Nurse Anesthetists' Perspectives on Improving the Anesthesia Care of Culturally Diverse Patients

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 26-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty J. Horton
2014 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 695-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leif Saager ◽  
Brian D. Hesler ◽  
Jing You ◽  
Alparslan Turan ◽  
Edward J. Mascha ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Transfers of patient care and responsibility among caregivers, “handovers,” are common. Whether handovers worsen patient outcome remains unclear. The authors tested the hypothesis that intraoperative care transitions among anesthesia providers are associated with postoperative complications. Methods: From the records of 138,932 adult Cleveland Clinic (Cleveland, Ohio) surgical patients, the authors assessed the association between total number of anesthesia handovers during a case and an adjusted collapsed composite of in-hospital mortality and major morbidities using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Anesthesia care transitions were significantly associated with higher odds of experiencing any major in-hospital mortality/morbidity (incidence of 8.8, 11.6, 14.2, 17.0, and 21.2% for patients with 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 transitions; odds ratio 1.08 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.10] for an increase of 1 transition category, P < 0.001). Care transitions among attending anesthesiologists and residents or nurse anesthetists were similarly associated with harm (odds ratio 1.07 [98.3% CI, 1.03 to 1.12] for attending [incidence of 9.4, 13.9, 17.4, and 21.5% for patients with 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 transitions] and 1.07 [1.04 to 1.11] for residents or nurses [incidence of 9.4, 13.0, 15.4, and 21.2% for patients with 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 transitions], both P < 0.001). There was no difference between matched resident only (8.5%) and nurse anesthetist only (8.8%) cases on the collapsed composite outcome (odds ratio, 1.00 [98.3%, 0.93 to 1.07]; P = 0.92). Conclusion: Intraoperative anesthesia care transitions are strongly associated with worse outcomes, with a similar effect size for attendings, residents, and nurse anesthetists.


2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 700-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric C. Sun ◽  
Thomas R. Miller ◽  
Jasmin Moshfegh ◽  
Laurence C. Baker

Abstract Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background In the United States, anesthesia care can be provided by an anesthesia care team consisting of nonphysician providers (nurse anesthetists and anesthesiologist assistants) working under the supervision of a physician anesthesiologist. Nurse anesthetists may practice nationwide, whereas anesthesiologist assistants are restricted to 16 states. To inform policies concerning the expanded use of anesthesiologist assistants, the authors examined whether the specific anesthesia care team composition (physician anesthesiologist plus nurse anesthetist or anesthesiologist assistant) was associated with differences in perioperative outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of national claims data for 443,098 publicly insured elderly (ages 65 to 89 yr) patients who underwent inpatient surgery between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2011. The differences in inpatient mortality, spending, and length of stay between cases where an anesthesiologist supervised an anesthesiologist assistant compared to cases where an anesthesiologist supervised a nurse anesthetist were estimated. The approach used a quasirandomization technique known as instrumental variables to reduce confounding. Results The adjusted mortality for care teams with anesthesiologist assistants was 1.6% (95% CI, 1.4 to 1.8) versus 1.7% for care teams with nurse anesthetists (95% CI, 1.7 to 1.7; difference −0.08; 95% CI, −0.3 to 0.1; P = 0.47). Compared to care teams with nurse anesthetists, care teams with anesthesiologist assistants were associated with non–statistically significant decreases in length of stay (−0.009 days; 95% CI, −0.1 to 0.1; P = 0.89) and medical spending (−$56; 95% CI, −334 to 223; P = 0.70). Conclusions The specific composition of the anesthesia care team was not associated with any significant differences in mortality, length of stay, or inpatient spending.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. e0250122
Author(s):  
Charlotte Romare ◽  
Per Enlöf ◽  
Peter Anderberg ◽  
Pether Jildenstål ◽  
Johan Sanmartin Berglund ◽  
...  

Purpose To describe nurse anesthetists’ experiences using smart glasses to monitor patients’ vital signs during anesthesia care. Methods Data was collected through individual semi-structured interviews with seven nurse anesthetists who had used smart glasses, with a customized application for monitoring vital signs, during clinical anesthesia care. Data was analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results An overarching theme became evident during analysis; Facing and embracing responsibility. Being a nurse anesthetist entails a great responsibility, and the participants demonstrated that they shouldered this responsibility with pride. The theme was divided in two sub-themes. The first of these, A new way of working, comprised the categories Adoption and Utility. This involved incorporating smart glasses into existing routines in order to provide safe anesthesia care. The second sub-theme, Encountering side effects, consisted of the categories Obstacles and Personal affect. This sub-theme concerned the possibility to use smart glasses as intended, as well as the affect on nurse anesthetists as users. Conclusion Smart glasses improved access to vital signs and enabled continuous monitoring regardless of location. Continued development and improvement, both in terms of the application software and the hardware, are necessary for smart glasses to meet nurse anesthetists’ needs in clinical practice.


Author(s):  
José G. Centeno

Abstract The steady increase in linguistic and cultural diversity in the country, including the number of bilingual speakers, has been predicted to continue. Minorities are expected to be the majority by 2042. Strokes, the third leading cause of death and the leading cause of long-term disability in the U.S., are quite prevalent in racial and ethnic minorities, so population estimates underscore the imperative need to develop valid clinical procedures to serve the predicted increase in linguistically and culturally diverse bilingual adults with aphasia in post-stroke rehabilitation. Bilingualism is a complex phenomenon that interconnects culture, cognition, and language; thus, as aphasia is a social phenomenon, treatment of bilingual aphasic persons would benefit from conceptual frameworks that exploit the culture-cognition-language interaction in ways that maximize both linguistic and communicative improvement leading to social re-adaptation. This paper discusses a multidisciplinary evidence-based approach to develop ecologically-valid treatment strategies for bilingual aphasic individuals. Content aims to spark practitioners' interest to explore conceptually broad intervention strategies beyond strictly linguistic domains that would facilitate linguistic gains, communicative interactions, and social functioning. This paper largely emphasizes Spanish-English individuals in the United States. Practitioners, however, are advised to adapt the proposed principles to the unique backgrounds of other bilingual aphasic clients.


1996 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 82-89
Author(s):  
Linda Badon ◽  
Sandra Bourque

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Moll ◽  
Mark Kaufmann

Zusammenfassung. Ein Grossteil der opthalmologischen Eingriffe kann heute in Lokoregionalanästhesie mit «Monitored Anesthesia Care» (MAC) durchgeführt werden. Allgemeinanästhesieverfahren sind hauptsächlich im pädiatrischen Segment, bei spezifischer Comorbidität und bei langdauernden Eingriffen mit völlig ruhiggestelltem OP-Gebiet notwendig. Kataraktoperationen bei mehrheitlich geriatrischen Patienten gehören aufgrund Ihrer Häufigkeit zur sogenannten «Hochvolumen-Chirurgie»: In Anbetracht des niedrigen perioperativen Risikos bei dieser Patientengruppe sind angepasste, optimierte Prozesse sinnvoll. Eine fokussierte Prämedikation und Information dieser Patienten gewährleistet eine gute perioperative Compliance. Präoperative Untersuchungen sollen bei dieser Patientengruppe nur in Abhängigkeit von relevanter Comorbidität durchgeführt werden. Neben der klassischen Anästhesiesprechstunde stehen heute für gesundheitlich kompensierte Patienten auch neue Verfahren wie eine internetbasierte Prämedikationsvisite zur Verfügung. Das intraoperative Anästhesieverfahren hängt von den Erfordernissen des Chirurgen und den Erwartungen und Kooperationsmöglichkeiten des Patienten ab.


1995 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-52
Author(s):  
Kathryn J. Lindholm

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document