scholarly journals Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in Intergenerational Programming: A Scoping Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 016402752199619
Author(s):  
Shannon E. Jarrott ◽  
Rachel M. Scrivano ◽  
Cherrie Park ◽  
Angela N. Mendoza
Keyword(s):  
Small Samples ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Program Outcomes ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Technology Program ◽  
Intergenerational Program ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Program Content ◽  
Intergenerational Programming

Evidence-based intergenerational practices are sought by practitioners interested in the potential value of intergenerational programs. These are often difficult to identify as intergenerational program research frequently consists of small samples and pre-post analyses of attitudinal data with little attention to implementation characteristics. We systematically identified evidence-based intergenerational practices linked to program outcomes from peer-reviewed journal articles ( n = 21) published between 2000 and 2019. Scoping reviews facilitate synthesis of available evidence-based practices and identification of gaps in the literature. Fifteen evidence-based intergenerational practices were identified; each was coded in at least five articles. The practices informed program content (e.g., using technology), program considerations (e.g., environmental modifications), facilitator and participant preparation (e.g., training), and quality interactions among participants (e.g., incorporating mechanisms of friendship). While these identified practices reflect extant theory and research, rigorous implementation research is needed to advance evidence-based intergenerational practice as policymakers and practitioners advocate for intergenerational program growth.

scholarly journals Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in Intergenerational Programming: A Scoping Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 732-733
Author(s):  
Shannon Jarrott ◽  
Rachel Scrivano ◽  
Nancy Mendoza ◽  
Cherrie Park
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Program Outcomes ◽  
Post Secondary ◽  
Intergenerational Programs ◽  
Empirically Supported ◽  
Program Content ◽  
Intergenerational Programming

Abstract Intergenerational programs facilitate mutually beneficial interactions between youth and older adults, achieving an array of outcomes. With few exceptions, implementation factors rarely figure into outcome analyses, though researchers frequently gather data on factors influencing outcomes. The resulting practice-evidence gap may deter wide-spread adoption of intergenerational programming. We conducted a scoping review of 35 peer-reviewed articles (2000-2019) to map key concepts and evidence sources of empirically-supported practices impacting intergenerational program outcomes. A scoping review is appropriate when an area is complex, like intergenerational programs that incorporate diverse participants, content, and goals. Primarily qualitative studies involved programs equally likely to involve young, school-age, or post-secondary age youth and independent or frail older adults. Half had sample sizes under 50, frequently measuring both age groups. Implementation practices included co-learning and sharing personal stories. Program content (e.g., technology) and greater exposure amplified outcomes. Rigorous implementation research is needed to advance evidence-based intergenerational practice.

scholarly journals Virtual external implementation facilitation: successful methods for remotely engaging groups in quality improvement

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine W. Hartmann ◽  
Ryann L. Engle ◽  
Camilla B. Pimentel ◽  
Whitney L. Mills ◽  
Valerie A. Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
National Program ◽  
Extensive Experience ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Virtual Experience ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Program Content

Abstract Background Relatively little guidance exists on how to use virtual implementation facilitation to successfully implement evidence-based practices and innovations into clinical programs. Yet virtual methods are increasingly common. They have potentially wider reach, emergent public health situations necessitate their use, and restrictions on resources can make them more attractive. We therefore outline a set of principles for virtual external implementation facilitation and a series of recommendations based on extensive experience successfully using virtual external implementation facilitation in a national program. Model and recommendations Success in virtual external implementation facilitation may be achieved by facilitators applying three overarching principles: pilot everything, incorporate a model, and prioritize metacognition. Five practical principles also help: plan in advance, communicate in real time, build relationships, engage participants, and construct a virtual room for participants. We present eight concrete suggestions for enacting the practical principles: (1) assign key facilitation roles to facilitation team members to ensure the program runs smoothly; (2) create small cohorts of participants so they can have meaningful interactions; (3) provide clarity and structure for all participant interactions; (4) structure program content to ensure key points are described, reinforced, and practiced; (5) use visuals to supplement audio content; (6) build activities into the agenda that enable participants to immediately apply knowledge at their own sites, separate from the virtual experience; (7) create backup plans whenever possible; and (8) engage all participants in the program. Summary These principles represent a novel conceptualization of virtual external implementation facilitation, giving structure to a process that has been, to date, inadequately described. The associated actions are demonstrably useful in supporting the principles and offer teams interested in virtual external implementation facilitation concrete methods by which to ensure success. Our examples stem from experiences in healthcare. But the principles can, in theory, be applied to virtual external implementation facilitation regardless of setting, as they and the associated actions are not setting specific.

scholarly journals Implementing IG Best Practices in Community-Based Settings: A Pre-Implementation Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 733-733
Author(s):  
Lisa Juckett ◽  
Shannon Jarrott ◽  
Jill Naar ◽  
Rachel Scivano ◽  
Alicia Bunger
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Valuable Insight ◽  
Small Community ◽  
Community Settings ◽  
Intergenerational Program ◽  
Specific Implementation ◽  
Intergenerational Programming

Abstract Programs that intentionally engage unrelated young and old persons often lead to mutual benefits; however, specific implementation strategies that support the use of evidence-based intergenerational programming in community settings are understudied. With strong demand for training resources among intergenerational program providers, this pilot study examined how a multifaceted training strategy facilitated the implementation of 14 distinct evidence-based intergenerational best practices. Intergenerational programming was implemented with nine staff from two small community sites using three implementation strategies including educational meetings, ongoing consultation, and routine practice reminders. Observational analysis of video recorded intergenerational program sessions indicated that staff adopted an average of 81.7% of intergenerational best practices suggesting the feasibility of implementing IG in community settings. Findings yield valuable insight that can inform training refinements, and selection of strategies for improving implementation. Next steps include aligning specific practices with participant outcomes.

scholarly journals Using Mixed Methods to Adapt and Evaluate the Implementation of a Multicomponent Tobacco-Free Workplace Program within Behavioral Health Centers

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Martinez Leal ◽  
Tzu-An Chen ◽  
Virmarie Correa-Fernández ◽  
Kathy Le ◽  
Daniel P. O’Connor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Behavioral Health ◽  
Program Implementation ◽  
Organizational Capacity ◽  
Tobacco Dependence ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Program Outcomes ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Local Contexts

Abstract Background: Behavioral health treatment centers (BHTCs) rarely implement existing evidence-based practices for treating tobacco dependence, despite high rates of tobacco use among their clients. Taking Texas Tobacco Free (TTTF) has successfully targeted this disparity by delivering an evidence-based, multilevel, tobacco-free workplace program providing policy implementation and enforcement, education, provider training in tobacco screenings and treatments, and nicotine replacement therapies (NRT) to BHTCs across Texas. We describe a mixed methods design used to conduct a formative evaluation process to adapt implementation strategies to local contexts, evaluate program outcomes and characterize processes influencing program implementation in two BHTCs serving 17 clinics.Methods: Varied data collection included pre and post-implementation leader, provider, and staff surveys; and pre, mid, and post-implementation provider, staff and consumer focus groups. During implementation, data were collected via various logs (tobacco screenings, NRT delivery) to monitor program content delivery. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework guided translation of behavioral interventions into sustainable practice.Results: While program implementation varied between each BHTC, all clinics adopted a 100% tobacco-free workplace policy, integrated tobacco screenings into routine practice, delivered evidence-based interventions, dispensed NRT to consumers and staff, and increased provider knowledge on how to address tobacco dependence. Pre, mid, and post-implementation qualitative findings served to: 1) develop program strategies and materials adapted to local contexts and populations and address barriers; 2) adjust delivery systems of key components to enhance implementation; 3) understand reasons for success or failure to implement specific practices; and 4) reveal program integration into clinic culture, enhancing sustainability.Conclusions: Implementation of TTTF at both BHTCs increased organizational capacity in the provision of evidence-based practices to treat tobacco dependence through successfully meeting most of our RE-AIM targets. Mixing methods involved program adopters and recipients as collaborators directly shaping core interventions to their individual context and needs, thus increasing program fit, ownership, adoption and sustainability; closing the gap between research and practice. These findings contribute to the development of flexible strategies and interventions capable of addressing variable implementation contexts and barriers, thus enhancing the effectiveness and sustainability of a tobacco-free workplace program.

Self-Regulation and the Writing Process: Enhancing the Performance of Students With Language and Learning Difficulties

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary A. Troia
Keyword(s):  
Writing Process ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Learning Difficulties ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Struggling Learners ◽  
Evidence Based Practices

Abstract This article first provides an overview of components of self-regulation in writing and specific examples of each component are given. The remainder of the article addresses common reasons why struggling learners experience trouble with revising, followed by evidence-based practices to help students revise their papers more effectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document