Shared Mental Models and Shared Displays: An Empirical Evaluation of Team Performance

Author(s):  
Cheryl A. Bolstad ◽  
Mica R. Endsley
2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjam Körner ◽  
Corinna Lippenberger ◽  
Sonja Becker ◽  
Lars Reichler ◽  
Christian Müller ◽  
...  

Purpose – Knowledge integration is the process of building shared mental models. The integration of the diverse knowledge of the health professions in shared mental models is a precondition for effective teamwork and team performance. As it is known that different groups of health care professionals often tend to work in isolation, the authors compared the perceptions of knowledge integration. It can be expected that based on this isolation, knowledge integration is assessed differently. The purpose of this paper is to test these differences in the perception of knowledge integration between the professional groups and to identify to what extent knowledge integration predicts perceptions of teamwork and team performance and to determine if teamwork has a mediating effect. Design/methodology/approach – The study is a multi-center cross-sectional study with a descriptive-explorative design. Data were collected by means of a staff questionnaire for all health care professionals working in the rehabilitation clinics. Findings – The results showed that there are significant differences in knowledge integration within interprofessional health care teams. Furthermore, it could be shown that knowledge integration is significantly related to patient-centered teamwork as well as to team performance. Mediation analysis revealed partial mediation of the effect of knowledge integration on team performance through teamwork. Practical/implications – In practice, the results of the study provide a valuable starting point for team development interventions. Originality/value – This is the first study that explored knowledge integration in medical rehabilitation teams and its relation to patient-centered teamwork and team performance.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Zhou ◽  
Erping Wang

The effects of shared mental models on the relationship between episodic team behavioral processes and performance were investigated, while teams were using an experimentally stimulated construction project planning program. The results indicated that episodic team processes made positive contributions to the team performance. Furthermore, a hierarchical linear regression indicated that the convergence of shared teamwork mental models moderated the effects of team processes on team performance. Specifically, the positive impact of team processes on performance was found to be improved for those teams who shared more similar teamwork mental models than for teams who hold fewer similar teamwork mental models. Potential implications and relevant impacts on future research are discussed.


Author(s):  
Stephen M. Fiore ◽  
Haydee M. Cuevas ◽  
Eduardo Salas ◽  
Jonathan W. Schooler

The nature of teams is changing in that the implementation of distributed teams as a definable organizational unit has substantially increased. In this paper we discuss a portion of the cognitive processes potentially impacting distributed team performance. We elaborate on how team opacity arising from distributed interaction can impact team cognition, with an emphasis on the critical memory components that are foundational to the development and implementation of shared mental models.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 1145-1163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Kude ◽  
Sunil Mithas ◽  
Christoph T. Schmidt ◽  
Armin Heinzl

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueyan Zhang ◽  
Xiaohong Wang

Purpose Team learning is critical to interdisciplinary research teams (IDR teams) to use heterogeneous knowledge effectively. Nevertheless, team learning is rarely addressed in the IDR team literature. Also, few studies investigate the antecedents and consequences of team learning in IDR teams, leading to a lack of guidance for management practices. This study aims to investigate how team learning can be developed and how team learning influences team outcomes in IDR teams. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire survey on 304 members of 37 IDR teams in a research university in China is conducted. Data are analyzed using a partial least square structural equation modeling. Findings The results support most hypotheses in general. For the antecedent variables, task interdependence, trust and constructive conflict positively affect team learning. For the outcome variables, team learning improves shared mental models, coordination quality and team performance significantly. Additionally, task uncertainty positively moderates the team learning-coordination quality relation and team learning-team performance relation. However, this paper does not find support for the moderating role of task uncertainty on the team learning-shared mental models relation. Originality/value To the best of the knowledge, this is the first study investigating the antecedents and consequences of team learning in IDR teams. A multidimensional measurement of team learning for the IDR team context is developed. This study investigates how team behavioral factors influence team learning and the effect of team learning on shared mental models, coordination quality and team performance. This study also explores the contingency role of task uncertainty in the effects of team learning.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 222-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigid Gillespie ◽  
Wendy Chaboyer

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pia Justen ◽  
Robert R. van Doorn ◽  
Fred Zijlstra ◽  
Jelke van der Pal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document