scholarly journals Upper-Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Breast Cancer With Chest Versus Arm Central Venous Port Catheters

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117822341877190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Tippit ◽  
Eric Siegel ◽  
Daniella Ochoa ◽  
Angela Pennisi ◽  
Erica Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Safe Delivery ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Access Device ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Active Cancer

Most of the patients undergoing treatment for cancer require placement of a totally implantable venous access device to facilitate safe delivery of chemotherapy. However, implantable ports also increase the risk of deep vein thrombosis and related complications in this high-risk population. The objective of this study was to assess the incidence of upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) in patients with breast cancer to determine whether the risk of UEDVT was higher with chest versus arm ports, as well as to determine the importance of previously reported risk factors predisposing to UEDVT in the setting of active cancer. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 297 women with breast cancer who had ports placed in our institution between the dates of December 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016. The primary outcome was the development of radiologically confirmed UEDVT ipsilateral to the implanted port. Overall, 17 of 297 study subjects (5.7%) were found to have UEDVT. There was 1 documented case of associated pulmonary embolism. Fourteen (9.5%) of 147 subjects with arm ports experienced UEDVT compared with only 3 (2.0%) of 150 subjects with chest ports ( P = .0056). Thus, implantation of arm ports as opposed to chest ports may be associated with a higher rate of UEDVT in patients with breast cancer.

Risk factors determining central venous access device-associated deep vein thrombosis resolution in children: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel García-Boyano ◽  
José Manuel Caballero-Caballero ◽  
Marta García Fernández de Villalta ◽  
Mar Gutiérrez Alvariño ◽  
María Jesús Blanco Bañares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Central Venous Access Device ◽  
Access Device ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Access Device ◽  
Deep Vein

scholarly journals Association between Cancer and Anatomical Site of Venous Thromboembolic Disease

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
David A Froehling ◽  
Damon E. Houghton ◽  
Waldemar E. Wysokinski ◽  
Robert D. McBane ◽  
Danielle Vlazny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Renal Vein ◽  
The Body ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Anatomical Site ◽  
Pulmonary Emboli ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Active Cancer

Background:There is limited published data on the association between malignancy and the location of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the body. Aims:Assess the location of VTE in the body in patients with active cancer and compare these results in patients without malignancy. Methods:Consecutive patients enrolled in the Mayo Clinic VTE Registry between March 1, 2013 and November 30, 2019 for acute VTE were followed prospectively. Anatomical site of thrombosis and malignancy status were recorded. Patient outcomes were assessed in person, by mailed questionnaire, or by a scripted phone interview. Active cancer was defined as treatment for malignancy within the last six months or not yet in remission. Results:During the study period there were 2,798 patients with acute VTE (1256 with and 1542 without active cancer). Pulmonary emboli were more common in patients with active cancer compared to patients without cancer (49.5% vs. 39.7%, p<0.001). Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (11.4 % vs. 7.7%, p<0.001), renal vein thrombi (1.4% vs. 0.2%, p<0.001) and splanchnic vein thrombi (9.3% vs. 6.0%, p=0.001) were all more common in patients with active cancer compared to patients without cancer. Conclusion:Compared to those without malignancy, patients with active cancer were more likely to have pulmonary emboli, upper extremity deep vein thrombosis, renal vein thrombi, and splanchnic vein thrombi. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Incidence of Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in Acute Leukemia and Effect on Mortality

TH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (04) ◽  
pp. e309-e317
Author(s):  
Christina Poh ◽  
Ann Brunson ◽  
Theresa Keegan ◽  
Ted Wun ◽  
Anjlee Mahajan
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThe cumulative incidence, risk factors, rate of subsequent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding and impact on mortality of isolated upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UE DVT) in acute leukemia are not well-described. The California Cancer Registry, used to identify treated patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) diagnosed between 2009 and 2014, was linked with the statewide hospitalization database to determine cumulative incidences of UE DVT and subsequent VTE and bleeding after UE DVT diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the association of UE DVT on the risk of subsequent pulmonary embolism (PE) or lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LE DVT) and subsequent bleeding, and the impact of UE DVT on mortality. There were 5,072 patients identified: 3,252 had AML and 1,820 had ALL. Three- and 12-month cumulative incidences of UE DVT were 4.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.1–5.6) and 6.6% (95% CI: 5.8–7.5) for AML and 4.1% (95% CI: 3.2–5.1) and 5.9% (95% CI: 4.9–7.1) for ALL, respectively. Twelve-month cumulative incidences of subsequent VTE after an incident UE DVT diagnosis were 5.3% for AML and 12.2% for ALL. Twelve-month cumulative incidences of subsequent bleeding after an incident UE DVT diagnosis were 15.4% for AML and 21.1% for ALL. UE DVT was associated with an increased risk of subsequent bleeding for both AML (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.60–2.68) and ALL (HR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.02–2.57) but was not an independent risk factor for subsequent PE or LE DVT for either leukemia subtype. Isolated incident UE DVT was associated with increased leukemia-specific mortality for AML (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.16–1.73) and ALL (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.31–2.47). UE DVT is a relatively common complication among patients with AML and ALL and has a significant impact on bleeding and mortality. Further research is needed to determine appropriate therapy for this high-risk population.

scholarly journals Recurrence of Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis Secondary to COVID-19

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 878
Author(s):  
Yesha H. Parekh ◽  
Nicole J. Altomare ◽  
Erin P. McDonnell ◽  
Martin J. Blaser ◽  
Payal D. Parikh
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic ◽  
Deep Vein

Infection with SARS-CoV-2 leading to COVID-19 induces hyperinflammatory and hypercoagulable states, resulting in arterial and venous thromboembolic events. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been well reported in COVID-19 patients. While most DVTs occur in a lower extremity, involvement of the upper extremity is uncommon. In this report, we describe the first reported patient with an upper extremity DVT recurrence secondary to COVID-19 infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document