Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Recent Stroke Who Are Dependent on the Daily Help of Others

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louisa Meya ◽  
Alexandros A. Polymeris ◽  
Sabine Schaedelin ◽  
Fabian Schaub ◽  
Valerian L. Altersberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
Unique Identifier ◽  
The Individual

Background and Purpose: Data on the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with stroke attributable to atrial fibrillation (AF) who were dependent on the daily help of others at hospital discharge are scarce. Methods: Based on prospectively obtained data from the observational Novel-Oral-Anticoagulants-in-Ischemic-Stroke-Patients-longterm registry from Basel, Switzerland, we compared the occurrence of the primary outcome—the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and all-cause death—among consecutive patients with AF-stroke treated with either VKAs or DOACs between patients dependent (defined as modified Rankin Scale score, 3–5) and patients independent at discharge. We used simple, adjusted, and weighted Cox proportional hazards regression to account for potential confounders. Results: We analyzed 801 patients (median age 80 years, 46% female), of whom 391 (49%) were dependent at discharge and 680 (85%) received DOACs. Over a total follow-up of 1216 patient-years, DOAC- compared to VKA-treated patients had a lower hazard for the composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58 [95% CI, 0.42–0.81]), as did independent compared to dependent patients (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.40–0.71]). There was no evidence that the effect of anticoagulant type (DOAC versus VKA) on the hazard for the composite outcome differed between dependent (HR dependent , 0.68 [95% CI, 0.45–1.01]) and independent patients (HR independent , 0.44 [95% CI, 0.26–0.75]) in the simple model ( P interaction =0.212). Adjusted (HR dependent , 0.74 [95% CI, 0.49–1.11] and HR independent , 0.51 [95% CI, 0.30–0.87]; P interaction =0.284) and weighted models (HR dependent , 0.79 [95% CI, 0.48–1.31] and HR independent , 0.46 [95% CI, 0.26–0.81]; P interaction =0.163) yielded concordant results. Secondary analyses focusing on the individual components of the composite outcome were consistent to the primary analyses. Conclusions: The benefits of DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation with a recent stroke were maintained among patients who were dependent on the help of others at discharge. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03826927.

The Association between Oral Anticoagulants and Cancer Incidence among Individuals with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 120 (10) ◽  
pp. 1384-1394
Author(s):  
Devin Abrahami ◽  
Christel Renoux ◽  
Hui Yin ◽  
Jean-Pascal Fournier ◽  
Laurent Azoulay
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract Objective Existing evidence on the association between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and cancer is limited and contradictory. No observational studies have been conducted to simultaneously address the cancer safety of VKAs and DOACs. The objective of this study was to determine whether use of VKAs and DOACs, separately, when compared with nonuse, is associated with cancer overall and prespecified site-specific incidence. Methods Using the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we identified patients newly diagnosed with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) between 2011 and 2017. Using a time-varying exposure definition, each person-day of follow-up was classified as use of (1) VKAs, (2) DOACs, (3) VKAs and DOACs (drug switchers), and (4) nonuse of anticoagulants (reference). We also conducted a head-to-head comparison of new users of DOACs versus VKAs using propensity score fine stratification weighting. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer overall and prespecified subtypes were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results Compared with nonuse, use of VKAs was not associated with cancer overall (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.91–1.22) or cancer subtypes. Similarly, use of DOACs was not associated with cancer overall (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.93–1.37), but an association was observed for colorectal cancer (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.01–2.99), and pancreatic cancer generated an elevated, though nonsignificant HR (HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 0.72–6.44). Results were consistent in the head-to-head comparison. Conclusion Use of oral anticoagulants is not associated with the incidence of cancer overall among patients with NVAF. Possible associations between DOACs and colorectal and pancreatic cancer warrant further study.

scholarly journals Risks and Benefits of Direct Oral Anticoagulants across the Spectrum of GFR among Incident and Prevalent Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1144-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-Im Shin ◽  
Alex Secora ◽  
G. Caleb Alexander ◽  
Lesley A. Inker ◽  
Josef Coresh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding

Background and objectivesAll randomized trials of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation excluded patients with severe kidney disease. The safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants across the range of eGFR in real-world settings is unknown. Our objective is to quantify the risk of bleeding and benefit of ischemic stroke prevention for direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation with and without CKD.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsWe created a propensity score–matched cohort of 3206 patients with atrial fibrillation and direct oral anticoagulant use and 3206 patients with atrial fibrillation using warfarin from October of 2010 to February of 2017 in an electronic health record (Geisinger Health System). The risks of bleeding and ischemic stroke were compared between direct oral anticoagulant and warfarin users using Cox proportional hazards regression, stratified by eGFR (≥60 and <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2).ResultsThe mean (SD) age of the 6412 participants was 72 (12) years, 47% were women, and average eGFR was 69 (21) ml/min per 1.73 m2. There were 1181 bleeding events and 466 ischemic strokes over 7391 person-years of follow-up. Compared with warfarin use, the hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence interval [95% CI]) of bleeding associated with direct oral anticoagulant use were 1.01 (0.88 to 1.17) and 1.23 (1.02 to 1.48) for those with eGFR≥60 and eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively (P-interaction=0.10). There was no difference between direct oral anticoagulant and warfarin users in the risk of ischemic stroke: HRs (95% CI) of 0.94 (0.74 to 1.18) and 1.02 (0.76 to 1.37) for those with eGFR≥60 and eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively (P-interaction=0.70). Similar findings were observed with individual drugs.ConclusionsIn a large health care system, patients with eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 who took direct oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation had slightly higher risk of bleeding compared with those on warfarin, but similar benefits from prevention of ischemic stroke.

scholarly journals Rates and Determinants for the Use of Anticoagulation Treatment before Stroke in Patients with Known Atrial Fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-49
Author(s):  
Michela  Giustozzi ◽  
Giancarlo Agnelli ◽  
Silvia Quattrocchi ◽  
Monica Acciarresi ◽  
Andrea Alberti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Anticoagulant Treatment ◽  
Anticoagulation Treatment

Introduction and Objective: Even though the introduction of less cumbersome anticoagulant agents has improved, the rates ofoverall anticoagulant treatment in eligible patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remain to be defined. We aimed to assess the rates of and determinants for the use of anticoagulation treatment before stroke in patients with known AF since the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in clinical practice. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted to an individual stroke unit, from September 2013 through July 2019, for acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) with known AF before the event were included in the study. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of the use of anticoagulant treatment. Results: Overall, 155 patients with ischemic stroke/TIA and known AF were included in this study. Among 152 patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score >1, 43 patients were not receiving any treatment, 47 patients were receiving antiplatelet agents, and the remaining 62 patients were on oral anticoagulants. Among 34 patients on DOAC, 13 were receiving a nonlabeled reduced dose and 18 out of 34 patients on vitamin K antagonists had an INR value <2 at the time of admission. Before stroke, only 34 out of 155 patients (21.9%) were adequately treated according to current guidelines. Previous stroke/TIA was the only independent predictor of the use of anticoagulant therapy. Conclusions: Only 21.9% of the patients hospitalized for a stroke or TIA with known AF before the event were adequately treated according to recent treatment guidelines. It is important to improve medical information about the risk of AF and the efficacy of anticoagulants in stroke prevention.

scholarly journals Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alpesh Amin ◽  
Allison Keshishian ◽  
Oluwaseyi Dina ◽  
Amol Dhamane ◽  
Anagha Nadkarni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Medicare Patients ◽  
Similar Risk

AbstractAtrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence increases with age; > 80% of US adults with AF are aged ≥ 65 years. Compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), net clinical outcome (NCO), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among elderly non-valvular AF (NVAF) Medicare patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs warfarin. NVAF patients aged ≥ 65 years who initiated DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) or warfarin were selected from 01JAN2013-31DEC2015 in CMS Medicare data. Propensity score matching was used to balance DOAC and warfarin cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the risk of stroke/SE, MB, NCO, and MACE. 37,525 apixaban–warfarin, 18,131 dabigatran–warfarin, and 55,359 rivaroxaban–warfarin pairs were included. Compared to warfarin, apixaban (HR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.59–0.81) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.73–0.91) had lower risk of stroke/SE, and dabigatran (HR: 0.88; 95% CI 0.72–1.07) had similar risk of stroke/SE. Apixaban (MB: HR: 0.61; 95% CI 0.57–0.67; NCO: HR: 0.64; 95% CI 0.60–0.69) and dabigatran (MB: HR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.71–0.89; NCO: HR: 0.84; 95% CI 0.76–0.93) had lower risk of MB and NCO, and rivaroxaban had higher risk of MB (HR: 1.08; 95% CI 1.02–1.14) and similar risk of NCO (HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.99–1.09). Compared to warfarin, apixaban had a lower risk for stroke/SE, MB, and NCO; dabigatran had a lower risk of MB and NCO; and rivaroxaban had a lower risk of stroke/SE but higher risk of MB. All DOACs had lower risk of MACE compared to warfarin.

scholarly journals Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists after recent ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 823-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Seiffge ◽  
Maurizio Paciaroni ◽  
Duncan Wilson ◽  
Masatoshi Koga ◽  
Kosmas Macha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Abstract 20218: Comparative Effectiveness of Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay Bengtson ◽  
Lin Chen ◽  
Richard MacLehose ◽  
Pamela Lutsey ◽  
Alvaro Alonso
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Real World ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Intracranial Bleeding ◽  
Gi Bleeding ◽  
Pharmacy Claims ◽  
The Us

Background: In randomized trials, the new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) dabigatran and rivaroxaban have been at least as efficacious as warfarin in the prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Information on the effectiveness of NOACs versus warfarin in real-world populations in the US is more limited. Methods: We used data from the US MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases in the period 2010-12. We selected patients initiating oral anticoagulants after NVAF diagnosis, and with at least 6 months of enrollment before first anticoagulant use. Patients initiating dabigatran or rivaroxaban were matched with up to 5 warfarin users by age, sex, and time in the database. Outcomes of interest (ischemic stroke, intracranial bleeding, and gastrointestinal [GI] bleeding) were defined according to validated algorithms. Information on other comorbidities and medication use was obtained from inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy claims. High-dimensional propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the association of NOACs vs warfarin with each outcome of interest. Results: The analysis included 32,918 dabigatran, 3,301 rivaroxaban and 92,633 warfarin users with NVAF. During an average 13-month follow-up (6 for rivaroxaban, 15 for dabigatran), 1035 ischemic strokes, 225 intracranial bleeds, and 1842 GI bleeds were identified. Rate of ischemic stroke was similar in patients initiating NOACs compared to those on warfarin. However, rate of intracranial bleeding was lower in patients using NOACs compared to warfarin users, while GI bleeding rate was higher in dabigatran users than warfarin users (Table). Conclusion: In this large real-world patient population, effectiveness of NOACs (compared to warfarin) for diverse outcomes was comparable to efficacy reported in the RE-LY and ROCKET-AF trials.

scholarly journals Direct Oral Anticoagulants after Ischemic Stroke: Which Patient? Which Drug? And How Early?

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (01) ◽  
pp. 031-034
Author(s):  
Gian Marco De Marchis
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Reversal Agents

AbstractDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ischemic stroke. The main advantage of DOAC over VKA is the lower rate of bleeding and mortality. This review covers challenges clinicians can encounter when treating patients with AF and ischemic stroke, including timing of DOAC start and ongoing randomized clinical trials, appropriate dosing, and available comparative evidence across DOACs. For patients without AF but with an ischemic stroke, the review outlines the role of DOACs. Finally, the risk of thrombotic events associated with specific DOAC reversal agents and DOAC pausing is reviewed.

New Avenues for Optimal Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Prevention

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gian Marco De Marchis ◽  
Luciano A. Sposato ◽  
Michael Kühne ◽  
Tolga D. Dittrich ◽  
Leo H. Bonati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Interdisciplinary Approach ◽  
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion ◽  
High Risk Populations

One in 3 individuals free of atrial fibrillation (AF) at index age 55 years is estimated to develop AF later in life. AF increases not only the risk of ischemic stroke but also of dementia, even in stroke-free patients. In this review, we address recent advances in the heart-brain interaction with focus on AF. Issues discussed are (1) the timing of direct oral anticoagulants start following an ischemic stroke; (2) the comparison of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in early secondary stroke prevention; (3) harms of bridging with heparin before direct oral anticoagulants; (4) importance of appropriate direct oral anticoagulants dosing; (5) screening for AF in high-risk populations, including the role of wearables; (6) left atrial appendage occlusion as an alternative to oral anticoagulation; (7) the role of early rhythm-control therapy; (8) effect of lifestyle interventions on AF; (9) AF as a risk factor for dementia. An interdisciplinary approach seems appropriate to address the complex challenges posed by AF.

Abstract 14354: Persistence to Oral Anticoagulation Treatment in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients in the United States

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amol Dhamane ◽  
Manuela Di Fusco ◽  
Cynthia Gutierrez ◽  
Mauricio Ferri ◽  
Cristina Russ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Time Varying Covariates

Background: Studies have shown that nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients who discontinue direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are at higher risk of complications, such as stroke. This analysis compared the risk of non-persistence of OACs among NVAF patients. Methods: Adult NVAF patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin were identified using 01JAN2013-31MAR2019 data from the IQVIA commercial claims database. Non-persistence was defined as discontinuation (no evidence of index OAC use for 60 days from the last days’ of supply) or switch to another OAC. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were generated to illustrate time-to-non-persistence along with cumulative incidences of non-persistence. Adjusted cox proportional hazards models, including time-varying covariates (e.g., major bleeding, stroke), were used to evaluate non-persistence risk. Results: A total of 32,103 apixaban, 5,906 dabigatran, 29,385 rivaroxaban, and 21,420 warfarin patients were included; mean age: 63. Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of non-persistence compared to dabigatran (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-0.56), rivaroxaban (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.78-0.81), and warfarin (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.65-0.68). Dabigatran was associated with a higher risk of non-persistence compared to warfarin (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.19-1.28) and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.42-1.52), and rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk compared to warfarin (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.82-0.86). KM curves and cumulative incidences are presented below (Figure). Conclusions: In this group of NVAF patients, apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of non-persistence compared to dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. Rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of non-persistence compared to warfarin and dabigatran. Such differences are critical as persistence with OACs is essential to prevent thromboembolic complications.

scholarly journals Direct oral anticoagulants for prevention of stroke and other cardiovascular outcomes in patients aged 80 years or older with atrial fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-23
Author(s):  
S. Moiseev
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Very Elderly ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Reduced Kidney Function

Over the last decade, the number of people aged 80 years or over in Russia increased by 41% up to 5.7 mln. At least 10% of these individuals develop atrial fibrillation (AF). Treatment of rhythm disorders in the very elderly patients is challenging due to the high occurrence of comorbidities, including cognitive dysfunction, changes in the pharmacokinetics of drugs as a result of reduced kidney function, increased risk of interaction of drugs. The very elderly patients with AF have a higher risk of ischemic stroke and other cardiovasculat outcomes, including myocardial infarction, and should be treated with oral anticoagulants. The results of randomized controlled trials and prospective and retrospective observational studies suggest that in patients aged 80 years or older with non-valvular AF direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists for prevention of ischemic stroke and are associated with a lower risk of intracerebral haemorrhage. The use of DOAC (once daily rivaroxaban in particular) impoves compliance to anticoagulation in the very elderly patients with non-valvular AF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document