Urologic laparoscopic surgery: Light and shade

1995 ◽  
Vol 62 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 80-84
Author(s):  
G. Breda ◽  
P. Silvestre ◽  
L. Gherardi ◽  
A. Giunta ◽  
A. Tamai ◽  
...  

— Analysing material and world-wide urologic laparoscopie surgery experience, the Authors try to define, also according to their experience, the indications for which the laparoscopic technique is established and well accepted and, on the contrary, those which are still controversial. Critical evaluation about laparoscopic surgery indications are often supported by the costs of the “minimally invasive” technique compared to the traditional surgical approach.

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482095635
Author(s):  
Iswanto Sucandy ◽  
Andres Giovannetti ◽  
Janelle Spence ◽  
Sharona Ross ◽  
Alexander Rosemurgy

Minimally Invasive bile duct repair is an emerging modern technique in hepatobiliary surgery. Conventional laparoscopic technique had been sporadically reported by high volume surgeons as an alternative to open operation, however, the majority of those repairs were undertaken for biliary injury below the biliary bifurcation. Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy below the biliary bifurcation is technically much simpler to complete when compared to that above the hilar plate (high bile duct injury). The risk of long-term anastomotic stricture is also higher as bile duct caliber decreases. This is anatomically inherent as we travel further cranial beyond the hilar plate. In this multimedia article, we describe our minimally invasive technique for high bile duct injury repair using robotic technology.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giordano Perin ◽  
Maria Grazia Scarpa

TULAA or Transumbilical Laparoscopic Assisted Appendicectomy is a minimally invasive technique described by Pelosi in 1992 for the removal of the inflamed appendix. Its main advantage is the possibility of exploring the peritoneal cavity and performing a simple and safe extracorporeal appendicectomy. Since its first description, different authors reported their experience with such technique. The aim of this review is to summarise the surgical outcomes currently reported in the literature for this minimally invasive surgical approach and compare it with standard open and laparoscopic appendicectomy.


2021 ◽  
pp. 155335062098822
Author(s):  
Eirini Giovannopoulou ◽  
Anastasia Prodromidou ◽  
Nikolaos Blontzos ◽  
Christos Iavazzo

Objective. To review the existing studies on single-site robotic myomectomy and test the safety and feasibility of this innovative minimally invasive technique. Data Sources. PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar (from their inception to October 2019), as well as Clinicaltrials.gov databases up to April 2020. Methods of Study Selection. Clinical trials (prospective or retrospective) that reported the outcomes of single-site robotic myomectomy, with a sample of at least 20 patients were considered eligible for the review. Results. The present review was performed in accordance with the guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Four (4) studies met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 267 patients were included with a mean age from 37.1 to 39.1 years and BMI from 21.6 to 29.4 kg/m2. The mean operative time ranged from 131.4 to 154.2 min, the mean docking time from 5.1 to 5.45 min, and the mean blood loss from 57.9 to 182.62 ml. No intraoperative complications were observed, and a conversion rate of 3.8% was reported by a sole study. The overall postoperative complication rate was estimated at 2.2%, and the mean hospital stay ranged from 0.57 to 4.7 days. No significant differences were detected when single-site robotic myomectomy was compared to the multiport technique concerning operative time, blood loss, and total complication rate. Conclusion. Our findings support the safety of single-site robotic myomectomy and its equivalency with the multiport technique on the most studied outcomes. Further studies are needed to conclude on the optimal minimally invasive technique for myomectomy.


1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHENIE R. LONG ◽  
RALPH V. CLAYMAN ◽  
STEPHEN M. DIERKS ◽  
SHIMON MERETYK ◽  
TERRY BUELNA

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 761-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego I. Ramos-Valadez ◽  
Chirag B. Patel ◽  
Madhu Ragupathi ◽  
Malak B. Bokhari ◽  
T. Bartley Pickron ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document