scholarly journals Current Status of Partial Nephrectomy in the Management of Kidney Cancer

1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 560-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arndt Van Ophoven ◽  
Ke-Hung Tsui ◽  
Oleg Shvarts ◽  
Sherelle Laifer-Narin ◽  
Arie S. Belldegrun
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 130-131
Author(s):  
Jian Sun ◽  
Tania Stafinski ◽  
Fernanda Inagaki Nagase ◽  
Devidas Menon

Introduction:Many population-based studies identify surgical complications using hospital discharge abstract databases (DAD). With DAD, however, complications occurring after the discharge date cannot be followed up. This study used physician claims data to identify the complications of partial nephrectomy, and to compare the rates of complications of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted nephrectomies.Methods:Physician claims, DAD, and ambulatory care data from April 2003 to March 2016 were provided by Alberta Health. DAD and ambulatory care data were used to extract information on patients with kidney cancer who underwent partial nephrectomy. All physician claims within 30 days before and after surgery for the cohort were extracted. The numbers of the same International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), codes before and after surgery were compared. If a number increased after surgery, this diagnosis was initially identified as a complication. All diagnoses with neoplasms were excluded. The incidence rates of complications for the three surgery groups were calculated. Chi-squared tests were conducted for the following nephrectomy comparisons: laparoscopic versus open; robot-assisted versus open; and robot-assisted versus laparoscopic.Results:A total of 1,890 kidney cancer patients had partial nephrectomies. Among them, 1,080, 411, and 399 had open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted nephrectomies, respectively. One patient who had two different nephrectomies on the same day was excluded from analysis. The robot-assisted group had lower rates of digestive complications (ICD-9: 537–578, 787, 789, 998.6) and infections (ICD-9: 004–041, 998.5) than the open group, and higher rates of genitourinary complications (ICD-9: 584–599, 788, 997.5) than the laparoscopy group. The robot-assisted group had lower rates than the open group for most of the complication categories, but the differences were not statistically significant.Conclusions:Robot-assisted surgery appears to be superior to open surgery, but no better than laparoscopic surgery, in terms of minimizing the risk of complications following partial nephrectomy.


2011 ◽  
Vol 108 (6b) ◽  
pp. 935-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene K. Cha ◽  
Daniel J. Lee ◽  
Joseph J. Del Pizzo

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 153.e7-153.e14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung-Jui Tan ◽  
Timothy J. Daskivich ◽  
Joseph D. Shirk ◽  
Christopher P. Filson ◽  
Mark S. Litwin ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. e1299
Author(s):  
J. Katusic ◽  
I. Pezelj ◽  
I. Svagusa ◽  
A. Reljic ◽  
G. Stimac ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 131-137
Author(s):  
Stefano Luzzago ◽  
Giuseppe Rosiello ◽  
Angela Pecoraro ◽  
Marina Deuker ◽  
Franziska Stolzenbach ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 365-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel S Eisenberg ◽  
Ricardo Brandina ◽  
Inderbir S Gill

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16077-e16077
Author(s):  
Sergey N Dimitriadi ◽  
Oleg Ivanovich Kit ◽  
Elena Mikhaylovna Frantsiyants ◽  
Natalya Dmitrievna Ushakova ◽  
Dmitry Rozenko ◽  
...  

e16077 Background: Introduction of modern organ-preservingapproaches in surgical treatment of kidney cancer is limited by the duration of warm ischemia used during the partial nephrectomy (PN), including surgery for elective indications. Some resection procedures require prolonged warm ischemia time resulting in acute kidney injury and development of renal failure in the postoperative period. The purpose of the study was to analyze the effectiveness of a new organ-preserving surgery method for kidney cancer. Methods: 46 patients with clinically localized renal cancer, R.E.N.A.L. score 6-10, underwent PN for elective indications. Patients were divided into two groups: the first group – 20 patients (8 patients – laparoscopic PN (LPN), 12 – open PN (OPN)) with bilateral perirenal procaine blockade (BPPB) before the resection. The second group included 26 patients (19- LPN, 7– OPN) receiving surgery without BPPB. BPPB was performed under US-control. 50 ml of 0.25% procaine solution was successively injected to the perinephric fat in upper, middle and lower kidney segments at both sides. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was diagnosed by serum creatinine level increase by 50% of the initial level and higher. Results: Patients in both groups were comparable by age – 58.35±7.5 (44–70) and 58.7±5.6 (50–65) years, and resection difficulty by R.E.N.A.L. score – 7.35±1.1 (6–10) and 7.15±1.2 (6–10), respectively. Median warm ischemia time did not differ significantly in both groups and was 20.0±2.99 (15–25) and 18.42±2.93 (15–25) min., respectively. Morphologically, all patients were diagnosed with renal cancer, surgical margins were negative. 9 (34.6%) patients of the second group developed AKI, while no AKI was registered in the first group. Urinary fistula and delayed bleeding were not observed. Conclusions: The results suppose renal protective effect of BPPB during partial nephrectomy for kidney cancer with warm ischemia time of 15-25-minutes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 197 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Lenis ◽  
Amir Salmasi ◽  
Izak Faiena ◽  
Nicholas Donin ◽  
Alexandra Drakaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document