Comparison of two different intravenous serotonin antagonists used for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in patients treated with moderately emetogenic risk regimens: A retrospective analysis from a large academic medical center

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 1964-1969
Author(s):  
Melissa Gamble ◽  
Elisabeth Carroll ◽  
Garth C Wright ◽  
Ashley E Glode
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Emetogenic Chemotherapy ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy ◽  
Prophylactic Regimen ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Academic Medical

Introduction Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) can be a serious and debilitating adverse effect that is highly feared by cancer patients. For patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens at our institution in the ambulatory infusion center, palonosetron was selected as the preferred serotonin (5-HT3) antagonist for CINV prophylaxis per the 2016 NCCN Guidelines, when a neurokinin1 antagonist was not included in the prophylactic regimen. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone and palonosetron versus granisetron for the prevention of CINV in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. Methods This study is an Institutional Review Board-approved, single-center retrospective review of electronic health records including patients who received moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens with CINV prophylaxis with dexamethasone and either palonosetron or granisetron. Results A total of 268 eligible patients were included in the study. Eighty-eight patients received palonosetron and 180 patients received granisetron as their 5-HT3 receptor antagonist between October 31, 2014 and October 31, 2016. There were no statistically significant differences between the two antiemetic groups for the primary outcome of presence of any change in day 1 intravenous prophylactic antiemetics. Nine (10.23%) palonosetron patients and 15 (8.33%) granisetron patients required a change in their day 1 intravenous prophylactic antiemetics ( P = 0.610). Conclusions Despite palonosetron’s better efficacy, longer half-life, and higher binding affinity, the results of this retrospective review demonstrates that the choice of serotonin antagonist, palonosetron or granisetron, did not result in a change in day 1 intravenous prophylactic antiemetics or antiemetic outpatient medications for patients undergoing moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens.

scholarly journals 154. Antibiotic Use During Three Separate Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic at a Large Academic Medical Center in Detroit, MI

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S188-S189
Author(s):  
Deepika Sivakumar ◽  
Shelbye R Herbin ◽  
Raymond Yost ◽  
Marco R Scipione
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Bacterial Pneumonia ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Percent Change ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Time Periods ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Inpatient antibiotic use early on in the COVID-19 pandemic may have increased due to the inability to distinguish between bacterial and COVID-19 pneumonia. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of COVID-19 on antimicrobial usage during three separate waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted to Detroit Medical Center between 3/10/19 to 4/24/21. Median days of therapy per 1000 adjusted patient days (DOT/1000 pt days) was evaluated for all administered antibiotics included in our pneumonia guidelines during 4 separate time periods: pre-COVID (3/3/19-4/27/19); 1st wave (3/8/20-5/2/20); 2nd wave (12/6/21-1/30/21); and 3rd wave (3/7/21-4/24/21). Antibiotics included in our pneumonia guidelines include: amoxicillin, azithromycin, aztreonam, ceftriaxone, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, linezolid, meropenem, moxifloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, tobramycin, and vancomycin. The percent change in antibiotic use between the separate time periods was also evaluated. Results An increase in antibiotics was seen during the 1st wave compared to the pre-COVID period (2639 [IQR 2339-3439] DOT/1000 pt days vs. 2432 [IQR 2291-2499] DOT/1000 pt days, p=0.08). This corresponded to an increase of 8.5% during the 1st wave. This increase did not persist during the 2nd and 3rd waves of the pandemic, and the use decreased by 8% and 16%, respectively, compared to the pre-COVID period. There was an increased use of ceftriaxone (+6.5%, p=0.23), doxycycline (+46%, p=0.13), linezolid (+61%, p=0.014), cefepime (+50%, p=0.001), and meropenem (+29%, p=0.25) during the 1st wave compared to the pre-COVID period. Linezolid (+39%, p=0.013), cefepime (+47%, p=0.08) and tobramycin (+47%, p=0.05) use remained high during the 3rd wave compared to the pre-COVID period, but the use was lower when compared to the 1st and 2nd waves. Figure 1. Antibiotic Use 01/2019 to 04/2019 Conclusion Antibiotics used to treat bacterial pneumonia during the 1st wave of the pandemic increased and there was a shift to broader spectrum agents during that period. The increased use was not sustained during the 2nd and 3rd waves of the pandemic, possibly due to the increased awareness of the differences between patients who present with COVID-19 pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Aprepitant and Fosaprepitant Use in Children and Adolescents at an Academic Medical Center

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Shillingburg ◽  
Lisa Biondo
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Primary Prophylaxis ◽  
Emetogenic Chemotherapy ◽  
Record System ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Academic Medical

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of aprepitant and fosaprepitant, a neurokinin 1 (NK-1) receptor inhibitor, in children and adolescents at a large academic medical center, for the prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted using an electronic medical record system to evaluate the use of aprepitant and fosaprepitant in all pediatric patients that were discharged from a single academic medical center between February 25, 2009 and May 25, 2012. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included in this review and received a total of 287 doses over the span of 114 cycles. Mean age was 10.1 years, with a range of 11 months to 17 years old. In 16 of 26 patients, aprepitant was used as the primary prophylaxis. Of those patients who received primary prophylaxis, 6 of 16 received it for highly emetogenic chemotherapy, and 10 of 16 received it for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Intravenous fosaprepitant was used in 7 of 26 patients, ages 13 to 17 (median 14) years old. No adverse effects attributable to aprepitant were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Use of aprepitant and fosaprepitant in pediatric patients appeared to be well tolerated. No currently published reports data using aprepitant in a patient younger than 32 months old, whereas we reported its use in patients as young as 11 months old.

Evaluation of inpatient cancer pain management at an academic medical center.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 128-128
Author(s):  
Michael Mearis ◽  
Joseph Shega ◽  
Randall Knoebel
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Cancer Pain Management ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cancer Network

128 Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines on cancer pain management were developed to direct pain assessment and management. The purpose of this study was to assess whether adherence to guidelines was associated with improved outcomes. Methods: One-hundred and nine patients admitted to the inpatient hematology oncology service that received at least one dose of morphine, oxycodone, or hydromorphone were evaluated and allocated into groups based on adherence to the NCCN guidelines. Safety and achievement of analgesia (pain score ≤ 4) at 24-hours after opioid initiation were compared between the two groups. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of opioid regimens non-adherent to guidelines. Results: Sixty-four percent of patients were initiated on regimens adherent to the NCCN guidelines. 63% of patients initiated on regimens adherent to NCCN guidelines reached the endpoint of analgesia at 24 hours compared to 41% of those who were not (p = 0.028). Adverse events were infrequent (p > 0.5). Opioid tolerance was the variable most predictive of being initiated on regimens non-adherent to guideline recommendations (OR 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.24-7.82). Conclusions: A significant number of patients presenting with cancer pain are initiated on regimens non-adherent to NCCN guidelines, leading to reduced attainment of adequate analgesia. Opioid tolerant patients are at an increased risk of inadequate analgesia, and should be identified and initiated on proper pain regimens taking home opioid usage into consideration.

Nurses’ perception of ethical climate at a large academic medical center

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 724-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Lemmenes ◽  
Pamela Valentine ◽  
Patricia Gwizdalski ◽  
Catherine Vincent ◽  
Chuanhong Liao
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Climate ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Specialty Area ◽  
Work Settings ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Nurses Perceptions

Background: Nurses are confronted daily with ethical issues while providing patient care. Hospital ethical climates can affect nurses’ job satisfaction, organizational commitment, retention, and physician collaboration. Purpose: At a metropolitan academic medical center, we examined nurses’ perceptions of the ethical climate and relationships among ethical climate factors and nurse characteristics. Design/participants: We used a descriptive correlational design and nurses ( N = 475) completed Olson’s Hospital Ethical Climate Survey. Data were analyzed using STATA. Ethical considerations: Approvals by the Nursing Research Council and Institutional Review Board were obtained; participants’ rights were protected. Results: Nurses reported an ethical climate total mean score of 3.22 ± 0.65 that varied across factors; significant differences were found for ethical climate scores by nurses’ age, race, and specialty area. Conclusion: These findings contribute to what is known about ethical climate and nurses’ characteristics and provides the foundation to develop strategies to improve the ethical climate in work settings.

Mannitol for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity: A retrospective comparison of hydration plus mannitol versus hydration alone in inpatient and outpatient regimens at a large academic medical center

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 422-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert P Williams ◽  
Brandon W Ferlas ◽  
Paul C Morales ◽  
Andy J Kurtzweil
Keyword(s):  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Toxicity Data ◽  
Average Increase ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Retrospective Comparison ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Background Cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity is a dose limiting adverse effect that occurs in nearly one-third of patients. Mannitol administration has been used as a means to negate this toxicity. Data regarding the efficacy of mannitol use in this context are conflicting and limited. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of mannitol on renal function and describe the incidence of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Methods This study is a quasi-experimental retrospective analysis approved by the Institutional Review Board of inpatient and outpatient adults receiving cisplatin doses ≥40 mg/m2. The primary outcome was mean change in serum creatinine from baseline. Secondary outcomes included incidences of various grades of nephrotoxicity. Results A total of 313 patients (95 treated with mannitol and 218 without) were evaluated. The average increase in serum creatinine (mg/dL) was lower in patients who received mannitol versus those who did not (0.30 vs. 0.47; 95% confidence interval for difference, 0.03 to 0.31; P = 0.02). Grade 2 or higher nephrotoxicity occurred less frequently in patients who received mannitol versus those who did not (8% vs. 17%; P = 0.04). Non-gynecologic regimens and those who received doses ≥70 mg/m2 of cisplatin had lower rates of grade 2 or higher nephrotoxicity with mannitol (6% vs. 23%; P = 0.001, and 7% vs. 22%; P = 0.03, respectively). Conclusion The use of mannitol reduces the incidence and severity of nephrotoxicity in patients treated with cisplatin. The results of the study suggest mannitol may be most effective when used with non-gynecologic regimens and with cisplatin doses ≥70 mg/m2.

scholarly journals Integrity of clinical information in computerized order requisitions for diagnostic imaging

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1651-1656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronilda Lacson ◽  
Romeo Laroya ◽  
Aijia Wang ◽  
Neena Kapoor ◽  
Daniel I Glazer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Accurate Diagnosis ◽  
Institutional Review Board ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Potential Impact ◽  
Kappa Agreement

Abstract Objective Assess information integrity (concordance and completeness of documented exam indications from the electronic health record [EHR] imaging order requisition, compared to EHR provider notes), and assess potential impact of indication inaccuracies on exam planning and interpretation. Methods This retrospective study, approved by the Institutional Review Board, was conducted at a tertiary academic medical center. There were 139 MRI lumbar spine (LS-MRI) and 176 CT abdomen/pelvis orders performed 4/1/2016-5/31/2016 randomly selected and reviewed by 4 radiologists for concordance and completeness of relevant exam indications in order requisitions compared to provider notes, and potential impact of indication inaccuracies on exam planning and interpretation. Forty each LS-MRI and CT abdomen/pelvis were re-reviewed to assess kappa agreement. Results Requisition indications were more likely to be incomplete (256/315, 81%) than discordant (133/315, 42%) compared to provider notes (p < 0.0001). Potential impact of discrepancy between clinical information in requisitions and provider notes was higher for radiologist’s interpretation than for exam planning (135/315, 43%, vs 25/315, 8%, p < 0.0001). Agreement among radiologists for concordance, completeness, and potential impact was moderate to strong (Kappa 0.66-0.89). Indications in EHR order requisitions are frequently incomplete or discordant compared to physician notes, potentially impacting imaging exam planning, interpretation and accurate diagnosis. Such inaccuracies could also diminish the relevance of clinical decision support alerts if based on information in order requisitions. Conclusions Improved availability of relevant documented clinical information within EHR imaging requisition is necessary for optimal exam planning and interpretation.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Spinal Decompression: A Retrospective Review of Pain Outcomes at an Academic Medical Center

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey D Panjeton ◽  
Holden L Brown ◽  
Sam Searcy ◽  
Matthew Meroney ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Spinal Decompression ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Pain Outcomes
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document