scholarly journals Help Seeking and Access to Primary Care for People from “Hard-to-Reach” Groups with Common Mental Health Problems

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Bristow ◽  
S. Edwards ◽  
E. Funnel ◽  
L. Fisher ◽  
L. Gask ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Help Seeking ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Care Givers ◽  
Common Mental Health Problems ◽  
Access To Primary Care ◽  
The Uk

Background. In the UK, most people with mental health problems are managed in primary care. However, many individuals in need of help are not able to access care, either because it is not available, or because the individual's interaction with care-givers deters or diverts help-seeking. Aims. To understand the experience of seeking care for distress from the perspective of potential patients from “hard-to-reach” groups. Methods. A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews, analysed using a thematic framework. Results. Access to primary care is problematic in four main areas: how distress is conceptualised by individuals, the decision to seek help, barriers to help-seeking, and navigating and negotiating services. Conclusion. There are complex reasons why people from “hard-to-reach” groups may not conceptualise their distress as a biomedical problem. In addition, there are particular barriers to accessing primary care when distress is recognised by the person and help-seeking is attempted. We suggest how primary care could be more accessible to people from “hard-to-reach” groups including the need to offer a flexible, non-biomedical response to distress.

scholarly journals Common mental health problems in immigrants and refugees: general approach in primary care

2010 ◽  
Vol 183 (12) ◽  
pp. E959-E967 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Kirmayer ◽  
L. Narasiah ◽  
M. Munoz ◽  
M. Rashid ◽  
A. G. Ryder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Immigrants And Refugees ◽  
Common Mental Health Problems

scholarly journals Vocational rehabilitation via social firms: a qualitative investigation of the views and experiences of employees with mental health problems, social firm managers and clinicians

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Morant ◽  
Alyssa Milton ◽  
Eleanor Gilbert ◽  
Sonia Johnson ◽  
Nicholas Parsons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Vocational Rehabilitation ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Mental Health Clinicians ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Background Employment within social firms in the UK is under-developed and under-researched, but a potentially beneficial route to vocational rehabilitation for people with mental health problems. This study explores the views and experiences of employees with mental ill-health, managers of social firms and mental health clinicians, in order to understand the potential value of social firms for the vocational rehabilitation, employment and well-being of people with mental health problems. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 employees with mental health problems in 11 social firms in England. A focus group and individual interviews were conducted with 12 managers of social firms. Two focus groups were held with 16 mental health clinicians. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Most employees expressed very positive views about working in a social firm. In responses from both employees and social firm managers, an overarching theme regarding the supportive ethos of social firms encompassed several related features: openness about mental health issues; peer, team and management support; flexibility; and support to progress and develop skills over time. Managers identified benefits of employing people with mental health problems who were sufficiently recovered. Knowledge of social firms within clinician focus groups was very limited, although clinicians thought they could be a welcome additional vocational resource. Conclusions High levels of job satisfaction among social firm employees may be explained by the supportive ethos of these working environments. Social firms have potential to be a helpful addition to the range of vocational pathways available for people with mental ill-health. Further mixed methods investigations of experiences and outcomes in order to understand who engages with and benefits from this form of vocational rehabilitation would be valuable in informing decisions about scaling up the model.

scholarly journals Genetic influences on treatment-seeking for common mental health problems in the UK biobank

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 103413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Rayner ◽  
Jonathan R.I. Coleman ◽  
Kirstin L. Purves ◽  
Rosa Cheesman ◽  
Christopher Hübel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Genetic Influences ◽  
Treatment Seeking ◽  
Uk Biobank ◽  
Common Mental Health Problems ◽  
The Uk

Emotional Freedom Techniques—How to Make It Mainstream; a Thematic Analysis of Practitioners’ Views

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-43
Author(s):  
Janine Mitchell ◽  
Gerasimos Chatzidamianos ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Therapeutic Modality ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Alternative Treatment Option ◽  
Common Mental Health Problems ◽  
Emotional Freedom Techniques

Background Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) is proposed as an effective therapy for the treatment of common mental health problems. It has, however, been met with criticism and is not presently considered a mainstream treatment option for conditions such as anxiety or trauma. Conversely, both cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) have achieved recognition in advancing into mainstream status, yet EFT is still perceived as an alternative treatment option despite evidence of effectiveness, in more than 100 clinical trials and 40 research reviews and meta-analyses. Aims: By examining the views of trained practitioners, this project aimed to explore the barriers and the facilitators to EFT becoming a mainstream treatment option in the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) for common mental health problems. Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted (N=12) exploring views of EFT practitioners. Transcripts were then subjected to thematic analysis. Results: Analysis of participants’ views resulted in three themes: (1) research as an asset and a challenge, (2) public perceptions of EFT as a therapeutic modality, and (3) EFT training standards. These themes are perceived as interlinked in the process of EFT becoming mainstream. Findings from this study indicate the requirement of further research evidence that is more widely disseminated to enable increased awareness to the public and those within the medical profession of EFT as a potentially beneficial adjunct intervention. Importantly, training for EFT therapists needs to be improved and standardized. Implications: Based on the results, a series of recommendations are discussed that aim to address the barriers identified.

Psychopharmacology and refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants

2021 ◽  
pp. 483-492
Author(s):  
David C. Henderson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Help Seeking ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Explanatory Models ◽  
Post Traumatic Stress ◽  
Therapeutic Alliances ◽  
Migrant Populations ◽  
Common Mental Health Problems ◽  
Genetic And Environmental Factors

Refugee, asylum seeker, and migrant populations may have experienced many adverse life events during time in their country and during the time of migration. As a result, many will experience common mental health problems, including anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, and depression. This chapter reviews the genetic and environmental factors that impact pharmacological interventions for the common mental health problems of these groups. Cultural and explanatory models may play a role in help-seeking, as well as therapeutic alliances and adherence. Cultures may carry different explanations for the use of medication. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic properties will vary across cultures. These will be affected by dietary factors, as well as genetic and biological factors. Recommendations are also included regarding the safe and effective approaches for treating these groups of patients with psychotropic medications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document