scholarly journals Cosmetic Surgery Training in Plastic Surgery Residency Programs in the United States: How Have We Progressed in the Last Three Years?

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 445-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Oni ◽  
J. Ahmad ◽  
J. E. Zins ◽  
J. M. Kenkel
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Momeni ◽  
Rebecca Y. Kim ◽  
Derrick C. Wan ◽  
Ali Izadpanah ◽  
Gordon K. Lee

Background. Three educational models for plastic surgery training exist in the United States, the integrated, combined, and independent model. The present study is a comparative analysis of aesthetic surgery training, to assess whether one model is particularly suitable to provide for high-quality training in aesthetic surgery. Methods. An 18-item online survey was developed to assess residents’ perceptions regarding the quality of training in aesthetic surgery in the US. The survey had three distinct sections: demographic information, current state of aesthetic surgery training, and residents’ perception regarding the quality of aesthetic surgery training. Results. A total of 86 senior plastic surgery residents completed the survey. Twenty-three, 24, and 39 residents were in integrated, combined, and independent residency programs, respectively. No statistically significant differences were seen with respect to number of aesthetic surgery procedures performed, additional training received in minimal-invasive cosmetic procedures, median level of confidence with index cosmetic surgery procedures, or perceived quality of aesthetic surgery training. Facial aesthetic procedures were felt to be the most challenging procedures. Exposure to minimally invasive aesthetic procedures was limited. Conclusion. While the educational experience in aesthetic surgery appears to be similar, weaknesses still exist with respect to training in minimally invasive/nonsurgical aesthetic procedures.


2008 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1570-1578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin M. Morrison ◽  
S Cristina Rotemberg ◽  
Andrea Moreira-Gonzalez ◽  
James E. Zins

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. e2493
Author(s):  
Johanna P. D’Agostino ◽  
Kavita T. Vakharia ◽  
Sheina Bawa ◽  
Sanja Sljivic ◽  
Noel Natoli

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 980-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Edwards ◽  
C. Ishii

Author(s):  
Christian Chartier ◽  
Akash A Chandawarkar ◽  
Daniel J Gould ◽  
W Grant Stevens

Abstract Background Recent evidence shows accelerating worldwide adoption of social media and suggests a commensurate increase in social media use by integrated plastic surgery residency programs in the United States. Programs nationwide are now making strides to include a longitudinal social media component in their plastic surgery curriculum. Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the use of Instagram by plastic surgery residency programs and to describe trends in adoption, volume, and content. Methods Current active Instagram accounts affiliated to integrated plastic surgery residency programs were surveyed to identify date of first post, number of posts, number of followers, number of followings, engagement rate, most-liked posts, and content of posts. All data were collected on May 12, 2020. Results Sixty-nine out of 81 (85.2%) integrated plastic surgery residency programs had Instagram accounts, totaling 5,544 posts. This represents an absolute increase in program accounts of 392% since 2018. The 100 most-liked posts were categorized as: promotion of the program/individual (46), resident life (32), promotion of plastic surgery (14), and education (8). Conclusions Instagram use by plastic surgery residency programs has drastically increased since it was first evaluated in 2018. This trend will continue as we reach near saturation of residency programs with accounts. We remain steadfast in our belief that the advantages of social media use by plastic surgeons and trainees are far outweighed by the potential community-wide impacts of violations of good social media practice on peers, patients, and the general public.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. e1491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colton H. L. McNichols ◽  
Silviu Diaconu ◽  
Sara Alfadil ◽  
Jhade Woodall ◽  
Michael Grant ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang An ◽  
Jinju Liu ◽  
Jianfang Zhao ◽  
Dong Li

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document