Effect of Fresh Gas Flow on Isoflurane Concentrations during Low-flow Anaesthesia

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 513-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
J-Y Park ◽  
J-H Kim ◽  
W-Y Kim ◽  
M-S Chang ◽  
J-Y Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gas Flow ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Physical Status ◽  
Closed Circle ◽  
Haemodynamic Changes ◽  
Low Flow Anaesthesia ◽  
Baseline Values ◽  
American Society ◽  
End Tidal ◽  
Closed Circle System

The effect of fresh gas flow (FGF) on isoflurane concentrations at given vaporizer settings during low-flow anaesthesia was investigated. Ninety patients (American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I or II) were randomly allocated to three groups (FGF 1 l/min, FGF 2 l/min and FGF 4 l/min). Anaesthesia was maintained for 10 min with vaporizer setting isoflurane 2 vol% and FGF 4 l/min for full-tissue anaesthetic uptake in a semi-closed circle system. Low-flow anaesthesia was maintained for 20 min with end-tidal isoflurane 1.5 vol% and FGF 2 l/min. FGF was then changed to FGF 1 l/min, FGF 2 l/min or FGF 4 l/min. Measurements during the 20-min period showed that inspired and end-tidal isoflurane concentrations decreased in the FGF 1-l/min group but increased in the FGF 4-l/min group compared with baseline values. No haemodynamic changes were observed. Monitoring of anaesthetic concentrations and appropriate control of vaporizer settings are necessary during low-flow anaesthesia.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of Basal Flow Sevoflurane Anaesthesia Using the Komesaroff Vaporizer inside the Circle System

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 609-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Nandalan ◽  
R. J. Eltringham ◽  
Q. W. Fan
Keyword(s):  
Gas Flow ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Gas Flows ◽  
Physical Status ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Sevoflurane Anaesthesia ◽  
Inspiratory Limb ◽  
Low Flow Anaesthesia ◽  
Induction Of Anaesthesia ◽  
Basal Flow

After ethics committee approval, 51 consenting ASA physical status 1 or 2 adult patients were given basal flow sevoflurane anaesthesia using fresh gas flows of 150 to 300 ml.min-1 oxygen. A Komesaroff vaporizer was placed on the inspiratory limb of the circle system. Basal flows were introduced immediately following intravenous induction of anaesthesia. The vaporizer was set to deliver the maximum concentration until the inspired sevoflurane concentration (FSI) reached 3%. The dial was then adjusted to maintain the FSI at 3%. After every 60 minutes, the circuit was washed out with 100% oxygen at a flow rate of 10 l.min-1 for one minute. The FSI reached 3% after an average of 8.5 (3.8) [mean (SD)] minutes. The trends in FSI and the expired sevoflurane concentrations were significantly different (P<0.05) between the mechanically ventilated patients (n=21) and the spontaneously ventilating patients (n=30) and demonstrated a more gradual build-up in the former group. The consumption of sevoflurane was found to be 9.2 (2.8) ml.h-1. This represented a 52.5% cost saving over the clinical application of the Mapleson's ideal fresh gas flow sequence for low-flow anaesthesia.

scholarly journals Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petter Jakobsson ◽  
Madleine Lindgren ◽  
Jan G. Jakobsson
Keyword(s):  
Gas Flow ◽  
Anaesthetic Machine ◽  
Flow Time ◽  
Lung Model ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Major Influence ◽  
Test Lung ◽  
Depth Of Anaesthesia ◽  
Low Flow Anaesthesia ◽  
End Tidal

Background:Modern anaesthesia workstations are reassuringly tight and are equipped with effective gas monitoring, thus providing good opportunities for low/minimal flow anaesthesia. A prerequisite for effective low flow anaesthesia is the possibility to rapidly increase and decrease gas concentrations in the circle system, thereby controlling the depth of anaesthesia. Methods:We studied the wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in the circle system with fixed fresh gas flow and vaporizer setting. We compared two modern anaesthesia work stations, the Aisys (GE, Madison, WI, USA) and FLOW-i (Maquet, Solna, Sweden) in a test lung model. Results: We found fresh-gas flow to have, as expected, a major influence on wash-in, as well as wash-out of sevoflurane. The wash-in time to reach a stable circle 1 MAC (2.1%) decreased from an average of 547 ± 83 seconds with a constant fresh gas flow of 300 ml/min and vaporizer setting of 8%, to a mean of 38 ± 6 seconds at a fresh gas flow of 4 L/min. There were only minor differences between the two works-stations tested; the Aisys was slightly faster at both 300 and 4 L/min flow. Time to further increase circle end-tidal concentration from 1-1.5 MAC showed likewise significant associations to fresh gas and decreased from 330 ± 24 seconds at 300 ml/min. to less than a minute at constant 4 L/min (17 ± 11 seconds), without anaesthetic machine difference. Wash-out was also fresh gas flow dependent and plateaued at 7.5 L/min. Conclusions: Circle system wash-in and wash-out show clear fresh gas dependency and varies somewhat between the Aisys and Flow-i. The circle saturation, reaching 1 MAC end-tidal or increasing from 1-1.5 MAC can be achieved with both work-stations within 1.5 minutes at a constant fresh gas flow of 2 and 4 L/min. Wash-out plateaued at 7.5 L/min.

scholarly journals Wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in a test-lung model: A comparison between Aisys and FLOW-i

F1000Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petter Jakobsson ◽  
Madleine Lindgren ◽  
Jan G. Jakobsson
Keyword(s):  
Gas Flow ◽  
Anaesthetic Machine ◽  
Flow Time ◽  
Lung Model ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Major Influence ◽  
Test Lung ◽  
Depth Of Anaesthesia ◽  
Low Flow Anaesthesia ◽  
End Tidal

Background:Modern anaesthesia workstations are reassuringly tight and are equipped with effective gas monitoring, thus providing good opportunities for low/minimal flow anaesthesia. A prerequisite for effective low flow anaesthesia is the possibility to rapidly increase and decrease gas concentrations in the circle system, thereby controlling the depth of anaesthesia. Methods:We studied the wash-in and wash-out of sevoflurane in the circle system with fixed fresh gas flow and vaporizer setting. We compared two modern anaesthesia work stations, the Aisys (GE, Madison, WI, USA) and FLOW-i (Maquet, Solna, Sweden) in a test lung model. Results: We found fresh-gas flow to have, as expected, a major influence on wash-in, as well as wash-out of sevoflurane. The wash-in time to reach a stable circle 1 MAC (2.1%) decreased from an average of 547 ± 83 seconds with a constant fresh gas flow of 300 ml/min and vaporizer setting of 8%, to a mean of 38 ± 6 seconds at a fresh gas flow of 4 L/min. There were only minor differences between the two works-stations tested; the Aisys was slightly faster at both 300 and 4 L/min flow. Time to further increase circle end-tidal concentration from 1-1.5 MAC showed likewise significant associations to fresh gas and decreased from 330 ± 24 seconds at 300 ml/L to less than a minute at constant 4 L/min (17 ± 11 seconds), without anaesthetic machine difference. Wash-out was also fresh gas flow dependent and plateaued at 7.5 L/min. Conclusions: Circle system wash-in and wash-out show clear fresh gas dependency and varies somewhat between the Aisys and Flow-i. The circle saturation, reaching 1 MAC end-tidal or increasing from 1-1.5 MAC can be achieved with both work-stations within 1.5 minutes at a constant fresh gas flow of 2 and 4 L/min. Wash-out plateaued at 7.5 L/min.

scholarly journals Change of inspired oxygen concentration in low flow anesthesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 434-440
Author(s):  
Jiwook Kim ◽  
Donghee Kang ◽  
Hochul Lee ◽  
Sungwon Ryu ◽  
Siejeong Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Concentration ◽  
Initial Phase ◽  
Gas Flow ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Physical Status ◽  
Gas Concentration ◽  
Low Flow Anesthesia ◽  
American Society ◽  
Inspired Oxygen

Background: There are several advantages of low flow anesthesia including safety, economics, and eco-friendliness. However, oxygen concentration of fresh gas flow and inspired gas are large different in low flow anesthesia. This is a hurdle to access to low flow anesthesia. In this study, we aimed to investigate the change in inhaled oxygen concentration in low flow anesthesia using oxygen and medical air.Methods: A total of 60 patients scheduled for elective surgery with an American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I or II were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups. Group H: Fresh gas flow rate (FGF) 4 L/min (FiO₂ 0.5). Group L: FGF 1 L/min (FiO₂ 0.5). FGF was applied 4 L/min in initial phase (10 min) after intubation. After initial phase FGF was adjusted according to groups. FGF continued at the end of surgery. Oxygen and inhalation anesthetic gas concentration were recorded for 180 min at 15 min interval.Results: The inspired oxygen concentration decreased by 5.5% during the first 15 min in the group L. Inspired oxygen decreased by 1.5% during next 15 min. Inspired oxygen decreased by 1.4% for 30 to 60 min. The inspired oxygen of group L is 35.4 ± 4.0% in 180 min. The group H had little difference in inspired oxygen concentration over time and decreased by 1.8% for 180 min.Conclusions: The inspired oxygen concentration is maintained at 30% or more for 180 min in patients under 90 kg. Despite some technical difficulties, low flow anesthesia may be considered.

Effects of the Water Content of Soda Lime on Compound A Concentration in the Anesthesia Circuit in Sevoflurane Anesthesia 

1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiromichi Bito ◽  
Yukako Ikeuchi ◽  
Kazuyuki Ikeda
Keyword(s):  
Gas Flow ◽  
Soda Lime ◽  
Absorption Capacity ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Co2 Absorption ◽  
Sevoflurane Anesthesia ◽  
Compound A ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2 ◽  
End Tidal ◽  
Co2 Elimination

Background Sevoflurane anesthesia is usually performed with fresh gas flow rates greater than 2 l/min due to the toxicity of compound A in rats and limited clinical experience with sevoflurane in low-flow systems. However, to reduce costs, it would be useful to identify ways to reduce compound A concentrations in low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia. This goal of this study was to determine if compound A concentrations can be reduced by using soda lime with water added. Methods Low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia (fresh gas flow of 1 l/min) was performed in 37 patients using soda lime with water added (perhydrated soda lime) or standard soda lime as the carbon dioxide (CO2) absorbent. The soda lime was not changed between patients, but rather was used until CO2 rebreathing occurred. The perhydrated soda lime was prepared by spraying 100 ml distilled water onto 1 kg fresh soda lime, and water was added only when a new bag of soda lime was placed into the canister. Compound A concentrations in the circle system, soda lime temperatures, inspired and end-tidal CO2 and end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations, and CO2 elimination by the patient were measured during anesthesia. Results Compound A concentrations were significantly lower for the perhydrated soda lime (1.9 +/- 1.8 ppm; means +/- SD) than for the standard soda lime (13.9 +/- 8.2 ppm). No differences were seen between the two types of soda lime with regard to the temperature of the soda lime, end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations, or CO2 elimination. Compound A concentration decreased with the total time of soda lime use for both types of soda lime. The CO2 absorption capacity was significantly less for perhydrated soda lime than for standard soda lime. Conclusions Compound A concentrations in the circuit can be reduced by using soda lime with water added. The CO2 absorption capacity of the soda lime is reduced by adding water to it, but this should not be clinically significant.

scholarly journals Promoting low-flow anaesthesia and volatile anaesthetic agent choice

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e000479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise A Carter ◽  
Molola Oyewole ◽  
Eleanor Bates ◽  
Kate Sherratt
Keyword(s):  
Gas Flow ◽  
Anaesthetic Agent ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volatile Agent ◽  
Monthly Basis ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Effective Manner ◽  
Low Flow Anaesthesia ◽  
Volatile Agents

BackgroundAs doctors, we are increasingly aware of the financial implications of our practice. The need to work in a more conscientious, efficacious and cost-effective manner is greater than ever before. Environmental and financial benefits can be seen through employing the use of low-flow anaesthesia.AimsThis quality improvement project aimed to make anaesthetic practice more environmentally friendly and to reduce departmental spending. This could be achieved by promoting the use of low-flow anaesthesia and by encouraging isoflurane use where appropriate.MethodsAll anaesthetic consultants and trainees were invited to fill out an initial questionnaire relating to their personal preferences and practices when conducting anaesthesia. There were specific questions relating to low-flow anaesthesia and isoflurane use. Our main measure of improvement was any decrease in the number of bottles of volatile agent ordered by the department from pharmacy. Monthly spot audits were conducted to assess gas flow rates and volatile agent use in theatre. Departmental spending figures relating to the purchase of volatile agent bottles were obtained from pharmacy. Information was then disseminated to anaesthetists on a monthly basis via a ‘low-flow board’, which showed pictorial and graphical representations of differing gas flows and volatile agent usage in relation to cost.ResultsOur project showed a trend for the increased use of low-flow anaesthesia within the department. We also showed a decrease in the number of bottles of volatile agent ordered: 18% fewer bottles ordered compared with the same period the previous year. This represented a 25% decrease in total departmental expenditure on volatile agents despite an increase in theatre activity.ConclusionIncreasing awareness regarding anaesthetic choices and promoting low-flow anaesthesia and isoflurane use, translated into an overall decreased departmental spend on volatile agents without affecting patient care.

scholarly journals The fresh-gas flow sequence at the start of low-flow anaesthesia

Anaesthesia ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Sobreira ◽  
M. M. Jreige ◽  
R. &Aring. Saraiva
Keyword(s):  
Gas Flow ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Low Flow Anaesthesia
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document