An Intercenter Comparison of Nasolabial Appearance Including a Center Using Nasoalveolar Molding

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 655-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supakit Peanchitlertkajorn ◽  
Ana Mercado ◽  
John Daskalogiannakis ◽  
Ronald Hathaway ◽  
Kathleen Russell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Nasal Reconstruction ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Symmetry Center ◽  
Specific Protocol ◽  
Nasoalveolar Molding ◽  
Presurgical Orthopedics

Objective: To compare nasolabial appearance outcomes of patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP) in preadolescence from 4 cleft centers including a center using nasoalveolar molding (NAM) and primary nasal reconstruction. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Four cleft centers in North America. Patients: 135 subjects with repaired CUCLP. Methods: Frontal and profile facial pictures were assessed using the Asher-McDade rating scale. Intra- and interrater reliability were tested using weighted Kappa statistics. Median scores by center were compared with Kruskal-Wallis statistics. Results: Intrarater reliability scores were moderate to good. Interrater reliability scores were moderate. Significant differences ( P < .05) among centers were found. For nasal form, center G (median = 2.83) had better scores than centers C and D (C median = 3.33, D median = 3.17). For nose symmetry, center G had better scores (median = 2.33) than all other centers (B median = 2.67, C median = 2.83, D median = 2.83). For vermillion border, center G had better scores (median = 2.58) than centers B and C (B median = 3.17, C median = 3.17). For nasolabial profile, center G (median score = 2.67) had better scores than center C (median = 3.00). For total nasolabial score, center G (median = 2.67) had better scores than all other centers (B median = 2.83, C median = 3, D median = 2.83). Conclusion: The protocol followed by center G, the only center that performed NAM and primary nasal reconstruction, produced better results in all categories when compared to center C, the only center that did not perform presurgical orthopedics or lip/nose revisions. When compared to centers that performed traditional presurgical orthopedics and surgical revisions (B and D), center G was not consistently better in all categories. As with other uncontrolled, retrospective intercenter studies, it is not possible to attribute the outcomes to a specific protocol component.

A Rapid Solution to Align the Severely Malpositioned Premaxilla in Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amornpong T. Vachiramon ◽  
John N. Groper ◽  
Simon Gamer
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Nasoalveolar Molding ◽  
Presurgical Orthopedics ◽  
Palate Patient

Objective: To describe a laboratory modification of the maxillary cast to make an improved nasoalveolar molding plate used in presurgical orthopedics for infants with bilateral cleft lip and palate. Conclusions: Modifying the nasoalveolar molding plate may reduce the presurgical treatment time for the bilateral cleft lip and palate patient.

Spontaneous Growth of the Palatal Plates in the Cleft Lip and Palate

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562098278
Author(s):  
Felipe Pontes ◽  
Gabriella Callegaris ◽  
Renato da Silva Freitas
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Posterior Arch ◽  
Arch Width ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
3D Software ◽  
Nasoalveolar Molding ◽  
Plaster Models ◽  
Presurgical Orthopedics

Objective: This is a prospective study examining palatal casts from patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) in the first month of life, immediately before cheiloplasty, and immediately before palatoplasty. None of the patients receives presurgical orthopedics (nasoalveolar molding). Design: In this prospective study, upper arch plaster models were taken 3 times during the treatment: in the first month of life (T1), before the cheiloplasty (T2), and before the palatoplasty (T3). Anatomic landmarks were defined and linear anthropometric measurements were obtained afterward. Dimensional analysis was performed using 3D software. Two-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey test was performed for statistical analysis. Setting: Tertiary, institutional. Participants: Twelve patients with UCLP of either sex with less than 1 month of life and without any other syndrome. Intervention: No intervention was performed. Main Outcome Measure: Reduction of the cleft without using orthopedics apparatus. Results: There was a statistically significant reduction in the cleft gap comparing T1 to T3. There was also a significant reduction in the intercanine width comparing T2 and T3, and T1 and T3. There was significant increase in the posterior arch width comparing T2 and T3, and T1 and T3. The palatal plate’s width increased in all times analyzed. Conclusion: The palatal cleft narrows spontaneously as well in both midpoint and posterior point during the first 6 months of patient’s treatment. This event was enhanced by cheiloplasty. This surgery might have a greater influence on the anterior arch width than in the posterior arch region.

scholarly journals Description of Nasoalveolar Molding Process in Neonatal Period of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Step by Step

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Azhari ◽  
Wijdane El Hawari ◽  
Hasnae Rokhssi ◽  
Nadia Merzouk ◽  
Oussama Bentahar
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Treatment Center ◽  
Congenital Defects ◽  
Molding Process ◽  
Aesthetic Results ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
Removable Appliances ◽  
Nasoalveolar Molding

Statement of problem. Cleft Lip and Palate (CLP) are common congenital defects of the present day. They result from a failure of facial bud sticking during embryological phenomena. Their therapeutics based on multi-disciplinary care to restore as much as possible the aesthetic and functional prejudices generated by these anomalies. Purpose. Through this work, we will illustrate, through a clinical case supported at the Consultation and Dental Treatment Center of Rabat, clinical and laboratory stages of realization of Nasoalveolar Molding (NAM). Material and methods. We describe original techniques used in our service for manufacturing of NAM fireworks and we define recommendations after insertion and follow-up procedures.Result. Place of NAM in management of these anomalies has increasingly recommended, given limitations of surgery alone to ensure satisfactory aesthetic results. Several fixed or removable appliances has used, in order to reposition gaps in cleft and / or to reshape affected bordering tissues. Conclusion. Despite the controversies surrounding this therapy, it remains highly recommended and scientifically based.

scholarly journals ASSESSMENT OF PRESURGICAL NASOALVEOLAR MOULDING (PNAM) IN UNILATERAL CLEFT LIP AND PALATE

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Santosh Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Width Ratio ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Important Indicator ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nasoalveolar Molding

Background: Midface symmetry is an important indicator of success of complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP) treatment. There is little literature on the long-term effects of Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding (PNAM) on Midface symmetry in children treated for CUCLP. Material and Methods: This case-control study was carried out in the Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery at Government Medical College and Hospital, Bettiah, Bihar, India from may 2018 to Dec 2019. Complete unilateral CL+P patients had basilar and frontal photographs at two time points: (1) initial (2) postsurgical. 30 nasal molding patients and 20 control patients were included. Presurgical nasal molding was performed prior to primary lip repair in intervention group. No nasal molding was performed in control group. Results: A statistically significant difference was found for postsurgical nostril height-width ratio (P< .05). No other statistically significant differences were found. Conclusion: Nasal molding and surgery resulted in more symmetrical nostril height-width ratios than surgery alone. Alar groove ratios were not statistically significantly different between groups perhaps because application of nasal molding was not early enough; postsurgical nasal splints were not utilized; overcorrection was not performed for nasal molding

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document