Atlas-Independent, Electrophysiological Mapping of the Optimal Locus of Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for the Motor Symptoms of Parkinson Disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin C. Conrad ◽  
James M. Mossner ◽  
Kelvin L. Chou ◽  
Parag G. Patil
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Deep Brain

Rescuing Suboptimal Outcomes of Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease by Surgical Lead Revision

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. E314-E321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C Nickl ◽  
Martin M Reich ◽  
Nicoló Gabriele Pozzi ◽  
Patrick Fricke ◽  
Florian Lange ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Surgical Revision ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Optimal Position ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Motor Improvement ◽  
Stn Dbs ◽  
Deep Brain

Abstract BACKGROUND Clinical trials have established subthalamic deep-brain-stimulation (STN-DBS) as a highly effective treatment for motor symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD), but in clinical practice outcomes are variable. Experienced centers are confronted with an increasing number of patients with partially “failed” STN-DBS, in whom motor benefit doesn’t meet expectations. These patients require a complex multidisciplinary and standardized workup to identify the likely cause. OBJECTIVE To describe outcomes in a series of PD patients undergoing lead revision for suboptimal motor benefit after STN-DBS surgery and characterize selection criteria for surgical revision. METHODS We investigated 9 PD patients with STN-DBS, who had unsatisfactory outcomes despite intensive neurological management. Surgical revision was considered if the ratio of DBS vs levodopa-induced improvement of UPDRS-III (DBS-rr) was below 75% and the electrodes were found outside the dorsolateral STN. RESULTS Fifteen electrodes were replaced via stereotactic revision surgery into the dorsolateral STN without any adverse effects. Median displacement distance was 4.1 mm (range 1.6-8.42 mm). Motor symptoms significantly improved (38.2 ± 6.6 to 15.5 ± 7.9 points, P < .001); DBS-rr increased from 64% to 190%. CONCLUSION Patients with persistent OFFmotor symptoms after STN-DBS should be screened for levodopa-responsiveness, which can serve as a benchmark for best achievable motor benefit. Even small horizontal deviations of the lead from the optimal position within the dorsolateral STN can cause stimulation responses, which are markedly inferior to the levodopa response. Patients with an image confirmed lead displacement and preserved levodopa response are candidates for lead revision and can expect significant motor improvement from appropriate lead replacement.

The Benefit of Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Pain in Parkinson Disease: A 2-Year Follow-up Study

Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han-Joon Kim ◽  
Beom S. Jeon ◽  
Jee-Young Lee ◽  
Sun Ha Paek ◽  
Dong Gyu Kim
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Beneficial Effect ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Motor Disorder ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Stn Dbs ◽  
Deep Brain

Abstract BACKGROUND Pain is a well-recognized feature of Parkinson disease (PD), which is primarily a motor disorder. In a previous study, we showed that subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) improves pain as well as motor symptoms 3 months after surgery in PD patients. OBJECTIVE To determine whether there is a long-term beneficial effect of STN DBS on pain in PD. METHODS We studied 21 patients with PD who underwent STN DBS. Motor symptoms were assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and Hoehn and Yahr staging. Pain was evaluated by asking patients about the quality and severity of pain in each body part. Evaluations were performed at baseline and at 3 and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS At baseline, 18 of the 21 patients (86%) experienced pain. After surgery, most of the pain reported at baseline had improved or disappeared at 3 months and improved further at 24 months. The benefit of STN DBS for pain evaluated at 24 months was comparable to that with medication at baseline. At 24 months, 9 patients (43%) reported new pain that was not present at baseline. Most of the new pain was musculoskeletal in quality. Despite the development of new pain, the mean pain score at follow-up was lower than at baseline. CONCLUSION STN DBS improves pain in PD, and this beneficial effect persists, being observed after a prolonged follow-up of 24 months. In addition, in many of the PD patients new, mainly musculoskeletal pain developed on longer follow-up.

Spatial Topographies of Unilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Efficacy for Ipsilateral, Contralateral, Midline, and Total Parkinson Disease Motor Symptoms

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-88
Author(s):  
Mahesh B Shenai ◽  
Andrew Romeo ◽  
Harrison C Walker ◽  
Stephanie Guthrie ◽  
Ray L Watts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Subthalamic Nucleus ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Electrode Placement ◽  
Kriging Interpolation ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Disease Rating ◽  
Deep Brain

Abstract BACKGROUND Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation is a successful intervention for medically refractory Parkinson disease, although its efficacy depends on optimal electrode placement. Even though the predominant effect is observed contralaterally, modest improvements in ipsilateral and midline symptoms are also observed. OBJECTIVE To elucidate the role of contact location of unilateral deep brain stimulation on contralateral, ipsilateral, and axial subscores of Parkinson disease motor symptoms. METHODS Eighty-six patients receiving first deep brain stimulation STN electrode placements were identified, yielding 73 patients with 3-month follow-up. Total preoperative and postoperative Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part III scores were obtained and divided into contralateral, ipsilateral, and midline subscores. Contact location was determined on immediate postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. A 3-dimensional ordinary “kriging” algorithm generated spatial interpolations for total, ipsilateral, contralateral, and midline symptom categories. Interpolative reconstructions were performed in the axial planes (z = −0.5, −1.0, −1.5, −3.5, −4.5, −6.0) and a sagittal plane (x = 12.0). Interpolation error and significance were quantified by use of a cross-validation technique and quantile-quantile analysis. RESULTS There was an overall reduction in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part III symptoms: total = 37.0 ± 24.11% (P &lt; .05), ipsilateral = 15.9 ± 51.8%, contralateral = 56.2 ± 26.8% (P &lt; .05), and midline = 26.5 ± 34.7%. Kriging interpolation was performed and cross-validated with quantile-quantile analysis with high correlation (R2 &gt; 0.92) and demonstrated regions of efficacy for each symptom category. Contralateral symptoms demonstrated broad regions of efficacy across the peri-STN area. The ipsilateral and midline regions of efficacy were constrained and located along the dorsal STN and caudal zona incerta. CONCLUSION We provide evidence for a unique functional topographic window in which contralateral, ipsilateral, and midline structures may achieve the best efficacy. Although there are overlapping regions, laterality demonstrates distinct topographies. Surgical optimization should target the intersection of optimal regions for these symptom categories.

A stroke of silence: tinnitus suppression following placement of a deep brain stimulation electrode with infarction in area LC

2013 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 192-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul S. Larson ◽  
Steven W. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Vascular Injury ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Postoperative Mri ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode ◽  
Contralateral Ear ◽  
Stimulation Electrode ◽  
Deep Brain

The authors report on a case of tinnitus suppression following deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson disease. A perioperative focal vascular injury to area LC, a locus of the caudate at the junction of the head and body of the caudate nucleus, is believed to be the neuroanatomical correlate. A 56-year-old woman underwent surgery for implantation of a DBS lead in the subthalamic nucleus to treat medically refractory motor symptoms. She had comorbid tinnitus localized to both ears. The lead trajectory was adjacent to area LC. Shortly after surgery, she reported tinnitus suppression in both ears. Postoperative MRI showed focal hyperintensity of area LC on T2-weighted images. At 18 months, tinnitus localized to the ipsilateral ear remained completely silenced, and tinnitus localized to the contralateral ear was substantially suppressed due to left area LC injury. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of a discrete injury to area LC that resulted in bilateral tinnitus suppression. Clinicians treating patients with DBS may wish to include auditory phantom assessment as part of the neurological evaluation.

Patient Selection Criteria for Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease

2020 ◽  
pp. 43-48
Author(s):  
Laura S. Surillo Dahdah ◽  
Padraig O’Suilleabhain ◽  
Hrishikesh Dadhich ◽  
Mazen Elkurd ◽  
Shilpa Chitnis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Patient Selection ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Cerebral Atrophy ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Patient Selection Criteria ◽  
Treatment Medication ◽  
Deep Brain

Patient selection is critical for optimizing clinical outcomes after deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Patient expectations need to be addressed before DBS surgery to avoid disappointment. There are generally accepted criteria for DBS candidacy for treatment of Parkinson disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), and dystonia. For PD, selection criteria include a diagnosis of idiopathic PD and the presence of disabling or troubling motor symptoms such as motor fluctuations or dyskinesia (despite optimized pharmacologic treatment). Medication-resistant tremor is also an indication. The response of problematic motor symptoms to dopaminergic drugs is an important predictor of DBS response, favoring selection of patients for whom levodopa substantially improves tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity. Rarely, gait is improved with DBS, and in some cases freezing can improve, although this is not a predictable post-DBS feature. Exclusion criteria include serious medical comorbidities, uncontrolled psychiatric illness (thought and mood disorders), and dementia. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging with extensive white matter changes, vascular malformations, severe cerebral atrophy, or hydrocephalus can also be exclusions. The patient should clearly understand the risks and benefits of DBS, which should be assessed using a preoperative multidisciplinary evaluation (neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychology, psychiatry, and rehabilitation). Use of a social worker and/or nutritionist can also be helpful in select cases.

Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease

2020 ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
Raja Mehanna
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Motor Control ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Benefit Ratio ◽  
Patient Screening ◽  
Deep Brain

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) directed to the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the globus pallidus interna (GPi) has been demonstrated to improve motor control as well as quality of life in patients with Parkinson disease (PD). While patient screening is key to ensure that only patients with the most advantageous risk-to-benefit ratio proceed to DBS, effective postoperative programming is key to improving cardinal motor symptoms of PD. Applying sound principles of DBS programming can maximize benefits and reduce side effects of DBS. This chapter suggests a systematic approach to DBS programming for PD as well as a few programming pearls.

scholarly journals Fully Automated Targeting Using Nonrigid Image Registration Matches Accuracy and Exceeds Precision of Best Manual Approaches to Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Targeting in Parkinson Disease

Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 756-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srivatsan Pallavaram ◽  
Pierre-François D'Haese ◽  
Wendell Lake ◽  
Peter E. Konrad ◽  
Benoit M. Dawant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Image Registration ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Red Nucleus ◽  
Nonrigid Image Registration ◽  
Direct Targeting ◽  
Fully Automatic ◽  
Stn Dbs ◽  
Deep Brain

Abstract BACKGROUND: Finding the optimal location for the implantation of the electrode in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is crucial for maximizing the therapeutic benefit to the patient. Such targeting is challenging for several reasons, including anatomic variability between patients as well as the lack of consensus about the location of the optimal target. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of popular manual targeting methods against a fully automatic nonrigid image registration-based approach. METHODS: In 71 Parkinson disease subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS implantations, an experienced functional neurosurgeon selected the target manually using 3 different approaches: indirect targeting using standard stereotactic coordinates, direct targeting based on the patient magnetic resonance imaging, and indirect targeting relative to the red nucleus. Targets were also automatically predicted by using a leave-one-out approach to populate the CranialVault atlas with the use of nonrigid image registration. The different targeting methods were compared against the location of the final active contact, determined through iterative clinical programming in each individual patient. RESULTS: Targeting by using standard stereotactic coordinates corresponding to the center of the motor territory of the STN had the largest targeting error (3.69 mm), followed by direct targeting (3.44 mm), average stereotactic coordinates of active contacts from this study (3.02 mm), red nucleus-based targeting (2.75 mm), and nonrigid image registration-based automatic predictions using the CranialVault atlas (2.70 mm). The CranialVault atlas method had statistically smaller variance than all manual approaches. CONCLUSION: Fully automatic targeting based on nonrigid image registration with the use of the CranialVault atlas is as accurate and more precise than popular manual methods for STN-DBS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document