scholarly journals Comparison of Presurgical Dental Models Manufactured with Two Different Three-Dimensional Printing Techniques

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Metlerski ◽  
Katarzyna Grocholewicz ◽  
Aleksandra Jaroń ◽  
Mariusz Lipski ◽  
Grzegorz Trybek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Oral Surgery ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Mean Deviation ◽  
Printing Technology ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
Reference Models ◽  
3D Printing Technology ◽  
Dimensional Printing ◽  
Printing Time

Three-dimensional printing is a rapidly developing area of technology and manufacturing in the field of oral surgery. The aim of this study was comparison of presurgical models made by two different types of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Digital reference models were printed 10 times using fused deposition modelling (FDM) and digital light processing (DLP) techniques. All 3D printed models were scanned using a technical scanner. The trueness, linear measurements, and printing time were evaluated. The diagnostic models were compared with the reference models using linear and mean deviation for trueness measurements with computer software. Paired t-tests were performed to compare the two types of 3D printing technology. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For FDM printing, all average distances between the reference points were smaller than the corresponding distances measured on the reference model. For the DLP models, the average distances in the three measurements were smaller than the original. Only one average distance measurement was greater. The mean deviation for trueness was 0.1775 mm for the FDM group and 0.0861 mm for the DLP group. Mean printing time for a single model was 517.6 minutes in FDM technology and 285.3 minutes in DLP. This study confirms that presurgical models manufactured with FDM and DLP technologies are usable in oral surgery. Our findings will facilitate clinical decision-making regarding the best 3D printing technology to use when planning a surgical procedure.

scholarly journals 3D Printing and Shaping Polymers, Composites, and Nanocomposites: A Review

Polymers ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 180
Author(s):  
M. N. M. Azlin ◽  
R. A. Ilyas ◽  
M. Y. M. Zuhri ◽  
S. M. Sapuan ◽  
M. M. Harussani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Historical Development ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Polymer Materials ◽  
Printing Technology ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
3D Printing Technology ◽  
Sustainable Technologies ◽  
Bright Future ◽  
Dimensional Printing

Sustainable technologies are vital due to the efforts of researchers and investors who have allocated significant amounts of money and time to their development. Nowadays, 3D printing has been accepted by the main industry players, since its first establishment almost 30 years ago. It is obvious that almost every industry is related to technology, which proves that technology has a bright future. Many studies have shown that technologies have changed the methods for developing particular products. Three-dimensional printing has evolved tremendously, and currently, many new types of 3D printing machines have been introduced. In this paper, we describe the historical development of 3D printing technology including its process, types of printing, and applications on polymer materials.

scholarly journals Traditional three-dimensional printing technology versus three-dimensional printing mirror model technology in the treatment of isolated acetabular fractures: a retrospective analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 030006052092425
Author(s):  
Cong Yu ◽  
Weiguang Yu ◽  
Shuai Mao ◽  
Peiru Zhang ◽  
Xinchao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Acetabular Fracture ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Acetabular Fractures ◽  
Printing Technology ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
3D Printing Technology ◽  
Technology Group ◽  
Dimensional Printing

Objective This study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of traditional three-dimensional (3D) printing technology and 3D printing mirror model technology in the treatment of isolated acetabular fractures. Methods Prospectively maintained databases were reviewed to retrospectively compare patients with an isolated acetabular fracture who were treated with traditional 3D printing technology (Group T) or 3D printing mirror model technology (Group M) from 2011 to 2017. In total, 146 advanced-age patients (146 hips) with an isolated acetabular fracture (Group T, n = 72; Group M, n = 74) were assessed for a mean follow-up period of 29 months (range, 24–34 months). The primary endpoint was the postoperative Harris hip score (HHS). The secondary endpoints were the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy screening time, fracture reduction quality, and incidence of postoperative complications at the final follow-up. Results The HHS, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy screening time, and incidence of postoperative complications were significantly different between the groups, with Group M showing superior clinical outcomes. Conclusion In patients with an isolated acetabular fracture, 3D printing mirror model technology might lead to more accurate and efficient treatment than traditional 3D printing technology.

scholarly journals Traditional versus mirror three-dimensional printing technology for isolated acetabular fractures: a retrospective study with a median follow-up of 25 months

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 030006052110285
Author(s):  
Kai Xiao ◽  
Bo Xu ◽  
Lin Ding ◽  
Weiguang Yu ◽  
Lei Bao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Acetabular Fractures ◽  
Printing Technology ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
3D Printing Technology ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective To assess the outcomes of traditional three-dimensional (3D) printing technology (TPT) versus mirror 3D printing technology (MTT) in treating isolated acetabular fractures (IAFs). Methods Consecutive patients with an IAF treated by either TPT or MTT at our tertiary medical centre from 2012 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up was performed 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and annually thereafter. The primary outcome was the Harris hip score (HHS), and the secondary outcomes were major intraoperative variables and key orthopaedic complications. Results One hundred fourteen eligible patients (114 hips) with an IAF (TPT, n = 56; MTT, n = 58) were evaluated. The median follow-up was 25 months (range, 21–28 months). At the last follow-up, the mean HHS was 82.46 ±14.70 for TPT and 86.30 ± 13.26 for MTT with a statistically significant difference. Significant differences were also detected in the major intraoperative variables (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopic screenings, and anatomical reduction number) and the major orthopaedic complications (loosening, implant failure, and heterotopic ossification). Conclusion Compared with TPT, MTT tends to produce accurate IAF reduction and may result in better intraoperative variables and a lower rate of major orthopaedic complications.

scholarly journals Three-Dimensional Printing: Custom-Made Implants for Craniomaxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 089-098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Matias ◽  
Horácio Zenha ◽  
Horácio Costa
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Reconstructive Surgery ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Tactile Feedback ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Printing Technology ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
3D Printing Technology ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
The Aesthetic

Craniomaxillofacial reconstructive surgery is a challenging field. First it aims to restore primary functions and second to preserve craniofacial anatomical features like symmetry and harmony. Three-dimensional (3D) printed biomodels have been widely adopted in medical fields by providing tactile feedback and a superior appreciation of visuospatial relationship between anatomical structures. Craniomaxillofacial reconstructive surgery was one of the first areas to implement 3D printing technology in their practice. Biomodeling has been used in craniofacial reconstruction of traumatic injuries, congenital disorders, tumor removal, iatrogenic injuries (e.g., decompressive craniectomies), orthognathic surgery, and implantology. 3D printing has proven to improve and enable an optimization of preoperative planning, develop intraoperative guidance tools, reduce operative time, and significantly improve the biofunctional and the aesthetic outcome. This technology has also shown great potential in enriching the teaching of medical students and surgical residents. The aim of this review is to present the current status of 3D printing technology and its practical and innovative applications, specifically in craniomaxillofacial reconstructive surgery, illustrated with two clinical cases where the 3D printing technology was successfully used.

Manufacture of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Advanced Project Design Using 3D Printing Technology

2013 ◽  
Vol 397-400 ◽  
pp. 970-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noor A. Ahmed ◽  
J.R. Page
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Project Design ◽  
Test Model ◽  
Printing Technology ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Dimensional Printing

The phenomenal growth in three-dimensional printing technology has the potential of ushering in the next wave of industrial revolution. As part of an advanced project design conducted at the Aerospace Engineering of the University of New South, the concept of a printable unmanned aerial vehicle was explored. A subsequent small scale test model was manufactured using three-dimensional printing technology for wind tunnel testing and validation. The exercise demonstrates the huge potential of such printing technology in future aircraft designs.Key words: 3D printing, design, manufacture, UAV

scholarly journals Utility of Three-Dimensional Printing for Preoperative Assessment of Children with Extra-Cranial Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review

2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-39
Author(s):  
Sachit Anand ◽  
Nellai Krishnan ◽  
Prabudh Goel ◽  
Anjan Kumar Dhua ◽  
Vishesh Jain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
3D Printing ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Surgical Planning ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Printing Technology ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
3D Printed ◽  
Dimensional Printing

Background: In cases with solid tumors, preoperative radiological investigations provide valuable information on the anatomy of the tumor and the adjoining structures, thus helping in operative planning. However, due to a two-dimensional view in these investigations, a detailed spatial relationship is difficult to decipher. In contrast, three-dimensional (3D) printing technology provides a precise topographic view to perform safe surgical resections of these tumors. This systematic review aimed to summarize and analyze current evidence on the utility of 3D printing in pediatric extra-cranial solid tumors. Methods: The present study was registered on PROSPERO—international prospective register of systematic reviews (registration number: CRD42020206022). PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases were explored with appropriate search criteria to select the relevant studies. Data were extracted to study the bibliographic information of each article, the number of patients in each study, age of the patient(s), type of tumor, organ of involvement, application of 3D printing (surgical planning, training, and/or parental education). The details of 3D printing, such as type of imaging used, software details, printing technique, printing material, and cost were also synthesized. Results: Eight studies were finally included in the systematic review. Three-dimensional printing technology was used in thirty children with Wilms tumor (n = 13), neuroblastoma (n = 7), hepatic tumors (n = 8), retroperitoneal tumor (n = 1), and synovial sarcoma (n = 1). Among the included studies, the technology was utilized for preoperative surgical planning (five studies), improved understanding of the surgical anatomy of solid organs (two studies), and improving the parental understanding of the tumor and its management (one study). Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were either performed alone or in combination for radiological evaluation in these children. Different types of printers and printing materials were used in the included studies. The cost of the 3D printed models and time involved (range 10 h to 4–5 days) were reported by two studies each. Conclusions: 3D printed models can be of great assistance to pediatric surgeons in understanding the spatial relationships of tumors with the adjacent anatomic structures. They also facilitate the understanding of families, improving doctor–patient communication.

scholarly journals Three-dimensional Printing in Spine Surgery: Protocol of a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanli Xie ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
Bo Jiang ◽  
Chunyan Yang ◽  
Deguang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Spinal Surgery ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Clinical Heterogeneity ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
3D Printing Technology ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Dimensional Printing

Abstract BackgroundThe complexity and diversity of spine pathology lead to the complexity and diversity of spinal surgery. The emergence and application of three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology has brought good news to surgeons and patients. However, the use of 3DP in spinal surgery remains controversial. Therefore, this study was designed to investigate whether 3D printing technology is beneficial for spinal surgery.MethodsThree English online databases including EMBASE (via embase.com), Medline (via PubMed), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) will be searched from inception until August 31, 2020. Document records retrieved according to the pre-defined search strategy will be managed by EndNote X7. The MINORST (methodological index for non-randomized studies) item recommended for non-randomized controlled interventional studies in surgery will be used to assess the quality of non-randomized controlled studies. The “Risk of bias” (ROB) table will be used to assess the quality of randomized controlled studies. The data extraction will be completed by two authors independently, one of whom extracts and the other checks. If there is any missing data, original author will be contacted to obtain the data required. Any inconsistencies were agreed upon by discussion with a third investigator. If the collected data can be synthesized, Review Manager (RevMan5.3) will be used to estimate the overall effect of 3DP for Spinal surgery. Otherwise, only the qualitative analysis will be carried out. According to the results of clinical heterogeneity test, random effects model or fixed effects model will be used for data synthesis. The sources of clinical heterogeneity will be explored by meta-regression and subgroup analysis. If more than 10 studies are included, funnel plots will be used to assess the publication bias. This review will be carried out in strict accordance with Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.ConclusionThis study will can provide surgeons and patients with evidence-based evidence for the use of 3D printing technology in spinal surgery.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO/ID = CRD42020204053.

From Patient to Procedure: The Process of Creating a Custom 3D-Printed Medical Device for Foot and Ankle Pathology

2020 ◽  
pp. 193864002097141
Author(s):  
Rishin J. Kadakia ◽  
Colleen M. Wixted ◽  
Cambre N. Kelly ◽  
Andrew E. Hanselman ◽  
Samuel B. Adams
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Improve Patient Care ◽  
Physician Education ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Printing Technology ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
3D Printing Technology ◽  
3D Printed ◽  
3D Anatomy

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has advanced greatly over the past decade and is being used extensively throughout the field of medicine. Several orthopaedic surgery specialties have demonstrated that 3D printing technology can improve patient care and physician education. Foot and ankle pathology can be complex as the 3D anatomy can be challenging to appreciate. Deformity can occur in several planes simultaneously and bone defects either from previous surgery or trauma can further complicate surgical correction. Three-dimensional printing technology provides an avenue to tackle the challenges associated with complex foot and ankle pathology. A basic understanding of how these implants are designed and made is important for surgeons as this technology is becoming more widespread and the clinical applications continue to grow within foot and ankle surgery. Levels of Evidence: Level V

scholarly journals Digital Light Processing Based Three-dimensional Printing for Medical Applications

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiumeng Zhang ◽  
Qipeng Hu ◽  
Shuai Wang ◽  
Jie Tao ◽  
Maling Gou
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Clinical Medicine ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Biological Research ◽  
Printing Technology ◽  
Digital Light Processing ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
Dimensional Printing ◽  
Potential Tool

An additive manufacturing technology based on projection light, digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing, has been widely applied in the field of medical products production and development. The precision projection light, reflected by a million pixels instead of a focused point, provides this technology both printing accuracy and printing speed. In particular, this printing technology provides a relatively milder condition to cells due to its non-direct contact. This review introduces the DLP-based 3D printing technology and its applications in medicine, including precise medical devices, functionalized artificial tissues and specific drug delivery systems. The products are particularly discussed for their significance for medicine. We believe that this technology provides a potential tool for biological research and clinical medicine, while challenges of scale-up and regulatory approval are also discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document