The Role of the New “Date Rape Drugs” in Attributions About Date Rape

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
April L. Girard ◽  
Charlene Y. Senn
Keyword(s):  
1998 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 271-277
Author(s):  
Susan A. Lyman ◽  
Carol Hughes-McLain ◽  
Gerald Thompson
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-373
Author(s):  
Bethany Rose Lamont

This article reflects on the importance of comedy when considering media engagements with sexual abuse themes. This approach is informed by how closely the study of humour is rooted in the analysis of power relations, with comic theorists, both historical and contemporary, grounding the work.The comic figures of both the child sex (CS) abuser and the sexual violence survivor are first identified, before exploring what exactly about these tropes evoke laughter, and what this means for wider conceptions of interpersonal abuse and victimology. In analysing examples of CS abuser themed British and American comedy, animated adult comedies such as Family Guy (1999-present) and Monkey Dust (2003-2005) are considered in the context of early 2000s anxieties towards the suburban dirty old man and online child safety. In the case of the sexual violence survivor, Saturday Night Live’s 1993 ‘Is It Date Rape?’ sketch is considered within the context of 1990s anxieties regarding feminist campus politics, and is paralleled to the mid-2010s media panic surrounding British and American university students and trigger warnings through examples including The Simpson’s 2017 ‘Caper Chase’ episode and early to mid-2010s online academic polemics on the humourless feminist, such as Mark Fisher’s ‘Exiting The Vampire Castle’ (2013) and Jack Halberstam’s ‘You are Triggering Me!’ (2014). The article concludes by considering the changing consensuses for sexual violence themed humour in the Me Too era through the 2018 episode of It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia (2005-present) ‘Times Up For The Gang.’


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. e0210940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Gräwe ◽  
Anna Dreyer ◽  
Tobias Vornholt ◽  
Ursela Barteczko ◽  
Luzia Buchholz ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 1092-1097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Jürschik ◽  
Bishu Agarwal ◽  
Thomas Kassebacher ◽  
Philipp Sulzer ◽  
Christopher A. Mayhew ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine A. Black ◽  
David J. Gold

Participants (80 men, 80 women) read hypothetical date rape scenarios, wherein the perpetrator’s socioeconomic status (bus driver versus doctor) and the victim’s level of resistance (verbal versus verbal and physical) were varied, and made judgments about who was at fault and what the consequences should be. In general, men assigned more blame to the victim and less blame to the perpetrator than did women. However, men assigned more blame to the bus driver than to the doctor. Women, on the other hand, assigned more blame to the victim who was raped by the bus driver than to the victim who was raped by the doctor. The results also indicated that participants recommended harsher punishments for the perpetrator when the victim resisted verbally than when she resisted verbally and physically. Future research on the role of the perpetrator’s, the victim’s, and the participants’ socioeconomic status in judgments about date rape is suggested.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document