scholarly journals A Synergy between Controlled Salinity Brine and Biosurfactant Flooding for Improved Oil Recovery: An Experimental Investigation Based on Zeta Potential and Interfacial Tension Measurements

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Tinuola Udoh ◽  
Jan Vinogradov
Keyword(s):  
Zeta Potential ◽  
Interfacial Tension ◽  
Crude Oil ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
High Salinity ◽  
Improved Oil Recovery ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
All Solutions ◽  
Rock Interface ◽  
Incremental Oil Recovery

In this study, we have investigated the effects of brine and biosurfactant compositions on crude-oil-rock-brine interactions, interfacial tension, zeta potential, and oil recovery. The results of this study show that reduced brine salinity does not cause significant change in IFT. However, addition of biosurfactants to both high and low salinity brines resulted in IFT reduction. Also, experimental results suggest that the zeta potential of high salinity formation brine-rock interface is positive, but oil-brine interface was found to be negatively charged for all solutions used in the study. When controlled salinity brine (CSB) with low salinity and CSB with biosurfactants were injected, both the oil-brine and rock-brine interfaces become negatively charged resulting in increased water-wetness and, hence, improved oil recovery. Addition of biosurfactants to CSB further increased electric double layer expansion which invariably resulted in increased electrostatic repulsion between rock-brine and oil-brine interfaces, but the corresponding incremental oil recovery was small compared with injection of low salinity brine alone. Moreover, we found that the effective zeta potential of crude oil-brine-rock systems is correlated with IFT. The results of this study are relevant to enhanced oil recovery in which controlled salinity waterflooding can be combined with injection of biosurfactants to improve oil recovery.

The Decisive Role of Microdispersion Formation in Improved Oil Recovery by Low-Salinity-Water Injection in Sandstone Formations

SPE Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (06) ◽  
pp. 2859-2873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedram Mahzari ◽  
Mehran Sohrabi ◽  
Juliana M. Façanha
Keyword(s):  
Crude Oil ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
High Salinity ◽  
Quartz Substrate ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Improved Oil Recovery ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Low Salinity Water ◽  
Salinity Water ◽  
Low Salinity Water Injection

Summary Efficiency of low–salinity–water injection primarily depends on oil/brine/rock interactions. Microdispersion formation (as the dominant interfacial interaction between oil and low–salinity water) is one of the mechanisms proposed for the reported additional oil recovery by low–salinity–water injection. Using similar rock and brines, here in this work, different crude–oil samples were selected to examine the relationship between crude–oil potency to form microdispersions and improved oil recovery (IOR) by low–salinity–water injection in sandstone cores. First, the potential of the crude–oil samples to form microdispersions was measured; next, coreflood tests were performed to evaluate the performance of low–salinity–water injection in tertiary mode. Sandstone core plugs taken from a whole reservoir core were used for the experiments. The tests started with spontaneous imbibition followed by forced imbibition of high–salinity brine. Low–salinity brine was then injected in tertiary mode. The oil–recovery profiles and compositions of the produced brine were measured to investigate the IOR benefits as well as the geochemical interactions. The results demonstrate that the ratio of the microdispersion quantity to bond water is the main factor controlling the effectiveness of low–salinity–water injection. In general, a monotonic trend was observed between incremental oil recovery and the microdispersion ratio of the different crude–oil samples. In addition, it can be inferred from the results that geochemical interactions (pH and ionic interactions) would be mainly controlled by the rock's initial wettability, and also that these processes could not affect the additional oil recovery by low-salinity-water injection. To further verify the observations of geochemical interactions, a novel experiment was designed and performed on a quartz substrate to investigate the ionic interactions on the film of water between an oil droplet and a flat quartz substrate, when the high–salinity brine was replaced with the low–salinity brine. The results of the flat–substrate test indicated that the water film beneath the oil could not interact with the surrounding brine, which is in line with the results of the core tests.

scholarly journals Experimental study of combined low salinity and surfactant flooding effect on oil recovery

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Abdulmecit Araz ◽  
Farad Kamyabi
Keyword(s):  
Interfacial Tension ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
High Salinity ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Moderate Increase ◽  
Surfactant Flooding ◽  
Improved Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Saturation ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Salinity Water

A new generation improved oil recovery methods comes from combining techniques to make the overall process of oil recovery more efficient. One of the most promising methods is combined Low Salinity Surfactant (LSS) flooding. Low salinity brine injection has proven by numerous laboratory core flood experiments to give a moderate increase in oil recovery. Current research shows that this method may be further enhanced by introduction of surfactants optimized for lowsal environment by reducing the interfacial tension. Researchers have suggested different mechanisms in the literature such as pH variation, fines migration, multi-component ionic exchange, interfacial tension reduction and wettability alteration for improved oil recovery during lowsal injection. In this study, surfactant solubility in lowsal brine was examined by bottle test experiments. A series of core displacement experiments was conducted on nine crude oil aged Berea core plugs that were designed to determine the impact of brine composition, wettability alteration, Low Salinity Water (LSW) and LSS flooding on Enhancing Oil Recovery (EOR). Laboratory core flooding experiments were conducted on the samples in a heating cabinet at 60 °C using five different brine compositions with different concentrations of NaCl, CaCl2 and MgCl2. The samples were first reached to initial water saturation, Swi, by injecting connate water (high salinity water). LSW injection followed by LSS flooding performed on the samples to obtain the irreducible oil saturation. The results showed a significant potential of oil recovery with maximum additional recovery of 7% Original Oil in Place (OOIP) by injection of LS water (10% LS brine and 90% distilled water) into water-wet cores compared to high salinity waterflooding. It is also concluded that oil recovery increases as wettability changes from water-wet to neutral-wet regardless of the salinity compositions. A reduction in residual oil saturation, Sor, by 1.1–4.8% occurred for various brine compositions after LSS flooding in tertiary recovery mode. The absence of clay swelling and fine migration has been confirmed by the stable differential pressure recorded for both LSW and LSS flooding. Aging the samples at high temperature prevented the problem of fines production. Combined LSS flooding resulted in an additional oil recovery of 9.2% OOIP when applied after LSW flooding. Surfactants improved the oil recovery by reducing the oil-water interfacial tension. In addition, lowsal environment decreased the surfactant retention, thus led to successful LSS flooding. The results showed that combined LSS flooding may be one of the most promising methods in EOR. This hybrid improved oil recovery method is economically more attractive and feasible compared to separate low salinity waterflooding or surfactant flooding.

scholarly journals Effect of ionic strength in low salinity water injection processes

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
Gustavo Maya Toro ◽  
Luisana Cardona Rojas ◽  
Mayra Fernanda Rueda Pelayo ◽  
Farid B. Cortes Correa
Keyword(s):  
Ionic Strength ◽  
Interfacial Tension ◽  
Crude Oil ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Spontaneous Imbibition ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Low Salinity Water ◽  
Salinity Water ◽  
Low Salinity Water Injection

Low salinity water injection has been frequently studied as an enhanced oil recovery process (EOR), mainly due to promising experimental results and because operational needs are not very different from those of the conventional water injection. However, there is no agreement on the mechanisms involved in increasing the displacement of crude oil, except for the effects of wettability changes. Water injection is the oil recovery method mostly used, and considering the characteristics of Colombian oil fields, this study analyses the effect of modifying the ionic composition of the waters involved in the process, starting from the concept of ionic strength (IS) in sandstone type rocks. The experimental plan for this research includes the evaluation of spontaneous imbibition (SI), contact angles, and displacement efficiencies in Berea core plugs. Interfacial tension and pH measurements were also carried out. The initial scenario consists in formation water (FW), with a total concentration of 9,800 ppm (TDS) (IS ~ 0.17) and a 27 °API crude oil. Magnesium and Calcium brine were also used in a first approach to assess the effect of the divalent ions. Displacement efficiency tests are performed using IS of 0.17, 0.08, and 0.05, as secondary and tertiary oil recovery and the recovery of oil increases in both scenarios. Spontaneous imbibition curves and contact angle measurements show variations as a function of the ionic strength, validating the displacement efficiencies. Interfacial tension and pH collected data evidence that fluid/fluid interactions occur due to ionic strength modifications. However, as per the conditions of this research, fluid/fluid mechanisms are not as determining as fluid/rock.

SARA-Based Correlation To Describe the Effect of Polar/Nonpolar Interaction, Salinity, and Temperature for Interfacial Tension of Low-Asphaltene Crude Oils Characteristic of Unconventional Shale Reservoirs

SPE Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
I. W. R. Saputra ◽  
D. S. Schechter
Keyword(s):  
Interfacial Tension ◽  
Crude Oil ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Petroleum Engineering ◽  
Crude Oils ◽  
Oil Composition ◽  
Surface Activities ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Oil Water ◽  
Shale Reservoirs

Summary Oil/water interfacial tension (IFT) is an important parameter in petroleum engineering, especially for enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) techniques. Surfactant and low-salinity EOR target IFT reduction to improve oil recovery. IFT values can be determined by empirical correlation, but widely used thermodynamic-based correlations do not account for the surface-activities characteristic of the polar/nonpolar interactions caused by naturally existing components in the crude oil. In addition, most crude oils included in these correlations come from conventional reservoirs, which are often dissimilar to the low-asphaltene crude oils produced from shale reservoirs. This study presents a novel oil-composition-based IFT correlation that can be applied to shale-crude-oil samples. The correlation is dependent on the saturates/aromatics/resins/asphaltenes (SARA) analysis of the oil samples. We show that the crude oil produced from most unconventional reservoirs contains little to no asphaltic material. In addition, a more thorough investigation of the effect of oil components, salinity, temperature, and their interactions on the oil/water IFT is provided and explained using the mutual polarity/solubility concept. Fifteen crude-oil samples from prominent US shale plays (i.e., Eagle Ford, Middle Bakken, and Wolfcamp) are included in this study. IFT was measured in systems with salinity from 0 to 24% and temperatures up to 195°F.

Synergistic Effects of Engineered Water-Nanoparticle on Oil/Brine/Rock Interactions in Carbonates

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibraheem Salaudeen ◽  
Muhammad Rehan Hashmet ◽  
Peyman Pourafshary
Keyword(s):  
Contact Angle ◽  
Zeta Potential ◽  
Interfacial Tension ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Sea Water ◽  
Hybrid Methods ◽  
Carbonate Reservoir ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Combined Effects ◽  
Low Salinity

Abstract Nano particle-assisted engineered water is one of the newest hybrid methods of Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) that is gaining attention in the oil and gas industry. This is attributed to the low cost of the technique and environmental friendliness of the materials involved. Low salinity and ions adjustment of the injection brine has been reported to be very useful for improving oil production in carbonates, and application of nanoparticles (NPs) to improve oil recovery via different mechanisms such as wettability alteration, interfacial tension reduction, disjoining pressure and viscosity modification. This paper therefore investigates the combined effects of these two techniques on oil-brine-rock (OBR) interactions in carbonate reservoirs. Caspian Sea Water salinity of 13000 ppm was synthesized in the laboratory, potential determining ions such as Mg2+, Ca2+ and SO42- were adjusted to obtain the desired engineered waters used as dispersant for SiO2 nanoparticle. A series of experiments were performed ranging from zeta potential, interfacial tension, contact angle, electron scanning environmental imaging, pH analysis and particle size to determine the optimum formulation of engineered low salinity brine and nanoparticle. The salinities and concentration of NP considered in this experimental study ranges between (3,250 - 40,000) ppm and (0.05 - 0.5) wt.%, respectively. It was observed that optimum homogenization time for achieving stability of the chosen nanofluid without using stabilizer is 45 minutes. Four times sulphate and calcium ions in the engineered water reduced the contact angle from 163 to 109 and 151 to 118 degrees respectively. However, in the presence of NP, the contact angle further reduced to a very low values of 5 and 41 degrees. This confirms the combined effects of EW and that of nanofluid (NF) in altering wettability from the hydrophobicity state to hydrophilicity one that rapidly improves oil recovery in carbonate reservoir. IFT measurements were made between oil and formation brine as well as between oil and different EWs at room temperature. The Formation water has the least value of interfacial tension- 15mN/m. Four times diluted sea water spiked with four times sulphate is denoted as 4dsw4S. The zeta potential values showed dsw4S-NF to be the most stable, whereas EW-NF spiked with 4 times Mg2+ show detrimental effects on NF stability. The nanoparticles sizes were measured to be less than 50 nm. Rheological studies of the EW-NF at different temperatures (25, 40, 60 and 80 degrees Celsius) shows similar trend of Newtonian and non-Newtonian behavior at shear rate less than 100 and above 100 per seconds respectively. We conclude that spiking calcium ion and sulphate ion into the injected brine in combination with 0.1wt% NP yielded the wettability alteration in carbonate rock samples. The significant reduction in wettability is attributed to the combined effects of the active mechanisms present in the hybrid method and is considerably better than each standalone technique.

Double-Layer Expansion: Is It a Primary Mechanism of Improved Oil Recovery by Low-Salinity Waterflooding?

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
pp. 49-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramez A. Nasralla ◽  
Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din
Keyword(s):  
Double Layer ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
High Salinity ◽  
Improved Oil Recovery ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Ph Values ◽  
Low Salinity Water ◽  
Primary Mechanism ◽  
Low Salinity Waterflooding ◽  
Salinity Water

Summary Literature review shows that improved oil recovery (IOR) by low-salinity waterflooding could be attributed to several mechanisms, such as sweep-efficiency improvement, interfacial-tension (IFT) reduction, multicomponent ionic exchange, and electrical-double-layer (EDL) expansion. Although these mechanisms might contribute to IOR by low-salinity water, they may not be the primary mechanism. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to investigate if the mechanism of EDL expansion could be the principal reason for IOR during low-salinity waterflooding. Low-salinity water results in a thicker EDL when compared to high-salinity water, so we tried to eliminate the effect of low-salinity brines on double-layer expansion to show to what extent IOR is related to EDL expansion caused by low-salinity water. The double-layer expansion is dependent on the electric surface charge, which is a function of the pH of brine; therefore, the pH levels of low-salinity brines were decreased in this study to provide low-salinity brines that can produce a thinner EDL, similar to high-salinity brines. ζ-potential measurements were performed on both rock/brine and oil/brine interfaces to demonstrate the effect of brine pH and salinity on EDL. Contact angle and coreflood experiments were conducted to test different brine salinities at different pH values, which could assess the effect of water salinity and pH on rock wettability and oil recovery, and hence involvement of EDL expansion in the IOR process. ζ-potential results in this study showed that decreasing the pH of low-salinity brines makes the electrical charges at both oil/brine and brine/rock interfaces slightly negative, which reduces the double-layer expansion caused by low-salinity brine. As a result, the rock becomes more oil-wet, which was confirmed by contact-angle measurements. Moreover, coreflood experiments indicated that injecting low-salinity brine at lower pH values recovered smaller amounts of oil when compared to the original pH because of the elimination of the low-salinity-water effect on the thickness of the double layer. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that expansion of the double layer is a dominant mechanism of oil-recovery improvement by low-salinity waterflooding.

scholarly journals Manipulation of surface charges of oil droplets and carbonate rocks to improve oil recovery

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Hou ◽  
Ming Han ◽  
Jinxun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Zeta Potential ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Carbonate Rocks ◽  
Zwitterionic Surfactant ◽  
Surface Charges ◽  
Oil Droplets ◽  
Zeta Potentials ◽  
Potential Value ◽  
Oil Water ◽  
Incremental Oil Recovery

AbstractThis work investigates the effect of the surface charges of oil droplets and carbonate rocks in brine and in surfactant solutions on oil production. The influences of the cations in brine and the surfactant types on the zeta-potentials of both oil droplets and carbonate rock particles are studied. It is found that the addition of anionic and cationic surfactants in brine result in both negative or positive zeta-potentials of rock particles and oil droplets respectively, while the zwitterionic surfactant induces a positive charge on rock particles and a negative charge on oil droplets. Micromodels with a CaCO3 nanocrystal layer coated on the flow channels were used in the oil displacement tests. The results show that when the oil-water interfacial tension (IFT) was at 10−1 mN/m, the injection of an anionic surfactant (SDS-R1) solution achieved 21.0% incremental oil recovery, higher than the 12.6% increment by the injection of a zwitterionic surfactant (SB-A2) solution. When the IFT was lowered to 10−3 mM/m, the injection of anionic/non-ionic surfactant SMAN-l1 solution with higher absolute zeta potential value (ζoil + ζrock) of 34 mV has achieved higher incremental oil recovery (39.4%) than the application of an anionic/cationic surfactant SMAC-l1 solution with a lower absolute zeta-potential value of 22 mV (30.6%). This indicates that the same charge of rocks and oil droplets improves the transportation of charged oil/water emulsion in the porous media. This work reveals that the surface charge in surfactant flooding plays an important role in addition to the oil/water interfacial tension reduction and the rock wettability alteration.

Continental-shelf freshwater water resources and improved oil recovery by low-salinity waterflooding

AAPG Bulletin ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 101 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Person ◽  
John L. Wilson ◽  
Norman Morrow ◽  
Vincent E.A. Post
Keyword(s):  
Water Resources ◽  
Continental Shelf ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Improved Oil Recovery ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Low Salinity Waterflooding

A Comparison of Different Nanoparticles' Effect on Fine Migration by Low Salinity Water Injection for Oil Recovery: Introducing an Optimum Condition

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Madadizadeh ◽  
Alireza Sadeghein ◽  
Siavash Riahi
Keyword(s):  
Porous Media ◽  
Zeta Potential ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Fine Particles ◽  
Production Equipment ◽  
Water Flooding ◽  
Sand Production ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Low Salinity Water ◽  
Salinity Water

Abstract Today, enhance oil recovery (EOR) methods are attracting more attention to increase the petroleum production rate. Some EOR methods such as low salinity water flooding (LSW) can increase the amount of fine migration and sand production in sandstone reservoirs which causes a reduction in permeability and inflict damages on to the reservoir and the production equipment. One of the methods to control fine migration is using nanotechnology. Nanoparticles (NPs) can reduce fine migration by various mechanisms such as reducing the zeta potential of fine particles' surfaces. In this paper, three NPs including SiO2, MgO, and Al2O3 's effects on controlling fine migration and sand production were investigated in two scenarios of pre-flush and co-injection by using sandpack as a porous media sample. When NPs are injected into the porous media sample, the outflow turbidity and zeta potential of particles decreases. Experiments showed that SiO2 has the best effect on controlling fine migration in comparison with other NPs and it could reduce fine migration 69% in pre-flush and 75% in co-injection. Also, MgO and Al2O3 decreased fine migration 65% and 33% in the pre-flush scenario and 49%,13% in the co-injection scenario, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document