Effect of Colostomy on Treatment Outcome in Fournier Gangrene: A Prospective Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 229255032110247
Author(s):  
Barakat Abdelreheem Mahmood ◽  
Emad Hussein ElSayed ◽  
Sherif Abdalla Ali
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Inhospital Mortality ◽  
Perianal Region ◽  
Fournier Gangrene ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
The Difference

Background and Aim: Value of colostomy in management of Fournier gangrene (FG) is a debatable issue. Almost all relevant studies are retrospective and included heterogeneous patients’ groups. The present prospective study aimed to evaluate the role of colostomy in management of FG affecting the perianal region in 2 well-matched FG groups. Patients and Methods: The present prospective comparative study included 30 patients with FG associated with extensive involvement of the perianal region. They comprised 15 patients subjected to colostomy and other 15 patients who refused to perform the procedure. Colostomy was performed after the first debridement. Outcome parameters in the present study included time to wound healing, length of hospital stay, and inhospital mortality. Results: Comparison between the studied groups regarding the preoperative characteristics revealed no statistically significant differences. Postoperatively, patients in the colostomy group had significantly fewer number of debridements (1.3 ± 0.5 vs 2.7 ± 1.2, P < .001), shorter hospital stay (9.5 ± 3.3 vs 29.9 ± 6.2 days, P < .001), and significantly shorter time to wound healing (16.5 ± 3.9 vs 42.9 ± 6.9 days, P < .001). Also, patients in the colostomy group had significantly lower rate of wound dehiscence, wound infection, and flap ischemia. However, the difference wasn’t statistically significant. Conclusions: Aggressive treatment of FG aided by colostomy after first debridement would result in better clinical outcome.

Propensity-adjusted cost analysis of radial versus femoral access for neuroendovascular procedures

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016728
Author(s):  
Joshua S Catapano ◽  
Andrew F Ducruet ◽  
Stefan W Koester ◽  
Tyler S Cole ◽  
Jacob F Baranoski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Catheter Size ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Procedure Type ◽  
Angiographic Findings

BackgroundTransradial artery (TRA) access for neuroendovascular procedures is associated with fewer complications than transfemoral artery (TFA) access. This study compares hospital costs associated with TRA access to those associated with TFA access for neurointerventions.MethodsElective neuroendovascular procedures at a single center were retrospectively analyzed from October 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019. Hospital costs for each procedure were obtained from the hospital financial department. The primary outcome was the difference in the mean hospital costs after propensity adjustment between patients who underwent TRA compared with TFA access.ResultsOf the 338 elective procedures included, 63 (19%) were performed through TRA versus 275 (81%) through TFA access. Diagnostic procedures were more common in the TRA cohort (51 of 63, 81%) compared with the TFA cohort (197 of 275, 72%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.48). The TRA cohort had a shorter length of hospital stay (mean (SD) 0.3 (0.5) days) compared with the TFA cohort (mean 0.7 (1.3) days; p=0.02) and lower hospital costs (mean $12 968 ($6518) compared with the TFA cohort (mean $17 150 ($10 946); p=0.004). After propensity adjustment for age, sex, symptoms, angiographic findings, procedure type, sheath size, and catheter size, TRA access was associated with a mean hospital cost of $2514 less than that for TFA access (95% CI −$4931 to −$97; p=0.04).ConclusionNeuroendovascular procedures performed through TRA access are associated with lower hospital costs than TFA procedures. The lower cost is likely due to a decreased length of hospital stay for TRA.

scholarly journals Management of post-operative discitis following discectomy in a tertiary-level hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902098821
Author(s):  
Md Kamrul Ahsan ◽  
Md Sariful Hasan ◽  
Md Shahidul Islam Khan ◽  
Najmus Sakeb
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Tertiary Level ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Level Hospital

Purpose: To perform retrospective analysis of 75 post-operative disc space infections after open lumbar discectomy (OLD) and to assess the outcome of their medical and surgical management in a tertiary-level hospital. Methods: Records of 50 men and 25 women aged 26–65 (mean, 42.53) years who underwent treatment for post-operative discitis (POD) after single level OLD at L3–4 (n = 8), L4–5 (n = 42), L5–S1 (n = 25) level. The POD was diagnosed according to specific clinical signs, laboratory and radiographic investigations and all of them received initial intravenous antibiotics (IVA) for at least 4–6 weeks followed by oral ones. Successful responders (n = 55) were considered in Group-C and remainder [Group-S (n = 20)] were operated at least after 4 weeks of failure. Demographic data, clinical variables, hospital stay, duration of antibiotic treatment and post-treatment complications were collected from the hospital record and assessment before and after treatment were done by using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Comprehensive outcome was evaluated by modified criteria of Kirkaldy-Willis. Results: The mean follows up was 36.38 months. Significant improvement of mean VAS and JOA score was achieved in both conservative (76.36% satisfactory) and operative (90% satisfactory) groups although the difference was statistically insignificant. Conclusion: Although insignificant, early surgical intervention provided better results (e.g. functional outcomes, length of hospital stay and duration of antibiotic treatment therapy) than conventional conservative treatment in post-operative discitis.

Comparison of topical honey and povidone iodine-based dressings for wound healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (Sup4) ◽  
pp. S28-S36
Author(s):  
Fujie Zhang ◽  
Zongnan Chen ◽  
Feng Su ◽  
Taijuan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Povidone Iodine ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Wound Recovery ◽  
Hospital Stay Duration

Objectives: In this review and meta-analysis, we analyse the evidence to compare the efficacy of honey and povidone iodine-based dressings on the outcome of wound healing. Method: A systematic literature search was performed using PRISMA guidelines in academic databases including MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and CENTRAL. A meta-analysis was carried out to assess the effect of honey and povidone iodine-based dressings on mean healing duration, mean hospital stay duration and visual analogue scale (VAS) score of pain. Results: From the search, 12 manuscripts with a total of 1236 participants (mean age: 40.7±11.7 years) were included. The honey-based dressings demonstrated a medium-to-large effect in reduction of mean healing duration (Hedge's g: –0.81), length of hospital stay (–3.1) and VAS score (–1.2) as compared with the povidone iodine-based dressings. We present evidence (level 1b) in favour of using honey for improvement of wound recovery as compared with povidone iodine. Conclusion: This review and meta-analysis demonstrate beneficial effects of honey-based dressings over povidone iodine-based dressings for wound recovery.

Epidemiology and Outcome of Major Congenital Malformations in a Large German County

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 282-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Wittekindt ◽  
Rolf Schloesser ◽  
Nora Doberschuetz ◽  
Emilia Salzmann-Manrique ◽  
Jasmin Grossmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Congenital Malformations ◽  
Heart Defects ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Trisomy 13 ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Inhospital Mortality ◽  
Major Congenital Malformations

Introduction Congenital malformations are associated with substantial neonatal morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, only sparse data are available on the modalities of care provided to and the associated clinical outcomes in affected neonates. In this study, we focused on five malformations that require surgery during the neonatal period: duodenal stenosis and atresia (DA), gastroschisis (GA), omphalocele (OM), congenital diaphragmatic herniation (CDH), and esophageal atresia (EA). Materials and Methods We reviewed the Hessian neonatal registry (2010–2015) to identify records including the ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition) codes for the aforementioned diagnoses and identified 283 patients who were affected by at least one of these conditions. Multiple regression analyses were performed to further identify risk factors for mortality and extended length of hospital stay. Results The incidence rates per 10,000 live births and inhospital mortality rates were as follows: DA: 1.79 and 3.6%; GA: 1.79 and 1.8%; OM: 1.60 and 24%; CDH: 1.32 and 27.5%; and EA: 2.67 and 11.1%, respectively. Thirty-three percent of the patients had not been born in a perinatal center in which corrective surgeries were performed. The following risk factors were significantly associated with early mortality: trisomy 13 and 18, congenital heart defects, prematurity, and high-risk malformations (OM and CDH). The predictors of length of stay were as follows: gestational age, number of additional malformations, and treatment in the center with the highest patient volume. Conclusion Epidemiology and outcome of major congenital malformations in Hesse, Germany, are comparable to previously published data. In addition, our data revealed a volume–outcome association with regard to the length of hospital stay.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of Fournier gangrene

2021 ◽  
pp. 1
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Vacuum Assisted Closure ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Vac Therapy ◽  
Fournier Gangrene ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Closure Method

Background and objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) in the treatment of Fournier gangrene (FG). Material and methods: Forty-eight male patients treated for Fournier gangrene were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups (Group I: conventional dressing, Group II: VAC therapy). Characteristics of the patients, laboratory parameters, number of debridement procedures, daily number of dressings, visual analogue scale (VAS) during dressing, analgesic requirement, colostomy requirement, time from the first debridement to wound closure, wound closure method, length of hospital stay, and mortality rates were compared. Results: Group I comprised 33 patients and Group II comprised 15 patients. The number of dressings, VAS score and daily analgesic requirement were statistically significantly lower in Group II (p < 0.05) than in Group I. The number of debridement procedures, colostomy requirement, orchiectomy rate, time from first debridement to wound closure, length of hospital stay, wound closure method and mortality rate were similar between these two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical results of conventional dressing and VAC therapy were similar for treating FG. VAC therapy is an effective postoperative wound care method that offers less requirement for dressing changes, less pain, less analgesic requirement and more patient satisfaction compared to conventional dressing.

scholarly journals Adrenaline and Dexamethasone, vs Adrenaline and Fluticasone, vs Adrenaline alone in Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 20-28
Author(s):  
Jayendra R. Gohil ◽  
Atul M. Sheladiya ◽  
N. B. Adithya ◽  
Ratna D. Bhojak
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Background and Objectives: There is no consensus over which drug best reduces symptoms in Bronchiolitis syndrome. The primary objective of our study is to establish comparative effect of adrenaline nebulisation alone and combination of adrenaline nebulisation plus injectable dexamethasone and adrenaline nebulisation plus fluticasone nebulisation in the treatment of clinical cases of bronchiolitis. Methods: 100 patients diagnosed clinically as bronchiolitis were enrolled in study from 1 month to 24 months of age. Patients were enrolled by purposive sampling. Patients with respiratory distress assessment instrument score [RDAI] of 4 to 15 were chosen, randomized into three groups and treatment given till patient fullfilled discharge criteria. Group A (n=33) were given nebulised adrenaline alone, Group B (n=34) were given nebulised adrenaline plus injectable dexamethasone and Group C (n=33) were given nebulised adrenaline plus nebulised fluticasone. Results: The mean reduction in clinical severity-RDAI score was 1.75 ±0.86 in Group A, 2.30 ± 0.68 in Group B and 1.42 ± 0.9 in Group C when measured in terms of difference in clinical scores between day 1 and 2 (p=0.0003). Mean duration of hospital stay in the group A was (4.93±1.95 days), Group C (4.78±1.83) and Group B (3.91 ±1.37 days). The difference of stay between the Groups A and B was 1.02±0.58 days vs 0.87± 0.46 days in groups B and C (p-0.0048). Reduction in the length of hospital stay in group B was 22% compared to Group A & 19% compared to Group C (p-0.0048). Side effects were tachycardia in six patients. Conclusion: Combination of adrenaline nebulization and injectable dexamethasone was found significantly better as compared to nebulised adrenaline plus nebulised fluticasone and nebulised adrenaline alone in patients of clinical bronchiolitis in reducing severity of clinical symptoms and duration of hospitalization.

scholarly journals SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PILONIDAL SINUS

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 63-67
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Limberg Flap ◽  
Secondary Intention ◽  
One Year ◽  
Flap Closure

Chronic pilonidal sinus is an acquired skin disease resulting from chronic inflammation of an affected skin area. It creates a cyst with epithelized subcutaneous channels. The disease mostly affects younger men with elevated BMI and sedentary lifestyle being the main risk factors. The aim of this study was to compare wound healing times, seroma, wound infection and wound dehiscence frequency, average length of hospital stay and recurrence rate in patients undergoing first-time operation for chronic pilonidal sinus at the Surgery clinic of University hospital Mostar from June 2015 to June 2017, with recurrence rate monitoring for one one year after the operative procedure. The patients were divided into three groups by the type of operating procedure: excision with primary closure (23.0%), excision with healing by secondary intention (55.2%) and excision with Limberg flap closure (21.8%). Most of the patients included in this study had elevated BMI (72.4%). Patients who were operated using primary closure and Limberg flap closure had on average shorter wound healing times than patients operated with excision and secondary intention healing. Seroma frequency was highest in patients operated using primary closure (70.6%) and lowest in patients operated using Limberg flap closure (29.4%). Average length of hospital stay was 6.4 days (min 3, max 13; SD 1.919). There were no statistically significant differences in hospital stay between different types of operating procedures used. Patients operated using Limberg flap closure had two (10.5%) cases of recurrence in the one year period after the operation. There were seven (35.0%) recurrences of the disease in patients operated using primary closure and six (12.5%) recurrences in patients operated using healing with secondary intention. The difference in the number of recurrences between patients operated using primary closure, healing by secondary intention and Limberg flap closure was borderline statistically significant. We find that Limberg flap closure reduces postoperative complications and wound healing time which improves postoperative recovery.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study between Staplers and Suture (Silk 2-0) for Skin Closure in Cesarean Sections at Gandaki Medical College Teaching Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
K Jahan ◽  
R Shrestha ◽  
P Adhikari ◽  
M Tripathi ◽  
C P Neupane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
College Teaching ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Skin Closure ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Suture Group

Background: Skin closure in the abdominal surgeries is an important factor that affects the prognosis of wound in terms of hospital stay as well as overall outcome of the surgery.Objectives: Cesarean section being the commonly performed operation, choice of suture material has the unexceptional role on it. This study has been performed with an objective to look for the merits and demerits of the skin closure by suture (Silk 2-0) and stapler.Methods: Prospective comparative study conducted among the patients admitted in a Maternity Ward of Gandaki Medical College Teaching Hospital for elective and emergency cesarean section. The comparison has been made in terms of time taken during the skin closure, presence or absence of soakage and wound dehiscence, day of suture removal and pain during the suture removal.Results: The average time taken for skin closure for suture group was found to be 5.46 min (±0.97) and the same for stapler group was found to be 1.22 min (±0.15) respectively. Similarly, the mean day of stitch removal in suture and staples were found to be 6.94 (±1.75) and 7.95 (±1.89) respectively. Surgical site infection (SSI) i.e. soakage was present in eight percent of those in suture group and 20% in stapler group. Wound dehiscence was present in two percent among the suture group and five percent among the stapler group. The severity of pain is more in stapler group than that of suture group during its removal.Conclusions: Our study concluded suture being superior to staplers for skin closure during cesarean section. Though time taken for the closure is less in the stapler group, other factors like wound complications, duration of hospital stay, pain during its removal favored for the suture to be used.J-GMC-N | Volume 11 | Issue 01 | January-June 2018, Page: 1-4

scholarly journals Day of surgery: the impact on patient length of stay in a tertiary vascular unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
NC Holford ◽  
C Ní Ghuidhir ◽  
L Hands
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Support Services ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Postoperative Length ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
The Impact

Background Our hypothesis was that patients undergoing surgery earlier in the week would have better access to physiotherapy and other discharge services after surgery and, as a result, would have a shorter length of hospital stay compared with patients undergoing surgery later in the week. This study aimed to assess whether there is a significant difference in postoperative length of hospital stay between the groups with secondary assessment by operation subtype. Methods We identified all patients admitted for vascular surgery in 2015 from a prospectively collected database and divided the week into Monday to Wednesday and Thursday to Friday. Endovascular cases were included but day cases were excluded. Further analysis was performed with a breakdown in both groups by operation type. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0. Results We identified 652 patients who met our criteria. Within the elective patient group, there was a significantly longer length of stay of three days for the late-week group compared with two days for the early-week group (P = 0.016). Femoral artery procedures had a median length of stay of two days for those operated on early in the week compared with four days later in the week (P < 0.005). Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair showed a trend to longer length of stay in the late-week group (P = 0.06). Conclusion Day of surgery appears to impact on patients’ length of stay following vascular procedures, with the greatest impact on medium-sized procedures. This difference could be explained by the difference in weekend support services, but further evaluation is required following introduction of weekend support services to assess this.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document