Abstract PO-083: Descriptive pilot study results of belief in research, religious coping, and willingness to participate in clinical trials among African Americans with hematologic malignancies

Author(s):  
Marjorie Petty
Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5808-5808
Author(s):  
Volha Mazziotto ◽  
Katrina Mikofalvy ◽  
Alexandra Houck ◽  
Lauren Beck ◽  
Prasad V. Bodas

Abstract Background: African Americans are underrepresented in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Underrepresentation of this patient group may lead to an inadequate analysis of therapy risks and benefits, and study findings may not be generalizable to a diverse patient population. Moreover, low representation of African Americans in existing clinical trials may discourage future trials focused on this population, as such trials are perceived to be infeasible. Barriers to participation in clinical trials have been extensively studied. Frequently identified factors include: systemic barriers (availability of clinical trials, eligibility barriers, lack of resources), geography (location of the research institution and access to transportation), and individual-level barriers such as low education, poverty, and poor access to healthcare. Willingness to participate has been cited as a major barrier, related to distrust in the US healthcare systemand to cultural and religious beliefs. Yet a dearth of empirical evidence bolsters the assertion that willingness to participate in clinical trials among African Americans is accountable for underrepresentation. We performed a retrospective review of major RCTs focused on sickle cell disease (SCD) in order to measure willingness of African Americans to participate in clinical research. Methods: We systematically identified landmark peer-reviewed RCTs focused on SCD. We analyzed the results of these trials reported in the medical literature and calculated participation and completion rates for each trial. For each study, we identified the number of subjects screened for participation, the number who agreed to participate, and the number who declined. We calculated ratios for study acceptance and study completion. We identified the number of publications which clearly reported data from which acceptance to participate could be directly calculated, the number from which participation could be inferred, or from which reported data were insufficient. Results: We identified 13 RCTs published between 1986 and 2018, representing the major clinically impactful studies in children and adults with SCD. Six of the 13 studies reported sufficient data to infer or calculate participation rates. It is notable that more than half (54%; n=7) of the studies provided insufficient data to calculate study acceptance rates. Our analysis encompassing 2407 patients included in six studies indicates that 82% of subjects with SCD demonstrated willingness to participate in an RCT (range 32-94%), and 95% of clinical trial subjects completed study activities (range 92-98%). Discussion: A minority of publications reported participation data. One of the 13 studies published data on the race of participants, reporting 94% of participants were African American and 3% were Hispanic. However, since SCD predominantly affects African Americans (approximately 90% of those with SCD nationwide are African American and approximately 10% are Hispanic), it is reasonable to estimate that the subjects in our analysis represent a predominantly African American population. We acknowledge that subjects with SCD may not be representative of the US African American population in total. Nonetheless, our findings contradict the assertion that African Americans are less willing to participate in clinical trials, or that African Americans have disproportionately high drop-out rates. Only a minority of publications reported data required to calculate participation rates. Despite this limitation, available empiric evidence suggests that when participation in high-quality clinical trials is made available, African Americans demonstrate a willingness and capacity to enroll and complete study participation. The generalized assertion that African American patients' willingness to participate in research is a major factor in their underrepresentation in clinical trials is false. Researchers should design high-quality clinical trials that include this underrepresented group at the outset, and investigators should be encouraged to collect and report participation data more carefully so that this disparity can be measured and addressed. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Cunningham-Erves ◽  
Tilicia Mayo-Gamble ◽  
Pamela C Hull ◽  
Tao Lu ◽  
Claudia Barajas ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim: Culturally-appropriate, educational programs are recommended to improve cancer clinical trial participation among African Americans and Latinos. This study investigated the effect of a culturally-appropriate, educational program on knowledge, trust in medical researchers, and intent for clinical trial participation among African Americans and Latinos in Middle Tennessee.Method: Trained community health educators delivered a 30-minute presentation with video testimonials to 198 participants in 13 town halls. A pre-post survey design was used to evaluate the intervention among 102 participants who completed both pre- and post-surveys one to two weeks after the session. Results: Paired-sample t-test showed significant increases in unadjusted mean scores for knowledge (p < .001), trust in medical researchers (p < .001), and willingness to participate in clinical trials (p = .003) after the town halls in the overall sample. After adjusting for gender and education, all three outcomes remained significant for the overall sample (knowledge: p < .001; trust in medical researchers: p < .001; willingness: p = .001) and for African Americans (knowledge: p < .001; trust in medical researchers: p = .007; willingness: p = .005). However, willingness to participate was no longer significant for Latinos (knowledge: p < .001; trust in medical researchers: p = .034; willingness: p = .084).Conclusions: The culturally-appropriate, educational program showed promising results for short-term, clinical trial outcomes. Further studies should examine efficacy to improve research participation outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica F Baird ◽  
Jeffer Eidi Sasaki ◽  
Brian M Sandroff ◽  
Gary Cutter ◽  
Robert W Motl

BACKGROUND Sedentary behavior is a major concern among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), as it may accelerate disease progression and exacerbate physical disability. This is especially concerning among African Americans, a segment of the MS population who present with greater neurological disability and higher odds of physical comorbidities than their Caucasian counterparts. OBJECTIVE To date, researchers have not proposed interventions that focus on changing sedentary behavior in African Americans with MS. METHODS This paper describes a pilot study that examines the feasibility and efficacy of using text messaging along with theory-driven newsletters and behavioral coaching for changing sedentary behavior in African Americans with MS. We herein present the methods, procedures, and outcomes for our ongoing study. RESULTS Enrollment began in February 2018 and is expected to conclude in April 2019. Study results will be reported in the fall of 2019. CONCLUSIONS After completion of this pilot intervention, we will summarize our study results in manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed journals that will provide critical information on the feasibility and efficacy of our strategy. These results will inform future studies and, potentially, larger interventions for remotely reducing sedentary behavior in African Americans with MS. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03671499; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03671499 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/77MZnxyNy)


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Moore ◽  
Michael Knepp ◽  
Christopher Immel ◽  
Russell Jones ◽  
Thomas Ollendick

1992 ◽  
Vol 26 (9-11) ◽  
pp. 2109-2112
Author(s):  
J. G. Cleary ◽  
T. J. Boehm ◽  
R. J. Geary

Schoeller Technical Papers, Inc. (Schoeller), which manufactures photographic and other specialty papers, is located in Pulaski, New York. The wastewater treatment system consists of a primary clarifier and two settling lagoons. Secondary treatment using a biotower was proposed to meet the new New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) discharge limits for BOD and TSS. The effluent from each basin is discharged directly to the Salmon River, at an approximate average flow of 1.6 million gallons/day (mgd). A biotower pilot study was performed to evaluate the suitability of a biotower treatment process for treating the total effluent from Schoeller's facility. The pilot study was used to select the media for the full-scale biotower and to confirm the design loading for the full-scale biotower, which proceeded in parallel with the pilot study due to the schedule constraints. Two pilot systems were operated to compare a conventional cross-flow and vertical media. Test data were collected to evaluate the performance of each pilot treatment system at a range of loading conditions and to develop the design loading information for the full-scale plant. The pilot units were operated for a period of 10 months. BOD concentrations to the pilot units averaged 58 mg/l with a peak of 210 mg/l. Approximately 80% of the BOD was soluble. BOD loadings averaged 21 lb BOD/day/1,000 cubic feet with a peak of 77 lb BOD/day/1,000 cubic feet. Both pilot units achieved excellent BOD removals exceeding 75%, with average effluent soluble BOD concentration less than 10 mg/l and average effluent TSS concentrations of 12 mg/l. The two media achieved comparable performance throughout most of the pilot study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document