scholarly journals Assessment of Biochemical and Densitometric Markers of Calcium-Phosphate Metabolism in the Groups of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Selected due to the Serum Level of Vitamin D3

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Niedziela ◽  
Krystyna Pierzchała ◽  
Jolanta Zalejska-Fiolka ◽  
Jacek T. Niedziela ◽  
Ewa Romuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Serum Level ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Phosphate Metabolism ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Calcium Phosphate Metabolism

Background. In addition to the widely known effect of vitamin D3 (vitD3) on the skeleton, its role in the regulation of the immune response was also confirmed. Aim. The assessment of biochemical and densitometric markers of calcium-phosphate metabolism in the groups of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) selected due to the serum level of vitamin D3. Methods. The concentrations of biochemical markers and indices of lumbar spine bone densitometry (DXA) were determined in 82 patients divided into vitamin D3 deficiency (VitDd), insufficiency (VitDi), and normal vitamin D3 level (VitDn) subgroups. Results. The highest level of the parathyroid hormone (PTH) and the highest prevalence of hypophosphatemia and osteopenia were demonstrated in VitDd group compared to VitDi and VitDn. However, in VitDd, VitDi, and VitDn subgroups no significant differences were observed in the levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and ionized calcium (Ca2+) and in DXA indices. A negative correlation was observed between the level of vitamin D3 and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in the whole MS group. The subgroups were significantly different with respect to the EDSS scores and the frequency of complaints related to walking according to the EQ-5D. Conclusions. It is necessary to assess calcium-phosphate metabolism and supplementation of vitamin D3 in RRMS patients. The higher the clinical stage of the disease assessed with the EDSS, the lower the level of vitamin D3 in blood serum. Subjectively reported complaints related to difficulties with walking were reflected in the EDSS in VitDd patients.

scholarly journals Relationship between Expanded Disability Status Scale scores and the presence of temporomandibular disorders in patients with multiple sclerosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 144-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Senra Correa Carvalho ◽  
Osvaldo José Moreira Nascimento ◽  
Luciane Lacerda Franco Rocha Rodrigues ◽  
Andre Palma Da Cunha Matta
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Expanded Disability Status Scale ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Axis I ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

ABSTRACTObjectives: The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) and to investigate whether an association exists between the presence of TMD symptoms and the degree of MS-related disability. Materials and Methods: In all, 120 individuals were evaluated: 60 patients with a diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS and 60 age- and sex-matched controls without neurological impairments. A questionnaire recommended by the European Academy of Craniomandibular Disorders for the assessment of TMD symptoms was administered. For those who answered affirmatively to at least one of the questions, the RDC/TMD Axis I instrument was used for a possible classification of TMD subtypes. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was the measure of the degree of MS-related disability. Statistical Analysis Used: Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the data. ANOVA was used to detect significant differences between means and to assess whether the factors influenced any of the dependent variables by comparing means from the different groups. Results: The prevalence of TMD symptoms in patients with MS was 61.7% versus 18.3% in the control group (CG). A diagnosis of TMD was established for 36.7% in the MS group and 3.3% in the CG (P = 0.0001). There were statistically significant differences between degrees of MS-related disability and the prevalence of TMD (P = 0.0288). Conclusions: The prevalence of both TMD and TMD symptoms was significantly greater in the MS group. EDSS scores and TMD prevalence rates were inversely related.

scholarly journals Pleiotrophin serum level is increased in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis and correlates with sex, BMI and treatment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Paulina Reyes-Mata ◽  
Argelia Esperanza Rojas-Mayorquín ◽  
Lucrecia Carrera-Quintanar ◽  
Celia González-Castillo ◽  
Mario Alberto Mireles-Ramírez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Serum Level ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

scholarly journals Patients with neuromyelitis optica have a more severe disease than patients with relapsingremitting multiple sclerosis, including higher risk of dying of a demyelinating disease

2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 275-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Bernardi Bichuetti ◽  
Enedina Maria Lobato de Oliveira ◽  
Nilton Amorin de Souza ◽  
Mar Tintoré ◽  
Alberto Alain Gabbai
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Neuromyelitis Optica ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Demyelinating Disease ◽  
Age Of Onset ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Expanded Disability Status Scale ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Although neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is known to be a more severe disease than relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), few studies comparing both conditions in a single center have been done.Methods:Comparison of our previously published cohort of 41 NMO patients with 177 RRMS patients followed in the same center, from 1994 to 2007.Results:Mean age of onset was 32.6 for NMO and 30.2 for RRMS (p=0.2062) with mean disease duration of 7.4 years for NMO and 10.3 years for RRMS. Patients with NMO had a higher annualized relapse rate (1.0 versus 0.8, p=0.0013) and progression index (0.9 versus 0.6, p≪0.0001), with more patients reaching expanded disability status scale (EDSS) 6.0 (39 versus 17%, p=0.0036). The odds ratio for reaching EDSS 6.0 and being deceased due to NMO in comparison to RRMS were, respectively, 3.14 and 12.15.Conclusion:Patients with NMO have a more severe disease than patients with RRMS, including higher risk of dying of a demyelinating disease.

Effect of lateral therapy switches to oral moderate-efficacy drugs in multiple sclerosis: a nationwide cohort study

2021 ◽  
pp. jnnp-2020-324869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Due Buron ◽  
Tomas Kalincik ◽  
Finn Sellebjerg ◽  
Per Soelberg Sørensen ◽  
Melinda Magyari
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Dimethyl Fumarate ◽  
Interferon Β ◽  
First Line ◽  
Disease Modifying Therapies ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

BackgroundSwitching between first-line disease-modifying therapies in patients with clinically stable relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) due to reasons other than disease activity is frequent, but evidence on the effect of this practice is limited. We investigated the effect of switching patients with stable RRMS on occurrences of disability accumulation, relapses and future treatment discontinuation.MethodsUsing the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, we identified patients with RRMS without disease activity who either (1) stayed on injectable platform therapy (interferon-β or glatiramer acetate) or (2) switched to dimethyl fumarate (DMF) or teriflunomide (TFL) and compared treatment outcomes using propensity-score-based methods and marginal structural models (MSM).ResultsWe included 3206 patients in the study. We found no change in risk of 6-month confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale score worsening in patients switching to DMF (HR: 1.15, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.50) or TFL (HR: 1.16, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.46). The risk of suffering any relapse tended to decrease when switching to DMF (HR: 0.73, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.04) and tended to increase when switching to TFL (HR: 1.25, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.63). Absolute risk differences were small. MSM analyses showed similar results but did not find an increased relapse risk in TFL switchers.ConclusionSwitching from injectable platform therapies to oral first-line therapies in patients with clinically stable RRMS does not increase the risk of disability accumulation. While the postswitch risk of relapses trended towards marginally higher on TFL, this trend was eliminated by adjustment for time-variant confounders.

Response to interferon-beta therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a comparison of different clinical criteria

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Portaccio ◽  
V Zipoli ◽  
G Siracusa ◽  
S Sorbi ◽  
M P Amato
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapse Rate ◽  
Interferon Beta ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Predictors Of Response ◽  
Lower Baseline ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
One Year ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

We assessed the proportion and potential predictors of response to interferon-beta (IFNβ) therapy in relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, comparing different definitions of response: a) lower relapse rate during therapy compared to the year and the two years before therapy, b) reduction of relapse rate during therapy of at least 30% compared to the two years before therapy, c) no relapse during treatment, d) no progression on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Among 147 RR patients treated for at least one year, 33 received IFNβ-1b subcutaneously (SC) (Betaferon), 59 IFNβ-1a intramuscularly (Avonex) and 55 IFNβ-1a SC (Rebif). Using definitions a), b) and d), 72%, 73% and 73% patients, respectively, were considered responders. Forty-four per cent of our patients were completely relapse free. In the logistic regression model, using definitions a) and b), a higher relapse rate in the two years preceding the therapy turned out to be a significant predictor of response. Considering definition c), lower baseline relapse rate was associated with a more favourable response.

Interferon beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: an independent postmarketing study in southern Italy

2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Trojano ◽  
Maria Liguori ◽  
Damiano Paolicelli ◽  
Giovanni Bosco Zimatore ◽  
Francesca De Robertis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Interferon Beta ◽  
Population Based ◽  
First Year ◽  
Independent Population ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

This independent, population-based surveillance study monitored the efficacy and safety of interferon beta (IFNb) products in 1033 patients with relapsing -remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) from 15 centres in Italy. Relapses, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, and adverse events were evaluated for up to 24 months. Data of patients with a baseline EDSS score 5-3.5 are reported. The proportions of relapse-free patients were similar among the groups at 12 and 24 months (P =0.10). IFNb products produced significant reductio ns from baseline in relapse rates at 12 and 24 months (P B-0.001), with no differences among treatments (P =0.2). There were no significant differences in mean EDSS change among groups at 12 or 24 months. The IFNb-1b group showed a higher incidence of adverse events during the first year of treatment (P B-0.05) than IFNb-1a groups, and more withdrawals (10%) compared with Avonex (5%) at 24 months. IFNb products are equally effective in low disability RRMS, but IFNb-1a may have a more favorable efficacy/tolerability ratio.

Long-term (up to 22 years), open-label, compassionate-use study of glatiramer acetate in relapsing—remitting multiple sclerosis

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 494-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Miller ◽  
Vincent Spada ◽  
Dorothy Beerkircher ◽  
Rivka Riven Kreitman
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Glatiramer Acetate ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Pretreatment Score

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term glatiramer acetate (GA) therapy, 46 patients with relapsing—remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) were treated for up to 22 years in an ongoing, open-label study. Kurtzke expanded disability status scale (EDSS) was measured every six months, relapses were reported at occurrence and patients self-reported adverse events (AEs). At GA initiation, disease durations ranged from 0—20 years (median 6.0 years) and at data cut-off (October 2004), GA therapy duration ranged from 1—22 years (median 12.0 years). Mean EDSS score increased 0.9 ± 1.9 from the pretreatment score (3.0 ± 1.8; P = 0.076). Only 10/28 (36%) patients with baseline EDSS <4.0 had a last observed value ≥ 4.0 and 8/34 (24%) with entry EDSS < 6.0 reached EDSS ≥ 6.0. A majority (57%) maintained improved or unchanged EDSS scores. Annualized relapse rate decreased to 0.1 ± 0.2 from 2.9 ± 1.4 prestudy ( P < 0.0001). Of the 18 remaining patients in October 2004 (average disease duration 23 years), 17% with baseline EDSS scores < 4.0 reached EDSS ≥ 4.0 and 28% with baseline scores < 6.0 reached EDSS ≥ 6.0. Adverse events were similar to those reported in short-term clinical trials. This study shows a low rate of relapses and EDSS progression in RRMS patients on GA for up to 22 years. Multiple Sclerosis 2008; 14: 494—499. http://msj.sagepub.com

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document