scholarly journals Tracking Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation and Completion Among Medicare Beneficiaries to Inform the Efforts of a National Initiative

Author(s):  
Matthew D. Ritchey ◽  
Sha Maresh ◽  
Jessica McNeely ◽  
Thomas Shaffer ◽  
Sandra L. Jackson ◽  
...  

Background: Despite cardiac rehabilitation (CR) being shown to improve health outcomes among patients with heart disease, its use has been suboptimal. In response, the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative developed a road map to improve CR use, including increasing participation rates to ≥70% by 2022. This observational study provides current estimates to measure progress and identifies the populations and regions most at risk for CR service underutilization. Methods and Results: We identified Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who were CR eligible in 2016, and assessed CR participation (≥1 CR session attended), timely initiation (participation within 21 days of event), and completion (≥36 sessions attended) through 2017. Measures were assessed overall, by beneficiary characteristics and geography, and by primary CR-qualifying event type (acute myocardial infarction hospitalization; coronary artery bypass surgery; heart valve repair/replacement; percutaneous coronary intervention; or heart/heart-lung transplant). Among 366 103 CR-eligible beneficiaries, 89 327 (24.4%) participated in CR, of whom 24.3% initiated within 21 days and 26.9% completed CR. Eligibility was highest in the East South Central Census Division (14.8 per 1000). Participation decreased with increasing age, was lower among women (18.9%) compared with men (28.6%; adjusted prevalence ratio: 0.91 [95% CI, 0.90–0.93]) was lower among Hispanics (13.2%) and non-Hispanic blacks (13.6%) compared with non-Hispanic whites (25.8%; adjusted prevalence ratio: 0.63 [0.61–0.66] and 0.70 [0.67–0.72], respectively), and varied by hospital referral region and Census Division (range: 18.6% [East South Central] to 39.1% [West North Central]) and by qualifying event type (range: 7.1% [acute myocardial infarction without procedure] to 55.3% [coronary artery bypass surgery only]). Timely initiation varied by geography and qualifying event type; completion varied by geography. Conclusions: Only 1 in 4 CR-eligible Medicare beneficiaries participated in CR and marked disparities were observed. Reinforcement of current effective strategies and development of new strategies will be critical to address the noted disparities and achieve the 70% participation goal.

Author(s):  
David W Schopfer ◽  
Mary A Whooley

Objective: Referral to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is one of nine performance measures for patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD), but fewer than 10% of eligible Veterans participate. Home-based CR programs may improve participation in CR, particularly for rural Veterans who do not live near traditional facility-based programs. We sought to compare referral to, participation in, and completion of CR in rural and urban Veterans. Methods: We established The Healthy Heart Program, a home-based CR program, to increase participation in CR programs and provide an alternative to facility-based CR programs for Veterans with IHD. Between August 2013 and May 2015, 574 patients were referred to CR during hospitalization for myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, valve surgery, angina, or as an outpatient with heart failure. We used the Rural-Urban Commuting Areas (zip code) system to categorize urban and rural Veterans. We then compared the proportions of urban vs. rural Veterans who were referred to, enrolled in, and completed home-based CR. Results: Overall, 52% (94/181) of rural and 51% (202/393) of urban Veterans agreed to enroll in CR. Rural Veterans were more likely to be married (50% vs. 41%, p=0.02) and have undergone coronary artery bypass surgery (30% vs. 20%, p=0.03). Among 296 patients who agreed to enroll, 82% chose home-based and 18% chose facility-based CR (p<0.001). Rural Veterans were more likely than urban Veterans to choose home-based CR (95% vs. 76%; p<0.001). Among 243 patients who enrolled in home-based CR, rural Veterans were more likely to complete at least 9 weeks of home-based CR (67% vs. 53%; p=0.031) and less likely to withdraw (33% vs. 47%, p=0.031). After adjustment for demographics and clinical indication, rural Veterans had 49% greater odds of enrolling in (odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.03, 2.14; p=0.034) and 80% greater odds of completing home-based CR (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.20, 2.71; p=0.004). Conclusion: The majority of Veterans who were interested in CR chose a home-based over a facility-based program. Rural Veterans were more likely to choose home-based CR and to complete CR. Home-based CR is an effective way of engaging patients who may otherwise decline to participate in CR, especially for rural Veterans.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document