Effect of Three Clinical Curing Treatments on Fluoride Release and Surface Hardness of Glass-Ionomer Cements

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. e197-e203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Dionysopoulos ◽  
Kosmas Tolidis ◽  
Paris Gerasimou ◽  
Thrasyvoulos Sfeikos
Keyword(s):  
Surface Hardness ◽  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer

scholarly journals Effect of radiant heat and ultrasound on fluoride release and surface hardness of glass ionomer cements

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 0-0 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosmas Tolidis ◽  
Dimitrios Dionysopoulos ◽  
Paris Gerasimou ◽  
Thrasyvoulos Sfeikos
Keyword(s):  
Surface Hardness ◽  
Radiant Heat ◽  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer

Positive correlation between fluoride release and acid erosion of restorative glass-ionomer cements

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lígia S. Bueno ◽  
Rafael M. Silva ◽  
Ana Paula R. Magalhães ◽  
Maria Fidela L. Navarro ◽  
Renata C. Pascotto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Positive Correlation

Effect of immersion time of restorative glass ionomer cements and immersion duration in calcium chloride solution on surface hardness

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. e377-e383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maho Shiozawa ◽  
Hidekazu Takahashi ◽  
Naohiko Iwasaki ◽  
Takahiro Wada ◽  
Motohiro Uo
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Chloride ◽  
Chloride Solution ◽  
Immersion Time ◽  
Surface Hardness ◽  
Calcium Chloride Solution ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer

Dental Cements

1988 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.C. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Zinc Phosphate ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Biological Properties ◽  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Laboratory Measurements ◽  
Acid Dissolution ◽  
Luting Agents ◽  
Unchanged Form

The manifold uses of dental cements-as (a) luting agents, (b) cavity linings and bases, and (c) restorations for teeth—make them perhaps the most important materials in clinical dentistry. The research of the last 10 years has resulted in four main types, classified by matrix-forming species: (1) phosphate, (2) phenolate, (3) polycarboxylate, and (4) polymethacrylate. The zinc phosphate cements continue to be widely used for luting in an essentially unchanged form. Acidity and oral dissolution remain as problems. The zinc-oxide eugenol cements and their modifications are useful as linings and temporary materials but are susceptible to hydrolytic breakdown. Vanillate cements may be an improvement. Calcium hydroxide-salicylate cements are widely used as cavity linings, especially on exposures, and show improved resistance to acid dissolution. Polycarboxylate cements as both zinc polycarboxylate and glass-ionomer cements show adhesion potential, good physical properties, fluoride release, and, generally, good biological properties. Glass-ionomer cements when correctly manipulated show minimal oral dissolution. Polymethacrylate cements have been used principally for bonding etched cast metal restorations to etched enamel. Recently, adhesive crown-and-bridge cements have been developed. There are no well-established correlations between laboratory measurements of apparently relevant properties and clinical performance. More clinically-based research is needed to facilitate the development of new cements.

scholarly journals Effect of one-bottle adhesive systems on the fluoride release of a resin-modified glass ionomer

2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Wang ◽  
Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf ◽  
Maria Teresa Atta
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
The One ◽  
In The Beginning

A dhesive systems associated to resin-modified glass ionomer cements are employed for the achievement of a higher bond strength to dentin. Despite this benefit, other properties should not be damaged. This study aimed at evaluating the short-time fluoride release of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement coated with two one-bottle adhesive systems in a pH cycling system. Four combinations were investigated: G1: Vitremer (V); G2: Vitremer + Primer (VP); G3: Vitremer + Single Bond (VSB) and G4: Vitremer + Prime & Bond 2.1 (VPB). SB is a fluoride-free and PB is a fluoride-containing system. After preparation of the Vitremer specimens, two coats of the selected adhesive system were carefully applied and light-cured. Specimens were immersed in demineralizing solution for 6 hours followed by immersion in remineralizing solution for 18 hours, totalizing the 15-day cycle. All groups released fluoride in a similar pattern, with a greater release in the beginning and decreasing with time. VP showed the greatest fluoride release, followed by V, with no statistical difference. VSB and VPB released less fluoride compared to V and VP, with statistical difference. Regardless the one-bottle adhesive system, application of coating decreased the fluoride release from the resin-modified glass ionomer cements. This suggests that this combination would reduce the beneficial effect of the restorative material to the walls around the restoration.

An in-vitro assessment of weekly cumulative fluoride release from three glass ionomer cements used for orthodontic banding

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaheh Vahid-Dastjerdi ◽  
Ali Borzabadi-Farahani ◽  
Homa Pourmofidi-Neistanak ◽  
Nazila Amini
Keyword(s):  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
In Vitro Assessment

Fluoride release and absorption at different pH from glass-ionomer cements

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 441-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G. Gandolfi ◽  
S. Chersoni ◽  
G.L. Acquaviva ◽  
G. Piana ◽  
C. Prati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document