scholarly journals Synchronous Penile Metastasis from a High-Grade Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Dijkstra ◽  
A. G. van der Heijden ◽  
H. E. Schaafsma ◽  
P. F. A. Mulders
Keyword(s):  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Glans Penis ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Penile Metastasis ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded ◽  
Adenocarcinoma Of The Prostate

Metastasis to the glans penis is a rare phenomenon and usually occurs in a late stage of disease. A 68-year-old man was referred to our clinic because of two indurated lesions of the glans penis and minor lower urinary tract symptoms. Digital rectal examination revealed a hard nodular prostate, and serum prostate-specific antigen (sPSA) level was 13.3 ng/mL. Biopsies of the penile lesions and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies were taken. Immunohistochemical staining of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue exposed a synchronous penile metastasis from a high-grade adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Except a pathologically enlarged lymph node detected with MRI there was no suspicion on other metastases. Currently this patient is being treated with a Gonadoreline (GnRH) antagonist. Nevertheless, the prognosis will be poor.

scholarly journals Widespread high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on biopsy predicts the risk of prostate cancer: A 12 months analysis after three consecutive prostate biopsies

2013 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cosimo De Nunzio ◽  
Simone Albisinni ◽  
Antonio Cicione ◽  
Mauro Gacci ◽  
Costantino Leonardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Prostatic Biopsy ◽  
The Third ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Logistic Regressions

Purpose: To evaluate the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) on a third prostate biopsy in a group of patients with two consecutive diagnoses of high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). Materials and methods: From November 2004 to December 2007, patients referred to our clinic with a PSA ! 4 ng/ml or an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) were scheduled for trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided 12-core prostate biopsy. Patients with HGPIN underwent a second prostate biopsy, and if the results of such procedure yielded a second diagnosis of HGPIN, we proposed a third 12-core needle biopsy regardless of PSA value. Crude and adjusted logistic regressions were used to assess predictors of PCa on the third biopsy. Results: A total of 650 patients underwent 12 cores transrectal ultrasound prostatic biopsy in the study period. Of 147 (22%) men with a diagnosis of HGPIN, 117 underwent a second prostatic biopsy after six months and 43 a third biopsy after other six months. After the third biopsy, 19 patients (34%) still showed HGPIN, 15 (35%) were diagnosed with PCa and 9 (21%) presented with chronic prostatitis. Widespread HGPIN on a second biopsy was significantly associated with PCa on further biopsy (!2 = 4.04, p = 0.04). Moreover, the presence of widespread HGPIN significantly predicted the risk of PCa on crude and adjusted logistic regressions. Conclusions: Widespread HGPIN on second biopsy is associated with the presence of PCa on a third biopsy. Nonetheless, the relationship between HGPIN and PCa remains complex and further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Clinical Impact of New Prostate-Specific Antigen WHO Standardization on Biopsy Rates and Cancer Detection

2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1999-2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
F H Jansen ◽  
M Roobol ◽  
C H Bangma ◽  
R H N van Schaik
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Ultrasound Evaluation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract Background: Clinicians may be unaware that replacement of the historical total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) standard with the WHO 96/670 international standard leads to difficulties in interpreting tPSA results. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between the Hybritech and WHO calibrations of the Beckman Coulter tPSA assay, and to assess the impact on prostate cancer (PCa) detection. Methods: tPSA concentrations were measured in 106 serum samples with both Hybritech and WHO calibrations. The established relationships were used for an in silico experiment with a cohort of 5865 men. Differences in prostate biopsy rates, PCa detection, and characteristics of missed cancers were calculated at biopsy thresholds of 3.0 and 4.0 μg/L. Results: A linear relationship was observed between the 2 calibrations, with a 20.3% decrease in tPSA values with the WHO standard compared with the Hybritech calibration. Applying the WHO calibration to the cohort of 5865 men yielded a 20% or 19% decrease in prostate biopsies and a 19% or 20% decrease in detected cancers compared with the Hybritech calibration, at a cutoff for biopsy of 3.0 or 4.0 μg/L, respectively. The decrease in detected cancers declined to 9% or 11% if an abnormal result in a digital rectal examination or a transrectal ultrasound evaluation was used as trigger for prostate biopsy (cutoff of 3.0 or 4.0 μg/L, respectively). Conclusions: Application of the WHO standard for tPSA assays with commonly used tPSA thresholds leads to a significant decrease in PCa detection. Careful assessment of the relationship between the WHO standard and the thresholds used for prostate biopsy is hence necessary.

scholarly journals What is the risk of prostate cancer mortality following negative systematic TRUS-guided biopsies? A systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e040965
Author(s):  
Sandra Miriam Kawa ◽  
Signe Benzon Larsen ◽  
John Thomas Helgstrand ◽  
Peter Iversen ◽  
Klaus Brasso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Medical Subject Headings ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Prostate Biopsies

ObjectiveTo investigate the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) following initial negative systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsies.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesPubMed and Embase were searched using a string combination with keywords/Medical Subject Headings terms and free text in the search builder. Date of search was 13 April 2020.Study selectionStudies addressing PCSM following initial negative TRUS biopsies. Randomised controlled trials and population-based studies including men with initial negative TRUS biopsies reported in English from 1990 until present were included.Data extractionData extraction was done using a predefined form by two authors independently and compared with confirm data; risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for cohort studies when applicable.ResultsFour eligible studies were identified. Outcomes were reported differently in the studies as both cumulative incidence and Kaplan-Meier estimates have been used. Regardless of the study differences, all studies reported low estimated incidence of PCSM of 1.8%–5.2% in men with negative TRUS biopsies during the following 10–20 years. Main limitation in all studies was limited follow-up.ConclusionOnly a few studies have investigated the risk of PCSM following initial negative biopsies and all studies included patients before the era of MRI of the prostate. However, the studies point to the fact that the risk of PCSM is low following initial negative TRUS biopsies, and that the level of prostate-specific antigen before biopsies holds prognostic information. This may be considered when advising patients about the need for further diagnostic evaluation.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019134548.

scholarly journals Prostate Cancer Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers’ Clinical Utility in Diagnosis and Prognosis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3373
Author(s):  
Milena Matuszczak ◽  
Jack A. Schalken ◽  
Maciej Salagierski
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Liquid Biopsy ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Prostate Gland ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Diagnosis And Prognosis

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men worldwide. The current gold standard for diagnosing PCa relies on a transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic core needle biopsy indicated after detection changes in a digital rectal examination (DRE) and elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level in the blood serum. PSA is a marker produced by prostate cells, not just cancer cells. Therefore, an elevated PSA level may be associated with other symptoms such as benign prostatic hyperplasia or inflammation of the prostate gland. Due to this marker’s low specificity, a common problem is overdiagnosis, which leads to unnecessary biopsies and overtreatment. This is associated with various treatment complications (such as bleeding or infection) and generates unnecessary costs. Therefore, there is no doubt that the improvement of the current procedure by applying effective, sensitive and specific markers is an urgent need. Several non-invasive, cost-effective, high-accuracy liquid biopsy diagnostic biomarkers such as Progensa PCA3, MyProstateScore ExoDx, SelectMDx, PHI, 4K, Stockholm3 and ConfirmMDx have been developed in recent years. This article compares current knowledge about them and their potential application in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Analysis of risk factors for determining the need for prostate biopsy in patients with negative MRI

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linghui Liang ◽  
Feng Qi ◽  
Yifei Cheng ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Dongliang Cao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Detection Efficiency ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Medical University

AbstractTo analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with negative biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) who didn’t need prostate biopsies (PBs). A total of 1,012 male patients who underwent PBs in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from March 2018 to November 2019, of 225 had prebiopsy negative bpMRI (defined as Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS 2.1) score less than 3). The detection efficiency of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) was assessed according to age, digital rectal examination (DRE), prostate volume (PV) on bpMRI, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density (PSAD). The definition of CSPCa for Gleason score > 6. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to identify predictive factors of absent CSPCa on PBs. Moreover, absent CSPCa contained clinically insignificant prostate cancer (CIPCa) and benign result. The detection rates of present prostate cancer (PCa) and CSPCa were 27.11% and 16.44%, respectively. Patients who were diagnosed as CSPCa had an older age (P < 0.001), suspicious DRE (P < 0.001), a smaller PV (P < 0.001), higher PSA value (P = 0.008) and higher PSAD (P < 0.001) compared to the CIPCa group and benign result group. PSAD < 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 (P = 0.004) and suspicious DRE (P < 0.001) were independent predictors of absent CSPCa on BPs. The negative forecast value of bpMRI for BP detection of CSPCa increased with decreasing PSAD, mainly in patients with naive PB (P < 0.001) but not in prior negative PB patients. 25.33% of the men had the combination of negative bpMRI, PSAD < 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 and PB naive, and none had CSPCa on repeat PBs. The incidence of PB was determined, CSPCa was 1.59%, 0% and 16.67% in patients with negative bpMRI and PSAD < 0.15 ng/ml/cm3, patients with negative bpMRI, PSAD < 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 and biopsy naive and patients with negative bpMRI, PSAD < 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 and prior negative PB, separately. We found that a part of patients with negative bpMRI, a younger age, no suspicious DRE and PSAD < 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 may securely avoid PBs. Conversely PB should be considered in patients regardless of negative bpMRI, especially who with a greater age, obviously suspicious DRE, significantly increased PSA value, a significantly small PV on MRI and PSAD > 0.15 ng/ml/cm3.

scholarly journals Persistent Intraprostatic Androgen Concentrations after Medical Castration in Healthy Men

2006 ◽  
Vol 91 (10) ◽  
pp. 3850-3856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie T. Page ◽  
Daniel W. Lin ◽  
Elahe A. Mostaghel ◽  
David L. Hess ◽  
Lawrence D. True ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
Prostate Cell ◽  
Hormone Levels ◽  
Prostate Biopsies ◽  
Clinical Consequences ◽  
Normal Men ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Context: The impact of serum androgen manipulation on prostate tissue hormone levels in normal men is unknown. Studies of men with prostate cancer have suggested that prostatic androgens are preserved in the setting of castration. Tissue androgens might stimulate prostate growth, producing adverse clinical consequences. Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the effect of serum androgen manipulation on intraprostatic androgens in normal men. Design: Thirteen male volunteers ages 35–55 yr (prostate-specific antigen &lt; 2.0 ng/ml; normal transrectal ultrasound) were randomly assigned to: 1) a long-acting GnRH-antagonist, acyline, every 2 wk; 2) acyline plus testosterone (T) gel (10 mg/d); or 3) placebo for 28 d. Serum hormones were assessed weekly. Prostate biopsies were obtained on d 28. Extracted androgens were measured by RIA, and immunohistochemistry for androgen-regulated proteins was performed. Results: The mean decrease in serum T was 94%, whereas prostatic T and dihydrotestosterone levels were 70 and 80% lower, respectively, in subjects receiving acyline alone compared with controls (P &lt; 0.05). Despite this decrease in prostate androgens, there were no detectable differences in prostate epithelial proliferation, apoptosis, prostate-specific antigen, and androgen receptor expression. Conclusion: In this small study of healthy subjects, despite a 94% decrease in serum T with medical castration, intraprostatic T and dihydrotestosterone levels remained 20–30% of control values, and prostate cell proliferation, apoptosis, and androgen-regulated protein expression were unaffected. Our data highlight the importance of assessing tissue hormone levels. The source of persistent prostate androgens associated with medical castration and their potential role in supporting prostate metabolism deserves further study.

scholarly journals Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an unusual case of a rare prostate cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Rayan El Hassan ◽  
John Corr ◽  
Rajiv Pillai
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Flexible Cystoscopy ◽  
Open Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Adenocarcinoma Of The Prostate ◽  
Papillary Lesions ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
The Right

A 65 year old gentleman was referred with symptoms of haematuria and haematospermia in association with an elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA). He was investigated with a flexible cystoscopy, Ultrasound scan and a computed tomography (CT) of his abdomen and pelvis. These failed to reveal any abnormality. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System PIRADS 2 lesion in the left peripheral gland and PIRADS 3 lesion on the right side posterolaterally at the level of mid gland of the prostate. He went on to have Transrectal ultrasound biopsies of his prostate (TRUS Bx) that excluded any pathology. On follow up visits his PSA continued to rise and he underwent Template biopsies of the prostate. The histological features had no evidence of any Prostatic intraepithelial carcinoma (PIN) or other malignancies. Flexible cystoscopy was repeated due to his persistent haematospermia. This showed prominent papillary lesions over his verumontanum and prostatic urethra. Biopsies from these areas revealed Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate (DACP). A subsequent staging MRI revealed unchanged appearance of the PIRADS2 nodule. There was however some low signal extending into the right seminal vesicle which is more pronounced than on the previous scan reported as PIRADS3. Subsequent mapping Template biopsies and Transurethral biopsies revealed a Gleason 4+4 DCAP. A staging CT and bone scan excluded any metastasis. He went on to receive an open radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection as a curative treatment for his locally advanced disease.

Multiparametric ultrasound and micro-ultrasound in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriano Basso Dias ◽  
Ciara O’Brien ◽  
Jean-Michel Correas ◽  
Sangeet Ghai
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Cognitive Fusion ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Multiparametric Ultrasound ◽  
Targeted Biopsies

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-cutaneous cancer diagnosed in males. Traditional tools for screening and diagnosis, such as prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and conventional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), present low accuracy for PCa detection. Multiparametric MRI has become a game changer in the PCa diagnosis pathway and MRI-targeted biopsies are currently recommended for males at risk of clinically significant PCa, even in biopsy-naïve patients. Recent advances in ultrasound have also emerged with the goal to provide a readily accessible and cost-effective tool for detection of PCa. These newer techniques include elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, as well as improved B-mode and Doppler techniques. These modalities can be combined to define a novel ultrasound approach, multiparametric ultrasound. High frequency Micro-ultrasound has emerged as a promising imaging technology for PCa diagnosis. Initial results have shown high sensitivity of Micro-ultrasound in detecting PCa in addition to its potential in improving the accuracy of targeted biopsies, based on targeting under real-time visualization, rather than relying on cognitive/fusion software MRI-transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.

scholarly journals Histology results of systematic prostate biopsies by in-bore magnetic resonance imaging vs. transrectal ultrasound

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alon Lazarovich ◽  
Gil Raviv ◽  
Yael Laitman ◽  
Orith Portnoy ◽  
Orit Raz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Clinically Significant

Introduction: We aimed to compare systematic biopsies (SBs) of in-bore magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy (MRGpB) with those performed under transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance in the clinical setting. Methods: Data on all 161 consecutive patients undergoing prostate biopsy in our institution between November 2017 and July 2019 were retrospectively collected. The patients were referred to biopsy due to elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination and/or at least one Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) lesion score of ≥3 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). We included patients with PSA levels ≤20 ng/ml and those with 8–12 core biopsies. Histology results of SBs performed by in-bore MRGpB were compared to TRUS SBs. Chi-squared, Fischer’s exact, and multivariate Pearson regression tests were used for statistical analysis (SPSS, IBM Corporation). Results: In total, 128 patients were eligible for analysis. Their median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 61.5–72), mean prostate size 55±29 cc, and mean PSA and PSA density levels 7.6±3.5 ng/ml and 0.18±0.13 ng/ml/cc, respectively. Thirty-five patients (27.3%) had suspicious digital rectal examination findings. Both biopsy groups were similar for these parameters. Thirty-eight (62.3%) MRGpB patients had a previous biopsy vs. 5 (7.1%) TRUS-SB patients (p<0.0001). The number of patients diagnosed with clinically significant and non-significant disease was similar for both groups. High-risk disease was more prevalent in the TRUS-SB group (22.4% vs. 4.9%, p<0.01). Conclusions: Our data suggest that in-bore MRGpB is no better than TRUS for guiding SBs for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document