The Addition of Rotator Interval Closure after Arthroscopic Repair of Either Anterior or Posterior Shoulder Instability

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1123-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy S. Mologne ◽  
Kristin Zhao ◽  
Michio Hongo ◽  
Anthony A. Romeo ◽  
Kai-Nan An ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1337-1343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett A. Lenart ◽  
Seth L. Sherman ◽  
Nathan A. Mall ◽  
Eric Gochanour ◽  
Stacy L. Twigg ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riley J. Williams ◽  
Sabrina Strickland ◽  
Matthew Cohen ◽  
David W. Altchek ◽  
Russell F. Warren

Background: The role of arthroscopic repair in the treatment of posterior shoulder instability remains poorly defined. Purpose: To evaluate the results of arthroscopic repair of posterior Bankart lesions. Study Design: Retrospective review. Methods: Records were reviewed of 27 shoulders (26 patients). All of the patients were male with a mean age of 28.7 years; in all cases symptoms were preceded by a traumatic event. Fourteen of the patients had 2+ to 3+ posterior translation noted under preoperative anesthesia. The posterior capsulolabral complex was found to be detached from the glenoid rim in all cases; bioabsorbable tack fixation was used for repair. Results: At a mean follow-up of 5.1 years, no patients demonstrated a range of motion deficit. Muscle weakness (grade 4/5) in external rotation was noted in two patients (8%). There was no instability greater than 1+ in the anterior, posterior, or inferior directions. The mean L'Insalata shoulder score was 90.0 ± 13.9. The mean SF-36 physical and mental component scores were 50.4 ± 7 and 53.9 ± 9, respectively. Symptoms of pain and instability were eliminated in 24 patients (92%). Two patients (8%) required additional surgery after arthroscopic repair of the posterior Bankart lesion. Radiographs demonstrated that there had been no progressive glenohumeral joint degeneration. Conclusions: Arthroscopic repair of the posterior capsulolabral complex is an effective means of eliminating symptoms of pain and instability associated with posterior Bankart lesions of traumatic origin.


2020 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 177-181
Author(s):  
Joseph Maalouly ◽  
Dany Aouad ◽  
Mohammad Darwish ◽  
Elias Saidy ◽  
Hicham Abdelnour ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 263502542110319
Author(s):  
Gautam P. Yagnik ◽  
Kevin West ◽  
Bhavya K. Sheth ◽  
Luis Vargas ◽  
John W. Uribe

Background: Gross posterior instability is rare and when found likely has an injury or deficiency to the posterior static restraints of shoulder associated with it. Traditionally, injuries to the posterior capsule have been difficult to diagnose and visualize with magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively, and very little literature regarding arthroscopic repair of posterior capsular tears exists currently. Indications: We present a repair of a posterior midcapsular and posterior labral tear in a 26-year-old man with recurrent left posterior shoulder instability using a novel all–arthroscopic technique. Technique Description: We performed a shoulder arthroscopy in a lateral decubitus position with the arm at 45° of abduction using standard posterior viewing and anterior working portals. Diagnostic arthroscopy revealed a large posterior midcapsular rupture approximately 2 cm lateral to the glenoid with an associated posterior labral tear. We created an accessory posterolateral portal with needle localization that was outside the capsular defect yet allowed access to the posterior labrum. Anatomic closure of the capsular tear was achieved arthroscopically with 3 interrupted No. 2 nonabsorbable sutures in a side–to–side fashion. Posterior labral repair and capsular shift were done to further address the instability using 2 knotless all–suture anchors percutaneously placed at the 7 o'clock and 9 o'clock position. We closed the posterior portal with a combination of curved and penetrating suture passers. Incisions were closed with interrupted 4-0 nylon. Postoperatively, the patient was placed in an ultra–sling for 4 weeks before physical therapy. We allowed light strengthening at 8 weeks, full strengthening at 12 weeks, and estimated return to sport at 4 months. Results: At 6 months postoperatively, the patient has regained symmetric motion, full strength, and has no residual pain or instability. Conclusion: Gross posterior instability is a rare and difficult condition to diagnose and manage. If no significant labral injuries are identified, injury to the posterior capsule must be considered and full assessment should be done when visualizing from the anterior portal. Repair of the posterior capsule is necessary and can be achieved all arthroscopically with this technique.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596712110064
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Vopat ◽  
Reed G. Coda ◽  
Nick E. Giusti ◽  
Jordan Baker ◽  
Armin Tarakemeh ◽  
...  

Background: The glenohumeral joint is one of the most frequently dislocated joints in the body, particularly in young, active adults. Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate and compare outcomes between anterior versus posterior shoulder instability. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases (from inception to September 2019) according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies were included if they were published in the English language, contained outcomes after anterior or posterior shoulder instability, had at least 1 year of follow-up, and included arthroscopic soft tissue labral repair of either anterior or posterior instability. Outcomes including return-to-sport (RTS) rate, postoperative instability rate, and pre- and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were recorded and analyzed. Results: Overall, 39 studies were included (2077 patients; 1716 male patients and 361 female patients). Patients with anterior instability had a mean age of 23.45 ± 5.40 years (range, 11-72 years), while patients with posterior instability had a mean age of 23.08 ± 8.41 years (range, 13-61 years). The percentage of male patients with anterior instability was significantly higher than that of female patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% CI, 1.04-1.77; P = .021). Compared with patients with posterior instability, those with anterior instability were significantly more likely to RTS (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.76-3.04; P < .001), and they were significantly more likely to have postoperative instability (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.07-2.23; P = .018). Patients with anterior instability also had significantly higher ASES scores than those with posterior instability (difference in means, 6.74; 95% CI, 4.71-8.77; P < .001). There were no significant differences found in postoperative complications between the anterior group (11 complications; 1.8%) and the posterior group (3 complications; 1.6%) (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.29-6.30; P = .999). Conclusion: Patients with anterior shoulder instability had higher RTS rates but were more likely to have postoperative instability compared with posterior instability patients. Overall, male patients were significantly more likely to have anterior shoulder instability, while female patients were significantly more likely to have posterior shoulder instability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document