A national survey of telemedicine use by US emergency departments

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 278-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kori S Zachrison ◽  
Krislyn M Boggs ◽  
Emily M Hayden ◽  
Janice A Espinola ◽  
Carlos A Camargo
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Clinical Applications ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Emergency Medical Care ◽  
Adults And Children ◽  
Annual Total ◽  
National Emergency ◽  
Total Visit

Objective Telemedicine has the potential to improve the delivery of emergency medical care: however, the extent of its adoption in United States (US) emergency departments is not known. Our objective was to characterise the prevalence of telemedicine use among all US emergency departments, describe clinical applications for which it is most commonly used, and identify emergency department characteristics associated with its use. Methods As part of the National Emergency Department Inventory-USA survey, we queried all 5375 US emergency departments open in 2016. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified characteristics associated with emergency department receipt of telemedicine services. Results Overall, 4507 emergency departments (84%) responded to our survey, with 4031 responding to both telemedicine questions (75%). Although 1694 emergency departments (42%) reported no telemedicine in 2016, most did: 1923 (48%) emergency departments received telemedicine services, 149 (4%) emergency departments received telemedicine services and were in hospitals that provided telemedicine, and 265 emergency departments (7%) did not receive telemedicine but were in hospitals that provided telemedicine services. Among emergency departments receiving telemedicine, the most common applications were stroke/neurology (76%), psychiatry (38%), and paediatrics (15%). In multivariable analysis, telemedicine-receiving emergency departments had higher annual total visit volume for adults and lower annual total visit volume by children; were less likely to be academic or freestanding; and varied by region. In multivariable analysis, emergency departments in telemedicine-providing hospitals had higher annual total visit volume for adults and children, were more likely to be academic and were less likely to be freestanding. Conclusion In 2016, telemedicine was used in most US emergency departments (58%), especially for stroke/neurology and psychiatry. Future research is needed to understand the value of telemedicine for different clinical applications, and the barriers to its implementation.

scholarly journals 140. Symptoms and Situations Predispose Patients to Use Antibiotics Without Medical Advice

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S200-S200
Author(s):  
Michael Hansen ◽  
Barbara Trautner ◽  
Roger Zoorob ◽  
George Germanos ◽  
Osvaldo Alquicira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Primary Care Clinic ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
Primary Care Patients ◽  
Emergency Department Patients

Abstract Background Use of antibiotics without a prescription (non-prescription use) contributes to antimicrobial resistance. Non-prescription use includes obtaining and taking antibiotics without a prescription, taking another person’s antibiotics, or taking one’s own stored antibiotics. We conducted a quantitative survey focusing on the factors that impact patients’ decisions to use non-prescription antibiotics. Methods We surveyed patients visiting public safety net primary care clinics and private emergency departments in a racially/ethnically diverse urban area. Surveys were read aloud to patients in Spanish and English. Survey domains included patients’ perspectives on which syndromes require antibiotic treatment, their perceptions of health care, and their access to antibiotics without a prescription. Results We interviewed 190 patients, 122 from emergency departments (64%), and 68 from primary care clinics (36%). Overall, 44% reported non-prescription antibiotic use within the past 12 months. Non-prescription use was higher among primary care clinic patients (63%) than the emergency department patients (39%, p = 0.002). The majority felt that antibiotics would be needed for bronchitis (78%) while few felt antibiotics would be needed for diarrhea (30%) (Figure 1). The most common situation identified “in which respondents would consider taking antibiotics without contacting a healthcare provider was “got better by taking this antibiotic before” (Figure 2). Primary care patients were more likely to obtain antibiotics without prescription from another country than emergency department patients (27% vs. 13%, P=0.03). Also, primary care patients were more likely to report obstacles to seeking a doctor’s care, such as the inability to take time off from work or transportation difficulties, but these comparisons were not statistically significant. Figure 1. Patients’ agreement that antibiotics would be needed varied by symptom/syndrome. Figure 2. Situations that lead to non-prescription antibiotic use impacted the two clinical populations differently Conclusion Non-prescription antibiotic use is a widespread problem in the two very different healthcare systems we included in this study, although factors underlying this practice differ by patient population. Better understanding of the factors driving non-prescription antibiotic use is essential to designing patient-focused interventions to decrease this unsafe practice. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Peri-intubation cardiac arrest in the Emergency Department: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) study

Resuscitation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. April ◽  
Allyson Arana ◽  
Joshua C. Reynolds ◽  
Jestin N. Carlson ◽  
William T. Davis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Emergency Airway ◽  
National Emergency

Finding the path of least resistance: Locally adapting the MITIGATE toolkit in emergency departments and urgent care centers

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Joanne Huang ◽  
Zahra Kassamali Escobar ◽  
Todd S. Bouchard ◽  
Jose Mari G. Lansang ◽  
Rupali Jain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Complex Data ◽  
University Of Washington ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
Urgent Care Centers ◽  
The University

Abstract The MITIGATE toolkit was developed to assist urgent care and emergency departments in the development of antimicrobial stewardship programs. At the University of Washington, we adopted the MITIGATE toolkit in 10 urgent care centers, 9 primary care clinics, and 1 emergency department. We encountered and overcame challenges: a complex data build, choosing feasible outcomes to measure, issues with accurate coding, and maintaining positive stewardship relationships. Herein, we discuss solutions to challenges we encountered to provide guidance for those considering using this toolkit.

scholarly journals Prevalence and direct costs of emergency department visits and hospitalizations for selected diseases that can be transmitted by water, United States

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 673-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Adam ◽  
S. A. Collier ◽  
K. E. Fullerton ◽  
J. W. Gargano ◽  
M. J. Beach
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Otitis Externa ◽  
Hepatitis A Virus ◽  
Direct Costs ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Escherichia Coli Infection ◽  
Waterborne Transmission ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
National Emergency ◽  
Attribution Process

National emergency department (ED) visit prevalence and costs for selected diseases that can be transmitted by water were estimated using large healthcare databases (acute otitis externa, campylobacteriosis, cryptosporidiosis, Escherichia coli infection, free-living ameba infection, giardiasis, hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection, Legionnaires’ disease, nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infection, Pseudomonas-related pneumonia or septicemia, salmonellosis, shigellosis, and vibriosis or cholera). An estimated 477,000 annual ED visits (95% CI: 459,000–494,000) were documented, with 21% (n = 101,000, 95% CI: 97,000–105,000) resulting in immediate hospital admission. The remaining 376,000 annual treat-and-release ED visits (95% CI: 361,000–390,000) resulted in $194 million in annual direct costs. Most treat-and-release ED visits (97%) and costs ($178 million/year) were associated with acute otitis externa. HAV ($5.5 million), NTM ($2.3 million), and salmonellosis ($2.2 million) were associated with next highest total costs. Cryptosporidiosis ($2,035), campylobacteriosis ($1,783), and NTM ($1,709) had the highest mean costs per treat-and-release ED visit. Overall, the annual hospitalization and treat-and-release ED visit costs associated with the selected diseases totaled $3.8 billion. As most of these diseases are not solely transmitted by water, an attribution process is needed as a next step to determine the proportion of these visits and costs attributable to waterborne transmission.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document