Are International Guidelines for the Prescription of Adjuvant Treatment for Early Breast Cancer Followed in Clinical Practice? Results of a Population-Based Study on 1547 Patients

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 503-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Palazzi ◽  
Dolores De Tomasi ◽  
Caterina D'Affronto ◽  
Antonella Richetti ◽  
Maria Carla Valli ◽  
...  

Aims and background The results of several randomized trials and meta-analyses have been reported on adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer and treatment guidelines have been defined accordingly, but detailed data are lacking on the appropriateness of treatment prescription in clinical practice. Methods We performed a prospective, observational, multicenter study to monitor the prescription, delivery and effectiveness of radiotherapy following conservative surgery for early breast cancer; 1610 patients treated with postoperative radiation to the breast in 1997 were entered by 12 centers in Lombardy, Italy. Here we report the results of a secondary analysis focused on the prescription of medical adjuvant treatment (1547 eligible patients). Results Chemotherapy only was prescribed to 526 patients (33%), hormonal therapy only to 539 (33%), and both treatments to 85 patients (5%); 460 women (29%) received no medical adjuvant treatment. We compared the collected data with guidelines defined in 1995 by the St Gallen Consensus Conference. Undertreatment was most frequent in node-negative patients at intermediate/high risk, no treatment (instead of tamoxifen or chemotherapy) being prescribed in 21–45% of cases. Node-negative patients at low risk, on the other hand, were overtreated with tamoxifen in 31% of cases. In node-positive, premenopausal women compliance with guidelines was far better, with a 91–96% rate of chemotherapy prescription. In node-positive, postmenopausal, estrogen receptor-positive patients chemotherapy was unduly prescribed in as many as 56% of cases. Comparison of clinical practice with the next version of the guidelines (1998) showed a somewhat better compliance. Conclusions Despite the availability of official and authoritative guidelines, adjuvant treatment prescription for early breast cancer in Lombardy in 1997 was suboptimal, especially in well-defined subgroups of patients.

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19647-19647 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. J. Robert ◽  
W. Eiermann ◽  
T. Pienkowski ◽  
J. Crown ◽  
M. Martin ◽  
...  

19647 Background: The primary objective of the BCIRG 006 trial was to determine if the use of trastuzumab in early high-risk HER2-positive breast cancer significantly improved clinical outcomes. A secondary objective was to evaluate the QOL of patients receiving the 2 treatments. Methods: The BCIRG 006 trial compared adjuvant standard AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide x 4 cycles) followed by docetaxel x 4 [AC-T] or 2 trastuzumab-containing regimens, AC followed by T with trastuzumab x 1 year [AC-TH] or TCarbo x 6 with trastuzumab x 1 year [TCH] in patients with node positive or high-risk node negative HER2-positive early breast cancer (n=3222). Results: The 2nd planned interim analysis, median follow-up at 36 months, showed that both AC-TH and TCH significantly improved the DFS and OS over the control (relative reduction risk of relapse 39% (P<0.0001) and 33% (P=0.0003) respectively, for AC-TH and TCH vs control). Relative reduction in the risk of death was 41% (P=0.0041) and 34% (P =0.017) respectively, for AC-TH and TCH vs control. Congestive heart failure occurred in 0.4% of patients in AC-T and TCH vs 1.9% of patients in AC-TH. Global safety profile was acceptable in all 3 arms and more favourable in TCH than AC-TH. QOL, a secondary endpoint of this trial, was assessed using the EORTC QLQC-30, BR-23, and EQ5D. We will present the primary QOL endpoints comparing Physical Function, Global Health Status, Future Perspectives, and Systemic Treatment Effects change scores from baseline to mid-chemotherapy, end of chemotherapy, and 12 months follow-up (with a 10% change considered clinically important). The proportion of patients with improved/stable/worsened QOL scores will be compared with chi-square tests. Other QOL exploratory analyses will be presented. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document