Abstract TP17: Outcomes in Octogenarians Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Single Center Experience

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Aboul Nour ◽  
Owais Khadem Alsrouji ◽  
Devashi Dharaiya ◽  
Ghada Mohamed ◽  
Alex Chebl ◽  
...  

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the elderly presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities. Most existing studies include patients up to the age of 90 with stricter criteria of inclusion for patients ≥ 80 years of age. The following study compares the outcomes in octogenarians compared to younger patients in a single center. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who were ≥ 80yo who underwent MT from March 2016 to July 2019. Data on age, recanalization score measured by Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score and clinical outcomes were compared to 126 patients < 80 years of age treated during the same time period. Clinical outcomes were classified based on modified Rankin score (mRS) at discharge. Poor outcomes were defined as mRS 4-6. Good recanalization was defined as TICI score 2b or 3. Results: Eighty-three patients with a median age of 86±4.34yo were compared to 126 patients with median age of 63±12.48yo (p<0.0001). Good recanalization was achieved in 74% of patients ≥80yo compared to 84% in patients <80yo (p= 0.06). Poor outcomes were reported in 74.6% of patients ≥80yo compared to 47.0% in patients <80yo (p<0.0001). All-cause mortality was 28.9% in the ≥80yo vs 12.9% in the < 80yo (p=0.006). Conclusion: In our cohort, the clinical outcomes among octogenarians receiving MT were worse than in younger patients despite no difference in recanalization. Various factors may be responsible including overall health status, comorbid conditions and neuroplasticity. Further prospective multicentral studies are needed to better understand the benefit of MT in octogenarians.

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 406
Author(s):  
Manish Shrivastava ◽  
Darshana Sanghvi ◽  
Shirish Hastak ◽  
Sourabh Lahoti ◽  
Annu Aggarwal

Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 242-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus D. Mazur ◽  
Craig Kilburg ◽  
Min S. Park ◽  
Philipp Taussky

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Revascularization rates with stent retrievers after acute ischemic stroke are 69% to 86%, but favorable clinical outcomes occur in just 43% to 58% of cases. New distal emboli may negatively impact clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and angiographic pattern of distal emboli associated with mechanical thrombectomy using the Solitaire Flow Restoration device and evaluate their correlation with clinical outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cerebral angiography of all patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent mechanical thrombectomy with the use of the Solitaire FR device from 2012 to 2013. Angiographic microcatheter runs prior to Solitaire deployment and after thrombectomy were compared to identify new distal filling defects. Clinical outcome was assessed at discharge and after 90 days. RESULTS: Successful revascularization using the Solitaire device occurred in 36 of 39 patients (92%). Three distinct patterns were identified: new distal emboli in the same vascular territory (n = 3), new distal emboli in a new vascular territory (n = 3), and distal emboli that resolved after proximal revascularization (n = 7). Thirteen patients had distal emboli before and after Solitaire runs, and 13 showed no evidence of distal emboli. Favorable outcome (modified Rankin scores 0-2) was seen in 54% of all patients and 83% of patients with new distal emboli; thus, there was no correlation between new emboli and unfavorable clinical outcome (P = .67). CONCLUSION: We report an incidence rate of at least 15% of new emboli associated with use of the Solitaire device during thrombectomy in our series. Filling defects after Solitaire use were not associated with poor outcomes at discharge or 90-day follow-up.


2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 1182-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie E. Andrews ◽  
Nikolaos Mouchtouris ◽  
Evan M. Fitchett ◽  
Fadi Al Saiegh ◽  
Michael J. Lang ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEMechanical thrombectomy (MT) is now the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large-vessel occlusion, but there remains a question of whether elderly patients benefit from this procedure to the same degree as the younger populations enrolled in the seminal trials on MT. The authors compared outcomes after MT of patients 80–89 and ≥ 90 years old with AIS to those of younger patients.METHODSThe authors retrospectively analyzed records of patients undergoing MT at their institution to examine stroke severity, comorbid conditions, medical management, recanalization results, and clinical outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to compare patients < 80 years, 80–89 years, and ≥ 90 years old.RESULTSAll groups had similar rates of comorbid disease and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration, and stroke severity did not differ significantly between groups. Elderly patients had equivalent recanalization outcomes, with similar rates of readmission, 30-day mortality, and hospital-associated complications. These patients were more likely to have poor clinical outcome on discharge, as defined by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 3–6, but this difference was not significant when controlled for stroke severity, tPA administration, and recanalization results.CONCLUSIONSOctogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians with AIS have similar rates of mortality, hospital readmission, and hospital-associated complications as younger patients after MT. Elderly patients also have the capacity to achieve good functional outcome after MT, but this potential is moderated by stroke severity and success of treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 504
Author(s):  
Dalibor Sila ◽  
Markus Lenski ◽  
Maria Vojtková ◽  
Mustafa Elgharbawy ◽  
František Charvát ◽  
...  

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy is the standard therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The primary aim of our study was to compare the procedural efficacy of the direct aspiration technique, using Penumbra ACETM aspiration catheter, and the stent retriever technique, with a SolitaireTM FR stent. Secondarily, we investigated treatment-dependent and treatment-independent factors that predict a good clinical outcome. Methods: We analyzed our series of mechanical thrombectomies using a SolitaireTM FR stent and a Penumbra ACETM catheter. The clinical and radiographic data of 76 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Using binary logistic regression, we looked for the predictors of a good clinical outcome. Results: In the Penumbra ACETM group we achieved significantly higher rates of complete vessel recanalization with lower device passage counts, shorter recanalization times, shorter procedure times and shorter fluoroscopy times (p < 0.001) compared to the SolitaireTM FR group. We observed no significant difference in good clinical outcomes (52.4% vs. 56.4%, p = 0.756). Predictors of a good clinical outcome were lower initial NIHSS scores, pial arterial collateralization on admission head CT angiography scan, shorter recanalization times and device passage counts. Conclusions: The aspiration technique using Penumbra ACETM catheter is comparable to the stent retriever technique with SolitaireTM FR regarding clinical outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document