scholarly journals The Effects of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide and Insulin Glargine on Glucose Fluctuation in Poorly Oral-Antidiabetic Controlled Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Wang ◽  
Hui-qin Li ◽  
Xiao-hua Xu ◽  
Xiao-cen Kong ◽  
Rui Sun ◽  
...  

Aim. To compare the effects of once-weekly Dulaglutide with once-daily glargine in poorly oral-antidiabetic controlled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Method. A total of 25 patients with T2DM admitted into Department of Endocrinology from December 2012 to August 2013 were randomly assigned into two groups: Dulaglutide group (n=16) and glargine group (n=9). All patients received either Dulaglutide or glargine treatments for 52 weeks. Continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMS) were applied to them for two 72 h periods at before and after the treatment each. Patient general clinical data were collected and analyzed. Result. Fast blood glucose (FBG) of the glargine group declined more significantly than the Dulaglutide group after treatment (p<0.05). The mean blood glucose (MBG), standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG), mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE) within a day, the largest amplitude of glycemic excursion (LAGE), M-value, absolute means of daily difference (MODD) of glycemic excursion, the percentage of time (≤2.8 mmol/L, ≤3.9 mmol/L, ≥10.0 mmol/L, ≥13.9 mmol/L, 3.9–7.8 mmol/L, and 9–10.0 mmol/L), maximum glycemic value, and minimum glycemic value were similar between the two groups (p>0.05). The incidence of hypoglycemia was also similar between the two groups (p>0.05). Though serum levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and 8-PGF2α all decreased, significant reduction was found in TNF-α and 8-PGF2α. TNF-α was only significantly reduced in the Dulaglutide group, while 8-PGF2α was seen in both groups. Conclusion. For T2DM patients with poorly controlled oral antidiabetic drugs, once-weekly Dulaglutide not only has the same effect on glucose fluctuation as once-daily glargine but also significantly reduced TNF-α and 8-PGF2α after a 52 week treatment protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01648582.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huiqin Li ◽  
Xiaohua Xu ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Xiaocen Kong ◽  
Maoyuan Chen ◽  
...  

Objective. To evaluate the effects of once-weekly dulaglutide injection and once-daily glimepiride on glucose fluctuation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS). Methods. A total of 23 patients with T2DM were randomly assigned into two groups for 26 weeks: the dulaglutide group (n=13) and the glimepiride group (n=10). 72-hour CGMS was applied to all patients: before and after the treatment. General clinical data were collected and measured, such as fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Results. HbA1c of the dulaglutide group was reduced from 8.38±0.93% to 6.68±0.73% after the treatment (P<0.05); similarly, it was reduced from 7.91±0.98% to 6.67±0.74% (P<0.05) in the glimepiride group. The levels of serum 8-iso-PGF2α, TNF-α, and IL-6 all decreased significantly in both groups after treatment, and there was no significant difference found between the two groups (P>0.05). The Mean Blood Glucose (MBG) of the two groups declined significantly after therapy (P<0.05). However, the Standard Deviation of Blood Glucose (SDBG) decreased significantly only in the dulaglutide group (from 2.57±0.74 mmol/L to 1.98±0.74 mmol/L, P<0.05). There were no significant changes of Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursion (MAGE) and Absolute Means of Daily Difference (MODD) after treatment in both groups. Furthermore, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in MBG, SDBG, MAGE, and MODD (P>0.05). The percentage time (PT) (>10 mmol/L and 3.9-10 mmol/L) of the two groups was significantly changed after the treatment (P<0.05). However, this was not seen in the PT<3.9 mmol/L after the treatment (P>0.05). Conclusion. Once-weekly dulaglutide injection has the same effectiveness as daily glimepiride on lowering blood glucose and decreasing oxidation stress and inflammation and is more effective in controlling glucose fluctuation as compared with glimepiride. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01644500.


2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (04) ◽  
pp. 627-633
Author(s):  
IMRAN ASHRAF ◽  
Imran Khan ◽  
NOOR KAMIL ◽  
Abdul Mannan ◽  
Muhammad Shamaun Razi

Background: Hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus also tend to coexist.The goal of antihypertensive therapy should consist of reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated withhypertension by a strategy focused on lowering blood pressure while minimizing the impact on other associatedcardiovascular risk factors like diabetes mellitus. Objectives: To observe and compare any change in serum glucosein patients with newly diagnosed essential hypertension with Atenolol and Amlodipine. Setting: Department ofPharmacology and Therapeutics, Basic Medical Science Institute (BMSI), Jinnah Post Graduate Medical Centre(JPMC), Karachi. Period: 12 weeks (90 days) Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed essential hypertension (N=70)were enrolled in this study and were divided into two groups, each comprised of 35 patients and were given tabletAtenolol 50/100mg once daily and tablet Amlodipine 5/10 mg once daily respectively for 90 days. Fasting Blood glucosewas measured on day of inclusion i.e. day 0, day 45 and day 90. At each fortnightly visit, blood pressure was recorded.Results: Atenolol raised mean blood glucose levels from baseline levels of 91.82±1.34 mg/dl to 99.73±1.33 mg/dl onday 90 (P<0.001) while Amlodipine had no significant effect on blood glucose level (P= N.S). Conclusion: Atenololmay not be a good choice for essential hypertensive patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus as it is found to impair the normal glucose metabolism. Long term clinical trials in diabetic patients are needed to confirm the observation of thepresent study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-137
Author(s):  
Sangita Shakya ◽  
Smrity Bajracharya ◽  
Amit Shakya ◽  
Santosh Shakya ◽  
Shailendra Chaudhary ◽  
...  

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a progressive complex disorder so most patients require dual and triple therapy using glucose- lowering agents.Purpose: To find the effectiveness of the dual therapy [glimepiride and metformin] and triple therapy [glimepiride, metformin and pioglitazone] for glycemic control.Method: The prospective study was conducted in Diabetes and Endocrinology Centre including 112 patients with Type 2 diabetes treating with oral antidiabetic drugs. Patients, age group between 30-70 years having pre- prandial blood glucose [≥ 110 mg/dl] and post-prandial blood glucose [≥ 140 mg/dl] were included. They were grouped into dual and triple therapy according to treatment they received. The blood glucose level was examined after one week of initial drug therapy. Patients taking oral antidiabetic drugs along with insulin therapy were excluded.Result: Type 2 diabetes mellitus was prevalent in the age group between 50- 60years. The reduction in pre-prandial blood glucose with dual therapy and triple therapy were 26.5 % and 27.1 % respectively and reduction in post-prandial blood sugar were 32.6 % and 30.5 % respectively. Hence the effectiveness of the dual therapy (p=0.827) and triple therapy (p=0.949) was similar in pre and post glycemic control .Conclusion: The dual and triple therapy may be equally effective for the treatment of type 2 DM.Journal of Advanced Academic Research Vol. 3, No. 2, 2016, Page: 128-137


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huiying Wang ◽  
Yunting Zhou ◽  
Xiaofang Zhai ◽  
Bo Ding ◽  
Ting Jing ◽  
...  

AimThis study aims at evaluating glycemic control during Basalin or Lantus administration in adults with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus using continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM).Methods47 patients with well-controlled T2DM using both Basalin and oral hypoglycemic drugs were recruited. CGM were applied from day 1 to day 3 with the unchanged dose of Basalin and then removed from day 4. A washout was performed with Lantus at the same dose as Basalin from day 4 to day 10. Then patients were continued to install the CGM under Lantus administration from day 11 to day 13. Variables of CGM, such as the area under the curve (AUC) for both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, 24h mean blood glucose (24h MBG), 24h standard deviation of blood glucose (24h SDBG), 24h mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (24h MAGE), PT (percentage of time), and time in range (TIR), were calculated and compared between Basalin group and Lantus group.ResultsThe group of Lantus showed lower 24h MBG (p&lt;0.01), 24h MAGE (p&lt;0.05), and lower 24h SDBG (p&lt;0.01) than the Basalin group. Lantus−treated patients had a lower PT and AUC when the cut-off point for blood glucose was 10 mmol/L (p&lt;0.05) and 13.9 mmol/L (p&lt;0.05), respectively. In this study, no patient developed symptomatic hypoglycemia, few hypoglycemia was observed and there was no difference of hypoglycemia between the two groups.ConclusionIn patients with well-controlled T2DM who were treated with insulin glargine, Lantus group showed lower MBG, GV, and lower PT (BG &gt; 10.0 mmol/L, BG &gt; 13.9 mmol/L) than Basalin group. In summary, for T2DM population with HbA1c ≤ 7%, Lantus may be a better choice compared with Basalin.


2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 636-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leyna Leite Santos ◽  
Fernando José Camello de Lima ◽  
Célio Fernando de Sousa-Rodrigues ◽  
Fabiano Timbó Barbosa

Summary Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common chronic diseases in the world, with high morbidity and mortality rates, resulting in a greatly negative socioeconomic impact. Although there are several classes of oral antidiabetic agents, most of the patients are outside the therapeutic goal range. Objective: To review the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, focusing on their favorable and unfavorable effects, as well as on cardiovascular profile. Method: A literature search on Pubmed database was performed using the following keywords: "SGLT-2 inhibitors," "dapagliflozin," "empagliflozin," "canagliflozin." Results: SGLT-2 inhibitors are a class of oral antidiabetic drugs directed to the kidney. Their mechanism of action is to reduce blood glucose by inducing glycosuria. Extra-glycemic benefits have been described, such as weight loss, decline in blood pressure and levels of triglycerides and uric acid, and they can slow the progression of kidney disease. Genitourinary infections are the main side effects. There is a low risk of hypotension and hypoglycemia. Diabetic ketoacidosis is a serious adverse effect, although rare. Empagliflozin has already had its cardiovascular benefit demonstrated and studies with other drugs are currently being performed. Conclusion: SGLT-2 inhibitors are a new treatment option for type 2 diabetes mellitus, acting independently of insulin. They have potential benefits other than the reduction of blood glucose, but also carry a risk for adverse effects.


Author(s):  
Lavakumar S. ◽  
Jesurun R. S.

Background: The pathophysiology of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is characterized by deficient insulin activity arising from decreased insulin secretion secondary to beta cell failure, and/or compromised insulin action in peripheral target tissues (insulin resistance).Methods: The patients attending the medicine outpatient department of tertiary care teaching hospital were enrolled in the study. Patients, who fulfilled the selection criteria, were allocated in two treatment groups. Group A was treated with metformin (Sustained release preparation) 500mg once daily and group B was treated with vildagliptin 50mg once daily. Measurement of body weight, fasting blood glucose (FPG), postprandial blood glucose (PPG), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), serum urea, creatinine and urine albumin/creatinine ratio was performed at the initial visit and at the end of 12 weeks of treatment.Results: Out of 84 patients screened, 74 were enrolled for the study. Of the 74 patients, 39(52.7%) were male and 35(47.3%) were female. The patients were divided into two groups (group A and group B) consisting 37 patients in each group. Out of 74 patients, 62 completed the study. Out of 12 patients who did not complete the study, 5 patients were lost during follow-up period and 7 patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. The mean age of the patients was 51 and 49years in the groups A and B respectively. There was no statistical difference in the baseline FPG, PPG, HbA1c, serum urea, serum creatinine, urine ACR and body weight between two groups.Conclusions: The study shows that metformin and vildagliptin have similar effect on glycaemic control, but vildagliptin exerts better Reno protective effect and there were no reports of serious adverse events.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document