The Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Paraclinical Characteristics

An outbreak of pneumonia, caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), was identified in China in December 2019. This virus expanded worldwide, causing global concern. Although clinical, laboratory, and imaging features of COVID-19 are characterized in some observational studies, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the frequency of these features. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis using three databases to identify clinical, laboratory, and computerized tomography (CT) scanning features of rRT-PCR confirmed cases of COVID-19. Data for 3420 patients from 30 observational studies were included. Overall, the results showed that fever (84.2%, 95% CI 82.6-85.7), cough (62%, 95% CI 60-64), and fatigue (39.4%, 95% CI 37.2-41.6%) are the most prevalent symptoms in COVID-19 patients. Increased CRP level, decreased lymphocyte count, and increased D-dimer level were the most common laboratory findings. Among COVID-19 patients, 92% had a positive CT finding, most prevalently ground-glass opacification (GGO) (60%, 95% CI 58-62) and peripheral distribution opacification (64%, 95% CI 60-69). These results demonstrate the clinical, paraclinical, and imaging features of COVID-19.

Download Full-text

The Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical and Paraclinical characteristics

10.1101/2020.04.19.20071456 ◽

2020 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Hamidreza Hasani ◽

Shayan Mardi ◽

Sareh Shakerian ◽

Nooshin Taherzadeh-Ghahfarokhi ◽

Parham Mardi

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Observational Studies ◽

Clinical Laboratory ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Imaging Features ◽

The Novel ◽

Laboratory Findings ◽

Global Concern ◽

Novel Coronavirus ◽

Ct Features

AbstractAn outbreak of pneumonia, caused by a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) was Identified in China in Dec 2019. This virus expanded worldwide, causing global concern. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of this infection are characterized in some observational studies. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the frequency of clinical, laboratory, and CT features in COVID-19 patients.We did a systematic review and meta-analysis using three databases to identify clinical, laboratory, and CT features of rRT-PCR confirmed cases of COVID-19. Data for 3420 patients from 30 observational studies were included.Overall, the results showed that fever (84.2%, 95%CI 82.6-85.7), cough (62%, 95%CI 60-64), and fatigue (39.4%, 95%CI 37.2-41.6%) were the most prevalent symptoms in COVID-19 patients. Increased CRP level, decreased lymphocyte count, and increased D-dimer level were the most common laboratory findings. Among COVID-19 patients, 92% had a positive CT finding, most prevalently GGO (60%, 95%CI 58-62) and peripheral distribution (64%, 95%CI 60-69).These results demonstrate the clinical, paraclinical, and imaging features of COIVD-19.

Download Full-text

Clinical, Laboratory and Imaging Features of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

10.20944/preprints202002.0378.v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales ◽

Jaime A. Cardona-Ospina ◽

Estefanía Gutiérrez-Ocampo ◽

Rhuvi Villamizar-Peña ◽

Yeimer Holguin-Rivera ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Observational Studies ◽

Clinical Laboratory ◽

Case Reports ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Clinical Manifestations ◽

Clinical Infectious Disease ◽

Primary Concern ◽

Imaging Features ◽

Pooled Prevalence

Introduction: An epidemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) begun in December 2019 in China, causing primary concern. Among raised questions, clinical, laboratory, and imaging features have been partially characterized in some observational studies. No systematic reviews have been published on this matter. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis, using three databases to assess clinical, laboratory, imaging features, and outcomes of confirmed cases of COVID-19. All the observational studies, and also case reports, were included. The case reports were analyzed separately. We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis to calculate the pooled prevalence and 95%CI. Measures of heterogeneity, including Cochran’s Q statistic, the I2 index, and the τ2 test, were estimated and reported.Results: 660 articles were retrieved. After screening by abstract and title, 27 articles were selected for full-text assessment. Of them, 19 were finally included for qualitative and quantitative analyses. Additionally, 39 case report articles were included and analyzed separately. For >656 patients, fever (88.7%, 95%CI 84.5-92.9%), cough (57.6%, 40.8-74.4%) and dyspnea (45.6%, 10.9-80.4%) were the most prevalent clinical manifestations. Among the patients, 20.3% (95%CI 10.0-30.6%) required ICU, with 32.8% presenting ARDS (95%CI 13.7-51.8), 6.2% (95%CI 3.1-9.3) with shock and 13.9% (95%CI 6.2-21.5%) with a fatal outcome.Discussion: COVID-19 is a new clinical infectious disease, causing considerable compromise, especially in patients with comorbidities, requiring ICU in at least a fifth of them and sometimes with fatal outcomes. Additional research is needed to elucidate factors that may mediate the pathogenesis of the severe and fatal associated disease.

Download Full-text

COVID-19, MERS and SARS with Concomitant Liver Injury—Systematic Review of the Existing Literature

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm9051420 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (5) ◽

pp. 1420 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Michał Kukla ◽

Karolina Skonieczna-Żydecka ◽

Katarzyna Kotfis ◽

Dominika Maciejewska ◽

Igor Łoniewski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Liver Injury ◽

Clinical Course ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽

Intensive Care Treatment ◽

The Novel ◽

Massive Necrosis ◽

Novel Coronavirus ◽

Elevated Transaminases

The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection has been predominantly linked to respiratory distress syndrome, but gastrointestinal symptoms and hepatic injury have also been reported. The mechanism of liver injury is poorly understood and may result as a consequence of viral hepatitis, systemic inflammatory response, gut barrier and microbiome alterations, intensive care treatment or drug toxicity. The incidence of hepatopathy among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear, but studies have reported liver injury in patients with SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). We aimed to systematically review data on the prevalence of hepatic impairments and their clinical course in SARS and MERS Coronaviridae infections. A systematic literature search (PubMed/Embase/Cinahl/Web of Science) according to preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA) was conducted from database inception until 17/03/2020 for studies that evaluated the incidence of hepatic abnormalities in SARS CoV-1, SARS CoV-2 and MERS infected patients with reported liver-related parameters. A total of forty-three studies were included. Liver anomalies were predominantly mild to moderately elevated transaminases, hypoalbuminemia and prolongation of prothrombin time. Histopathology varied between non-specific inflammation, mild steatosis, congestion and massive necrosis. More studies to elucidate the mechanism and importance of liver injury on the clinical course and prognosis in patients with novel SARS-CoV-2 infection are warranted.

Download Full-text

Clinical laboratory parameters associated with severe or critical novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽

10.1371/journal.pone.0239802 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 15 (10) ◽

pp. e0239802 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jude Moutchia ◽

Pratik Pokharel ◽

Aldiona Kerri ◽

Kaodi McGaw ◽

Shreeshti Uchai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Clinical Laboratory ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Laboratory Parameters ◽

Novel Coronavirus

Download Full-text

Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease ◽

10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101623 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 34 ◽

pp. 101623 ◽

Cited By ~ 579

Author(s):

Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales ◽

Jaime A. Cardona-Ospina ◽

Estefanía Gutiérrez-Ocampo ◽

Rhuvi Villamizar-Peña ◽

Yeimer Holguin-Rivera ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Clinical Laboratory ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Imaging Features

Download Full-text

Cardiovascular manifestations in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research ◽

10.34172/jcvtr.2021.30 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (3) ◽

pp. 181-189

Author(s):

Seyyedmohammadsadeq Mirmoeeni ◽

Amirhossein Azari Jafari ◽

Seyedeh Zohreh Hashemi ◽

Elham Angouraj Taghavi ◽

Alireza Azani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Systolic Pressure ◽

Clinical Manifestations ◽

Laboratory Findings ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Cardiovascular Comorbidities ◽

Study Characteristics ◽

Novel Coronavirus ◽

Cardiac Manifestations

Since December 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the global population, and one of the major causes of mortality in infected patients is cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we systematically searched Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for all articles published by April 2, 2020. Observational studies (cohort and cross-sectional designs) were included in this meta-analysis if they reported at least one of the related cardiovascular symptoms or laboratory findings in COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, we did not use any language, age, diagnostic COVID-19 criteria, and hospitalization criteria restrictions. The following keywords alone or in combination with OR and AND operators were used for searching the literature: "Wuhan coronavirus", "COVID-19", "coronavirus disease 2019", "SARS-CoV-2", "2019 novel coronavirus" "cardiovascular disease", "CVD", "hypertension", "systolic pressure", "dyspnea", "hemoptysis", and "arrhythmia". Study characteristics, exposure history, laboratory findings, clinical manifestations, and comorbidities were extracted from the retrieved articles. Sixteen studies were selected which involved 4754 patients, including 2103 female and 2639 male patients. Among clinical cardiac manifestations, chest pain and arrhythmia were found to have the highest incidence proportion. In addition, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and D-dimer levels were the most common cardiovascular laboratory findings. Finally, hypertension, chronic heart failure, and coronary heart disease were the most frequently reported comorbidities. The findings suggest that COVID-19 can cause various cardiovascular symptoms and laboratory findings. It is also worth noting that cardiovascular comorbidities like hypertension have a notable prevalence among COVID-19 patients.

Download Full-text

Clinical, Laboratory and Imaging Features of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

10.20944/preprints202002.0378.v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales ◽

Jaime A. Cardona-Ospina ◽

Estefanía Gutiérrez-Ocampo ◽

Rhuvi Villamizar-Peña ◽

Yeimer Holguin-Rivera ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Observational Studies ◽

Clinical Laboratory ◽

Case Reports ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Fatal Outcome ◽

Clinical Manifestations ◽

Clinical Infectious Disease ◽

Imaging Features ◽

Pooled Prevalence ◽

Quantitative Analyses

Introduction: An epidemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) begun in December 2019 in China, causing a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Among raised questions, clinical, laboratory, and imaging features have been partially characterized in some observational studies. No systematic reviews have been published on this matter. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review with meta-analysis, using three databases to assess clinical, laboratory, imaging features, and outcomes of confirmed cases of COVID-19. All the observational studies, and also case reports, were included and analyzed separately. We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis to calculate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Measures of heterogeneity were estimated and reported. Results: 660 articles were retrieved. After screening by abstract and title, 27 articles were selected for full-text assessment. Of them, 19 were finally included for qualitative and quantitative analyses. Additionally, 39 case report articles were included and analyzed separately. For 656 patients, fever (88.7%, 95%CI 84.5-92.9%), cough (57.6%, 40.8-74.4%) and dyspnea (45.6%, 10.9-80.4%) were the most prevalent clinical manifestations. Among the patients, 20.3% (95%CI 10.0-30.6%) required intensive care unit (ICU), with 32.8% presenting acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (95%CI 13.7-51.8), 6.2% (95%CI 3.1-9.3) with shock and 13.9% (95%CI 6.2-21.5%) with a fatal outcome. Discussion: COVID-19 is a new clinical infectious disease, causing considerable compromise, especially in patients with comorbidities, requiring ICU in at least a fifth of them and sometimes with fatal outcomes. Additional research is needed to elucidate factors that may mediate the pathogenesis of the severe and fatal associated disease.

Download Full-text

The impact of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on drug overdose-related deaths in the United States and Canada: a systematic review of observational studies and analysis of public health surveillance data

Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy ◽

10.1186/s13011-021-00423-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Sameer Imtiaz ◽

Frishta Nafeh ◽

Cayley Russell ◽

Farihah Ali ◽

Tara Elton-Marshall ◽

...

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Drug Overdose ◽

Observational Studies ◽

Public Health Surveillance ◽

The United States ◽

Health Surveillance ◽

The Novel ◽

Novel Coronavirus ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background There are preliminary indications that the trajectory of drug overdose-related deaths in North America has been exacerbated due to the novel coronavirus disease pandemic (COVID-19). As such, the impact of COVID-19 on drug overdose-related deaths was examined through a systematic review of the literature and percentage change analyses of surveillance data. Methods Systematic searches in electronic databases were conducted, a topical issue brief and bibliography were reviewed, reference lists of included studies were searched and expert consultations were held to identify studies (Registration # CRD42021230223). Observational studies from the United States and Canada were eligible for inclusion if drug overdose-related deaths were assessed in quantitative or qualitative analyses onwards from at least March 2020. In addition, percentage changes comparing drug overdose-related deaths in the second annual quarter (Q2 2020 [April to June]) with the first annual quarter (Q1 2020 [January to March]) were generated using national and subnational data from public health surveillance systems and reports from jurisdictions in the United States and Canada. Results Nine studies were included in the systematic review, eight from the United States and one from Canada. The maximum outcome assessment period in the included studies extended until September 2020. Drug overdose-related deaths after the onset of COVID-19 were higher compared with the months leading up to the pandemic in 2020 and the comparative months in 2019. In additional percentage change analyses, drug overdose-related deaths increased by 2 to 60% in jurisdictions in the United States and by 58% in Canada when comparing Q2 2020 with Q1 2020. Conclusions Drug overdose-related deaths increased after the onset of COVID-19. The current situation necessitates a multi-pronged approach, encompassing expanded access to substance use disorder treatment, undisrupted access to harm reduction services, emphasis on risk reduction strategies, provision of a safe drug supply and decriminalization of drug use.

Download Full-text

Prevalence of Anxiety in Medical Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Rapid Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph17186603 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 17 (18) ◽

pp. 6603 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Isabel Lasheras ◽

Patricia Gracia-García ◽

Darren Lipnicki ◽

Juan Bueno-Notivol ◽

Raúl López-Antón ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Medical Students ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Total Sample ◽

Significant Heterogeneity ◽

The Novel ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Manual Search ◽

Novel Coronavirus ◽

Treatment Prognosis

The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has brought a great deal of pressure for medical students, who typically show elevated anxiety rates. Our aim is to investigate the prevalence of anxiety in medical students during this pandemic. This systematic review and mini meta-analysis has been conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Two researchers independently searched PubMed on 26 August 2020 for cross-sectional studies on medical students during the COVID-19 outbreak, with no language restrictions applied. We then performed a manual search to detect other potentially eligible investigations. To the 1361 records retrieved in the initial search, 4 more were added by manual search on medRxiv. Finally, eight studies were finally included for qualitative and quantitative analysis, which yielded an estimated prevalence of anxiety of 28% (95% CI: 22–34%), with significant heterogeneity between studies. The prevalence of anxiety in medical students is similar to that prior to the pandemic but correlates with several specific COVID-related stressors. While some preventive and risk factors have been previously identified in a non-pandemic context, knowledge and cognitions on COVID-19 transmission, treatment, prognosis and prevention negatively correlate with anxiety, emerging as a key preventive factor that may provide a rationale for why the levels of anxiety have remained stable in medical students during the pandemic while increasing in their non-medical peers and the general population. Other reasons for the invariability of anxiety rates in this population are discussed. A major limitation of our review is that Chinese students comprised 89% the total sample, which could compromise the external validity of our work

Download Full-text