scholarly journals Adherence of Pain Assessment to the German National Standard for Pain Management in 12 Nursing Homes

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Osterbrink ◽  
Zsuzsa Bauer ◽  
Barbara Mitterlehner ◽  
Irmela Gnass ◽  
Patrick Kutschar

BACKGROUND: Pain is very common among nursing home residents. The assessment of pain is a prerequisite for effective multiprofessional pain management. Within the framework of the German health services research project, ‘Action Alliance Pain-Free City Muenster’, the authors investigated pain assessment adherence according to the German national Expert Standard for Pain Management in Nursing, which is a general standard applicable to all chronic/acute pain-affected persons and highly recommended for practice.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the state of pain assessment and to identify need for improvement in 12 nursing homes in a German city.METHODS: In the present study, the authors used an ex-post-facto design (survey methodology). Available written policies for routine pain assessment in residents ≥65 years of age were reviewed and a standardized online survey completed by 151 of 349 nurses in 12 nursing home facilities was conducted between September 2010 and April 2011.RESULTS: Most of the included nursing homes provided written policies for pain assessment, and the majority of nurses reported that they assess and regularly reassess pain. However, observational tools for residents with severe cognitive impairment and written reassessment schedules were lacking in many facilities or were inconsistent.CONCLUSIONS: Essentially, pain assessment appeared to be feasible in the majority of the German nursing homes studied. However, the absence or inconsistency of reassessment schedules indicate that pain management guidelines should include a detailed and explicit reassessment schedule for the heterogenic needs of nursing home residents. For residents with severe cognitive impairment, assessment tools are needed that are simple to use and clearly indicate the presence or absence of pain.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audai A. Hayajneh ◽  
Mohammad Rababa ◽  
Alia A. Alghwiri ◽  
Dina Masha'al

Abstract Background: A dearth of differential research exists regarding the determinants of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and moderate cognitive impairment or dementia among nursing home residents. This study aimed to identify and examine the association between medical factors (number of comorbidities, hospitalization, disability, depression, frailty and quality of life) and moderate cognitive impairment or dementia in nursing homes residents.Methods: A cross-sectional design was used in this study. Convenience sampling of 182 participants was conducted in nursing homes located in the central part of Jordan. Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) was used to screen both MCI and moderate cognitive impairment or dementia. Bivariate analysis, including t-test and ANOVA test, and logistic and linear regression models were used to examine and identify the medical factors associated with moderate cognitive impairment or dementia compared to mild cognitive impairment.Results: Most nursing home residents had MCI (87.4%) compared to a few with moderate cognitive impairment or dementia. Age (t = -2.773), number of comorbidities (t = -4.045), depression (t = -4.809), frailty (t = -4.038), and quality of life physical (t = 3.282) and mental component summaries (t = 2.469) were significantly different between the stages of cognitive impairment. Marital status (t = -4.050, p < 0.001), higher-income (t = 3.755, p < 0.001), recent hospitalization (t = 2.622,p = 0.01), depression (t = -2.737, p = 0.007), and frailty (t = 2.852, p = 0.005) were significantly associated with mental ability scores among nursing home residents.Conclusion: The coexistence of comorbidities and depression among nursing home residents with MCI necessitates prompt management by healthcare providers to combat depressive symptoms in order to delay the dementia trajectory among at-risk residents.Trail registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04589637


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Audai A. Hayajneh ◽  
Mohammad Rababa ◽  
Alia A. Alghwiri ◽  
Dina Masha’al

Abstract Background A dearth of differential research exists regarding the determinants of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and moderate cognitive impairment or dementia among nursing home residents. This study aimed to identify and examine the association between medical factors (number of comorbidities, hospitalization, disability, depression, frailty and quality of life) and moderate cognitive impairment or dementia in nursing homes residents. Methods A cross-sectional design was used in this study. Convenience sampling of 182 participants was conducted in nursing homes located in the central part of Jordan. Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) was used to screen both MCI and moderate cognitive impairment or dementia. Bivariate analysis, including t-test and ANOVA test, and logistic and linear regression models were used to examine and identify the medical factors associated with moderate cognitive impairment or dementia compared to mild cognitive impairment. Results Most nursing home residents had MCI (87.4%) compared to a few with moderate cognitive impairment or dementia. Age (t = − 2.773), number of comorbidities (t = − 4.045), depression (t = − 4.809), frailty (t = − 4.038), and quality of life physical (t = 3.282) and mental component summaries (t = 2.469) were significantly different between the stages of cognitive impairment. Marital status (t = − 4.050, p <  0.001), higher-income (t = 3.755, p <  0.001), recent hospitalization (t = 2.622,p = 0.01), depression (t = − 2.737, p = 0.007), and frailty (t = 2.852, p = 0.005) were significantly associated with mental ability scores among nursing home residents. Conclusion The coexistence of comorbidities and depression among nursing home residents with MCI necessitates prompt management by healthcare providers to combat depressive symptoms in order to delay the dementia trajectory among at-risk residents. Trail registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04589637, October 15,2020, Retrospectively registered.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Centmayer ◽  
Manfred Leiske ◽  
Nils Axel Lahmann

Abstract Background: There is evidence that knowledge about the prevalence of pain and quality of pain management particularly in nursing home residents (NHR) with severe cognitive impairment (CI) is poor.Methods: The multicenter cross-sectional surveys explored the prevalence of pain of NHR with or without CI from nursing homes in Germany. Actual pain intensity in rest and stress were documented. NHR were asked about their daily restrictions due to pain. Data about the pain management were collected and analyzed.Results: A total of 3437 residents were interviewed with respect to feeling pain, including one third each with mild and severe CI. The prevalence of actual pain was 31,8%. Women reported pain more often. Prevalence of NHR without CI or with self-report on pain was significantly higher than NHR with severe CI or with external report on pain. About 20% of all NHR were dependent on external pain-recording. Nearly 10% of all NHR with pain confirmed pain in stress above 5 on a scale of 0 - 10. 85% of all NHR with pain reported that they had pain for longer than 3 months. Residents with severe CI are 0.55 times less likely to take painkillers than NHR without CI.Conclusion: The study points out a significant deficit in pain management in German NHR with severe CI. Intensive training in pain management for employees in nursing homes is recommended.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 885-885
Author(s):  
Cassandra Dictus ◽  
Youngmin Cho ◽  
Tamara Baker ◽  
Anna Beeber

Abstract Within nursing homes, residents commonly experience pain that unfortunately goes underrecognized and undertreated, having a dramatic negative impact on residents' quality of life. Nursing homes are becoming more racially and ethnically diverse, and there is concerning evidence documenting disparities in the quality of nursing home care. In other healthcare settings, people of diverse race groups often receive less optimal pain management, but the evidence regarding racial disparities has not been synthesized for nursing homes. Thus, the purpose of this review was to investigate what is known about racial disparities related to pain management (e.g. assessment, treatment, preferences) in US nursing homes. We completed a scoping literature review using PRISMA-ScR guidelines and searching PubMed, CINHAL, and Scopus for peer-reviewed, empirical studies. Most studies were older large retrospective cohort studies of administrative data documenting that White residents were more likely than residents of diverse race groups to have pain documented and treated. Only a few studies looked at possible reasons to explain the disparities; differences were not found to be related to nursing staff racial bias nor differences in pain-related diagnoses. However, there was evidence of racial differences in resident behavior and attitudes related to pain management. None of the studies examined systemic factors related to differences among nursing homes, which has been implicated in studies looking at other outcomes including COVID-19. More research is needed which examines the causal mechanisms behind the documented racial disparities in pain management so that gaps in care can be reduced.


2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela Tabali ◽  
Elke Jeschke ◽  
Theo Dassen ◽  
Thomas Ostermann ◽  
Cornelia Heinze

AbstractBackground:The Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) assesses perceived emotional, social, and physical health problems and the extent to which such problems affect daily activities. The objective of our study was to determine the feasibility of the NHP for nursing home residents.Methods:A prospective multicenter observational study was conducted in 11 nursing homes from April 2008 to December 2009 in which 286 newly admitted residents were included. Cognitive status was evaluated using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The feasibility of the NHP was determined by administration rate, time and type of administration, and missing items. A cut-off point stating the MMSE score up to which the NHP can be applied was determined with receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC). Internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation; ICC) were evaluated.Results:Administration rate was 44.4% (n = 127) ranging from 76.1% for normal residents to 5.9% for residents with a severe cognitive impairment. An average of 12.6 (SD + 6.0) minutes was required for data collection and 92.1% (n = 117) of the questionnaires were completed during an interview. Frequently missing items were in the domain “Pain” (47.2). MMSE scores were significantly higher in the group with a completed NHP (P < 0.001) and analyses of ROC curves indicated a cut-off point of >16 on the MMSE score. Cronbach's α was >0.7 in four domains and >0.6 in two domains, while the ICC in all domains was >0.7.Conclusion:The NHP is a feasible questionnaire for residents with normal cognitive function and moderate cognitive impairment, and can be administered in nursing homes.


1989 ◽  
Vol 64 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1019-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia S. Marx ◽  
Perla Werner ◽  
Jiska Cohen-Mansfield

The relationship between manifestations of agitated behaviors and interpersonal distance was examined in 24 nursing home residents with high agitation and severe cognitive impairment. Analysis indicated that agitated residents displayed divergent responses to touch: touch was related to an increase in aggressive behaviors and to a decrease in physically nonaggressive behaviors (e.g., strange movements). The positive relationship between aggressiveness and touching suggests that residents may interpret touching as a violation of their personal space. The finding that residents exhibited fewer strange movements when touched suggests that touching can act as a quieting and comforting form of communication. The implications of these findings for caregivers are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document