Meropenem/Vaborbactam, the First Carbapenem/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 769-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan C. Cho ◽  
Monika T. Zmarlicka ◽  
Kristy M. Shaeer ◽  
Joe Pardo
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae Carbapenemase ◽  
Preclinical Phase ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Lactamase Inhibitor

Objective: To review the pharmacology, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, efficacy, administration, and considerations for clinical use of meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V). Data Sources: A literature search using PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov (June 2013 to December 2017) was conducted using the search terms meropenem, vaborbactam, RPX7009, biapenem, RPX2003, and carbavance. References from relevant articles and conference abstracts were also reviewed. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Preclinical, phase I studies, and phase III studies written in the English language were evaluated. Data Synthesis: M/V is a novel carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor antimicrobial with in vitro activity against nearly 99% of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase–producing Enterobacteriaceae. M/V is approved for the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis. In a phase III cUTI trial (TANGO I), 98.4% of patients treated with M/V experienced overall clinical success compared with 94% of patients treated with piperacillin/tazobactam (95% CI = 0.7 to 9.1). When compared with best available therapy for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections in TANGO II, patients receiving M/V were more likely to achieve clinical cure at both the end of therapy (64.3% vs 33.3%, P = 0.04) as well as at the test of cure (57.1% vs 26.7%, P = 0.04). The most common adverse effects associated with M/V were headache, infusion-site reactions, and diarrhea. Conclusion: M/V has a valuable role in the treatment of CRE and should be used judiciously to preserve its use for resistant infections.

Cefiderocol: A Siderophore Cephalosporin

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 1215-1231
Author(s):  
Rania M. El-Lababidi ◽  
John George Rizk
Keyword(s):  
Nosocomial Pneumonia ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Serious Infections ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Tract Infections

Objective: This article reviews the available data on the chemistry, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, clinical efficacy, and potential place in therapy of cefiderocol. Data Sources: A literature search through PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted (2009 to March 2020) using the search terms cefiderocol and S-649266. Abstracts presented at recent conferences, prescribing information, and information from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the manufacturer’s website were reviewed. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All relevant published articles, package inserts, and unpublished meeting abstracts on cefiderocol were reviewed. Data Synthesis: Cefiderocol is the first siderophore antibiotic to be approved by the FDA. It was shown to be active against a wide range of resistant Gram-negative pathogens, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacteriaceae, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Cefiderocol was studied in the treatment of adult patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and nosocomial pneumonia and was well tolerated. In a recently completed prospective study, higher mortality was observed with cefiderocol in the treatment of serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative pathogens. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: The approval of cefiderocol provides a new option in the treatment of cUTIs and potentially treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Given the higher mortality observed with cefiderocol, its use in the treatment of CR Gram-negative infections should be carefully considered. Conclusion: Cefiderocol shows promising activity against MDR Gram-negative pathogens. Its use in the treatment of serious infections caused by CR Gram-negative bacteria needs further evaluation in phase III clinical studies.

Brexpiprazole

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marija Markovic ◽  
Alyssa Gallipani ◽  
Krina H. Patel ◽  
Megan Maroney
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Good Tolerability ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Animal Data

Objective: To review the pharmacology and clinical data for brexpiprazole in schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD). Data Sources: An English-language literature search using PubMed and MEDLINE was performed using the term brexpiprazole. All articles containing human clinical trial data published up to September 2016 were evaluated for inclusion as well as information from the manufacturer’s product labeling. Study Selection/Data Extraction: Phase 3 trials for brexpiprazole were evaluated. Key in vitro and animal data were incorporated into the pharmacology and pharmacokinetic sections where appropriate. Data Synthesis: Four phase 3 trials have evaluated the use of brexpiprazole as a primary therapy for schizophrenia or as an antidepressant adjunct for MDD. For its schizophrenia indication, brexpiprazole was studied in 2 placebo-controlled trials of approximately 1300 patients, with 4 mg of brexpiprazole consistently showing superiority over placebo. For MDD, brexpiprazole was compared with placebo as an adjunct to antidepressants in approximately 1000 patients who had failed trials of 1 to 3 prior antidepressants. The 2-mg and 3-mg dosages of brexpiprazole showed consistent superiority over placebo in the MDD trials. Common treatment emergent adverse effects included akathisia and weight gain. Conclusions: Brexpiprazole showed efficacy for the treatment of schizophrenia in the range of 2 to 4 mg/d and as an adjunct to antidepressant therapy in MDD when dosed at 2 to 3 mg/d. Advantages of this drug include once-daily dosing, good tolerability, and lack of effect on sexual function. Disadvantages include the lack of long-term safety data and potentially high cost.

Clarithromycin: Review of a New Macrolide Antibiotic with Improved Microbiologic Spectrum and Favorable Pharmacokinetic and Adverse Effect Profiles

1992 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1099-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc G. Sturgill ◽  
Robert P. Rapp
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
English Language ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Macrolide Antibiotic ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Stated Purpose

OBJECTIVE: To compare the new macrolide antibiotic clarithromycin with erythromycin in terms of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, and toxicity. DATA IDENTIFICATION: An English-language literature search employing MEDLINE (1987–91), Index Medicus (1987–91), Program and Abstracts of the 30th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1990), Program and Abstracts of the 31st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (1991), and bibliographic reviews of related textbooks and review articles. STUDY SELECTION: Eighty-five articles were selected. Clinical trials with clarithromycin have been limited, and emphasis was placed on trials reported in the Program and Abstracts of the 30th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy and Program and Abstracts of the 31st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. DATA EXTRACTION: Articles were assessed for study quality and specific information addressing the stated purpose. In articles reporting the results of clinical trials, emphasis was placed on comparative efficacy and toxicity. RESULTS OF DATA ANALYSIS: A review of 24 human trials suggests that clarithromycin is equally effective as erythromycin, penicillin VK, ampicillin, or amoxicillin for treatment of a variety of upper and lower respiratory tract or skin infections. Clarithromycin also appears to be better tolerated than these agents, with a lower incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects. Limited clinical studies in patients with Mycobacterium leprae or Mycobacterium aviumintracellulare complex (MAI) suggest that clarithromycin may prove to be efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of these infections. CONCLUSIONS: Clarithromycin is as effective in vivo as erythromycin, with less gastrointestinal irritation. Additionally, clarithromycin appears to expand the traditional spectrum of macrolide antibiotics, with promising activity against M. leprae and MAI.

Oral cephalosporin and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae urinary tract infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (9) ◽  
pp. 2384-2393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam G Stewart ◽  
Patrick N A Harris ◽  
Andrew Henderson ◽  
Mark A Schembri ◽  
David L Paterson
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
Oral Cephalosporin ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Lactamase Inhibitor

Abstract ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae as uropathogens have given rise to a sizeable amount of global morbidity. Community and hospital surveillance studies continue to report increasing proportions of these organisms as causes of urinary tract infection (UTI). Due to limited treatment options and the presence of cross-resistance amongst oral antibiotics of different classes, patients often require IV therapy, thereby increasing healthcare costs and reducing the effectiveness of delivering healthcare. Oral cephalosporin antibiotics are well known for their ability to achieve high urinary concentrations, in addition to achieving clinical success for treatment of uncomplicated UTI with a drug-susceptible pathogen. Novel cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations have been developed and demonstrate good in vitro activity against ESBL-producing isolates. A pooled analysis of in vitro activity of existing oral cephalosporin/clavulanate combinations in ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae has shown MIC50s of 0.5–1, 0.125–1 and 0.25 mg/L for cefpodoxime, ceftibuten and cefixime, respectively. A novel cyclic boronic acid β-lactamase inhibitor, QPX7728, was able to produce MIC50 values of 0.5 and ≤0.06 mg/L when paired with cefpodoxime and ceftibuten, respectively. Other novel combinations, cefpodoxime/ETX0282 and ceftibuten/VNRX7145, have also demonstrated excellent activity against ESBL producers. Clinical trials are now awaited.

scholarly journals Delafloxacin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 110-118
Author(s):  
Young Ran Lee ◽  
Caitlin Elizabeth Burton ◽  
Kolton Rucks Bevel
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Option ◽  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Patient Morbidity ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Pubmed Search

Objective: To review the microbiological activity, safety, and efficacy of the new fluoroquinolone delafloxacin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). Data Sources: A PubMed search from 1945 to September 2018 was done using the terms delafloxacin, acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and fluoroquinolone. Additional sources include the Food and Drug Administration website, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Melinta Therapeutics website. Study Selection and Data Extraction: The literature search was limited to those published in the English language and included in vitro and human studies that evaluated microbiological coverage, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and/or efficacy. Data Synthesis: Delafloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone with a unique structure for its class that covers both methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas. This new antibiotic has demonstrated noninferiority to vancomycin plus aztreonam for the treatment of ABSSSIs in both an intravenous-only regimen and an intravenous to an oral regimen. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: ABSSSIs are infections that are most often caused by Staphylococcus and represent one of the most common types of hospital infections. MRSA represents about half of all staphylococcal skin infections, and along with gram-negative infections, increase the rates of patient morbidity and health care costs. Delafloxacin is an additional treatment option that covers both of these types of microorganisms. Conclusions: Delafloxacin is a safe and effective treatment option for ABSSSIs, particularly in those with polymicrobial infections and those with MRSA.

Nusinersen: A Treatment for Spinal Muscular Atrophy

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie K. Claborn ◽  
Debra L. Stevens ◽  
Cheri K. Walker ◽  
Brooke L. Gildon
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Spinal Muscular Atrophy ◽  
English Language ◽  
Muscular Atrophy ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Survival Motor Neuron ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Tract Infections

Objective: To review the efficacy and safety of nusinersen (Spinraza) in the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Data Sources: An English-language literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE (1946 to June 2018) was performed using the terms nusinersen, ISIS-SMN (Rx), and spinal muscular atrophy. Manufacturer prescribing information, abstracts, article bibliographies, and clinicaltrials.gov data were incorporated for additional materials. Study Selection/Data Extraction: All clinical trials of nusinersen were identified and analyzed in the review. Data Synthesis: Nusinersen is the first drug therapy approved for the treatment of SMA. It is a novel modified antisense oligonucleotide designed to treat SMA caused by mutations in chromosome 5q that lead to survival motor neuron protein deficiency. Nusinersen has been studied for safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in both open-label and randomized controlled trials. The studies show improvement in motor function across SMA of all types. The most common adverse effects were respiratory tract infections, headache, back pain, constipation, and post–lumbar puncture syndrome. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Based on phase III trial data, nusinersen produced positive changes in the clinical course of patients with SMA. The acquisition and administration of nusinersen present a number of challenges in clinical practice. Its intrathecal delivery and costly price tag must be recognized. Conclusion: Nusinersen is safe and effective in patients with SMA. It was well tolerated across all studied age groups.

Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet: A New Option for Acute Pain Management

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (12) ◽  
pp. 1220-1226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin E. Reardon ◽  
Sandra L. Kane-Gill ◽  
Pamela L. Smithburger ◽  
Joseph F. Dasta
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pain ◽  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Pain Intensity Score ◽  
Sublingual Tablet ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Pubmed Search

Objective: The purpose of this article is to review the safety and efficacy of sufentanil sublingual tablet (SST) and suggest its place in therapy for managing acute pain in patients requiring intravenous (IV) opioids. Data Sources: A MEDLINE/PubMed search was performed (2010 to April 2019) using the following keywords: sufentanil sublingual tablet, sufentanil, opioid, moderate to severe acute pain. Study Selection and Data Extraction Quantification: We included English language articles evaluating SST pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety in humans for the treatment of acute pain. Data Synthesis: SST is Food and Drug Administration approved and considered safe and effective for the treatment of acute pain in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy–certified and medically supervised health care settings. Phase III clinical trials showed a statistically significant decrease in summed pain intensity score when SST was compared with placebo. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: SST can be a useful option in patients requiring a parenteral opioid who do not have IV access, or it may be unnecessary or difficult to obtain. Because of its quick onset and sustained analgesia, SST may also be useful for procedural pain in the critically ill, to expedite discharges for outpatient procedures, in emergency departments (EDs), and in the battlefield. Conclusions: SST can satisfy an unmet need in patients with acute pain, who require parenteral opioids, and either have no IV access or require prolonged time to achieve IV access such as patients in outpatient surgical centers, EDs, and the battlefield. During periods of parenteral opioid shortage, SST may provide another option for adequate analgesia.

Sugar Paste for Treatment of Decubital Ulcers

1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 289-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Tuneu Valls ◽  
Magdalena Trullás Altisen ◽  
Ramón Plá Poblador ◽  
Angels Ciurán Alvarez ◽  
Rosa Garriga Biosca
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Data Synthesis ◽  
Length Of Treatment ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Wide Variability

Objective: To review the use of sugar paste in the treatment of decubital ulcers. Data Sources: A MEDLINE, IDIS, and current journal search of English-language articles published between 1978 and 1993 on sugar paste in the treatment of ulcers. Study Selection: Case reports, cohort, epidemiologic, in vivo, and in vitro studies were evaluated. Data Extraction: Reports using granulated sugar or derivatives in the treatment of refractory cutaneous ulcers were evaluated. Data Synthesis: All the studies show that sugar paste treatment has satisfactorily resolved decubital ulcers, although a wide variability in treatment length has been seen. Considering the likely mechanisms of action for sugar paste, this wide variability may be a result of dressing frequency. In other words, for sugar paste to be most effective it has to be applied in such a way that a continuous optimal sugar concentration in the ulcer is maintained. To achieve this, dressing frequency should not be standardized, but individualized according to ulcer type, depth, and exudate, as well as patient healing capacity. Healing could probably have been achieved earlier if dressing had been individualized. Besides effectiveness and low cost, sugar paste is also safe, with few adverse events associated with its use. Conclusions: In spite of difficulties in evaluating the use of sugar paste in treatment of decubital ulcers, it has been shown to be an effective therapy for this disorder. However, we recommend that length of treatment be individualized for each patient.

scholarly journals Review of Ceftazidime-Avibactam, Meropenem-Vaborbactam, and Imipenem/Cilastatin-Relebactam to Target Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 202-210
Author(s):  
Dillon A. Hayden ◽  
Bryan P. White ◽  
Kiya K. Bennett
Keyword(s):  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae ◽  
English Language ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Product Information ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Klebsiella Pneumoniae Carbapenemase ◽  
Ovid Medline ◽  
Study Selection

Objective: To provide a review of 3 novel antimicrobial agents—ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam—regarding treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (KPC). Data Sources: A literature search of PubMed and OVID (MEDLINE) was performed up to March 2020 using the following search terms: Vabomere, meropenem-vaborbactam, vaborbactam, RPX7009, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase, KPC, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, CRE, relebactam, imipenem-relebactam, MK-7655, ceftazidime-avibactam. Abstracts from conferences, article bibliographies, and product information were also reviewed. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Articles were first screened by English language, then title, then abstract, and finally by review of the full article. Fifty-five clinical and preclinical studies were included. Data Synthesis: These 3 novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations have shown considerable improvement in safety and efficacy as compared with traditional polymyxin-based combination therapy for the treatment of KPC infections. While meropenem-vaborbactam has not shown improved activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, it has shown decreased rates of resistance to KPC versus ceftazidime-avibactam. Conclusions: With increasing incidence of KPC infections on a global scale, pharmacists should be aware of the notable similarities and differences between these 3 agents, and the current data supporting their use. Pharmacists may want to consider meropenem-vaborbactam over ceftazidime-avibactam for KPC infections due to decreased likelihood of resistance.

Eravacycline: The Tetracyclines Strike Back

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 1124-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Heaney ◽  
Monica V. Mahoney ◽  
Jason C. Gallagher
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Language Studies ◽  
Mesh Terms ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Organisms ◽  
Pubmed Search

Objective: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of eravacycline, a novel fluorocycline antibiotic from the tetracycline family. Data Sources: A PubMed search was conducted for data between 1946 and March 2019 using MeSH terms eravacycline and TP-434. An internet search was conducted for unpublished clinical research. Study Selection and Data Extraction: The literature search was limited to English-language studies that described clinical efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics in humans and animals. Abstracts featuring prepublished data were also evaluated for inclusion. Data Synthesis: Eravacycline has in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and Acinetobacter. It was approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) in adults following favorable results of 2 phase III trials, IGNITE 1 and IGNITE 4, compared with ertapenem and meropenem, respectively. The most common adverse drug events associated with eravacycline were infusion site reactions (7.7%), nausea (6.5%), vomiting (3.7%), and diarrhea (2.3%). Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Eravacycline will likely be most useful for resistant infections when lack of tolerability, resistant phenotypes, or allergies prevent the use of β-lactams. Conclusions: Eravacycline is a new tetracycline antibiotic with a broad spectrum of activity that has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of cIAIs. Although it has activity against multidrug-resistant organisms, data are limited for other indications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document