An Organizational Ecology of National Self-Help/Mutual-Aid Organizations

2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 598-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew E. Archibald
Drug Courts ◽  
2008 ◽  
pp. 195-205
Author(s):  
Anne M. Herron ◽  
Dee S. Owens

Author(s):  
Tanja Bueltmann ◽  
Donald M. MacRaild

Having established the structures and social and cultural activities of English ethnic associations, Chapter 5 examines in detail the two critical pillars of English ethnic associationalism: charity and mutual aid. It does this through the charity dispensed by St George’s societies, and the collective self-help facilitated in particular by the Sons of England (there are no detailed archives for the OSStG, hence the focus on the SoE). The chapter explores both levels of support and the regulatory framework adopted by the associations to disburse funds. By exploring the aid distributed by St George’s societies, this chapter enables us to examine the level of associational networking between organisations in dispensing charity to all immigrant groups, and the extent to which this gave those organisations a wider civic role. We have located particularly good records for the SoE in Canada and thus explore the workings of this friendly society. Quite unlike the St George’s societies, the SoE built up reserves of members’ funds, which were expended on sickness, unemployment and burial benefits. Ranging across Canada from the Maritimes to British Columbia, and entailing thousands of members in hundreds of lodges, and engaging in the good management of funds and the promulgation of a shared English culture, the Sons add very significantly to our understanding of what it meant to be English in North America.


1985 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 25-29
Author(s):  
Catherine J. Paskert ◽  
Edward J. Madara
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 258-281
Author(s):  
Marina Tan Harper (陈美月)

Abstract Due to push and pull factors, millions of Chinese migrants fanned out into the Nanyang from the mid-1800s onward. The G1 (first generation) diasporic Chinese left China with a sojourner mentality, compelling their philanthropic action back to motherland China. As G1 diasporic Chinese and their second or third generation ethnic Chinese (G2, G3 …) eventually settled as nationals into various countries in Southeast Asia, their Confucian Chinese values were confronted, severely tested, remolded, and evolved as they assimilated and converged with the political, social, and economic circumstances of the times. With self-help and mutual aid philanthropy, they thrived and prospered in the Nanyang and were soon propelled to lead local communities. As they engendered gratitude to where they built their wealth, raised families, and honored ancestry in their resettled new homes, their loyalties, generosity, and philanthropy also began to shift away from China. This study investigates these traditions, ethos, and value systems through the lens of philanthropy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document