scholarly journals Obesity and Recurrent Vascular Risk After a Recent Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 3397-3402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Ovbiagele ◽  
Philip M. Bath ◽  
Daniel Cotton ◽  
Richard Vinisko ◽  
Hans-Christoph Diener

Background and Purpose— Although obesity is an established risk factor for the occurrence of a primary stroke, little is known about the impact of baseline obesity on recurrent vascular risk among patients with recently symptomatic cerebrovascular disease. We evaluated the association of obesity with future vascular risk in patients with a recent history of stroke. Methods— We analyzed the database of a multicenter trial involving 20 332 patients with recent ischemic stroke followed for 2.5 years. Subjects were divided into 3 groups according to recognized body mass index categories representing lean, overweight, and obese. Primary outcome was time to first recurrent stroke and secondary outcome time to stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. The independent association of obesity with outcome was assessed by controlling for other known risk factors. Results— Of 20 246 eligible subjects, 4805 (24%) were obese. After adjusting for confounders, compared with the lean group, being overweight (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85–1.06) or obese (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83–1.08) was not associated with increased recurrent stroke risk, but being overweight (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77–0.92) or obese (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77–0.96) was associated with lower risk of a major vascular event. Conclusions— Obesity is not related to recurrent stroke risk, but obese patients with stroke are at lower overall vascular risk than their leaner counterparts, supporting the widely held notion of the existence of a cardiovascular “obesity paradox.”

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong-Ho Park ◽  
Bruce Ovbiagele

Background: Expert consensus guidelines recommend low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol as the primary serum lipid target for recurrent stroke risk reduction. Indeed, emerging evidence suggests that non-traditional serum lipid indices may be better predictors of vascular risk than LDL. Triglycerides (TG)/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) is a powerful independent predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. Furthermore, total cholesterol (TC)/HDL ratio, LDL/HDL and non-HDL have all been independently linked with greater coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Little is known about the effects non-traditional serum lipid indices on recurrent vascular risk after a recent stroke. Method: We analyzed the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention study database comprising 3680 recent (<120 days) ischemic stroke patients followed up for 2 years. Independent associations of each 4 lipid index (TG/HDL, TC/HDL, LDL/HDL, and non-HDL) with recurrent stroke (primary outcome) and stroke/coronary heart disease (CHD)/vascular death (secondary outcome) were analyzed. Each of the 4 groups was stratified into quintiles according to the distribution of lipid indices. Results: Of all indices evaluated only TG/HDL was consistently and independently related to both outcomes: compared with the lowest quintile (≤1.93), the highest TG/HDL quintile (≥6.22) was associated with stroke [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR), 1.56; 95% CI, 1.05–2.32] and stroke/CHD/vascular death (AHR 1.39, 95% CI, 1.05–1.83), including adjustment for lipid modifier use. Compared with the lowest quintile (≤3.50), the highest TC/HDL quintile (≥5.98) was associated with stroke/CHD/vascular death (AHR 1.44, 95% CI, 1.03–2.01). LDL/HDL, non-HDL, elevated TG alone, and low HDL alone, were not independently linked to either outcome. Conclusions: Of various non-traditional serum lipid indices, elevated baseline TG/HDL and TC/HDL predict future vascular risk after a stroke, but only elevated TG/HDL is related to risk of recurrent stroke. Future studies should assess the role of TG/HDL as a potential therapeutic target for global vascular risk reduction after stroke.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam H de Havenon ◽  
Maarten G Lansberg ◽  
Guido J Falcone ◽  
Rommell Noche ◽  
Shadi Yaghi ◽  
...  

Introduction: The SPRINT trial demonstrated cardiovascular benefit for a target systolic blood pressure (SBP) <120 mm Hg, but the effect on primary stroke was neutral. The Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes (SPS3) trial did not reduce secondary stroke with a target SBP <130 mm Hg. No trial has investigated the effect of the more intensive SPRINT target of <120 mm Hg on secondary stroke risk. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of SPS3 and included patients with at least 10 SBP readings. The primary predictor is mean SBP from day 30 (to avoid confounding from the initial study intervention) to 2 years. The primary outcome is recurrent ischemic stroke from day 30 to 2 years. We fit Cox models to our outcomes to derive hazard ratios for recurrent stroke events. Results: We included 2,859 patients, of which 121 (4.2%) had ischemic stroke during follow-up. There were 321 patients with SBP <120 (mean=115.5 mm Hg) and 2,538 with SBP ≥120 (mean=134.6 mm Hg), with a respective recurrent stroke rate of 1.9% versus 4.5% (p=0.026). In the Cox model, the hazard ratio for stroke with mean SBP <120 mm Hg was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.18-0.92) (Figure 1) and after adjustment for potential confounders (age, sex, race, education, smoking, prior stroke, prior myocardial infarction) the hazard ratio was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.16-0.96). Conclusion: In patients with lacunar stroke, achieving the SPRINT intensive blood pressure goal of <120 mm Hg was associated with a lower risk of recurrent stroke. While the current study is underpowered and has bias, these preliminary results suggest that the SPRINT definition of intensive blood pressure reduction could be beneficial for secondary stroke prevention.


Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajbeer S Sangha ◽  
Carlos Corado ◽  
Richard A Bernstein ◽  
Ilana Ruff ◽  
Yvonne Curran ◽  
...  

Background: Since the SAMMPRIS trial, aggressive medical management (AMM) with the use of dual antiplatelets (aspirin, clopidogrel) and high dose statin therapy has been standard of care for patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). However, there is limited data on the “real-world” application of this regimen. We hypothesized that 30-day recurrent stroke risk among patients treated with AMM would be similar to that in SAMMPRIS medically-treated patients. Methods: Using the prospective Northwestern University Brain Attack Registry, we identified all patients admitted between 8/1/12 and 1/31/14 with 1) confirmed ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA); 2) independently adjudicated symptomatic ICAD; and 3) discharged on AMM. At 30 days (28-35 day window) post-stroke, patients or proxies were contacted by telephone to review events and outcomes. We also utilized an electronic surveillance system of hospital records at any of 3 health system hospitals with confirmation by manual review of the medical record in all instances of reported recurrent stroke or TIA. Ischemic stroke in the territory of the symptomatic stenotic artery was the primary outcome. We calculated 30-day rate of stroke in the territory of the stenotic artery and 95% confidence intervals using the Wald method and compared it with that reported in the SAMMPRIS trial. Results: Among 36 patients who met study criteria, 13 (36.1%) were female and mean age was 65.4 (± 9.7) years. Median initial NIHSS score was 4 (interquartile range 0-17). Symptomatic ICAD was localized to the anterior circulation in 21 (58%) patients and posterior circulation in 15 (41.7%). At 30 days, 3 of the 36 patients (8.3%, 95% CI 2.1-22.6%) had recurrent stroke compared to 5.8% in the medical arm of SAMMPRIS (p=0.47). An additional 3 patients (8.3%) experienced TIA within 30 days. Conclusions: In a single-center observational cohort study, we found that AMM in patients with symptomatic ICAD yielded similar rates of recurrent stroke at 30-days as observed in the SAMMPRIS trial. Our study provides “real-world” confirmation of the potential benefits of AMM in this high-risk stroke subtype.


Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Katrin Giese ◽  
Markus D Schirmer ◽  
Adrian V Dalca ◽  
Ramesh Sridharan ◽  
Lisa Cloonan ◽  
...  

Introduction: White matter hyperintensity (WMH) is a highly heritable trait and a significant contributor to stroke risk and severity. Vascular risk factors contribute to WMH severity; however, knowledge of the determinants of WMH in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is still limited. Hypothesis: WMH volume (WMHv) varies across AIS subtypes and is modified by vascular risk factors. Methods: We extracted WMHv from the clinical MRI scans of 2683 AIS subjects from the MRI-Genetics Interface Exploration (MRI-GENIE) study using a novel fully-automated, volumetric analysis pipeline. Demographic data, stroke risk factors and stroke subtyping for the Causative Classification of Stroke (CCS) were performed at each of the 12 international study sites. WMHv was natural log-transformed for linear regression analyses. Results: Median WMHv was 5.7cm 3 (interquartile range (IQR): 2.2-12.8cm 3 ). In univariable analysis, age (63.1 ± 14.7 years, β=0.04, SE=0.002), prior stroke (10.2%, β=0.66, SE=0.08), hypertension (65.4%, β=0.75, SE=0.05), diabetes mellitus (23.1%, β=0.35, SE=0.06), coronary artery disease (17.6%, β=0.04, SE=0.002), and atrial fibrillation (14.6%, β=0.48, SE=0.07) were significant predictors of WMHv (all p<0.0001), as well as smoking status (52.2%, β=0.15, SE=0.05, p=0.005), race (16.5% Non-Caucasian, β=0.25, SE=0.07) and ethnicity (8.2% Hispanic, β=0.30, SE=0.11) (all p<0.01). In multivariable analysis, age (β=0.04, SE=0.002), prior stroke (β=0.56, SE=0.08), hypertension (β=0.33, SE=0.05), smoking status (β=0.16, SE=0.05), race (β=0.42, SE=0.06), and ethnicity (β=0.34, SE=0.09) were independent predictors of WMHv (all p<0.0001), as well as diabetes mellitus (β=0.13, SE=0.06, p=0.02). WMHv differed significantly (p<0.0001, unadjusted) across CCS stroke subtypes: cardioembolic stroke (8.0cm 3 , IQR: 4.2-15.4cm 3 ), large-artery stroke (6.9cm 3 , IQR: 3.1-14.7cm 3 ), small-vessel stroke (5.8cm 3 , IQR: 2.5-13.5cm 3 ), stroke of undetermined (4.7cm 3 , IQR: 1.6-11.0cm 3 ) or other (2.55cm 3 , IQR: 0.9-8.8cm 3 ) causes. Conclusion: In this largest-to-date, multicenter hospital-based cohort of AIS patients with automated WMHv analysis, common vascular risk factors contribute significantly to WMH burden and WMHv varies by CCS subtype.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 1758-1765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Christoph Diener ◽  
Ralph L. Sacco ◽  
J. Donald Easton ◽  
Christopher B. Granger ◽  
Michal Bar ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— The RE-SPECT ESUS trial (Randomized, Double-Blind, Evaluation in Secondary Stroke Prevention Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) tested the hypothesis that dabigatran would be superior to aspirin for the prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. This exploratory subgroup analysis investigates the impact of age, renal function (both predefined), and dabigatran dose (post hoc) on the rates of recurrent stroke and major bleeding. Methods— RE-SPECT ESUS was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of dabigatran 150 or 110 mg (for patients aged ≥75 years and/or with creatinine clearance 30 to <50 mL/minute) twice daily compared with aspirin 100 mg once daily. The primary outcome was recurrent stroke. Results— The trial, which enrolled 5390 patients from December 2014 to January 2018, did not demonstrate superiority of dabigatran versus aspirin for prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. However, among the population qualifying for the lower dabigatran dose, the rate of recurrent stroke was reduced with dabigatran versus aspirin (7.4% versus 13.0%; hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.39–0.82]; interaction P =0.01). This was driven mainly by the subgroup aged ≥75 years (7.8% versus 12.4%; hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.43–0.94]; interaction P =0.10). Stroke rates tended to be lower with dabigatran versus aspirin with declining renal function. Risks for major bleeding were similar between treatments, irrespective of renal function, but with a trend for lower bleeding rates with dabigatran versus aspirin in older patients. Conclusions— In subgroup analyses of RE-SPECT ESUS, dabigatran reduced the rate of recurrent stroke compared with aspirin in patients qualifying for the lower dose of dabigatran. These results are hypothesis-generating. Aspirin remains the standard antithrombotic treatment for patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02239120.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 164-171
Author(s):  
Wookjin Yang ◽  
Dong-Wan Kang ◽  
Sue Young Ha ◽  
Seung-Hoon Lee

Background and Purpose: Although it has been reported that the amount of alcohol consumption has a J-shaped association with ischemic stroke, it is unclear whether differences in drinking patterns affect this relationship. We aimed to clarify the impact of drinking patterns on ischemic stroke in midlife. Methods: We used data from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort, which is a large-sized, standardized population cohort in Korea. Five different drinking patterns were defined by combining the frequency of alcohol consumption and quantity of alcohol consumed per occasion, that is, abstainers, not drinking alcohol; drinker group I, ≤30 g/d and <5 d/wk; drinker group II, ≤30 g/d and ≥5 d/wk; drinker group III, >30 g/d and <5 d/wk; and drinker group IV, >30 g/d and ≥5 d/wk. The association between the drinking patterns and ischemic stroke occurrence was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 152 469 middle-aged participants (mean age, 50.2 years; 72 285 men [47.4%]) were eligible for the analyses. The median follow-up time was 9.0 years. Compared with abstainers, those who drank <5 d/wk (drinker groups I and III) had a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke (group I hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.59–0.85]; group III hazard ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.68–0.93]) during the first 7 years from the baseline, while other drinker groups showed no such differences. However, the effect of drinking patterns on ischemic stroke risk was attenuated after the first 7 years. Conclusions: Reduced risk of ischemic stroke was observed in middle-aged participants with specific drinking patterns, but it was limited to the earlier period. Physicians should be cautious in educating patients on alcohol consumption, considering the long-term association between drinking patterns and ischemic stroke.


BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. l6983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S Phipps ◽  
Carolyn A Cronin

ABSTRACT Stroke is the leading cause of long term disability in developed countries and one of the top causes of mortality worldwide. The past decade has seen substantial advances in the diagnostic and treatment options available to minimize the impact of acute ischemic stroke. The key first step in stroke care is early identification of patients with stroke and triage to centers capable of delivering the appropriate treatment, as fast as possible. Here, we review the data supporting pre-hospital and emergency stroke care, including use of emergency medical services protocols for identification of patients with stroke, intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke including updates to recommended patient eligibility criteria and treatment time windows, and advanced imaging techniques with automated interpretation to identify patients with large areas of brain at risk but without large completed infarcts who are likely to benefit from endovascular thrombectomy in extended time windows from symptom onset. We also review protocols for management of patient physiologic parameters to minimize infarct volumes and recent updates in secondary prevention recommendations including short term use of dual antiplatelet therapy to prevent recurrent stroke in the high risk period immediately after stroke. Finally, we discuss emerging therapies and questions for future research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon-Tae Kim ◽  
Beom Joon Kim ◽  
Jong-Moo Park ◽  
Soo Joo Lee ◽  
Jae-Kwan Cha ◽  
...  

Abstract Uncertainty regarding an optimal antiplatelet regimen still exists in patients with breakthrough acute ischemic stroke (AIS) while on aspirin. This study provides an analysis of a prospective multicenter registry between April 2008 and April 2014. Eligible patients were on aspirin at the time of AIS and treated with antiplatelet regimens (aspirin, clopidogrel, or clopidogrel-aspirin). Potential factors associated with the choice of each antiplatelet regimen were explored and included a predictive risk score for future vascular events, the Essen Stroke Risk Score (ESRS). A total of 2348 patients (age, 69 ± 11 years; male, 57.7%) were analyzed, and 55.3%, 25.3% and 19.4% were treated with clopidogrel-aspirin, aspirin and clopidogrel, respectively. While the likelihood of choosing clopidogrel-aspirin increased as the ESRS increased, the likelihood of choosing aspirin decreased as the ESRS increased (Ptrend < 0.001). The ESRS category (0–1/2–3/ ≥ 4) modified the effect of antiplatelet regimens for 1-year vascular events (Pinteraction < 0.01). Among patients with ESRS ≥ 4, clopidogrel-aspirin (HR 0.47 [0.30–0.74]) and clopidogrel (HR 0.30 [0.15–0.60]) significantly reduced the risk of outcome events. Our study showed that more than half of the patients with aspirin failure were treated with clopidogrel-aspirin. In particular, a higher ESRS, which indicates an increased risk of recurrent stroke, was associated with the choice of clopidogrel-aspirin rather than aspirin.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117957351989947
Author(s):  
Nima Ahmed ◽  
Vitor A Queiroz Mauad ◽  
Olga Gomez-Rojas ◽  
Ammu Sushea ◽  
Gelanys Castro-Tejada ◽  
...  

Background and rationale: Stroke is considered the most common cause of adult disability. Intensive rehabilitation protocols outperform nonintensive counterparts. The subacute stroke phase represents a potential window to recovery. Virtual reality (VR) has been shown to provide a more stimulating environment, allowing for increased patient compliance. However, the quality of current literature comparing VR with standard therapies is limited. Our aim is to measure the impact of VR versus standard therapy on the recovery of the upper limb motor function in patients with stroke in the early subacute recovery phase. Method: This is a randomized, controlled trial that will assign 262 patients to tailor-made standard rehabilitation (TMSR) or TMSR plus immersive VR device. The trial will be conducted in an urban rehabilitation clinic in the United States with expertise in the management of poststroke patients. Patients will be 18 to 70 years of age and in the early subacute period (30-90 days post ischemic stroke). The primary outcome will be the change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment—Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score, measured at baseline and 13 weeks after randomization. The secondary outcome will be the change in the UK Functional Independence Measure and Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM-FAM) score at the same time points. Discussion: If the use of VR in the rehabilitation of patients with stroke proves to have a significant impact on their motor recovery, it will constitute an extremely important step into decreasing the functional impairment associated with stroke and the related health care expense burden.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document