scholarly journals Mode of Vaginal Delivery: A Modifiable Intrapartum Risk Factor for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Simó González ◽  
Oriol Porta Roda ◽  
Josep Perelló Capó ◽  
Ignasi Gich Saladich ◽  
Joaquim Calaf Alsina
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Anal Sphincter ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury ◽  
Vacuum Extraction ◽  
Sphincter Injury ◽  
Anal Sphincter Injury ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Spontaneous Delivery

The aim of this study was to analyze the comparative risks of this anal sphincter injury in relation to the type of intervention in vaginal delivery. We performed an observational, retrospective study of all vaginal deliveries attended at a tertiary university hospital between January 2006 and December 2009. We analyzed the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury for each mode of vaginal delivery: spontaneous delivery, vacuum, Thierry spatulas, and forceps. We determined the proportional incidence between methods taking spontaneous delivery as the reference. Ninety-seven of 4526 (2.14%) women included in the study presented obstetric anal sphincter injury. Instrumental deliveries showed a significantly higher risk of anal sphincter injury (2.7 to 4.9%) than spontaneous deliveries (1.1%). The highest incidence was for Thierry spatulas (OR 4.804), followed by forceps (OR 4.089) and vacuum extraction (OR 2.509). The type of intervention in a vaginal delivery is a modifiable intrapartum risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury. Tearing can occur in any type of delivery but proportions vary significantly. All healthcare professionals attending childbirth should be aware of the risk for each type of intervention and consider these together with the obstetric factors in each case.

scholarly journals Third and Fourth Degree Perineal Tear in Four-Year Period at Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1067-1071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivka Djaković ◽  
Emina Ejubović ◽  
Ivan Bolanča ◽  
Marina Markuš Sandrić ◽  
Dino Bečić ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anal Sphincter ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury ◽  
Large For Gestational Age ◽  
Vacuum Extraction ◽  
Sphincter Injury ◽  
Fourth Degree ◽  
Anal Sphincter Injury ◽  
Perineal Injury ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries

OBJECTIVES: Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) includes the third and fourth degree of perineal injury. The risk for OASIS is about 1% of all vaginal deliveries. If not recognised and treated properly, obstetric anal sphincter injury can have serious consequences for reproductive age woman.MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have retrospectively gathered and analysed data on obstetric anal sphincter injury in a four-year period at our department. The control group in this study included vaginal deliveries in 2012.RESULTS: We recorded 0.34% third and fourth degree of perineal injury in all vaginal deliveries, and 87.9% of those patients were primiparae. Episiotomy was performed in 57.6% of all women with obstetric anal sphincter injury. In 30.3% of cases, newborns were large for gestational age. Gestational diabetes was found in 9.1% of OASIS cases, occipitoposterior position was found in 9.1% of cases. Induced labour took place in 39.4%, and oxytocin infusion was applied in 60.6% of OASIS cases. Vacuum extraction was performed in 12.1% of deliveries with OASIS. The average BMI in 3a and 3b injuries was 29.9. In 3c degree it was 28.0, and in the fourth degree, it was 32.1. In 27.0% of OASIS cases due to the extent of the injury surgeon engagement was necessary. When compared with vaginal deliveries in 2012 we found a significant increase in OASIS in primiparas, large for gestational age, occipitoposterior position, induced labour, vacuum extraction and hypertension (P < 0.01). There is also increased incidence of OASIS in episiotomy and oxytocin use group (P < 0.05).CONCLUSION: Low incidence of OASIS in our department is a result of active management of delivery, manual perineal protection and timely episiotomy.

scholarly journals Is obstetric anal sphincter injury a risk factor for levator ani muscle avulsion in vaginal delivery?

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Simó González ◽  
J. Cassadó Garriga ◽  
C. Dosouto Capel ◽  
O. Porta Roda ◽  
J. Perelló Capó ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Anal Sphincter ◽  
Levator Ani ◽  
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury ◽  
Levator Ani Muscle ◽  
Sphincter Injury ◽  
Anal Sphincter Injury ◽  
Levator Ani Muscle Avulsion

Anal Sphincter Injury Associated with Vaginal Twin Delivery

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1134-1139
Author(s):  
Bobby D. O'Leary ◽  
Tariq Bholah ◽  
Tamara Kalisse ◽  
Mark P. Hehir ◽  
Michael P. Geary
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Anal Sphincter ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Sphincter Injury ◽  
Anal Sphincter Injury ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Twin Pregnancies

Abstract Objective Obstetric anal sphincter injury remains the most common cause of fecal incontinence in women, and research in twin pregnancies is sparse. This study aimed to examine risk factors for sphincter injury in twin deliveries over a 10-year period. Study Design This was a retrospective study of twin vaginal deliveries in a tertiary-level hospital over 10 years. We examined the demographics of women who had a vaginal delivery of at least one twin. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine risk factors. Results There were 1,783 (2.1%) twin pregnancies, of which 556 (31%) had a vaginal delivery of at least one twin. Sphincter injury occurred in 1.1% (6/556) women with twins compared with 2.9% (1720/59,944) singleton vaginal deliveries. Women with sphincter injury had more instrumental deliveries (83.3 vs. 27.6%; p = 0.008). On univariate analysis, only instrumental delivery was a significant risk factor (odds ratio: 2.93; p = 0.019). Conclusion Sphincter injury occurs at a lower rate in vaginal twin pregnancies than in singletons. No twin-specific risk factors were identified. Discussion of the risk of sphincter injury should form part of patient counseling with regard to the mode of delivery.

Obstetric anal sphincter injury and anal incontinence

2021 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-122
Author(s):  
Jan Dvořák ◽  
◽  
Jaromír Mašata ◽  
Kamil Švabík ◽  
Alois Martan
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Anal Sphincter ◽  
Anal Incontinence ◽  
Vacuum Extraction ◽  
Sphincter Injury ◽  
Assisted Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Anal Sphincter Injury ◽  
Current State ◽  
Complex Approach ◽  
Risk Patients

Overview Objective: The aim of our study is to clarify the problems of OASI (obstetric anal sphincter injuries) and anal incontinence and prevention of this injury. Methods: Review of articles in peer reviewed journals with the usage of Google Scholar function and PubMed. Conclusion: OASI is a severe injury which is more commonly associated with assisted vaginal delivery. This injury cannot be fully prevented, but its incidence can be averted by the usage of selective mediolateral episiotomy, or by other precautionary moves in high risk patients. The treatment of anal incontinence after OASI requires a complex approach and thorough examination. At first delivery, OASI is not a stern indication for caesarean section in accordance with current state of knowledge. Keywords: OASI – sphincter injury – anal incontinence – assisted vaginal delivery – vacuum-extraction – forceps

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document