaze displacement signal is derived from the locus of activity within the motor map of the SC and subsequently is decomposed into separate eye and head displacement signals downstream from the colliculus.

scholarly journals Coupling Between Horizontal and Vertical Components of Saccadic Eye Movements During Constant Amplitude and Direction Gaze Shifts in the Rhesus Monkey

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 3375-3393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward G. Freedman
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Horizontal Meridian ◽  
Constant Amplitude ◽  
Saccade Amplitude ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Horizontal Saccade ◽  
Vertical Saccade ◽  
Saccade Duration

When the head is free to move, changes in the direction of the line of sight (gaze shifts) can be accomplished using coordinated movements of the eyes and head. During repeated gaze shifts between the same two targets, the amplitudes of the saccadic eye movements and movements of the head vary inversely as a function of the starting positions of the eyes in the orbits. In addition, as head-movement amplitudes and velocities increase, saccade velocities decline. Taken together these observations lead to a reversal in the expected correlation between saccade duration and amplitude: small-amplitude saccades associated with large head movements can have longer durations than larger-amplitude saccades associated with small head movements. The data in this report indicate that this reversal occurs during gaze shifts along the horizontal meridian and also when considering the horizontal component of oblique saccades made when the eyes begin deviated only along the horizontal meridian. Under these conditions, it is possible to determine whether the variability in the duration of the constant amplitude vertical component of oblique saccades is accounted for better by increases in horizontal saccade amplitude or increases in horizontal saccade duration. Results show that vertical saccade duration can be inversely related to horizontal saccade amplitude (or unrelated to it) but that horizontal saccade duration is an excellent predictor of vertical saccade duration. Modifications to existing hypotheses of gaze control are assessed based on these new observations and a mechanism is proposed that can account for these data.

Sensorimotor serial dependencies in head movements

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eckart Zimmermann
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Target Location ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Visual Localization ◽  
Target Displacement ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Movement Accuracy ◽  
Head Mounted Display

On average, we redirect our gaze with a frequency at about 3 Hz. In real life, gaze shifts consist of eye and head movements. Much research has focused on how the accuracy of eye movements is monitored and calibrated. By contrast, little is known about how head movements remain accurate. I wondered whether serial dependencies between artificially induced errors in head movement targeting and the immediately following head movement might recalibrate movement accuracy. I also asked whether head movement targeting errors would influence visual localization. To this end, participants wore a head mounted display and performed head movements to targets, which were displaced as soon as the start of the head movement was detected. I found that target displacements influenced head movement amplitudes in the same trial, indicating that participants could adjust their movement online to reach the new target location. However, I also found serial dependencies between the target displacement in trial n-1 and head movements amplitudes in the following trial n. I did not find serial dependencies between target displacements and visuomotor localization. The results reveal that serial dependencies recalibrate head movement accuracy.

Lateral Inhibitory Interactions in the Intermediate Layers of the Monkey Superior Colliculus

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 1193-1209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas P. Munoz ◽  
Peter J. Istvan
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Action Potentials ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Fixation ◽  
Inhibitory Interneurons ◽  
Intermediate Layers ◽  
Inhibitory Interactions ◽  
Stimulation Of

Munoz, Douglas P. and Peter J. Istvan. Lateral inhibitory interactions in the intermediate layers of the monkey superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 1193–1209, 1998. The intermediate layers of the monkey superior colliculus (SC) contain neurons the discharges of which are modulated by visual fixation and saccadic eye movements. Fixation neurons, located in the rostral pole of the SC, discharge action potentials tonically during visual fixation and pause for most saccades. Saccade neurons, located throughout the remainder of the intermediate layers of the SC, discharge action potentials for saccades to a restricted region of the visual field. We defined the fixation zone as that region of the rostral SC containing fixation neurons and the saccade zone as the remainder of the SC. It recently has been hypothesized that a network of local inhibitory interneurons may help shape the reciprocal discharge pattern of fixation and saccade neurons. To test this hypothesis, we combined extracellular recording and microstimulation techniques in awake monkeys trained to perform oculomotor paradigms that enabled us to classify collicular fixation and saccade neurons. Microstimulation was used to electrically activate the fixation and saccade zones of the ipsilateral and contralateral SC to test for inhibitory and excitatory inputs onto fixation and saccade neurons. Saccade neurons were inhibited at short latencies following electrical stimulation of either the ipsilateral (1–5 ms) or contralateral (2–7 ms) fixation or saccade zones. Fixation neurons were inhibited 1–4 ms after electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral saccade zone. Stimulation of the contralateral saccade zone led to much weaker inhibition of fixation neurons. Stimulation of the contralateral fixation zone led to short-latency (1–2 ms) excitation of fixation neurons. Only a small percentage of saccade and fixation neurons were activated by the electrical stimulation (latency: 0.5–2.0 ms). These responses were confirmed as either orthodromic or antidromic responses using collision testing. The results suggest that a local network of inhibitory interneurons may help shape not only the reciprocal discharge pattern of fixation and saccade neurons but also permit lateral interactions between all regions of the ipsilateral and contralateral SC. These interactions therefore may be critical for maintaining stable visual fixation, suppressing unwanted saccades, and initiating saccadic eye movements to targets of interest.

scholarly journals Countermanding Eye-Head Gaze Shifts in Humans: Marching Orders Are Delivered to the Head First

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 883-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian D. Corneil ◽  
James K. Elsley
Keyword(s):  
Head Movement ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Race Model ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Oculomotor System ◽  
Stop Signal ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Countermanding Task

The countermanding task requires subjects to cancel a planned movement on appearance of a stop signal, providing insights into response generation and suppression. Here, we studied human eye-head gaze shifts in a countermanding task with targets located beyond the horizontal oculomotor range. Consistent with head-restrained saccadic countermanding studies, the proportion of gaze shifts on stop trials increased the longer the stop signal was delayed after target presentation, and gaze shift stop-signal reaction times (SSRTs: a derived statistic measuring how long it takes to cancel a movement) averaged ∼120 ms across seven subjects. We also observed a marked proportion of trials (13% of all stop trials) during which gaze remained stable but the head moved toward the target. Such head movements were more common at intermediate stop signal delays. We never observed the converse sequence wherein gaze moved while the head remained stable. SSRTs for head movements averaged ∼190 ms or ∼70–75 ms longer than gaze SSRTs. Although our findings are inconsistent with a single race to threshold as proposed for controlling saccadic eye movements, movement parameters on stop trials attested to interactions consistent with a race model architecture. To explain our data, we tested two extensions to the saccadic race model. The first assumed that gaze shifts and head movements are controlled by parallel but independent races. The second model assumed that gaze shifts and head movements are controlled by a single race, preceded by terminal ballistic intervals not under inhibitory control, and that the head-movement branch is activated at a lower threshold. Although simulations of both models produced acceptable fits to the empirical data, we favor the second alternative as it is more parsimonious with recent findings in the oculomotor system. Using the second model, estimates for gaze and head ballistic intervals were ∼25 and 90 ms, respectively, consistent with the known physiology of the final motor paths. Further, the threshold of the head movement branch was estimated to be 85% of that required to activate gaze shifts. From these results, we conclude that a commitment to a head movement is made in advance of gaze shifts and that the comparative SSRT differences result primarily from biomechanical differences inherent to eye and head motion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document