Feasibility of the American Special Education Resource Room Model for Japanese Students with Learning and/or Behavior Problems

1988 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-307
Author(s):  
Patricia Woods Prewitt ◽  
Taro Sakai ◽  
Fumiko Iwaki
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Behavior Problems ◽  
Resource Room ◽  
Japanese Students ◽  
Room Model ◽  
Education Resource

Parent Attitudes about Special Education and Reintegration: What is the Role of Student Outcomes?

1994 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan K. Green ◽  
Mark R. Shinn
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Education Reform ◽  
General Education ◽  
Reading Instruction ◽  
Research Strategies ◽  
Resource Room ◽  
Subjective Perceptions ◽  
Quantitative And Qualitative Research ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
Education Resource

Parents ( N=21) of children receiving special education resource room services in reading were interviewed to learn about their views concerning these services and reintegration decisions. Quantitative and qualitative research strategies were used to scale attitudes and cluster responses. Most parents had strong positive attitudes toward resource room services. The basis for these attitudes was explored, and it was found that parents' satisfaction was derived primarily from subjective perceptions (such as teachers' caring), rather than academic performance data. Most parents were reluctant to have their children reintegrated into general education classes for reading instruction. Findings are discussed in the context of special education reform efforts.

The Effects of Microcomputers on the Secondary Special Education Classroom Ecology

1987 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 36-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert Rieth ◽  
Christine Bahr ◽  
Lewis Polsgrove ◽  
Cynthia Okolo ◽  
Robert Eckert
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Computer Use ◽  
Student Behavior ◽  
Teacher Behavior ◽  
Instructional Programs ◽  
Secondary Special Education ◽  
Resource Room ◽  
Education Resource ◽  
Training And Support ◽  
The Impact

This study was designed to investigate the impact of the microcomputer upon the curricular content, curricular format, student behavior, teacher behavior, and teacher focus employed in secondary special education resource room programs. These behaviors were compared in classes in which a microcomputer was used with classes in which no computer was used. Overall, the data suggested different effects associated with computer use The most important benefits appear to be increased active task engagement and increased individually focused instruction. In many key categories of teacher behavior, however, there were no significant differences between the computer-use and noncomputer-use classes. The data strongly suggest that teachers will need training and support if they are to integrate computers into their instructional programs.

What's “Special” about the Special Education Resource Room for Learning Disabled Students?

1983 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha L. Thurlow ◽  
James E. Ysseldyke ◽  
Janet L. Graden ◽  
Bob Algozzine
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Differentiated Instruction ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Disabled Students ◽  
Resource Room ◽  
Academic Tasks ◽  
Regular Classrooms ◽  
Resource Rooms ◽  
Education Resource ◽  
Short Time

This article reports on a study of the instructional ecology of resource rooms and regular classrooms for LD students. Eight students were observed on 53 events in 10-second intervals for two complete days of classroom instruction. Comparisons were made of how these students spent their time in resource and regular rooms. In general, opportunities for differentiated instruction were available to the LD students in the resource rooms (e.g., instruction in reading was more individualized). However, no practical differences were noted in the amount of time students were actively engaged in instruction in the two settings. Overall, in both settings, LD students were actively engaged in responding to academic tasks for a very short time (29 minutes per day in resource rooms, 19 minutes per day in regular classrooms).

Comparison of Comprehension Scores of Learning Disabled High School Students for Content Presented Aurally at Variable Rates of Speech

1981 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 499-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno J. D'Alonzo ◽  
Stanley H. Zucker
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Special Education ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
School Students ◽  
Disabled Students ◽  
Resource Room ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Rate Of Speech ◽  
Education Resource

60 learning disabled students, 43 males and 17 females, enrolled in a high school special education resource-room program listened to content presented at variable rates. The 60 subjects were randomly assigned to six experimental groups of 10 students each. Three groups were assigned to listen to content in history each at one of three predetermined rates. The same procedure was used for the three groups assigned to listen to biological content. Measures of comprehension of the content indicated no significant difference in the amount of information each group of students retained when the historical or biological content was presented to their particular group aurally at an expanded, normal, or compressed rate of speech.

Resource Room Programs: Where are we Now?

1984 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn Friend ◽  
Gaye McNutt
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Service Delivery ◽  
Delivery System ◽  
District Of Columbia ◽  
Service Delivery System ◽  
Resource Room ◽  
School Year ◽  
Departments Of Education ◽  
The One ◽  
Room Model

Resource room programs are reported to be the most widely used educational service delivery system for the mildly handicapped, but there appears to be considerable variation in the ways in which the resource room model is operated. The purpose of this investigation was to survey state departments of education and the District of Columbia to determine the nationwide status of the resource room as a service delivery system and to identify characteristics of resource room programs as they were implemented during the 1982-1983 school year. A questionnaire was sent to a special education representative in each State Department of Education and the District of Columbia and a 100% response rate was obtained. The results indicated that the resource room was the most frequently used alternative to the regular education classroom setting for special education students, and the one most often used to serve the mildly-to-moderately handicapped. The amount of time that students spent in these programs varied, but most states recommended time parameters. The data also suggested that state descriptions generally failed to delineate resource room services or resource teacher responsibilities.

Language Resource Room Level of Service

1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Farber ◽  
Mary Ellen Denenberg ◽  
Susan Klyman ◽  
Patricia Lachman
Keyword(s):  
Level Of Service ◽  
Language Performance ◽  
Resource Room ◽  
Speech Language Pathologist ◽  
Pull Out ◽  
Innovative Program ◽  
Language Resource ◽  
Initial Resistance ◽  
Room Model ◽  
Philadelphia School

This article describes the Philadelphia School District’s approach for providing an intensive level of language treatment by combining aspects of the traditional itinerant pull-out method with instruction received in the classroom. The speech-language pathologist assumes the roles of co-teacher, consultant, and direct treatment provider. This innovative program allows flexibility of programming and adjusts the level of effort to individual and classroom needs. Students with moderate to severe speech-language disorders are selected on a system-wide basis for this level of service. Initial resistance to the presence of speech-language pathologists in classrooms eases as students’ speech-language performance shows marked improvement. Preliminary data analysis indicates that the Language Resource Room model is a successful adjunct to traditional treatment modes.

Broken Promises: Reading Instruction in the Resource Room

1998 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Vaughn ◽  
Sally Watson Moody ◽  
Jeanne Shay Schumm
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Reading Instruction ◽  
Special Education Teachers ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Resource Room ◽  
School Year ◽  
Grade Levels ◽  
Reading Abilities ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
In The Beginning

Reading instruction and grouping practices provided for students with learning disabilities (LD) by special education teachers in the resource room were examined. Fourteen special education teachers representing 13 schools were observed three times over the course of 1 year and interviewed in the beginning and end of the school year. Results indicated that teachers primarily provided whole group reading instruction to relatively large groups of students (5 to 19), and little differentiated instruction or materials were provided despite the wide range (3 to 5 grade levels) of reading abilities represented. Most teachers identified whole language as their primary approach to reading, and little instruction that addressed word recognition or comprehension was observed.

Staying in School

1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry J. Kortering ◽  
Patricia M. Braziel
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
School Dropout ◽  
Mild Mental Retardation ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Secondary Special Education ◽  
Education Resource ◽  
And Behavior ◽  
Attitudes And Behavior ◽  
Insight Into

Fifty-two students with learning disabilities (LD), behavior disorders (BD), or mild mental retardation (MMR) answered questions relating to secondary special education resource and self-contained programs. Their responses provided insight into their perceptions about secondary special education and possible improvements. In terms of staying in school and reducing school dropout rates, the most dominant themes suggested a need for the students and teachers to change their attitudes and behavior. Related, but less dominant, themes suggested better textbooks, more help from parents and teachers, and more sports. Students indicated that the best part of school was socializing with peers, a particular class or teacher, and sports, whereas the worst part was being in particular classes, dealing with teachers or administrators, the schoolwork, and getting up so early. As for advantages, 46 students (89%) linked staying in school to an improvement in employment prospects. Conversely, 9 students (17%) perceived doing the schoolwork and limited employment prospects as a disadvantage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document