scholarly journals Living with Ulcerative Colitis in Japan: Biologic Persistence and Health-Care Resource Use

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Danielle Bargo ◽  
Theo Tritton ◽  
Joseph C. Cappelleri ◽  
Marco DiBonaventura ◽  
Timothy W. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Biologic Therapy ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Health Care Resource ◽  
Administrative Database ◽  
Outpatient Visits

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of the study was to improve understanding of adherence and persistence to biologics, and their association with health-care resource utilization (HCRU), in Japanese patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Data were from Medical Data Vision, a secondary care administrative database. A retrospective, longitudinal cohort analysis was conducted of data from UC patients initiating biologic therapy between August 2013 and July 2016. Data collected for 2 years prior (baseline) and 2 years after (follow-up) the index date were evaluated. Patients completing biologic induction were identified, and adherence/persistence to biologic therapy calculated. HCRU, steroid, and immunosuppressant use during baseline and follow-up were assessed. Biologic switching during the follow-up was evaluated. Descriptive statistics (e.g., means and proportions) were obtained and inferential analyses (from Student’s <i>t</i> tests, Fisher’s exact tests, χ<sup>2</sup> tests, the Cox proportional hazard model, and negative binomial regression) were performed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The analysis included 649 patients (adalimumab: 265; infliximab: 384). Biologic induction was completed by 80% of patients. Adherence to adalimumab was higher than that to infliximab (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). Persistence at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months was higher with infliximab than with adalimumab (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). Overall, gastroenterology outpatient visits increased, and hospitalization frequency and duration decreased, from baseline to follow-up. UC-related hospitalizations were fewer and shorter, and endoscopies fewer, in persistent than in nonpersistent patients, although persistent patients made more outpatient visits than nonpersistent patients. Hospitalization duration was lower in persistent than nonpersistent patients. Approximately 50% of patients received an immunosuppressant during biologic therapy; 5% received a concomitant steroid during biologic therapy. Overall, 17% and 3% of patients, respectively, received 2nd line and 3rd line biologics. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Poor biologic persistence was associated with increased non-medication-associated HCRU. Effective treatments with high persistence levels and limited associated HCRU are needed in UC.

Disease burden in patients with asthma before initiating biologics: A retrospective cohort database study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hector Ortega ◽  
Beth Hahn ◽  
Josephine N. Tran ◽  
Chris Bell ◽  
Salman A. Shams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Biologic Therapy ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Baseline Period ◽  
Health Care Resource ◽  
Blood Eosinophil ◽  
Health Care Resource Utilization

Background: Real-world data on the characteristics and burden of disease among patients with asthma before receiving asthma-specific biologics would improve the understanding of the use of these therapies in a clinical setting. Currently, limited data are available on the use of mepolizumab and omalizumab for the treatment of asthma. Objective: To determine the characteristics and disease burden among patients with asthma before initiating treatment with mepolizumab or omalizumab. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of commercial and Medicare Advantage Plan members from a medical claims database with a new claim for mepolizumab or omalizumab between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2017 (GSK ID: HO-17‐18283). Eligible patients had a diagnosis of asthma and continuous enrollment in the health plan, with clinical and pharmacy benefits for 12 months before initiating asthma-specific biologic treatment (baseline period), and no diagnosis of chronic idiopathic urticaria during the baseline period. Patient characteristics, exacerbations, and asthma-related health care resource utilization and costs were assessed during the baseline period. Results: Overall, 188 and 901 patients prescribed mepolizumab and omalizumab, respectively, were included. In the 12 months before initiating asthma-specific biologic therapy, the patients prescribed mepolizumab were older, had higher blood eosinophil counts, more-frequent exacerbations (2.9 versus 2.0 exacerbations/year; p < 0.001), and more inhaled corticosteroid and systemic corticosteroid use compared with those prescribed omalizumab. Overall, asthma-related health-care resource utilization and costs were similar across both treatment cohorts, although patients prescribed mepolizumab had more pharmacy fills, higher pharmacy costs, and lower clinic costs compared with patients prescribed omalizumab (20.8 versus 16.9 fills, $4504 versus $3102, and $1816 versus $2709, respectively; all p < 0.001). Conclusion: In the 12 months before initiating asthma-specific biologic therapy, the patients prescribed mepolizumab may have a greater disease burden than those prescribed omalizumab. Overall, health-care resource utilization and costs were broadly similar across both treatment cohorts.

scholarly journals Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: a population-wide study on prevalence and health care use in Finland in 1998–2016

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaana Keto ◽  
Sonja Hahtola ◽  
Miika Linna ◽  
Liisa Väkevä
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Mycosis Fungoides ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Medical Specialty ◽  
Health Care Use ◽  
Sézary Syndrome ◽  
Sezary Syndrome ◽  
Outpatient Visits

Abstract Background Information about health care use and costs of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) patients is limited, particularly in a European setting. Methods In this population-wide study we set out to investigate prevalence, and trends in health care use in two CTCL subtypes, mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) over a time period of 19 years in 1998–2016 by using a nation-wide patient register containing data on all diagnosed MF and SS cases in Finland. Results The prevalence of diagnosed MF and SS rose from 2.04 to 5.38/100000, and from 0.16 to 0.36/100000 for MF and SS respectively during 1998–2016. We found a substantial decrease in inpatient treatment of MF/SS in the past two decades with a mean of 2 inpatient days/patient/year due to MF/SS in 2016, while the mean numbers of MF/SS related outpatient visits remained stable at 8 visits/year/patient. Most MF/SS-related outpatient visits occurred in the medical specialty of dermatology. In a ten-year follow-up after MF/SS diagnosis, the main causes for outpatient visits and inpatient stays were MF/SS itself, other cancers, and other skin conditions. Also cardiovascular disease and infections contributed to the number of inpatient days. Mean total hospital costs decreased from 11,600 eur/patient/year to 3600 eur/patient/year by year 4 of the follow-up, and remained at that level for the remainder of the 10-year follow-up. MF/SS accounted for approximately half of the hospital costs of these patients throughout the follow-up. Conclusions The nearly 3-fold increase in prevalence of diagnosed MF/SS during 1998–2016 puts pressure on the health care system, as this is a high-cost patient group with a heavy burden of comorbidities. The challenge can be in part answered by shifting the treatment of MF/SS to a more outpatient-based practice, and by adapting new pharmacotherapy, as has been done in Finland.

scholarly journals The impact of high-risk and chronic opioid use among commercially insured endometriosis patients on health care resource utilization and costs in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 174550652096589
Author(s):  
Stephanie J Estes ◽  
Ahmed M Soliman ◽  
Marko Zivkovic ◽  
Divyan Chopra ◽  
Xuelian Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Health Care Resource ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Health Care Resource Utilization ◽  
Outpatient Visits ◽  
Chronic Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Users

Objectives: Evaluate all-cause and endometriosis-related health care resource utilization and costs among newly diagnosed endometriosis patients with high-risk versus low-risk opioid use or patients with chronic versus non-chronic opioid use. Methods: A retrospective analysis of IBM MarketScan® Commercial Claims data from 2009 to 2018 was performed for females aged 18 to 49 with newly diagnosed endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition code: 617.xx; International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition code: N80.xx). Two sub-cohorts were identified: high-risk (⩾1 day with ⩾90 morphine milligram equivalents per day or ⩾1-day concomitant benzodiazepine use) or chronic opioid utilization (⩾90-day supply prescribed or ⩾10 opioid prescriptions). High-risk or chronic utilization was evaluated during the 12-month assessment period after the index date. Index date was the first opioid prescription within 12 months following endometriosis diagnosis. All outcomes were assessed over 12-month post-assessment period while adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Out of 61,019 patients identified, 18,239 had high-risk opioid use and 5001 chronic opioid use. Health care resource utilization drivers were outpatient visits and pharmacy fills, which were higher among high-risk versus low-risk patients (outpatient visits: 17.49 vs 15.51; pharmacy fills: 19.58 vs 16.88, p < 0.0001). Chronic opioid users had a higher number of outpatient visits (19.53 vs 15.00, p < 0.0001) and pharmacy fills (23.18 vs 16.43, p < 0.0001) compared to non-chronic opioid users. High-risk opioid users had significantly higher all-cause health care costs compared to low-risk opioid users (US$16,377 vs US$13,153; p < 0.0001). Chronic opioid users also had significantly higher all-cause health care costs compared to non-chronic opioid users (US$20,930 vs US$12,272; p < 0.0001). Similar patterns were observed among endometriosis-related HCRU, except pharmacy fills among high-risk and chronic sub-cohorts. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates significantly higher all-cause and endometriosis-related health care resource utilization and total costs for high-risk opioid users compared to low-risk opioid users among newly diagnosed endometriosis patients over 1 year. Similar trends were observed for comparing chronic opioid users with non-chronic opioid users, except for endometriosis-related pharmacy fills and associated costs.

scholarly journals PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PERSPECTIVE ON COVID-19 AND HEALTH CARE SERVICE DURING THE PANDEMIC

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S50-S51
Author(s):  
Randi Opheim ◽  
Kristian Moum ◽  
Bjørn Moum
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Biological Therapy ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Health Care Service ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have experienced changes to the routine management of their conditions during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The disease as well IBD treatment frequently require immunosuppressant medications, which could increase their risk of infection. The aim of this study was to determine patients’ experience of the health care service, including the restrictions of hospitals visits made in Norway from Mars 12th 2020. Method From June 18 to September 18 2020, all patients at the IBD outpatient clinic at Oslo University Hospital in Norway on biological therapy or other immunosuppressant’s were included. A questionnaire including patients concerns regarding their disease, medical therapy and COVID-19, as well as their health care service needs in follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results Altogether 506 IBD patients answered a paper-based questionnaire. The mean age was 40.78 (SD 14.71), 289/506 (57%) men, ulcerative colitis 199/506 (39%), Crohn’s disease 307/506 (61%). Sixty-three patients (12.5%) used biological therapy in combination with azathioprine or steroids. Ninety-one (18.2%) were in obligated quarantine with negative test. Five patients (4.9%) tested positive to SARS- CoV-2 of the 98 patients tested, (1.0% of the total sample). One third of the IBD patients perceived they had increased risk for being infected by SARS- CoV-2 because of the immunosuppressive drugs they used. Nonetheless, 496/506 (98.6%) of the patients adhered to continuing their medication. One-hundred and sixty-one (32.3%) voluntarily isolated, and 21/506 (4.2%) was in sick leave being afraid of being infected. Furthermore, 20/506 (4.0%) cancelled their consultation because they were afraid of being infected from SARS- CoV-2 at the hospital. The hospital changed physical consultation to telephone consultation for 75/506 (15.0%) of the patients. Thirty-eight patients (7.6%) reported that they were afraid of going to the hospital because of restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and 18/506 (3.6%) did not feel safe when at hospital. Approximately half of the IBD patients (219/506) were satisfied with the information provided by physician about medical treatment for IBD and Covid-19 while 398/506 (77.3%) were satisfied with the information from health-care providers about restrictions due to COVID-19. There were no statistical differences between Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Conclusion IBD patients on biological treatment and immunosuppressives took precautions because of fear of being infected with SARS- CoV-2. At the same time, they adhere to medical treatment regimens and follow-up at the hospital. Most patients were satisfied with the information they received from physicians and other health-care workers. One percent tested positive to SARS-CoV-2.

scholarly journals Analysis of Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs after the Initiation of Biologic Treatment in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease

10.36469/9791 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Perera ◽  
Shibing Yang ◽  
Marni Stott-Miller ◽  
Joanne Brady
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Outpatient Visits ◽  
Ed Visits

Background: This retrospective cohort study aimed to describe and quantify healthcare resource utilization and costs for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) following initiation of biologic therapy. Methods: Resource utilization and costs were analyzed at baseline and 1- and 2-years after initiating a biologic. Data were extracted from a US administrative health insurance claims database for adults ≥18 years. Eligible patients were continuously enrolled in a health plan with medical and pharmacy benefits for ≥12 months prior to, and 12 months (primary analysis) or 24 months (secondary analysis) after index date (biologic initiation). Results: In total, 4864 and 2692 patients with UC, and 8910 and 5227 patients with CD were identified in the 1- and 2-year follow-up cohorts, respectively. Of 1-year follow-up cohort patients, 45% received the same biologic initiated at index for ≥1 year. Infliximab and adalimumab were the most commonly initiated biologics in patients with UC or CD. The highest proportion of patients who continued with the same biologic after 1-and 2-years had initiated therapy with infliximab for both indications (although at the 1-year follow-up for CD, the highest proportion continued to use natalizumab, but this was a small sample [n=15]). Generally, the proportion of patients having inpatient admissions and emergency department (ED) visits decreased after receiving the same biologic for 1 year compared with baseline, although the proportion having outpatient visits did not change. Mean per patient all-cause costs for inpatient hospitalizations, ED visits and outpatient visits decreased for patients with UC or CD who received the same biologic for 1 year, while mean pharmacy costs per patient increased. Conclusions; This descriptive analysis shows that although biologics effectively reduced inpatient and ED resource utilization and corresponding costs in patients with UC and CD, total management costs increased, driven by increased pharmacy costs.

scholarly journals P562 5-ASA in ulcerative colitis: Are they really needed in the biological therapy era?

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S474-S474
Author(s):  
C Arieira ◽  
F Dias de Castro ◽  
T Cúrdia Gonçalves ◽  
M J Moreira ◽  
J Cotter
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Biologic Therapy ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Inflammatory Biomarkers ◽  
Faecal Calprotectin ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Maintenance Of Remission ◽  
Treatment Escalation

Abstract Background Biologic therapy has demonstrated efficacy for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it remains unclear whether oral aminosalicylates (5-ASA) should be continued or stopped after treatment escalation to biologics. The aim of the study was to evaluate differences in inflammatory biomarkers or the occurrence of complications in UC patients being treated with a combination of 5-ASA and biologics vs. biologics alone. Methods Retrospective study, including patients with UC and on biologic therapy with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Collected inflammatory biomarkers were faecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The occurrence of complications was defined as the need of hospitalisation, need of corticosteroids or other top-up therapy, surgery and the occurrence of dysplasia or colorectal cancer. Results We included 65 patients with UC, 56.9% female with a mean age of 32.8 (±12.8) years. The median follow-up was 30 (6–132) months. Regarding extension, 61.5% were E3, 35.4% E2 and 3.1% E1. While 44 patients (67.7%) were on 5-ASA and biologics (infliximab = 32, adalimumab = 6, vedolizumab = 6), 21 (32.3%) were on biologics alone (infliximab = 13, adalimumab = 3, vedolizumab = 5). The median duration of biologic therapy was 30 (6–126) months. Regarding baseline characteristics, including age, gender, duration of the disease or biologic therapy and age at UC diagnosis, there were no differences between groups. No differences regarding inflammatory biomarkers were observed – fecal calprotectin (p = 0.39), CRP (p = 0.9) and ESR (p = 0.61). No differences were found regarding complications, namely the need of hospitalisation (p = 0.06) or need of corticosteroids (p = 0.89). Only one patient developed dysplasia (under infliximab and 5-ASA). Any of the included patients needed surgery or developed colorectal cancer. Conclusion About two-thirds of the UC patients under biologics are co-treated with 5-ASA. No differences between UC patients under combination biologics+5-ASA vs. biologics alone were found regarding inflammatory biomarkers or the occurrence of complications. These results raise the question if continuing 5-ASA in UC patients under biologics is really necessary.

Comparison of health care resource use before and after docetaxel treatment among prostate cancer patients.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 215-215
Author(s):  
M. Mehra ◽  
Y. Wu ◽  
R. Dhawan
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Health Care Resource ◽  
Claims Database ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Docetaxel Treatment ◽  
Lost To Follow Up

215 Background: Docetaxel is standard of care among late-stage prostate cancer patients. We analyzed patterns of health care resource utilization (RU) among patients before and after exposure to docetaxel using a large commercial claims database. Methods: A random sample of patients (N = 336) with a diagnosis of prostate cancer (ICD 9 code: 185.X) and a claim for docetaxel (2003–2009) was identified from the PharMetrics database, a nationally representative, non-payer-owned integrated commercial U.S. claims database. All patients had ≥ 12 months of enrollment prior to initiation of docetaxel. Patients were followed from their first docetaxel claim until lost to follow-up or June 30, 2009 (censored). RU was defined as all-cause hospitalization, ER, physician, and ambulatory visits. Incidence rates were derived. Results: Mean age of patients was 67.9 years (SD 10.6); mean number of docetaxel prescriptions was 9.9 (SD 10.3). Mean time to study end/lost to follow-up was 15.41 (SD 12.49) months from the index date. The table shows health care RU for the 12 months before, and over the follow-up period after docetaxel initiation. Hospitalizations, ER, physician, and ambulatory visits were significantly higher in the follow-up period. The average length of hospital stay was significantly longer after docetaxel treatment (8.2 vs 5.5 days). Prior to docetaxel, two-thirds of the patients were on hormonal therapy; 51% on analgesics, and 31% on bisphosphonates. After docetaxel, the proportions were 62%, 58%, and 54%, respectively. Conclusions: The significantly higher RU with disease progression in prostate cancer patients suggests a need for new treatment options that can effectively manage and improve patient outcomes. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Health care resource utilization in patients with advanced melanoma receiving immunotherapies in the real world.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9532-9532
Author(s):  
Richard Wayne Joseph ◽  
Alicia C. Shillington ◽  
Todd Lee ◽  
Cynthia Macahilig ◽  
Scott J. Diede ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Real World ◽  
Health Care Resource ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
The Real ◽  
Health Care Resource Utilization ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Ed Visits

9532 Background: Both pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) and combination ipilimumab + nivolumab (IPI+NIVO) are FDA-approved immunotherapies for advanced melanoma (AM). These two treatment regimens have different toxicity profiles which may impact health care resource utilization (HCRU). Our aim was to compare real-world risk of hospitalization and emergency department (ED) visits within 12 months of starting the two treatment regimens. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients ≥18 years old with AM initiating PEMBRO or IPI+NIVO between Jan 1, 2016 – Dec 30, 2017. Patients were identified from 12 US academic medical centers and affiliated satellite clinics. Data were abstracted through chart review. All-cause hospitalizations or ED visits and the rates per patient per month (PPPM) through 12 months of follow-up were calculated. Utilization was compared between PEMRBO and IPI+NIVO using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: 400 patients were included, 200 each PEMBRO and IPI+NIVO with mean (SD) follow-up time of 10 (3) and 10 (4) months, respectively. The PEMBRO cohort had poorer Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status at treatment start, 71% ECOG 0 or 1 vs 88% (p < .001); more diabetes, 21% vs 13% (p = .045); a trend towards more heart disease, 18% vs 12% (p = .067); were more likely to be PD-L1 expression positive, 77% vs 63% (p = .011); and less likely to harbor a BRAF mutation, 35% vs 50% (p = .003). The proportion with at least one hospitalization through 12 months was 17% PEMBRO vs 24% IPI+NIVO. Less than 2% of patients had more than one admission and none had more than two, regardless of cohort. Unadjusted mean (SD) PPPM hospitalizations were .016 (.037) for PEMBRO and .020 (.038) for IPI+NIVO. The adjusted odds ratio for any hospitalization with PEMBRO was 0.55 (95% CI .31, .97; p = .039) vs. IPI+NIVO. ED visits occurred in 18% vs 21% in PEMBRO and IPI+NIVO respectively, with no difference in covariate-adjusted analysis (p = .147). Conclusions: Patients receiving PEMBRO had a significantly lower probability of hospitalization and similar probability of ER visits compared with IPI+NIVO in the real world through 12 months.

scholarly journals Burden of Relapse Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation on Health Care Resource Utilization in the Management of Acute Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2372-2372
Author(s):  
Silvy Lachance ◽  
Joelle Bibeau ◽  
Jean Lachaine
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Health Care Resource ◽  
Treatment Choice ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Health Care Resource Utilization ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background: Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (aHSCT) represents the only curative modality for unfavorable acute leukemia (AL) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Despite its curative intent, a significant number of recipients relapse. There is no standardized approach for the management of relapse following transplants and therapeutic options vary among centers, which represent a major challenge. Post transplant relapse is usually associated with a poor outcome while the impact of the treatment choice on health care resource utilization and survival is unknown. The objective of this study was to measure the health care resource utilization for the management of relapse following AHSCT and how the treatment choice impacted on survival. Methods: A retrospective medical chart review was conducted at H™pital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (HMR) after research and ethic committee approval. Patients were selected using the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) program database. Eligible patients were diagnosed with AL or MDS and relapsed following a HLA identical aHSCT between January 1st 2011 and December 31st 2014. Patients' and disease characteristics as well as relapse-related health care resource utilization were collected from the date of transplant relapse diagnosis until death or last follow-up. Results: During the study period, of the 645 HSCT performed at HMR, 303 were allogeneic. A total of 36 patients who relapsed met the inclusion criteria and were included in the survival analysis. Healthcare resource utilization analysis was conducted on the 25 patients for whom complete records were available. Patients' characteristics at relapse, mean health care resource utilization per patient and survival by treatment choice are presented in tables 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The mean time from relapse to death was 10.6 months (SD=13.2). Relapse-related hospitalization duration represented on average 20.3% of patients' follow-up period (SD=26.0). For a mean follow-up time of 9.5 months (ranged from 6 days to 4.8 years), the mean number of relapse-related hospitalization was 2.2 per patient (SD=2.6). The mean length of stay was 40.4 days per patient (SD=54.5). The mean hematologist consultation number was 32.4 per patient (SD=37.3 Conclusion: Relapse following AHSCT is associated with a poor prognosis and survival and significant use of health care resources. Aggressive treatment rarely leads to a second transplant. Innovative approaches should be developed to address this unmet medical need. Healthcare resources devoted to the care of patients in relapse post AHSCT provide a comparative basis for the development of cellular therapy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Health-care resource utilization associated with peanut allergy management under allergen avoidance among commercially insured individuals

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Allen Meadows ◽  
Shengsheng Yu ◽  
Steve L. Hass ◽  
Annie Guerin ◽  
Dominick Latremouille-Viau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Peanut Allergy ◽  
Health Care Resource ◽  
Allergen Avoidance ◽  
Health Care Resource Utilization ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Outpatient Visits ◽  
Ed Visits

Background: Until recently, the standard approach to care for individuals with peanut allergy (PA) was limited to allergen avoidance and treatment of reactions with emergency medicines. Objectives: To assess health-care resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with PA management under allergen avoidance and to identify risk factors associated with peanut reactions that resulted in inpatient (IP) and/or emergency department (ED) visits. Methods: Privately insured individuals with PA diagnosis codes were identified from a large U.S. administrative claims data base (January 1, 1999, to March 31, 2017). PA-related HRU, indicated by a PA diagnosis and/or diagnostic procedure codes and by epinephrine autoinjectors (EAI) prescription fills in medical and pharmacy claims, respectively, and all-cause costs were described per patient-year (PPY). Risk factors associated with peanut reactions in an IP and/or ED setting were identified by using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results: A total of 86,483 patient-years from 14,136 individuals with PA were included. At the patient-year level, 28.1% were ages 0‐3 years, 43.6% were ages 4‐11 years, 13.7% were ages 12‐17 years, and 14.5% were ages ≥ 18 years; 35.6% had PA-related outpatient visits; 50.6% had EAI fills; and 2.4% had PA-related IP and/or ED visits PPY. Younger individuals had more PA-related outpatient visits and EAI fills, with peak intensive use at ages 4‐11 years. The proportion of individuals with PA-related IP and/or ED visits was highest among those aged ≥ 18 years. Mean all-cause costs were $3084 PPY; individuals with PA-related IP and/or ED visits incurred $8902 PPY ($17,451 for those with one or more IP visits). Risk factors associated with peanut reactions that resulted in IP and/or ED visits included young adults (odds ratio [OR] 3.19 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.66‐3.83]), previous peanut reaction(s) (OR 1.66 [95% CI, 1.23‐2.24]), asthma (OR 1.33 [95% CI, 1.18‐1.51]), and male sex (OR 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01‐1.28]). Conclusion: Individuals with PA and under allergen avoidance had significant HRU that varied across all age groups, with more PA-related outpatient visits during preschool and/or school age and PA-related urgent care among adults. Individuals with previous peanut reaction(s), asthma, and males had a higher risk of peanut reactions that resulted in IP and/or ED visits.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document